now basically they complain that Kannel does not check the UAProf
profile of a device and hence does not recognize that certain
mime-types can or can't be accepted by the device.
But can the list of acceptable MIME types not be checked against the
Accept: MIME headers ? I don't see this as a
Paul Keogh wrote:
now basically they complain that Kannel does not check the UAProf
profile of a device and hence does not recognize that certain
mime-types can or can't be accepted by the device.
But can the list of acceptable MIME types not be checked against the
Accept: MIME
Hi Paul,
Paul Keogh schrieb:
our REFPOOL tests are doing well. Handset manufacturers
claim the lack
of UAProf support within Kannel.
Is there any more details about these claims - ie. what exactly are
they claiming is missing ?
now basically they complain that Kannel does not check
our REFPOOL tests are doing well. Handset manufacturers
claim the lack
of UAProf support within Kannel.
Is there any more details about these claims - ie. what exactly are
they claiming is missing ?
Can someone please check if UAProf is a mandatory feature for WAP
1.2.1 (jun)?
Is
A Ter, 2003-06-17 às 09:22, Stipe Tolj escreveu:
Hi list,
our REFPOOL tests are doing well. Handset manufacturers claim the lack
of UAProf support within Kannel.
Can someone please check if UAProf is a mandatory feature for WAP
1.2.1 (jun)?
Is there anyone interested to pick this issue
Bruno
wap 1.2.1 specifications link
http://www.wapforum.org/what/technical_1_2_1.htm
Himalay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Bruno Rodrigues
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [REQ] UAProf suppport
