If you'd like to help make Firefox better for enterprises, we'd be
delighted to have you submit patches instead of questioning our
commitment to our users.
--
Gen Kanai
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
res NSPR 4.9.)
Hi Wan-Teh,
Thank you for this notice.
I'm more just curious but do we know of any publicly software shipping
for iOS that uses NSS 3.13?
Thank you,
Gen
--
Gen Kanai
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
is becomes a larger issue we can move it to Mozilla.governance here:
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
But I would suggest a discussion in the former of the two lists first.
--
Gen Kanai
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
rithm in next year. but current firefox version does not seem
>> to support SHA256 certificate.
>>
> I believe that it does. Why do you think that it does not?
>
Could we be bumping up against that content handler bug for pkcs client
certs?
https://bugzilla
===
> PayGate Inc.
> * WEB STANDARD PAYMENT
> * PCI DSS 100% COMPLIANT
> * www.paygate.net
> * payg...@paygate.net
>
>
--
Gen Kanai
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
d?
I have been told that Firefox is the only one of the 5 major desktop
browsers that functions in the way that it does (i.e. the other browsers
all have handlers for application/x-pkcs12.)
--
Gen Kanai
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
experience with PKCS#12 certs take a
look at this bug and provide feedback? I'm a bit surprised that Firefox
doesn't support PKCS#12.
Thank you,
Gen
--
Gen Kanai
http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/li
two NSC_ functions.
>
> Similarly, I can't find the pages for several CK_ data types such as
> CK_C_INITIALIZE_ARGS, which I seem to recall we documented.
>
> Wan-Teh
If we're definitely missing pages from MDC, we need to document that
and make sure that's not happening elsewhere. Let
On May 19, 2009, at 10:23 AM, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
Now, I don't want to set unrealistic expectations, so I must inform
you
that I have NO idea whether Mozilla Corporation will accept any
additional
NSS changes at this point or not. Three weeks ago, Bob Relyea and I
wrote
to MoCo power
Frank filed the inclusion request for SecomTrust on Dec. 8th, 2008.
As we're almost 2 months past the discussion period for this request,
I'd like to reconfirm that there are no other open issues.
If there are any open issues, SecomTrust is eager to resolve them asap
in order to have the ce
On Jan 21, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Michael Bell wrote:
SP3. If I use the same smartcard with Linux and Thunderbird 2.0.0.19
(more exactly icedove from Debian unstable) then I can configure all
the necessary stuff (e.g. assign the cert to the mail account) but I
cannot use the cert to sign or encrypt
On Dec 26, 2008, at 1:49 AM, Frank Hecker wrote:
Beyond that? It's somewhat of an open question.
Frank
Mozilla needs to have a concrete policy and procedures in place so
that there is no question as to what the penalties would be for future
actions of this kind.
I personally like John
More discussion on this topic over at Programming Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/7lb96/ssl_certificate_for_mozillacom_issued_without/
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/l
Are we going to receive information from Comodo regarding how many
other Comodo resellers may be in a similar position to Certstar?
Are we going to receive information from Certstar as to how many other
certs may have been issued in error?
How do we verify the claims from Comodo or Certstar
On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:49 AM, Eddy Nigg wrote:
On 12/22/2008 02:09 AM, Eddy Nigg:
Has anybody an idea how to prevent those spam and scam attempts? I
already contacted Godaddy with an abuse complaint. What else?
Apparently this site is connected to Comodo. I went all the way and
paid for a
On Nov 3, 2008, at 11:52 PM, Eddy Nigg wrote:
On 10/29/2008 11:13 PM, Eddy Nigg:
Frank, what happened to the schedule and inclusions of CAs? Is
there any
problem preventing us from continuing to process the CAs which are
ready
for the comments period?
BTW, I'd like to propose to cut the
ities
for supporting goals more important than "US government agency
penetration" to drop what they are doing in order to do that? I'll
leave that to your own conclusion. I've already made up my mind on
this issue.
Gen Kanai
_
On Jul 15, 2008, at 4:13 AM, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
>
> Eddy Nigg wrote, On 2008-07-13 22:09:
>> Nelson B Bolyard:
>>> Eddy Nigg wrote, On 2008-07-13 13:53:
>>>
This is perhaps the first EV request which doesn't have an
operating
OCSP responder at this stage. The EV guidelines r
a note to the NSS 3.12 Release Notes
> to clarify this point:
> http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/nss-3.12/nss-3.12-
> release-notes.html#Introduction
Wan-Teh,
Do you think we'll get SQLite support in for 3.1 or perhaps a dot-
release?
Gen Kanai
On May 23, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Frank Hecker wrote:
> I've updated the root CA certificate "pending" and "included" lists to
> reflect all the new roots that got approved in time for Firefox 3 RC1:
>
>http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/certs/pending/
>http://www.mozilla.org/projects/se
On May 23, 2008, at 7:45 AM, pascal wrote:
> Nelson B Bolyard a écrit :
>
>>
>>> and in the bug, they provided the information we were asking
>>
>> They did? That information was supplied in comment 8 by a third
>> party, namely you. Are you an official representative of FNMT?
>> If not, then I
On May 22, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Nukeador wrote:
> You have to understand that it's a public CA, not a private
> enterprise, FNMT is part of the Treasury and Economy Department of
> Spain.
FNMT is not the only public CA in the list.
See below:
"Kamu Sertifikasyon Merkezi is the one government CA in
On May 22, 2008, at 5:36 AM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
> Cristina needs to OPEN an NEW BUG, with all her contact information.
> The management of the request can only be done via direct contact
> between the CA and the root team.
>
> There has been no valid request for inclusion. There is no "ball" in
23 matches
Mail list logo
