Hi guys!
The Userguide daily snapshot is outdated, I guess the process that's
supposed to compile it is broken or something.
http://www.kannel.org/download/kannel-userguide-snapshot/userguide.html is
the userguide to rev. 5114 (November 11th, 2014) while the latest is rev.
5160 (February 15th, 20
Hi!
When Kannel fails delivering an MT to a remote SMSC, if it's a temporary
error it will retry to resend it according to the "sms-resend-freq" and
"sms-resend-retry" settings.
If we then reach "sms-resend-retry" number of attempts kannel will generate
a "NACK/Retries Exceeded" error.
On SMPP th
Hi!
There are several groups which contain smsc-id related directives that
allow to use a regex, e.g.:
- in group "smsc" we got "allowed-smsc-id" and the regex version is
"allowed-smsc-id-regex"
- in group "sms-service"" we got "accepted-smsc" and the regex version is
"accepted-smsc-regex"
But i
nteractive Websites - .mobi Sites - Mobile Apps(Android, iPhone,
> Blackberry, Nokia) - Premium Rated SMSs and short codes - SMS competitions
> and campaigns - Lead Generation - opt-in subscription Billing - MMS
> campaigns - USSD campaigns - WAP - Outlook SMS - Bulk SMS and Bulk Ema
16:00 schrieb
> :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any idea when the patch for retry handling will be submitted, as
> > otherwise kannel will keep retrying if the SMSC returns the wrong
> > error code to kannel?
> > I'm concerned this patch will not be submitted and we will
Hi Alex!
Stipe already fixed the retry logic during December, I guess he still has
not commited his code.
Regards.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> the issue is due to fact that SMSC returns wrong error code to kannel.
> 0x58 is throttling error and not q
What about the protocol on regular DLRs which are submitted by the remote
SMSC on a deliver_sm?
Wouldn't a new parameter %whatever be a good idea?
That way we could use it on both cases and avoid modifying the current
ACK/NACK formats
Juan
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi!
Yesterday we were talking about the same thing, that an ACK is an ACK, so
you don't really need the error code there.
But IMHO it anyway makes it more tidy to use the same approach for both ACK
and NACK, providing the same syntax on both.
It won't provide any real benefit to anyone, but looks
Something that I was thinking after that discussion we had today, is the
following:
It sounds good idea to me to add the protocol on the ACK/NACK DLRs text for
the mentioned reason.
Now, on regular DLRs we might be missing a similar approach...
This is a sample DLR log:
2012-10-24 22:18:17 Recei
t all.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:29 PM, spameden wrote:
> Could this potentially lead to problems if there is pending queue?
>
> (and you don't want to process specific messages through speicific SMSC)
>
>
> 2012/10/22 Juan Nin
>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
Bug #662 has been submitted for this.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Juan Nin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There's a small bug on the dead-start directive (smsc group)
> implementation.
> It seems that the dead-start code is executed after the TCP network
> connection is atte
Hi!
There's a small bug on the dead-start directive (smsc group) implementation.
It seems that the dead-start code is executed after the TCP network
connection is attempted.
So on a case where there's connectivity to the remote SMSC's specified host
and port(s) a TCP connection will be establishe
Sounds good!
Thanks!
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Am 03.10.2012 22:36, schrieb Juan Nin:
>
>> Was this ever commited?
>>
>
> Hi Juan,
>
> nop, this never made it's way to the SVN trunk. I'm winding this up right
> now.
>
>
Was this ever commited?
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Juan Nin wrote:
> See attached patch for adding the start-at-boot directive (smsc group) to
> the Kannel User's Guide.
> This was the only missing part so as to get Alejandro Guerrieri's
> start-at-boot pa
Hi guys!
I've just submitted a bug and a feature request into Kannel's Redmine.
*Bug #658: http-queue-delay directives not being properly honoured*
https://redmine.kannel.org/issues/658
*Feature #659: Persist messages on smsbox*
https://redmine.kannel.org/issues/659
The first one was discussed
+1
On 9/8/11 9:26 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
Ops, missed the point, sorry.
IMHO restricted to 0 and 3 should cover most cases. You could take it further
and allowing 0 _to_ 3 to make it slightly more flexible as well.
Default should be 3 to keep it backwards-compatible.
Regards,
--
Aleja
Yep, I had to patch it in the past at least for Telefonica Movistar on
several South American countries, among them Mexico
On 9/8/11 8:37 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
Having to patch and recompile Kannel a few times in the past to change that
parameters to make it work in South America, I ca
on is a no-no. Commenting a
configuration file off-line is convenience.
My 2 cents,
Nikos
- Original Message - From: Juan Nin
To: Kannel Devel
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: useful patches for everyone
That's what we do today, but the idea is not to have to do any &q
On 8/23/11 1:59 PM, Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
Am 22.08.2011 um 20:22 schrieb Juan Nin:
Note that the user guide is wrong, it says 0 is the higher priority
while it's the lowest and 3 is the highest
fixed in SVN...
Thanks Alex!
This has been noted multiple times on the list
Note that the user guide is wrong, it says 0 is the higher priority
while it's the lowest and 3 is the highest
This has been noted multiple times on the list, not sure why the docs
have not been fixed though
On 8/22/11 2:03 PM, Rene Kluwen wrote:
See: priority on
http://www.kannel.org/dow
.
>
> Stopping service to modify configuration is a no-no. Commenting a
> configuration file off-line is convenience.
>
For me and many others convenience is having a directive like start-at-boot,
and not having it is a nuisance :)
Juan
>
> My 2 cents,
> Nikos
>
That's what we do today, but the idea is not to have to do any "extra" work,
neither having to comment/uncomment things out, nor have to add/remove
config files.
Having the start-at-boot directive allows you to just keep the configuration
defined, but the smsc does not start.
So anytime you need i
--
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:08:00 +0200
> >> From: "Hillel"
> >> To:
> >> Cc: devel@kannel.org
> >> Subject: [PATCH] on speed/throughput meters and "start-at-boot"
> >&g
Thx Alex for the explanation on why the 1.5.0 branch! :)
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hi,
> we have at this point in time too much patches flighting and because of lack
> of time we are unable to
> process all of them or fix bugs that were found. We are only few pe
I work with Alex Guerrieri at the same company, so I know perfectly
well that Kannek SVN is very stable.
Now... when Kannel 1.5.0 was announced, I asked what did it exactly
mean, and got no answer about it...
See here: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.user/27072
Any insights ab
I can't say much about the code, but the features are both very useful!!!
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Hillel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We would like to wish all Kannel uses and developers a great 2011.
> We also want to thank all those that have contributed patches and especially
> the Kannel devel
n't been tested yet and probably contains a bug or two.
>>
>> But I am posting it anyway to see what the almighty Kannel Developers have
>> to say about it.
>>
>> This patch is especially useful if you want your clients to have access to
>> an open smppbox with a limited amount of credits. But also it works for
>> smsboxes and sqlboxes, as you please.
>>
>> I made a small patch to open smppbox that allows passing of binfo.
>>
>> == Rene
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Juan Nin
3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands
http://www.3cinteractive.com
same. So please try with
>> those 2 config options.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexander Malysh
>>
>> Am 25.02.2010 um 14:54 schrieb Juan Nin:
>>
>>> Alex, I'm not sure if you were that night on Barcelona with Alejandro,
>>> Stipe, etc, but I
Nice!
I see on your commit that it's now being ignored, and a warning is also issued.
Thanks! :)
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> fixed in svn.
>
> Thanks,
> Alexander Malysh
>
>
> Am 06.05.2010 um 02:41 schrieb Juan Nin:
&g
9] DEBUG: command_id: 2147483649 = 0x8001
2010-05-05 20:20:16 [25778] [69] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x
2010-05-05 20:20:16 [25778] [69] DEBUG: sequence_number: 2 = 0x0002
2010-05-05 20:20:16 [25778] [69] DEBUG: system_id: "GatewayName"
2010-05-05 20:20:16 [25778]
gt; until it gets through.
>
> So why is it disabled?
>
> Arkadiy Kulev mailto:e...@ethaniel.com
> +7 495 5070602
> Moscow, Russia
>
>
>
>
--
Juan Nin
3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands
http://www.3cinteractive.com
e to configure kannel .
>> Can You help me to solve this issue?
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/interface-to-configure-kannel-tp26657557p26657557.html
>> Sent from the Kannel - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Juan Nin
3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands
http://www.3cinteractive.com
t;>>>>
>>>>>> Please find a zip with the full folder attached.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's almost a full code rewrite, with lots of changes on the code
>>>>>> structure and UI as well, apart from support for the dlr f
mean kannel connected to real-world SMSC and servicing) please let me know.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Regards,
> syed asim
>
>
>
--
Juan Nin
3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands
http://www.3cinteractive.com
3 [9399] [14] DEBUG: immutable: 0
>> 2009-09-28 17:45:23 [9399] [14] DEBUG: data: 31 30 37 39 38 34 39 33 35 36
>> 30 30 31 30 30 31 1079849356001001
>> 2009-09-28 17:45:23 [9399] [14] DEBUG: data: 30 39 30 39 32 38 31 37 34 35
>> 30 39 30 39 32 38 0909281745090928
>> 20
details, then I can get you access
> to edit wiki.
>
> Thanks,
> Alexander Malysh
>
> Am 28.09.2009 um 01:24 schrieb Juan Nin:
>
>> Tthe User Guide already includes an example, but the idea is that on
>> the wiki you could far expand it.
>> I have heard here be
>
> ----- Original Message - From: "Juan Nin"
> To: "Kannel Devel"
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 1:23 AM
> Subject: Kannel wiki
>
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Around year and a half ago, I proposed creating a Kannel Wiki, where
>> people
ven
asking, cause it's easier to find stuff there than search mailing
lists...
I had proposed this on the users mailing list, but I guess it's better
to do it here where the main developers coexist (you're also on the
users list, but most don't participate that much on it).
What do
some carriers and another one for
others, It's also nice to do it via Kannel cause it already implements
stuff like it's internal queue, etc
Regards,
--
Juan Nin
3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands
http://www.3cinteractive.com
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
oft many years ago, and MS SQL
Server was born from that Sybase code, so obviously they are very
similar!!!
Of course over the years each one has implemented its own stuff, but
the base is the same
--
Juan Nin
3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands
http://www.3cinteractive.com
ported from Mantis DB. But it's not
>> possible to import user passwords.
>> Please use forgot password option to reset your password.
>>
>> This installation is just to play with Redmine and will be cleaned up if
>> we decide to use it for kannel.org
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>>
>
>
--
Juan Nin
3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands
http://www.3cinteractive.com
gt; "{$row['home_score']} " .
> "{$row['quarter']}" .
> "\n";
> }
>
> The lines still run together.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Bill Rigdon
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/HTTP-format-tp3405578p16538529.html
> Sent from the Kannel - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
--
Juan Nin
3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands
http://www.3cinteractive.com
well, probably the docs need on some parts more info to be added, but
not sure if filling the docs too much with examples is good idea, it
would get too crowded of info
on the wiki you can put all sort of specific configurations for this
and that thing, code examples, etc without cluttering the do
right now if u want scheduling u got to do it on the app side
i'm not sure it would be a good idea to put it into sqlbox..
sqlbox job is sending the messages, any scheduling u may want to do
can be easily done on your app, with schedules tables, and a cronjob
that reads them and feeds into sqlbox
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Andreas Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the problem is not Kannel or HTTP, the problem is your way of using
> it in PHP.
>
> If you for example use something like file("http://localhost/sendsms=...";)
> in php to send an SMS, PHP will stop and wait until K
On Jan 6, 2008 12:46 PM, Andreas Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 04.01.2008, at 22:10, Juan Nin wrote:
> what I mean is 2 submit_sm PDU's on 1 TCP packet...
>
> seeing the traffic capture on Wireshark (ethereal) I see this:
> http://img221.imageshack
SMPP.
>
>
>
> On 04.01.2008, at 15:20, Juan Nin wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I got an application where I got to send blasts of many messages as
> > quick as possible.
> >
> > I'm having the problem that sometimes 2 submit_sm are sent on the
Hi!
I got an application where I got to send blasts of many messages as
quick as possible.
I'm having the problem that sometimes 2 submit_sm are sent on the same
data packet, and there the SMSC returns a Throttling error for
receiving the 2 submit_sm too fast.
Is there any way of preventing Kann
SoNG,
This question should be posted to the users mailing-list, not to the devel one..
Set up the SMSC connection log level to 0 and check it you see it
being sent at SMPP level (which should be as wapbox said it was ok)
Check there if the SMSC didn't give any error while receiving it
Stupid que
this question is not for the devel list, it's for the users one...
anyway.. for SMPP traffic it's not the SMSC who has to connect to you Kannel box
it's your kannel box which connects to the SMSC
so u just NAT the traffic from you kannel box on your gateway and that's it
(if it was the SMSC which
nice :)
what will be the name of the runtime config for this?
regards,
Juan
On Nov 29, 2007 7:52 PM, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guillaume Cottenceau schrieb:
>
> > Well, runtime config not necessarily means runtime checks, if you
> > use a function pointer set at config time.
>
>
On Nov 29, 2007 2:02 PM, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vincent CHAVANIS schrieb:
> > ++1 But,
> >
> > with a config var that allow to activate/desactivate it.
> > and by default disabled. So no compatibility breaks
>
> grrr, runtime config? No way, this means we have a "branch check (if
ec / 1000;
> sprintf(p, "%04d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d.%03d ",
> tm.tm_year + 1900, tm.tm_mon + 1, tm.tm_mday,
> tm.tm_hour, tm.tm_min, tm.tm_sec, millis);
>
> p = strchr(p, '\0');
> }
>
>
>
>
> > -Origin
VANIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ive already posted a patch on this a year ago.
> Please refer to the archives
>
> Vincent.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Juan Nin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 6:2
Hi!
Sorry for this stupid question, but my C skills are very poor and I'm
not being able to do this correctly...
I want to be able to see miliseconds on my logs, something like having
this in gwlib/log.c
sprintf(p, "%04d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d (%d)",
tm.tm_year + 1900, tm.tm_mon + 1,
been received.
> If yes, then drop it. If not, insert it into your db.
>
> Vincent
> --
> Telemaque - 06560 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS - (FR)
> Service Technique/Reseau - NOC
> Developpement SMS/MMS/Kiosques
> http://www.telemaque.fr/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> - O
few times.
>
> If you have a problem I will take a closer look at what I have running
> right now and verify this is the right patch.
>
>
> Juan Nin wrote:
> > I've tried Stuart Beck's patch, but it isn't working for me, as soon
> > as an ACK is received
> The main idea to temporatily fix thjis is to check for each msg, if
> > they have already been received.
> > If yes, then drop it. If not, insert it into your db.
> >
> > Vincent
> > --
> > Telemaque - 06560 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS - (FR)
> > Service Technique/R
Hi!
Any feedback on this?
Thanks in advance
Juan
On Nov 16, 2007 12:35 PM, Juan Nin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've been reading the different threads about the problem with
> throughput, being this the last one (I think):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/deve
That's what Alexandar just said...
You're using:
?smpp-tlv?MBbilling=
and it should be:
?smpp?MBbilling=
regards,
Juan
On Nov 26, 2007 12:33 PM, Kyriacos Sakkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Call: (Relevant values inserted of courser)
>$post .= "X-Kannel-Meta-Data:
> ?smpp-tlv?MBbillin
Hi!
I've been reading the different threads about the problem with
throughput, being this the last one (I think):
http://www.mail-archive.com/devel@kannel.org/msg06847.html
Apparently that fixes the outgoing traffic throughput, but impacts
incoming ACKs.
Is there any new version of the patch whi
Hi Kyriacos!
Alexander Malysh created an SMPP Optional Parameters patch.
You have already participated on that thread:
http://www.nabble.com/-PATCH--SMPP-Optional-Parameters-t4223169.html
The other day I tested it, and found that nothing came back with %D
I sent e-mail to the devel list, and Ale
tch. The patch was only to allow operator specific TLVs.
> TLVs from SMPP spec. should be handled by kannel on regular basis (IMHO).
>
>
>
> Juan Nin wrote:
>
> > oks, great! :)
> >
> > to be able to plan my stuff, when do you think you can have some time to
>
oks, great! :)
to be able to plan my stuff, when do you think you can have some time to do it?
thnx again
On Nov 9, 2007 1:31 PM, Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's easier for me todo it myself instead of write how to do it :)
>
>
> Juan Nin wrote:
>
t; Hi again,
>
> in metadata you will receive only vendor specific TLVs.
>
> It could be expanded to all TLVs if needed.
>
>
> Juan Nin wrote:
>
> > On Nov 9, 2007 11:54 AM, Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
On Nov 9, 2007 11:54 AM, Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seems I just forgot about DLRs and data_sm :)
>
> Please try attached patch instead of previous one.
cool! :)
I just tried it, and now it's passing it!
BUT, it's not passing back all of the received optional parameter
any feedback on this?
thnx again!
Juan
On Nov 8, 2007 3:17 PM, Juan Nin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Alexander!
>
> I've made some tests with your patch.
> These are the Optional SMPP parameters I've configured:
>
>
> # Specifies if message must or not
Hi Alexander!
I've made some tests with your patch.
These are the Optional SMPP parameters I've configured:
# Specifies if message must or not be billed
group = smpp-tlv
name = charge_type
tag= 0x2151
type = integer
length = 1
# Specifies amount to be billed
group = smpp-tlv
name =
Hi!
3 months have passed by, and just today I was able to start testing this!!!
Haven't been able to test too much yet though
I've sent some premium messages, making them billable and setting it's
pricepoints via TLVs and everything went ok
Tomorrow I'm going to make more tests, I want to test it
Hi Alex!
Unfortunately I haven't been able to test it yet... :(
I'm opening a new company, and starting this monday, so I've been very busy!
Compiled Kannel with the patch with no problem
On tuesday a partner of mine from the US is comming down here, so
during the week I'll make tests with his
On 8/6/07, Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Juan Nin wrote:
>
> > Alexander.
> >
> > First of all, many many thanks for this :)
> > Long awaited patch!
> >
> > I will be setting up a test SMPP connection wit
Alexander.
First of all, many many thanks for this :)
Long awaited patch!
I will be setting up a test SMPP connection with OpenMarket from the US, I
hope this week, so I'll test it with them.
Will let you know about the results!!!
Question, will it compile against Kannel 1.4.1 or needs
Hi!
Sorry for the cross-listing!
Long ago Enver Altin submitted a patch for setting esm_class via a
sendsms cgi variable.
It was discussed that it was not the best way to do it, since it was
something too SMPP specific for adding to sendsms cgi
And then it was said of the possibility of crea
Stipe Tolj wrote:
seik wrote:
Hello all,
Marry Christmas to all of you :)
As an end user of Kannel project, I would like to thank all of you,
have to say, I earn my salary thank to the excellent Kannel behavior
at high peaks of MO-MT traffic.
So, thank you again, wish you all the best,
and
On 11/17/06, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hillel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are 3 patches that seem to be forgotten and we were wondered if
they
> can be added:
>
> 1)Noor Entertainment [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent in on Date: Wed,
12
> Jul 2006 02:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
> " Please find attached a sm
0 = 0x
2006-11-17 00:03:29 [8226] [7] DEBUG: sequence_number: 1513 = 0x05e9
2006-11-17 00:03:29 [8226] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
Regards,
Juan
-Original Message-
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
Sent: 15 November 2006 01:23
To: [
Enver ALTIN wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 19:45 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Now, we're heading towards:
a) a more flexible automake, libtool et all build system and .dso support for
the SMSC modules.
b) various upgrades in the WAP 1.2.x stack
c) integration of HTTP proxy abilities to play WAP
does anyone have a comment on this?
thanks in advance,
Juan
Juan Nin wrote:
ok, but as you said, it's not simple, and it requires C programming
skills...
I could try it, but it's not simple for me, and I need it quite urgent.. :(
has nobody made a patch for this??
I
n can be
passed as a url arg for sendsms/service
Its not simple, put it that way.
----- Original Message -
*From:* Juan Nin <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* users@kannel.org <mailto:users@kannel.org>
*Sent:* Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:20 AM
*Su
Hi!
I got PPG running for sending Wap Push and everything works fine.
It seems Kannel sends "1234" as the default sender in Wap Pushes, but I want to set it to the short
code where the user has sent his MO to.
I've found no parameter where to set that on PPG or anyhting...
The only possibili
80 matches
Mail list logo