Hi All,
I am using Kannel gw 1.4.0 for both push & pull. push is working fine.
The problem arise when A MO message is coming from smsc to the kannel GW
(Using SMPP ).
ISSUE -
When a MO message is coming from smsc to gw, gw is creating a url (taking
get-url from config) of our short code platform.
: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:10 PM
To: jyoti
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Kannel(1.4.0) is not creating get-url for MO message
On 06.05.2008, at 08:24, jyoti wrote:
Hi All,
I am using Kannel gw 1.4.0 for both push & pull. push is working fine.
The problem arise when
I am facing problem which I have mentioned below.
I have configured 2 send sms user for push purpose to my kannel(1.4.0) sms
gateway.
Suppose user1 sent 1000 msg ,then if it's not delevered it will be stored in
store.log.
Now the user2 sent 10 msg,then thease 10 msg will be stored next to those
p
I am waiting for any reply, please sugest me,
-Original Message-
From: jyoti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 5:32 PM
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Does kannel maintain multiple qeue for each user conected
I am facing problem which I have mentioned below.
I
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:09 AM
To: devel Devel
Subject: Re: Does kannel maintain multiple qeue for each user conected
On 23.09.2008, at 06:53, jyoti wrote:
I am waiting for any reply, please sugest me,
-Original Message-
From: jyoti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
We are using kannel sms g/w for commercial purpose.
Please suggest me in a configuration like P-IV machine, 512 RAM how many
instances of kannel I can configure without any obstacle in performance of
kannel ?
<>
]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:01 PM
To: jyoti
Cc: devel Devel
Subject: Re: how many instances of kannel I can configure in (p-IV,512
RAM)
you can run one instance doing all multiple connections.
Such a configuration can easily do 400msg/sec.
On 30.09.2008, at 09:15, jyoti
Hi All,
Does there any configurable parameter for windowing in smpp(i.e if I have
connected to smsc through smpp)?
Does congestion_state TLV is used in kannel for smpp? which could be sent in
response as parameter to provide real windowing
like TCP.
Waiting for reply
Thanks & Regards
J
-ack I think we are making the process static, By using
congestion_state TLV we can control windowing at run time.
If I am wrong please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
Jyoti Ranjan Panda
-Original Message-
From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:3
Hi,
What you are telling is not flow control or windowing.
Real flow control is the concept of a receiver informing the sender that it
can’t accept any more data.
Not that configuring statically before the process begins.
Regards
Jyoti Ranjan Panda
-Original Message-
From: Nikos
Is this the solution for achiving flow control ?. i.e re-queue of message
after geting a error code.
Regards
Jyoti Ranjan Panda
-Original Message-
From: Werner Coetzee [mailto:werner.coet...@clickatell.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 2:36 PM
To: jyoti; devel@kannel.org
Subject: RE
and that predetermined performance is not always guaranteed.
Regards
Jyoti Ranjan Panda
-Original Message-
From: Werner Coetzee [mailto:werner.coet...@clickatell.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 3:39 PM
To: jyoti; devel@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Real Windoing in kannel for smpp ?
I&#
Hi Donald,
I am agree with you. Thanks.
Regards
Jyoti Ranjan Panda
-Original Message-
From: Donald Jackson [mailto:donaldjs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 5:16 PM
To: jyoti
Cc: Werner Coetzee; devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Real Windoing in kannel for smpp
Hi,
I am not able to destroy Octstr *respstr defined in
/gateway-1.4.3/gw/smsc/smsc.smpp.c/static Msg *handle_dlr function.
As its a Octstr type I should be able to destroy the memory, but on trying
this I am geting PANIC.
regards
Jyoti Ranjan Panda
Hi,
First of all thanks.
Now I am able to destroy the octstr *respstr, By pointing it to NULL.
Actually I was storing a delivery report in Octstr *dlrstr(which is
identical to Octstr *respstr) for my customer requirement.
But I am not able to destry that.
Regards
Jyoti Ranjan Panda
Hi,
If we use sms for push over ss7 E1 link.i.e directly connected to MSC,
instead of SMSC(SMPP),Does we will get an advantage?
if yes can we devlop kannel to support the above?
Waiting for Any suggestion.
Thanks & Regards
Jyoti Ranjan Panda
]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:52 PM
To: Donald Jackson; jyoti
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: SMS over SS7
Hi,
SS7 protocol is very complex and difficult to write drivers for. It will
be quite a challenge to implement it in kannel as opensource. I am not sure
it justifies the
17 matches
Mail list logo
