But would it allow to controll access to aprticular SMSC? eg one
wap-push-user can only access some SMSCs and not some others.
Szymon
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Andreas Fink wrote:
The suggestion would be to add &smsc=... to the ppg URL as it is in the sendsms URL.
This would allow the same mechanisms
Hello,
I wonder if this matter has been solved in some recent cvs version? I
have found some thread about this. I would be useful to have possibility
of routing different push messages through apriopriate smsc.
regards,
Szymon
I wonder if the problem may be related to the one with sending wap push
on siemens modems - some DCS flags?
szymon
Szymon Stasik wrote:
> I can try falcom A1 tommorow (and maybe siemens as well...). However in
> the meantime I have found that this is not a kannel specific problem but
&g
Then logs would be more revealing.
Aarno
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 12:07 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote:
kannel.log is only (with log-level 0):
2002-11-22 02:58:20 [16] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got sms from wapbox
2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: smscconn_sender
(CIMD2:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:99
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
And the bearerbox log ?
Aarno
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 02:25 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote:
my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list.
Original Message
Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27
my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list.
Original Message
Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100
From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Wapme Systems AG
To: Szymon Stasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ccess).
Someone have answered to me that he have exactly the same problem (and
no one have reported any success with push working on this phones till now;)
Szymon
Aarno
On Friday, November 22, 2002, at 02:11 AM, Szymon Stasik wrote:
and which wap spec should I look into? I guess there is some
and which wap spec should I look into? I guess there is something wrong
in UDH...
Stipe Tolj wrote:
I'd like to investigate the problem deeper and my question is if there
is any possibility to have some push message correctly recognised on
siemens phone? I can look into wapforum specs, however an
Hi,
I'd like to investigate the problem deeper and my question is if there
is any possibility to have some push message correctly recognised on
siemens phone? I can look into wapforum specs, however any working case
or some other tips would be helpfull.
regards,
Szymon
Stipe Tolj wrote:
in latest cvs snapshot gw/wap_push_ppg.c is the same as in 1.2.1. I've
tried to do
http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host"); // and
http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "User-Agent")
but it did not help much. I am stil receiving an empty body or few dots,
(R) character in
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Aarno Syvänen schrieb:
Hello,
there is a bug in ppg, it sends host header to the phone, even though
this one
is meaningful only for pi->ppg transaction. So can you add function
call http_
header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host") into module gw/wap_push_ppg.c,
into function pa
Hello,
I'm tring the wap push service with different phones. It works for me
with all newer ericssons, nokia 3410, 6310, motorola v66, however I have
a problem with siemens me45 and mt50 (same as m50). Kannel version is 1.2.0
the problem is that wap push message shows in sms inbos as data mesas
Hi,
I wonder if someone have any experiences with MMS and if it is possible
to do some MMS testing with latest kannel? I was trying to investigate
it over the weekend and I'm a bit confused.
I was able to do the PUSH but then have no idea how to prepare MMS
encoded PUSH (eg. m-notification-ind)
13 matches
Mail list logo
