[PATCH-RFC] adding pids to logging

2004-01-26 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi list, we'd like to add the pid (process id) logging into the standard Kannel output log format. This may be used for further thread and process debugging. This would imply the change of the log-file format from [] to [] [] so we _add_ the pid as second argument of the log format.

RE: [PATCH-RFC] adding pids to logging

2004-01-26 Thread Kaido Karner
> Any objections to modify the standard log-file format into this? > > NOTE: this may imply of source that people who do analyze the logs > would have to change parser routines or regex expressions accordingly. make it an option with default set to current format, so all who need that can turn it

Re: [PATCH-RFC] adding pids to logging

2004-01-26 Thread Stipe Tolj
Kaido Karner wrote: > > > Any objections to modify the standard log-file format into this? > > > > NOTE: this may imply of source that people who do analyze the logs > > would have to change parser routines or regex expressions accordingly. > > make it an option with default set to current format

Re: [PATCH-RFC] adding pids to logging

2004-01-26 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, I'm +1 to have pid on per default w/o any "yet another option"... we can make it configurable at compile time but not runtime configurable (runtime configurable == overhead). On Monday 26 January 2004 17:17, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Kaido Karner wrote: > > > Any objections to modify the standard

Re: [PATCH-RFC] adding pids to logging

2004-01-26 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alexander Malysh wrote: > > I'm +1 to have pid on per default w/o any "yet another option"... > we can make it configurable at compile time but not runtime configurable > (runtime configurable == overhead). which means having an ./configure --enable-pids-log ?? I'd like to avoid that actually to

RE: [PATCH-RFC] adding pids to logging

2004-01-26 Thread Igor Ivoilov
figuration options. > -Original Message- > From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 7:55 PM > To: Alexander Malysh > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH-RFC] adding pids to logging > > > Alexander Malysh wrote: > > &g

Re: [PATCH-RFC] adding pids to logging

2004-01-26 Thread Stipe Tolj
Igor Ivoilov wrote: > > For me pids in debug log looks very usefull, and I don't think that changing in > debug log can affect production running of kannel, > at least it's true for me. > But for me everything except access log is debug ;) > So I would vote +1 for changing default behavior withou

Re: [PATCH-RFC] adding pids to logging

2004-01-28 Thread Stipe Tolj
patch _has_ been commited to cvs. Please update and check. Stipe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] h

Re: [PATCH-RFC] adding pids to logging

2004-02-03 Thread Nisan Bloch
At 01:12 PM 2004/01/28, Stipe Tolj wrote: patch _has_ been commited to cvs. Please update and check. Looks good - works in test environ. Nisan Stipe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf,

Re: [PATCH-RFC] adding pids to logging

2004-02-04 Thread Stipe Tolj
Nisan Bloch wrote: > > At 01:12 PM 2004/01/28, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > >patch _has_ been commited to cvs. Please update and check. > > Looks good - works in test environ. runs even on our production env ;) Stipe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --