× 21 × 2004, 16:18, ×× ××× JÃrg Pommnitz:
> The problem is that it is unclear whether Kannel can remain Apache/BSD-free
> when it references the newer MySQL libraries. Avoiding the GPL question at
> all is the safest way. If the GPL avoiding solution is technical superior
> to the
Hi,
The Problem here is that mysql does not intepret GPL in the same way
that the rest of the world does.
I wrote to them asking for a client license and they insist i need to
buy the server license and with it comes the client license. Do i need
to buy a road so that i can drive a car?
Oded
ביום ראשון 25 ינואר 2004, 12:03, נכתב על ידי Raditha Dissanayake:
> The Problem here is that mysql does not intepret GPL in the same way
> that the rest of the world does.
> I wrote to them asking for a client license and they insist i need to
> buy the server license and with it comes the client l
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
> If OTOH you want to redistribute Kannel w/o source code (which the Kannel
> license allows you to do), that also means you'd need to distrbute closed
> source code that links with MySQL client code. this is specifically
> disallowed b
Hi Oded,
Thanks for the intepretation of the GPL i am familiar with it too since
our company also contributes to a lot of open source developent
(unfortunately not to kannel - yet)
My point was the mysql inteprets the GPL differently from everyone else.
Yes we intend to to link the client agai
ביום ראשון 25 ינואר 2004, 13:59, נכתב על ידי Raditha Dissanayake:
> Hi Oded,
>
> Thanks for the intepretation of the GPL i am familiar with it too since
> our company also contributes to a lot of open source developent
> (unfortunately not to kannel - yet)
>
> My point was the mysql inteprets the G
ביום ראשון 25 ינואר 2004, 13:41, נכתב על ידי adi:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
> > If OTOH you want to redistribute Kannel w/o source code (which the Kannel
> > license allows you to do), that also means you'd need to distrbute closed
> > source code that links with
> Please note that current cvs version of kannel contains
> GPL code (i.e gw_uuid stuffs).
which is _not_ the fact. The gw_uuid module is LGPL'ed, as this header
states:
/*
* Public include file for the UUID library
*
* Copyright (C) 1996, 1997, 1998 Theodore Ts'o.
*
* %Begin-Header%
* Thi
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> áéåí øàùåï 25 éðåàø 2004, 13:41, ðëúá òì éãé adi:
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
> > > If OTOH you want to redistribute Kannel w/o source code (which the Kannel
> > > license allows you to do), that also means you'd need to distrbute closed
>
Raditha Dissanayake wrote:
>
> Hi Oded,
>
> Thanks for the intepretation of the GPL i am familiar with it too since
> our company also contributes to a lot of open source developent
> (unfortunately not to kannel - yet)
why is that? ... they definetly should ;)
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 12:54:29AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> > Please note that current cvs version of kannel contains
> > GPL code (i.e gw_uuid stuffs).
>
> which is _not_ the fact. The gw_uuid module is LGPL'ed, as this header
> states:
ups.. sorry. I stand corrected.
Regards,
P.Y. Adi Prasa
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Raditha Dissanayake wrote:
Hi Oded,
Thanks for the intepretation of the GPL i am familiar with it too since
our company also contributes to a lot of open source developent
(unfortunately not to kannel - yet)
why is that? ... they definetly should ;)
planning to :-)
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
