Jari Juslin wrote:
Jari Juslin wrote:
Further question: In general situation, does this really correct
problems or just hide them?
Ok, I was a bit hasty once again. By reading the mailing list archive
and code I came to this asumption: if I want to run Kannel under heavy
load, I
Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
2) allow to change msg-sms.service via X-Kannel-Service header or xml tag
Why should you change the sms.service ?
sms.service is the name field in configuration, for sms-service and
sendsms-user, so you can identify the service or username used, in
Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 08:47, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Mauricio Ramos wrote:
Hi Everybody
I'm curious to know when Kannel 1.2 is likely to be release. Accordingly to
the Roadmap, it should be released within April or early May of 2002.
Right, we originally had a
Paul Keogh wrote:
The
/* Table 40. Content Type Assignments */
LINEAR(content_type,
data structure includes the entry
...
STRING(application/vnd.wap.sia)
STRING(application/vnd.wap.mms-message)
as the last element in the data structure. This is wrong because
this content type
Angel Fradejas wrote:
Hi all,
here's a patch for smsbox.c
1) a couple of memory leaks (msg-sms.udhdata and accepted_chars)
added the fixes to cvs, thanks Angel!
2) allow to change msg-sms.service via X-Kannel-Service header
or xml tag
I'm +0 for this. I don't see usage szenarios
Hi all,
can we do some voting for releasing the stable version 1.2.0 from the
current cvs head tree, please?!
I'd like to hear votes from anyone who is a) core developer, b) core
productive user of Kannel and vetos from anyone who see major bugs in
current cvs tree.
If there is noone claiming
-Original Message-
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [RFC] timeline for stable 1.2.0
Hi all,
can we do some voting for releasing the stable version 1.2.0 from the
current cvs head tree, please?!
comes to think about it - it's stupid of me to submit the whole huge patch and ask for
special treatment of just one part.
Please ignore my previous email and commit the following patch, which only deals with
the memory bugs, to the CVS before doing 1.2.0
TIA
--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL
On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 09:34, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Angel Fradejas wrote:
Hi all,
here's a patch for smsbox.c
1) a couple of memory leaks (msg-sms.udhdata and accepted_chars)
added the fixes to cvs, thanks Angel!
2) allow to change msg-sms.service via X-Kannel-Service header
2) allow to change msg-sms.service via X-Kannel-Service header or xml
tag
Why should you change the sms.service ?
sms.service is the name field in configuration, for sms-service and
sendsms-user, so you can identify the service or username used, in
bearerbox_access.log.
We shouldn't give
Let me see if I get this correctly : you want to be able to set, in the HTTP response
for a GET or POST query generated by sms-service, the service name for the MT
generated from that response. right ?
What is it good for ? the only reason I can think of doing it is to have the kannel
logs
You are right, that's exactly what I want. The reason is that we collect all
the accounting information from kannel.
Anyway, if nobody else sees utility for this, I'll keep that in our
corporate patches. No need for a religious discussion ;-)
Angel FRADEJAS
Director de Investigación y
Hi List,
I have following querries:
1). Can I use Kannel for testing my MMS applications ?
2). If yes, which version should I use ? Should I wait for the stable release 1.2.0 ?
3). What all is required to set up such an environment ?
4). Has anybody tested MMS applications with Kannel ?
Thanks,
13 matches
Mail list logo
