On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Alexander Malysh wrote:
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 23:54, Peter Beckman wrote:
In 1.3.1 I'm seeing that when the remote connection disconnects without
an unbind, and then reconnects, messages stop getting sent until either
one side or I restart the gateway.
Anyone
Pedro B. wrote:
Bruno said he had to do the pack before August 13th.
I swear i looked at the calendar just now and appeared to me that 1 week
from now is past August 13th.
now, to make things more easy, we can roll it even earlier. I'll have
to catch-up with the list and mantis, since I was sort
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hello Bruno,
1.3.2 should be good tested and remaining bug's should be fixed first
before
we can call it stable (IMO) and cvs version (before 1.3.2) was not tested
by too much people, so we should wait a bit...
P.S. why not package 1.3.2 for debian and
Hi,
Sahil Aggarwal wrote:
i have lost many messages because of this type of disconnection as
everytime i have to restart the gateway.
if you don't use store-file then it's your problem...
Sahil
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 23:54, Peter Beckman wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Bruno Rodrigues
Pedro B. wrote:
Can this aspell version replace the www docs too?
yep, I'll hit it towards the htdocs dir ;)
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone:
Alan McNatty wrote:
I agree completely - just highlighting for Bruno.
If he's going to make a Debian package for stable it will be an issue if
package has is compiled --with-pgsql and as long as 7.2 is in stable.
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 10:04, Pedro B. wrote:
Sorry, but doing patches to support
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hello Bruno,
1.3.2 should be good tested and remaining bug's should be fixed first before
we can call it stable (IMO) and cvs version (before 1.3.2) was not tested
by too much people, so we should wait a bit...
P.S. why not package 1.3.2 for debian and get it more testing?
Bruno said he had to do the pack before August 13th.
I swear i looked at the calendar just now and appeared to me that 1 week
from now is past August 13th.
\\pb
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hello Bruno,
1.3.2 should be good tested and remaining bug's should be fixed first
before
we
Hello all.
Does anyone have any complain about 1.3.2 in comparison with 1.2.1 ?
What do you think about releasing 1.3.2 as 1.2.2 stable so I can package
it for Debian and we could have the latest stable version in Sarge ?
Stipe ?
On 2004-08-05 17:38:31 +0800 Bruno Rodrigues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all.
Does anyone have any complain about 1.3.2 in comparison with
1.2.1 ?
What do you think about releasing 1.3.2 as 1.2.2 stable so I
can package it
for Debian and we could have the latest stable version in
Sarge ?
Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
Hello all.
Does anyone have any complain about 1.3.2 in comparison with 1.2.1 ?
What do you think about releasing 1.3.2 as 1.2.2 stable so I can package
it for Debian and we could have the latest stable version in Sarge ?
Stipe ?
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hello Bruno,
Hi Bruno,
I've tested the pgsql dlr storage on 7.2.1 (debian stable) but found
that Kannel utilised a DELETE ... LIMIT 1 in dlr_pgsql_remove from
gw/dlr_pgsql.c which is not supported in 7.2.1.
ERROR: PGSQL: DELETE FROM dlr WHERE smsc='foo' AND ts='243251116' LIMIT
1;
ERROR: PGSQL: ERROR:
Sorry, but doing patches to support a 7.2.x version when 7.4.x is the
stable version, is like proposing to go back to stoneage and make fire
by using 2 sticks.
The 7.2 is completely deprecated on a postgres point of view.
I do know debian-stable still uses it, but it shouldn't. 7.4.3 should
I agree completely - just highlighting for Bruno.
If he's going to make a Debian package for stable it will be an issue if
package has is compiled --with-pgsql and as long as 7.2 is in stable.
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 10:04, Pedro B. wrote:
Sorry, but doing patches to support a 7.2.x version
i have lost many messages because of this type of disconnection as everytime i have to restart the gateway.
Sahil
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 23:54, Peter Beckman wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
Everybody else, please vote now or shutup forever ;) (how is it the
setence when
15 matches
Mail list logo
