On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Bill McCloskey
wrote:
> I'm sorry to be so corny and didactic, but I've been feeling really
> strongly about this problem given all the troubles that have arisen between
> the platform and front-end teams lately. We all need to stick together and
> be one Mozilla
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Bill McCloskey
wrote:
> I'm sorry to be so corny and didactic, but I've been feeling really
> strongly about this problem given all the troubles that have arisen between
> the platform and front-end teams lately. We all need to stick together and
> be one Mozilla.
Very much agreed on all these points. Also, beyond fixing bugs,
crossing components often allows for fundamentally simpler and more
efficient designs.
(Also, fwiw, 2-space indent seems fine, even preferable, to me.)
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Bill McCloskey wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 a
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron <
nicolas.b.pier...@mozilla.com> wrote:
If the problem are the pointless arguments on dev.platform, which are
> mistakenly considering SpiderMonkey as Gecko's property, I would totally
> agree on moving SpiderMonkey into its own repository.
>
> I
Yeah, you're right.
There's one usage pattern in particular where you grab the pending
exception state, set it aside, clear the context's pending exception, and
do some stuff; then possibly put the originally-pending exception back.
`finally` blocks are like this. Putting it back is the problem: y
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Anthony Ramine wrote:
> > Le 11 mai 2016 à 08:36, Jim Blandy a écrit :
> > The SpiderMonkey engineers build the library separately from the rest of
> Firefox all the time; the "JS shell" is the preferred development vehicle.
> So we can trust that the stand-alone
On 05/11/2016 02:42 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
On 11/05/16 08:36, Jim Blandy wrote:
It looks like the lack of any CI of the SM-only distribution is a
non-trivial source of pain. That seems independent of where the Rust JSAPI
bindings live, and indeed, independent of Rust altogether.
The SpiderMonkey eng
> Le 11 mai 2016 à 08:36, Jim Blandy a écrit :
>
> The SpiderMonkey engineers build the library separately from the rest of
> Firefox all the time; the "JS shell" is the preferred development vehicle. So
> we can trust that the stand-alone SM builds work. That means that the
> difficulties are
On 05/11/2016 02:15 AM, Jason Orendorff wrote:
instead go with Terrence’s suggestion and simply adopt the same style as
the rest of Gecko, including the 2-space indent.
I've said before that we won't do this without talking it over as a team.
Well, team? What do you think?
Massive changes ar
On 11/05/16 08:36, Jim Blandy wrote:
> It looks like the lack of any CI of the SM-only distribution is a
> non-trivial source of pain. That seems independent of where the Rust JSAPI
> bindings live, and indeed, independent of Rust altogether.
>
> The SpiderMonkey engineers build the library separa
Surely the 80 column limit can be changed in Gecko? Does anyone have
80-column monitors still?
-David
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Jan de Mooij wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Jason Orendorff
> wrote:
>
> > I've said before that we won't do this without talking it over as a team
11 matches
Mail list logo
