; 'Victor Luchitz'
vluch...@gmail.com; devel@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 1:30 AM
Subject: RE: smppbox code questions
Nikos, you disappoint me.
report_versions() is linked in from the gwlib libraries with the values
that
it was compiled with. Try it, and you will see.
== Rene
@kannel.org
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Hey, I didn't say it would work, just asked if you had tried it. You can't
expect me to remember by heart where each #define is set. Unfortunately it
needs patching.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl
-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Rene Kluwen
Sent: maandag 12 juli 2010 17:27
To: 'Nikos Balkanas'; 'Victor Luchitz'; devel@kannel.org
Subject: RE: smppbox code questions
To be honest: I didn't try it.
But report_versions() is a gwlib library
12, 2010 6:48 PM
Subject: RE: smppbox code questions
I added the file VERSION.
Also I changed the gw/smppbox.c and I think I have a workaround.
Now report_versions() says:
2010-07-12 17:47:35 [25289] [0] INFO: Debug_lvl = -1, log_file = none,
log_lvl = 0
2010-07-12 17:47:35 [25289] [0] DEBUG
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
As anticipated this is wrong and can be confusing to users.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl
To: 'Rene Kluwen' rene.klu...@chimit.nl; 'Nikos Balkanas'
nbalka...@gmail.com
, 2010 11:48 PM
Subject: RE: smppbox code questions
That is a gwlib quirk. The function report_versions() has the Kannel version
hard coded in it.
Sqlbox has the same problem.
Maybe we need to send in a patch for gwlib/utils.c.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Victor Luchitz
I haven't tried.
But it will only work if I recompile gwlib after the new #define's.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 11 juli 2010 9:46
To: Rene Kluwen; 'Victor Luchitz'; devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Hi
, July 11, 2010 4:50 PM
Subject: RE: smppbox code questions
I haven't tried.
But it will only work if I recompile gwlib after the new #define's.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 11 juli 2010 9:46
To: Rene Kluwen; 'Victor Luchitz
Luchitz'; devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Nope, that would defeat the whole puprose. Add it to your code, just before
calling report_versions()
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl
To: 'Nikos Balkanas' nbalka...@gmail.com; 'Victor
9 juli 2010 23:19
To: Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Yeah, I was thinking about this hack as well, but it's going to
create more problems than it solves. Btw, why does smppbox use
system-type as boxc_id instead of ESME's login name? That forces
EMSE's to have distinct system
]
Sent: zaterdag 10 juli 2010 9:16
To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
In my opinion it doesn't make much sense to have things this way.
First of all, you still need to list each
system-id/password/system-type triple individually in the smpp-logins
file:
system-id1
been an option. It's
just a choice that I made.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 10 juli 2010 9:16
To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
In my opinion it doesn't make much sense to have
questions
2010/7/10 Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl:
Passwords depend on system-ids. Not system-types. So per system-id you only
have to change one password.
I didn't say that. n fact, I said quite the opposite :P
system-id1 pass system-type1
system-id1 pass system-type2
Now, imagine you
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
2010/7/10 Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl:
Passwords depend on system-ids. Not system-types. So per system-id you only
have to change one password.
I didn't say that. n fact, I said quite the opposite :P
system-id1 pass system-type1
system-id1 pass
To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
In this case, system-type is just a mandatory but redundant alias for
system-id :P
I can code a patch that will make system-type optional, in this case
smppbox will use system-id as boxc_id. This mode will be toggled by a
config
[mailto:vluch...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 9 juli 2010 23:19
To: Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Yeah, I was thinking about this hack as well, but it's going to
create more problems than it solves. Btw, why does smppbox use
system-type as boxc_id instead of ESME's login name
: smppbox code questions
Oh, my original patch was missing the smppbox-cfg.def part (in
attachment) so currently you can't specify any of the new vars, otherwise
smppbox doesn't start.
One thing I noticed is that you committed my patch with vars using shorter
names: src-addr-npi, etc, while the svn
to include the svn version numbers.
But so far no luck. I did check things in, in case you want to have a look at
it.
-Original Message-
From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 10 juli 2010 18:27
To: Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Ok
To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Yeah, I made similar changes locally with the same result: at startup,
smppbox prints the following message:
[91108] [0] DEBUG: Kannel smppbox version `svn-r4833M'.
which is kannel's svn revision number, not that of smppbox
Message-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of
Victor Luchitz
Sent: donderdag 8 juli 2010 15:06
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Yeah, you committed the proposed change to boxc-boxc_id in revision
15. What I'm asking about
to distinguish to which box_id it belongs.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 9 juli 2010 11:12
To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
On a side note, why does smppbox use boxc_id as the first parameter
passed
smppbox.
So bearerbox will find their dlr's. And smppbox will do also.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 9 juli 2010 13:55
To: Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Well, this is going against the logic in bearerbox
If bearerbox sends a report_mo, then it should include a status (dlr type) as
well.
Or am I wrong?
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 9 juli 2010 14:24
To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
, then it should include a status (dlr type) as
well.
Or am I wrong?
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 9 juli 2010 14:24
To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Unfortunately there's currently no way
.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 9 juli 2010 15:35
To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Yes, but how is this relevant? I mean, there are two possibilities to
make smppbox be aware of bearerbox
It's already in the code.
Current revision is 16.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of
Victor Luchitz
Sent: donderdag 8 juli 2010 7:52
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Any hope
.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of
Victor Luchitz
Sent: donderdag 8 juli 2010 7:52
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
Any hope this will be reviewed and committed?
I'm also working
Luchitz
Sent: dinsdag 6 juli 2010 14:53
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
1) I think this assumption is incorrect. I have the routing set up
this way in bearerbox:
group = smsbox-route
smsbox-id = vma
smsc-id = HTTP
So all messages on the 'HTTP' smsc get routed
-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of
Victor Luchitz
Sent: maandag 5 juli 2010 20:36
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: smppbox code questions
Hello,
I have a few questions for you regarding the handling of DLR's by
smppbox, which might also turn out to be bugs.
1
Of
Victor Luchitz
Sent: dinsdag 6 juli 2010 14:53
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
1) I think this assumption is incorrect. I have the routing set up
this way in bearerbox:
group = smsbox-route
smsbox-id = vma
smsc-id = HTTP
So all messages on the 'HTTP' smsc get routed
Message-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of
Victor Luchitz
Sent: dinsdag 6 juli 2010 14:53
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: smppbox code questions
1) I think this assumption is incorrect. I have the routing set up
this way in bearerbox:
group
Hello,
I have a few questions for you regarding the handling of DLR's by
smppbox, which might also turn out to be bugs.
1)
In msg_to_pdu function there's a line which reads:
dlr = dlr_find(msg-sms.boxc_id, msgid, msg-sms.receiver, dlrtype);
I think it's incorrect because when a DLR is stored
Hi List,
I have a HTTP connection with my telco, and they send us a custom set of
parameter. What I want to know is, which files that I need to patch in
order to grab those custom parameters.
Second question, my telco send a 21 long numeric transaction id. And I
store is as binfo. When I see the
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for the reply.
1. The custom parameter such as
http://host/?smstype=numericsubstype=alphanumeric...
2. The effect of 2.0003040124E 19 instead of using 200030401240
in the dlr log is, Kannel failed to lookup the correct record to update
the status.
3. The transaction ID
On 11.02.2008, at 03:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List,
I have a HTTP connection with my telco, and they send us a custom
set of
parameter. What I want to know is, which files that I need to patch in
order to grab those custom parameters.
can you be more specific about what custom
carrier data as well as phone number portability.
For this reason, I have a few questions
1) I am wondering if I can send sms from a web page to a kannel
gateway?
2) Am I able to set quota's per user and sign users up via a web page?
3) I need to install it on a windows machine
carrier data as well as phone number portability.
For this reason, I have a few questions
1) I am wondering if I can send sms from a web page to a kannel
gateway?
2) Is there any charge per message or anything along those lines
3) I need to install it on a windows machine
carrier data as well as phone number portability.
For this reason, I have a few questions
1) I am wondering if I can send sms from a web page to a kannel
gateway?
2) Is there any charge per message or anything along those lines
3) I need to install it on a windows machine
Hi,
I looked at this product and was able to install it and still going through
the documentation.
I have set of questions
What I am trying to do
I want to setup my own sms messaging service i.e I want want to send
bulk sms from this kannel software to my friends mobile number
How can I
Hi,
I am very very newbie in SMS and Kannel.
My questions might be a little bit very stupid to you.
However, if you can,please, educate me.
1. To set up a sms gateway, do I have to haveSMSC specifications for each carrier, such as T-mobile, sprint, and verison.
2. I heard from some forum
torsdag 5. mai 2005, 14:43, skrev Dreams Come Ture:
Hi,
I am very very newbie in SMS and Kannel.
My questions might be a little bit very stupid to you.
However, if you can, please, educate me.
1. To set up a sms gateway, do I have to have SMSC specifications for each
carrier, such as T
Hello all,
I have questions about some kannel features as
follows:
1. X-Kannel headers: I was trying to use these
headers, some times in the service definition group in
the config file, other times in the sms push (sendsms)
function, but with no success.
2. Introducing delay: Is there a way
zohar wrote:
Hi,
I tried getting some answers on the users' list, but nobody answered. I hope
I have better luck here:
1. Is it possible to limit the listening endpoint in kannel to specific
interfaces, instead of them listening on all IPs?
yes, you can define in the conf file to which
Hi,
I tried getting some answers on the users' list, but nobody answered. I hope
I have better luck here:
1. Is it possible to limit the listening endpoint in kannel to specific
interfaces, instead of them listening on all IPs?
2. Is it possible to control the URLs accessible via the WAP Gateway?
44 matches
Mail list logo
