-Original Message-
From: Vibhu Mohindra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Also - I don't think that this patch is correct - it will
only make the
receiver thread not being able to change the status of the
connection if
a transmitter exist. maybe a better approach would be to
have
I wonder whether anyone out there has had this
problem, and what solution they've discovered:
When a user sends the '' character in an sms, on some
SMSCs, kannel receives '', on other it receives NULL
(as per GSM character spec). Now in the former case,
gwlib/charset.c will cause convert and
What happened to the little throttling change I
suggested in smsc_smpp.c:
smpp_status_to_smscconn_failure_reason to account for
the throttling error? Helps a lot, but seems to have
fallen out of 1.2.0 :(
P.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll
I have two SMPP connections to a network. One is
primary the other a backup. I want all my messages to
go through the first, unless it is dead. By default
kannel does a sort of load balance, which is not
good... Any ideas?
B.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
I wonder whether anyone out there has had this
problem, and what solution they've discovered:
When a user sends the '' character in an sms, on some
SMSCs, kannel receives '', on other it receives NULL
(as per GSM character spec). Now in the former case,
gwlib/charset.c will cause convert
I have two SMPP connections to a network. One is
primary the other a backup. I want all my messages to
go through the first, unless it is dead. By default
kannel does a sort of load balance, which is not
good... Any ideas?
enable routing to both of them, use preferred-routing to the
I've run out of ideas on this one. Do I need to set the clock on the TC35?
Is there a patch to fix this in the current version?
This is an SMSC problem. the time stamp generated by Kannel is extracted from
the SMSC generated timestamp in the received message, so if your time stamp is
The date off the SMS: 1902-02-05 17:41:40
The actual received date: 2002-09-27 13:13:13
This is weird. the month, days and time I can blame the SMSC on, but not the
year. the year part in the PDU timestamp is only two digits, and Kannel will
add the rest with the following logic - if
Lior Barnea wrote:
Hi list,
When i sent m-nitofication-ind (mms push) message to the mobile i noticed that every
header that is not known (in the wsp headers list)
is sent as is (readable text) to the mobile, including even the host name and port
of the HTTP POST to the wapbox, is it a
Hi Dominik,
First a SMS (or two) with WAP-URL of the mms-message, priority, date, sender,
ccs and bccs will be send to the mms-client (receiver). The receiver
press view on his mobile phone and it will connect to the
mms proxy-relay (wap-gateway) to get/fetch the mms-message.
I hope its
Kita B. Ndara wrote:
I have two SMPP connections to a network. One is
primary the other a backup. I want all my messages to
go through the first, unless it is dead. By default
kannel does a sort of load balance, which is not
good... Any ideas?
if your configuration allows bearerbox to
I have two SMPP connections to a network. One is
primary the other a backup. I want all my messages to
go through the first, unless it is dead. By default
kannel does a sort of load balance, which is not
good... Any ideas?
enable routing to both of them, use preferred-routing to the
Hi,
I meant to block headers that the kannel uses like X-Kannel-username etc.
maybe we need to block them in the application layer ?
Lior.
-Original Message-
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon, September 30, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Lior Barnea
Cc: Devel@kannel (E-mail)
enable routing to both of them, use preferred-routing to the primary.
yep, that may be an option. Does that really route everything primarly
to A?
should .. as I remeber from the code - preferred routes have preference over
normal ones ..
btw, please don't send additional copy to my
I don't understand. Do you mean that in certain situations we may not have
a transmitter thread at all? If so, then note that the status will never
become SMSCCONN_ACTIVE - it can only rise up to SMSCCONN_ACTIVE_RECV. This
is not right, I'm sure.
but a receiver thread should only rise to
Yep - that's my problem. how about the following complicated logic:
whenever the receiver thread wants to change the status, it will check
if it has a transmitter thread attached, and if so will do the
following:
if (its_safe_to_change_status()) {
if (new_status =
Hello All
Currently bearerbox and wapbox process run in super user mode. I
tried to run the bearerbox and wapbox process in user mode. It's
giving a ERROR:log file don't have permission. were are this
permission set up. please help us.
regards
Nigar
Currently bearerbox and wapbox process run in super user mode. I
tried to run the bearerbox and wapbox process in user mode. It's
giving a ERROR:log file don't have permission. were are this
permission set up. please help us.
bearerbox and wapbox don't check for user permissions. You have to
Currently bearerbox and wapbox process run in super user mode. I
tried to run the bearerbox and wapbox process in user mode. It's
giving a ERROR:log file don't have permission. were are this
permission set up. please help us.
if you run them as root - the log files are created owned by root
Hi!
How is the status of alphanumerical sender in the CIMD2? It isn't working
now afaik, is someone doing anything on that our should I start... ?
/S
-
Stefan Cars
CTO
Globalwire Communications
Phone: +46 18 10 79 50
Mobile(UK): +44 788 061 36 69
Mobile(SE): +46 708 44 36 00
How is the status of alphanumerical sender in the CIMD2? It isn't working
now afaik, is someone doing anything on that our should I start... ?
If there is no reply from the list, go fot it.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme
Yes, there is a way, using preferred-smsc
group = smsc
smsc-id = A
preferred-smsc-id = A
group = smsc
smsc-id = B
Then put smsc=A in all of your sendsms requests. They will go to A, unless
it's not online, in that case they will go to B.
You can even try to put this
group = smsc
Hi
well the problem is that the default character set on the SMPP servers is
not allways the GSM charset that Kannel uses. Some SMPP servers use ASCII
others Roman 8 and others GSM.
We have a small patch that loads up a character mapping array (similar to
the latin1 to gsm array in Kannel)
Hi,
I've just installed from cvs today and ran my usual test_ppg test set.
Previously this failed with this test_http_server log:
2002-08-29 12:20:31 [1] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area 0x100be730.
2002-08-29 12:20:31 [1] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'.
2002-08-29
I figured as much too. I can't see though (in the SMPP
spec) how to tell the SMSC that the data is GSM
alphabet. Any ideas?
B.
--- Nsan Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi
well the problem is that the default character set
on the SMPP servers is
not allways the GSM charset that Kannel
Hi,
I hope someone out there can help clarify this. I had
a problem long ago with concatenated text messages
sent from kannel. Now it seems it has to do with
data_coding issues and how kannel handles it all.
I did a small experiment. Sent a long message from a
Nokia 3310 to Kannel. Below is
Hello All
i want to test the kannel wap gateway using the actual mobile
phone. so i was just going thro' few documents which i had
downloaded from the Net.
while going thro' i came across a basic doubt:
1 The WAP gateway recieves data from CSD. What is actually CSD.
please guide me.
2 Can we
27 matches
Mail list logo
