Re: sendsms and smsc parameter

2002-04-26 Thread Stipe Tolj
Yes the docs tell the truth. In general specifying a "&smsc=foobar" in the GET request should route the message to the specific smsc-id = "foobar". Can you provide us a kannel.conf setup and example GET request where this is failing? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sendsms and smsc parameter

2002-04-26 Thread Andrea Viscovich
TED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:35 PM Subject: Re: sendsms and smsc parameter > Yes the docs tell the truth. > > In general specifying a "&smsc=foobar" in the GET request should route > the message to the specific smsc-id = "f

RE: sendsms and smsc parameter

2002-04-26 Thread Angel Fradejas
Para: Stipe Tolj CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: sendsms and smsc parameter Well, I'm sorry Stipe. I just thought that setting smsc was enought, instead I realized that I should set preferred-smsc-id to themselves for each smsc group, and now it works. Just one question. Now I have .. sm

Re: sendsms and smsc parameter

2002-04-27 Thread Nisan Bloch
At 11:49 AM 4/26/02 +0200, Andrea Viscovich wrote: As someone pointed out sometime ago, if you have multiple smsc, the parameter smsc in sendsms url does not work. I know the routingĀ  can be done by properly write the kannel conf file, but I would like to choose it from a web page time by time, so