[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Stipe ,
Hello all,
I'm a very old user for kannel , and I used to compile it on
cygwin-windows 2003 server and it was working fine till compiled the last
stable 1.4.0 then problems started bearerbox takes 100% of the cpu and I
lose the store file if I restarted
Enver ALTIN wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 13:13 -0600, Oscar Medina Duarte wrote:
I've compiled kannel on debian 3.1 and ran the same config I'm runing
in other versions of debian, Fedora and MAC OS X, but the different
thing here is that it makes around 9 processes only for the bearerbox!
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 20:28, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Oscar Medina Duarte wrote:
Hi list !
I think something is wrong, see, I need to run smsbox and bearerbox in
different computers, but happens that when ever I run smsbox -d -P
configfile it just terminates !
I dont achieve a
Hmm. How about conf file?
- Original Message -
From: Oscar Medina Duarte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kannel Development list
devel@kannel.org
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: Something is wrong on kannel
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 20:28,
Hi Oscar,
You have no log file defined in the core group, so you won't see any
errors reported. You should specify some additional variables, like:
log-file = /opt/Kannel/deploy/logs/kannel.log
log-level = 0
Browsing this file, you will be able to see connection progress to the
SMSC
Hi folks!
I've been doing some benchmarking on kannel on late days, and I'v found
some thinks I feel are wrong or that I dont like in it or I dont knew of
it.
This tests use 3 smpp simulators to send 10, 50 bytes long messages
each to kannel, and then kannel get's a url but sending no
