Hi Peter,
the permission is listed @
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Apps/App_permissions
Just to make sure, you need to work on a packaged app and set the type to
"privileged" to be able to add the permission "mobilenetwork".
To ensure that you have the latest Simulator version
On Wednesday, 10 July 2013 18:19:09 UTC-3, Matt Basta wrote:
> You want to use the navigator.mozMobileNetwork API. You can see an example of
> it's usage in the wild here:
>
> https://github.com/mozilla/fireplace/blob/master/hearth/media/js/mobilenetwork.js#L263
>
> That will give you the MCC a
I'd be happy to join to provide real-life scenarios and personas from the
partner world if needed.
---
Harald Kirschner | Partner Engineer & Web Craftsman | har...@mozilla.com
(mailto:hkirsch...@mozilla.com)
El lunes, junio 3, 2013 a las 12:24 PM, jsmith.mozi...@gmail.com escribió:
> On Fri
As Kumar proposed, "origin" is one solution but only in 1.1. Also "origin" is
rather for more controlled CORS configuration on your server and Persona logins.
The best solution is "redirects" [1], used in all OAuth implementations in gaia
apps in 1.0.1+.
You can check their use in gaia communic
You can, if you're a privileged app, specify an "origin" field in your manifest
to have a fixed app:// URI:
"origin": "app://my-app-uri/"
There's an unfortunate lack of docs surrounding that feature at the moment and
it's also not going to be supported until B2G 1.1. That, however, should sol
On Jul 10, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Peter Rukavina wrote:
> The new Dropbox Datastore API for JavaScript
> (https://www.dropbox.com/developers/datastore/docs/js) requires developers to
> register a redirect URI for its OAuth authentication to Dropbox.
>
> ---snip---
> The API does not allow a redir
On Jul 10, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Matt Basta wrote:
>> 1- anyone by checking the network traffic can see that I have this app
>> installed.
>
> This is a problem for any app (offline or not) that uses HTTP instead of
> HTTPS.
>
>> 2- doing MiM it is possible to inject code on the app and leak all
You want to use the navigator.mozMobileNetwork API. You can see an example of
it's usage in the wild here:
https://github.com/mozilla/fireplace/blob/master/hearth/media/js/mobilenetwork.js#L263
That will give you the MCC and MNC and some other data. You'll need to request
the "mobilenetwork" pe
Make sure that you're running the latest version of FXOS. Go into your system
settings and perform an update. The version that shipped with the phone has
some unfortunate bugs, and the latest version available should fix a good deal
of them :)
- Original Message -
From: "Avinash Reddy"
The new Dropbox Datastore API for JavaScript
(https://www.dropbox.com/developers/datastore/docs/js) requires developers to
register a redirect URI for its OAuth authentication to Dropbox.
---snip---
The API does not allow a redirect URI to be specified as a parameter in the
JavaScript authenti
> 1- anyone by checking the network traffic can see that I have this app
> installed.
This is a problem for any app (offline or not) that uses HTTP instead of HTTPS.
> 2- doing MiM it is possible to inject code on the app and leak all the
> passwords I type in the app.
This is also a problem t
> Ben Francis:
> Are we happy with a packaged model for trusted apps going forward, or is
> now the time to embrace the challenge of making trusted apps genuinely part
> of the web?
Packaged are IMHO the best part of FireFox OS so far, being simple and solving
the problem effectively.
appcache i
You can probably use the Page visibility API. It will tell you when your
app is visible or not. This is a bit different than your question but I
believe that it's useful for your use case.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Guide/User_experience/Using_the_Page_Visibility_API
On 26/06
So, I got this done. As long with navigator.mozApps.checkInstalled(), I check
navigator.mozApps.getSelf() for being empty. If it is not null, the app has
been installed. Still this is always null when I run the checkInstalled()
function, so I'll just have to use them both.
08 юли 2013, понедел
To test Firefox OS capabilities, I’m writing a privileged app that can have
access to various APIs on the device, but I got stuck in the development. I
hope you can help me, I cannot find any useful documentation...
I’d like to have access to Google Maps APIs from my app, but this requires a
scr
thanks, ctrl-r and especially shift-ctrl-r are greatly appreciated!
myk, Simulator v4 is based on latest-mozilla-b2g18_v1_1_0_hd, if I am not
mistaken. Are you planning to provide Firefox OS Simulator for the
latest-mozilla-central (v25 at this moment)?
On Friday, June 28, 2013 2:33:30 PM UTC-4
Hi,
About 9 months ago someone posted a 1 star review for my app
(https://marketplace.firefox.com/app/calcudoku)
because the manifest file wouldn't load.
Maybe there was a temporary network error at the time, I don't know.
I contacted the reviewer several times, to no avail.
My contact at mozi
I've been puzzled for a while trying to get an offline packaged app.
I have packaged my app, and also used html5 cache and localstorage to store all
the user settings and (theorically) prevent the browser from checking the
internet for updates.
But seems like nothing can't prevent a webapp to c
How do you test from a web app if the screen is off?
I made small test app that reads the GPS regularly, however, judging by power
consumption, it was still busy reading the GPS and updating its UI while the
screen was off.
I spotted that behavior in both FireFox OS and FireFox for Android (thi
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:59:09 AM UTC-7, Matt Basta wrote:
> > Why was that abandoned?
>
>
>
> The first it was ever mentioned was 2012 and it's not supported by any of the
> devices that we're shipping. It's effectively a non-feature and won't be
> useful since it's not backwards compatible
I just submitted an app – my first – to the Firefox Marketplace and upon
submission my app's status is shown as:
Queue position: 93 of 96
Estimated waiting time: 30 working days
Waiting 30 days to have an app reviewed seems like a great disincentive to a
healthy app developer ecosystem.
The M
On Friday, May 31, 2013 4:54:45 PM UTC-7, dbuc...@mozilla.com wrote:
> On Friday, May 31, 2013 10:15:07 AM UTC-7, jsmith@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I could go into a lot detail responding to the above discussion, but at
> > this point, I think we have to get people into a meeting to talk about
>
From a marketplace perspective, the majority of packaged apps aren't
privileged so most developers are using packaged apps because of some
combination of:
a) offline support without the horror of appcache
b) don't need to maintain a reliable, persistent, server infrastructure
c) its what they're
On Friday, May 31, 2013 10:15:07 AM UTC-7, jsmith@gmail.com wrote:
> I could go into a lot detail responding to the above discussion, but at this
> point, I think we have to get people into a meeting to talk about this.
> There's misunderstandings evident on both sides of the argument that n
Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2013 19:33:27 UTC+2 schrieb Binh An Tran:
> I try to make my website installable on FirefoxOS. But I have following
> problem
>
>
>
> api.mysite.com:443 uses an invalid security certificate.
>
>
>
> The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided.
>
I've done this in a little Foursquare app called Checkin that you can see at:
https://github.com/reinvented/checkin
Take a look at the OAuth-related code for Foursquare:
https://github.com/reinvented/checkin/blob/master/www/js/checkin.js#L136
___
dev-w
I have a mobile version of a website, where I ask Firefox OS users whether they
want to install the app on their Firefox OS device. I do the following, which
works just fine:
if (!!(navigator.mozApps && navigator.mozApps.installPackage)) {
var manifestFile = location.protocol + '//' + locatio
Jonas Sicking schrieb:
I think we have a few options here:
* Use some sort of naming scheme for icons, like size-platform or
size-platform-version.
That would get hairy very fast, as the next claim will be you need
different sets per platform and version when there's different themes,
like W
Here are the Bugzilla tickets relevant to this discussion:
- Manifest modification API: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=876984
- Device/environment capability API:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=873599
___
dev-webapps mailing
I am late to the party on this, only having started Firefox OS development
recently, but there's an issue that I've encountered that relates to this API.
I would like to have access, from non-certified apps, to the LAC, MNC, MCC,
signal strength and Cell ID that are returned by
window.navigator
I try to make my website installable on FirefoxOS. But I have following problem
api.mysite.com:443 uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided.
(Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)
The website works normally on firefox browser.
Hi folks,
I got Geeksphone PEAK a couple of days ago. I am working on the basic
installation of application to understand the flow of working.
There was an issue i found. If I uninstall the application and want to
re-install it once again, I was unable to do it.
I hosted the application in a p
All of the examples of packaged web apps that I have seen, feature the file
and edit menus and menu bar
Is there a plan ( or is it possible ) to suppress the Windows UI container
completely and simply show the content area ?
.. so that existing XUL chromeless apps can be migrated if and whe
> You can probably use the Page visibility API. It will tell you when your
> app is visible or not. This is a bit different than your question but I
> believe that it's useful for your use case.
Thanks, that's indeed suitable in my case, and it seems to be working well in
all scenarios.
___
Ok, all fixed, the original reviewer checked again
and updated the review :-)
___
dev-webapps mailing list
dev-webapps@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-webapps
See also the polyfill by Microsoft for the Pointer Event spec:
http://handjs.codeplex.com/
Also, note that Firefox and Chrome (maybe others) have a no-delay click
event when you use a fixed viewport.
On 24/05/13 23:12, Matt Claypotch wrote:
A common problem web developers face is abstracting
Avinash Reddy writes:
> There was an issue i found. If I uninstall the application and want to
> re-install it once again, I was unable to do it.
What happened?
Kanru
___
dev-webapps mailing list
dev-webapps@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org
I could go into a lot detail responding to the above discussion, but at this
point, I think we have to get people into a meeting to talk about this. There's
misunderstandings evident on both sides of the argument that need to be
addressed.
___
dev-web
Hi
On 10/07/13 10:45, Antonio M. Amaya wrote:
On 10/07/2013 10:09, Salvador de la Puente González wrote:
Hello!
On 09/07/13 23:13, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo wrote:
Hey all.
You know, at the risk of being the discordant voice here, I don't
see what the issue with packaged apps is. It's not l
On 10/07/2013 10:09, Salvador de la Puente González wrote:
Hello!
On 09/07/13 23:13, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo wrote:
Hey all.
You know, at the risk of being the discordant voice here, I don't see
what the issue with packaged apps is. It's not like you're required
to use packaged app if you w
Hello!
On 09/07/13 23:13, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo wrote:
Hey all.
You know, at the risk of being the discordant voice here, I don't see
what the issue with packaged apps is. It's not like you're required to
use packaged app if you want do develop a non special-api-using app.
You can just dev
Hello all,
I don't have much to add in the way of implementation suggestions, but I do
want to make a few points from an overall product and end user perspective.
(much of this is probably well known to this list, but it may spark some
further thought)
As was already mentioned, it is importa
42 matches
Mail list logo
