Mi Reflejo wrote:
Great, we need to add that hook to sqlbox-standalone module.
yep, go ahead... I also need to get the example configure/make build
environment
ripped out of my add-on boxes to let you use it.
Stipe
---
Kölner
It isn't nessesary i'v already done :)
M
On 7/6/06, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mi Reflejo wrote:
Great, we need to add that hook to sqlbox-standalone module.
yep, go ahead... I also need to get the example configure/make build environment
ripped out of my add-on boxes to let you
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list,
now, as Kannel maintains its own way of knowing what config directives
are allowed in group sections, this is a problem if external modules,
ie. Rene's sqlbox or Paul's Mbuni need to use the same gwlib/cfg.[ch]
thingies.
I tried to introduce a generic
Great, we need to add that hook to sqlbox-standalone module.
M.
On 7/5/06, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list,
now, as Kannel maintains its own way of knowing what config directives
are allowed in group sections, this is a problem if external modules,
ie.
Rene Kluwen wrote:
-1 from me.
Reason 1:
Does this mean add-ons need to temporarily use an interim API and switch to
another API when it becomes available?
Reason 2:
mBuni, sqlbox require patches to the Kannel sources either way.
It doesn't matter if such patches also patch cfg.def or not.
PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 14 juni 2006 1:02
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: Kannel Development list
Subject: Re: [PATCH] config definition file hooking (for external
modules),ie. sqlbox, mbuni, etc.
Rene Kluwen wrote:
-1 from me.
Reason 1:
Does this mean add-ons need to temporarily use an interim API
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list,
now, as Kannel maintains its own way of knowing what config directives
are allowed in group sections, this is a problem if external modules,
ie. Rene's sqlbox or Paul's Mbuni need to use the same gwlib/cfg.[ch]
thingies.
I tried to introduce a generic hooking
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Stipe Tolj
Sent: zondag 11 juni 2006 19:21
To: Stipe Tolj
Cc: Kannel Development list
Subject: Re: [PATCH] config definition file hooking (for external
modules),ie. sqlbox, mbuni, etc.
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi
Rene Kluwen wrote:
-1 from me.
Reason 1:
Does this mean add-ons need to temporarily use an interim API and switch to
another API when it becomes available?
now, this is a solution for add-ons to use a add-hook based approach. So this
_can_ be considered an API format for the adding of the
BTW guys,
sorry for my (at least sometimes) bad grammer in english. I simply type, and do
not double-check using any auto-checking tool. So that's why some words get
messed up totally.
Don't catch on my for those... otherwise my beer credit'ing would go nutz...
anyway, some guys of you have
Hi list,
now, as Kannel maintains its own way of knowing what config directives are
allowed in group sections, this is a problem if external modules, ie. Rene's
sqlbox or Paul's Mbuni need to use the same gwlib/cfg.[ch] thingies.
I tried to introduce a generic hooking mechanism for the 2
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list,
now, as Kannel maintains its own way of knowing what config directives
are allowed in group sections, this is a problem if external modules,
ie. Rene's sqlbox or Paul's Mbuni need to use the same gwlib/cfg.[ch]
thingies.
I tried to introduce a generic hooking
12 matches
Mail list logo
