On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 23:16, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> On 2/20/24 15:48, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Hello Mike,
> >
> > I understand the desire to be pedantic about cc'ing the right
> > maintainers, but I'm not convinced this is the way.
> >
> > - the presence of a cc: tag does not guarantee that
On 2/20/24 15:48, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> I understand the desire to be pedantic about cc'ing the right
> maintainers, but I'm not convinced this is the way.
>
> - the presence of a cc: tag does not guarantee that the person was
> cc'ed - only git send-email will take CC:s in the
istine ; Michael Kubacki
>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch 3/4] BaseTools/Scripts/PatchCheck:
> Error if no Cc tags are present
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> I understand the desire to be pedantic about cc'ing the right
> maintainers, but I'm not convinced this is the way.
>
Hello Mike,
I understand the desire to be pedantic about cc'ing the right
maintainers, but I'm not convinced this is the way.
- the presence of a cc: tag does not guarantee that the person was
cc'ed - only git send-email will take CC:s in the message body into
account by default (but this can
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4694
If no Cc tags are detected in a commit message, then generate an
error. All patches sent for review are required to provide the set
of maintainers and reviewers responsible for the directories/files
modified. The set of maintainers and
