Bill,
Did you commit those changes?
I ask because I see similar issues with abstract and static classes. Gamma
is an example of the static class issue. This class has only static
methods, but it is marked as serializable (why?). ContinuedFraction is a
good example of an abstract class that is
Phil Steitz wrote:
I added (but have not yet committed) the following test case to validate
the WHEN_EXHAUSTED_GROW contract.
public void testWhenExhaustedGrow() throws Exception {
pool.setMaxActive(1);
pool.setMaxTotal(1);
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/05/2009, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Maven release plugin is the one doing the copy to the branch. So I
don't see the commit message (well.. it's probably somewhere in the
huge load of text that passes through).
Mark Thomas wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
I added (but have not yet committed) the following test case to validate
the WHEN_EXHAUSTED_GROW contract.
public void testWhenExhaustedGrow() throws Exception {
pool.setMaxActive(1);
pool.setMaxTotal(1);
I realize this thread went the wrong direction.
Why the green? Just noticed Taglibs has the same problem (it uses the
Commons CSS :) ). Very ugly. Presumably we used to use a different
colour and the CSS has been changed?
Hen
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:08 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Going once, going twice...
Anyone have a problem with this?
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
I just saw this in one of my load tests
[java] java.util.NoSuchElementException
[java] at java.util.LinkedList.remove(LinkedList.java:644)
[java] at java.util.LinkedList.removeFirst(LinkedList.java:134)
[java] at
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=193279projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Mon 25 May 2009 08:34:39 -0700
Finished at: Mon 25 May 2009 08:36:44 -0700
Total time: 2m 5s
Build Trigger: Schedule
vmware is known to do funny things with timing. Assm this is one of
those, per comment in the test case.
contin...@vmbuild.apache.org wrote:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=193279projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State:
Phil Steitz wrote:
I just saw this in one of my load tests
[java] java.util.NoSuchElementException
[java] at java.util.LinkedList.remove(LinkedList.java:644)
[java] at java.util.LinkedList.removeFirst(LinkedList.java:134)
[java] at
Bill Barker a écrit :
Ok, most of the rest look like transient classes (e.g. all of
linear.decomposition). So asking for what needs to be Serialized, and
what doesn't.
As the main developer of the decomposition package, I can say the
reasons for having these classes Serializable are the same
Mark Thomas wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
I just saw this in one of my load tests
[java] java.util.NoSuchElementException
[java] at java.util.LinkedList.remove(LinkedList.java:644)
[java] at java.util.LinkedList.removeFirst(LinkedList.java:134)
[java] at
- Original Message -
From: Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
Bill,
Did you commit those changes?
Yes, but just for o.a.c.m.linear.
I ask because I see
- Original Message -
From: Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
Bill Barker a écrit :
Ok, most of the rest look like transient classes (e.g. all of
This sounds like the germ of a repair process.
Nuke all Serializable declarations without test cases. Then, add them back
where people care enough to guarantee correctness by demonstrating a correct
round trip.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.netwrote:
But
When I do this
// Second utilise any spare capacity to create new objects
if ((_maxActive 0 || pool.activeCount +
pool.internalProcessingCount _maxActive)
(_maxTotal 0 || _totalActive + _totalIdle +
_totalInternalProcessing _maxTotal)) {
- Original Message -
From: Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
This sounds like the germ of a repair process.
Nuke all Serializable declarations without test cases.
On 25/05/2009, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/05/2009, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Maven release plugin is the one doing the copy to the branch. So I
don't see the commit message (well.. it's
On 25/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Going once, going twice...
Anyone have a problem with this?
OK by me, as there is an Ant build for testing with Java 1.3.
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I'm working on a Google App Engine/Java (GAE/J) plug-in for VFS (it's almost
done) and have a few questions:
1. Is the LRUFilesCache safe for production use? GAE/J won't allow using
the default SoftRefFilesCache because it doesn't allow background threads.
I've found a few really old messages
-_allocationQueue.removeFirst();
+_allocationQueue.remove(latch);
both places in allocate() makes the problem go away. I am not sure that
is a good fix, but it eliminates the problem. Must have something to do
with the latch notifies. I also don't
21 matches
Mail list logo
