Re: renaming apache-mynewt-larva to apache-mynewt-os

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Mar 3, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Sterling Hughes  wrote:
> 
> oh, and please specify your preferred option:
> 
> [+1] apache-mynewt-core

Re: renaming apache-mynewt-larva to apache-mynewt-os

[Sterling Hughes]

oh, and please specify your preferred option:

 [  ] apache-mynewt-mynewt
 [  ] apache-mynewt-os
 [  ] apache-mynewt-core
 [  ] apache-mynewt-main

Mine is apache-mynewt-mynewt, since this really is the "mynewt" portion 
of the mynewt project.


For efficiencies sake, unless noted otherwise, by +1 you are saying "I 
am fine with all of these options", and then expressing a preference for 
a particular one.  If you feel strongly about any of these, please call 
it out.


Sterling

On 3/3/16 5:38 PM, will sanfilippo wrote:

+1



On Mar 3, 2016, at 4:24 PM, marko kiiskila  wrote:

+1 for the rename. Sooner the better if we’re going to go ahead with this one.


On Mar 3, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Sterling Hughes  wrote:

:)

Hey all -

I wanted to get a few more opinions on this.  We're going to need to change 
some repositories around on the newt/newtmgr side (Chris/Todd, can you send a 
summary to the list?)

I'd like to get this all done at once.  I don't think we need a formal vote on this 
one, but just lazy consensus.  My suggestion is that Chris send a summary of the go 
changes, and we leave this open till Sunday. If anyone has objections before then, 
we can stop & vote.

Also, we have our last few features/changes coming in this week. So, we should 
uncharacteristically have a few days to poke around at the release prior to 
releasing B2.

Sterling


On 3/3/16 4:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

Maintaining the precedent also becomes more painful as
things move forward :)


On Mar 2, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Sterling Hughes  wrote:

Howdy,

Awhile ago we decided to be cute about naming things: eggs, eggshells, 
clutches, etc.  One holdover from this was larva: our main package repository, 
which includes the OS and most of the packages.

While its painful to rename the git repo: it's only going to get more painful 
as we move forward.  Do we think it makes sense to make it clearer, and rename 
this to apache-mynewt-os or apache-mynewt-main?

Sterling

Re: renaming apache-mynewt-larva to apache-mynewt-os

[Sterling Hughes]

:)

Hey all -

I wanted to get a few more opinions on this.  We're going to need to 
change some repositories around on the newt/newtmgr side (Chris/Todd, 
can you send a summary to the list?)


I'd like to get this all done at once.  I don't think we need a formal 
vote on this one, but just lazy consensus.  My suggestion is that Chris 
send a summary of the go changes, and we leave this open till Sunday. 
If anyone has objections before then, we can stop & vote.


Also, we have our last few features/changes coming in this week. So, we 
should uncharacteristically have a few days to poke around at the 
release prior to releasing B2.


Sterling


On 3/3/16 4:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

Maintaining the precedent also becomes more painful as
things move forward :)


On Mar 2, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Sterling Hughes  wrote:

Howdy,

Awhile ago we decided to be cute about naming things: eggs, eggshells, 
clutches, etc.  One holdover from this was larva: our main package repository, 
which includes the OS and most of the packages.

While its painful to rename the git repo: it's only going to get more painful 
as we move forward.  Do we think it makes sense to make it clearer, and rename 
this to apache-mynewt-os or apache-mynewt-main?

Sterling