Hi,
We have been using Kannel 1.1.5 and cvs for SMS applications. It has been
working fine with AT and CIMD2 driver. Is it possible to strip Kannel to
bare minimum like bearerbox will have only required SMSC driver and no WDP
layer. If yes, how to do it. I thought about some options like
1. Chan
Hi,
I made some progress in stripping kannel. I have removed some drivers for
smsc protocol, I got bearerbox binary of reduced size (around 170 KB less).
The changes made are
1. smsc_p.h
Removed entry for CIMD, CIMD2, Sema 4.5 & Sema OIS 5.0
2. smsc.c
Removed entry for
> We have been using Kannel 1.1.5 and cvs for SMS applications. It has been
> working fine with AT and CIMD2 driver. Is it possible to strip Kannel to
> bare minimum like bearerbox will have only required SMSC driver and no WDP
> layer. If yes, how to do it. I thought about some options like
>
>
Hi Stipe,
Thanks for the reply, it was very encourging for us to start doing something
like this. It would be better idea, I guess,
having --with-bearerbox-mode=[sms|wap]
for the configuration. Any more suggestion from the list would be
appreciated regarding striping of Kannel, which I have wrote
Hi Stipe,
As suggested by u, I defined
#define KANNEL_NO_WAP 1
in config.h file, which was generated by configure script. But result was
same, make compiled everything in gw/ and made all executables (bearerbox,
wapbox & smsbox).
Little reading into bearerbox.c, we found that there r mention o
: Stipe Tolj; Kannel Developers
Asunto: Re: Stripping Kannel
Hi Stipe,
As suggested by u, I defined
#define KANNEL_NO_WAP 1
in config.h file, which was generated by configure script. But result was
same, make compiled everything in gw/ and made all executables (bearerbox,
wapbox & sm
lter Santos
- Original Message -
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Kannel Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: Stripping Kannel
> Angel Fradejas wrote:
>
> > I agree this is an interesting thing.
>
Stipe Tolj wrote:
>> I agree this is an interesting thing.
>> We also use kannel as a SMS gateway only, and striping down everything
wap
>> related makes sense to us, too.
>so you would agree to have a configure switch that strips down
>everything WAP related in bearerbox, right?!
Yes, that wou
Howdy,
> Nick, who is currently in charge of updating the wishlist or the TODO
> file?
Anyone who wants to be :->
> I'll put a item on my "Kannel's new web site features" for this.
Cool, go for it. I get the impression that the number of people using Kannel
for WAP isn't as extensive as those
e but with #ifdef it
could be done quite nicely - and this would avoid the split builds that
have hit projects like Mame so painfully.
Alex
> Hi,
>
> I made some progress in stripping kannel. I have removed some drivers for
> smsc protocol, I got bearerbox binary of reduced size (a
Alex Judd wrote:
>
> If there is a need for a lighter weight binary with reduced driver support
> shouldn't this be something put into the build process so that on
> compilation people can define the support and drivers they want to build
> in their binaries.
Yes, definitly. This would add a pro
11 matches
Mail list logo