, September 03, 2002 7:07 PM
To: Dima Milentiev
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
Hi Dima
I have the document pinned to my wall infront of me all the
time as it's the
best summary of error codes I've found, however it no longer
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
First things first, I've retyped that SMPP error code document and made it
available on our very minimalist website (http://www.skywire.co.uk) - it's a
great thing to have at your fingertips.
(slightly off topic) Let me look back
minimalist site :) I see
only download of green_fairly and nothing else.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Judd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Oded Arbel; Dima Milentiev
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
PM
To: Dima Milentiev
Cc: Oded Arbel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
Dima
Click on the SMS link on the side bar. If that doesn't work
try http://ajudd.kgbinternet.com/smpp/ which is a direct link to the page.
Let me know if I'm still wrong
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 8:38 PM
To: Dima Milentiev; Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
Hmmm... standards aren't being followed? In my tests with Logica's SMSC
wrong destination addresses are being notified with error
: Dima Milentiev
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:09 AM
To: 'Mauricio Ramos'; Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
Hi,
yes, standarts are following, but i've tested now all our SMPP providers with wrong
destination address and only one
. For
malformed phonenumbers I receive error 0x000b.
-Original Message-
From: Dima Milentiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: terça-feira, 3 de setembro de 2002 04:09
To: Mauricio Ramos; Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
, September 03, 2002 5:23 PM
To: Dima Milentiev; Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
I did a full inspection in every 0x0045 error I've received and I guess
you are right. It seems to be related to invalid prefixes (although they
are well
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 5:23 PM
To: Dima Milentiev; Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
I did a full inspection in every 0x0045 error I've received and I
guess
you are right. It seems to be related to invalid
To: Dima Milentiev
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
Hi Dima
I have the document pinned to my wall infront of me all the
time as it's the
best summary of error codes I've found, however it no longer
looks like they
have it available
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 7:07 PM
To: Dima Milentiev
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
Hi Dima
I have the document pinned to my wall infront of me all the
time as it's the
best summary of error codes I've found
PROTECTED]
Mobile: +972 (55) 679229
Tel:+972 (9) 9581711 (ext: 116 or 120)
-Original Message-
From: Mauricio Ramos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 10:28 PM
To: Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
:+972 (9) 9581711 (ext: 116 or 120)
-Original Message-
From: Mauricio Ramos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 10:28 PM
To: Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
Importance: High
Hi Oded,
In accordance to my
Hi Oded,
In accordance to my tests I found out and suggest you a new temporary nack
for SMPP. I've seen this in smsc_smpp.c:
--
/*
* Some SMPP error messages we come across
*/
enum {
SMPP_ESME_RMSGQFUL = 0x0014,
SMPP_ESME_RTHROTTLED =
14 matches
Mail list logo
