Maybe you didn't mean to. But there are people from different cultures
frequenting this forum, and calling someone imbecil publicly is certainly
not flattering. All the same, please avoid using any suggestions or personal
characterizations on me. Just stick to the facts.
You should also
huh you seems to be on the wrong way! btw imbecil is wrong spelled... that
should be imbecile... but anyway it's just YOUR opinion
but not mine and we will stick to the facts...
Consider your answer:
I don't see why we have to switch to relative time again. Only bug in kannel
is, that
look at gw/smsc/smsc_at.c
Have fun...
Am 14.12.2010 um 20:46 schrieb Mohammed Rashad:
hi all,
How to read sms from a gsm phone connected with PC using c++ code?
--
Rashad
what doesn't do sense for you? validity period in kannel is given relative
in minutes. relative to whatever timestamp
and this timestamp is wrong. validity as well as deferred should be
_absolute_ timestamp.
Correct expression would be:
...validity is in relative time and not absolute time
hey Nikos, I don't know what is your problem but it's IMHO not OK to start
such absurd thread for a little bit criticism.
This is my last post for this absurd thread.
Thanks,
Alexander Malysh
Am 15.12.2010 um 16:04 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
what doesn't do sense for you? validity period in
Its a long source code not for a beginner in kannel. will you please provide
more detailed information. which function do what and all?
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.orgwrote:
look at gw/smsc/smsc_at.c
Have fun...
Am 14.12.2010 um 20:46 schrieb Mohammed
I know I'm chiming in late, and no one here knows me from Adam, but I do
have an idea that may address both concerns...
Nikos is concerned about time sync issues.
Alexander is concerned that using relative time doesn't account for the
time before the message is delivered.
Both seem like valid
