Ok,
regarding the Siemens SX1 kludge and the WSP headers with as
only value byte, I'd like to get at least a vote for commiting this patch from
the following developers:
Aarno, Paul, Slava
please.
You guys haven't stated yet nothing regarding a vote. Please do so. I'd like to
keep it that wa
Hi, all.
+1 from me
Just one comment.
This patch will be good as far as no any header with special treatment
for "No-value".
We unpack fields in wsp_unpack_well_known_field().
I checked that in current specs no any header with special hanling for
"No-value". But if it will be added, than this patch
Have you tested the modification ? What will be result of parsing 0x80
0x00 ? Accept:
is ok according the rfc 2616. (Because this is a low level parsing
function, you definitely want to test.)
Aarno
On 27.1.2005, at 13:04, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Ok,
regarding the Siemens SX1 kludge and the WSP header
Replying to Stipe Tolj:
> Aarno, Paul, Slava
As already said, I have no objections :)
--
Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my pgp key
This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
Have you tested the modification ? What will be result of parsing 0x80
0x00 ? Accept:
is ok according the rfc 2616. (Because this is a low level parsing
function, you definitely want to test.)
Aarno, did you have chances to test this with various phones?
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{a
Hi, Stipe.
I've tested it with Nokia 3660 (which uses exactly this Accept header in
Connect PDU and doesn't work without patch). Everything is ok.
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
Have you tested the modification ? What will be result of parsing 0x80
0x00 ? Accept:
is ok according the rfc 26
commited to cvs.
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-
