UCP 50

2004-01-14 Thread Arne K. Haaje
Is this the same as EMI/UCP? Can that module be used for an operator (TeliaSonera Sweden) that say it use that protocol? -- Med vennlig hilsen, Eurobate ASA Arne K. Haaje Senior Network Engineer Eurobate ASA - Postboks

Re: UCP 50

2004-01-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Arne K. Haaje schrieb: Is this the same as EMI/UCP? Can that module be used for an operator (TeliaSonera Sweden) that say it use that protocol? yes, this is one operation mode of EMI/UCP. Stipe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: UCP 50

2004-01-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Arne K. Haaje wrote: Yes, I know - but that is what they are using.. To send an SMS you craft a packet then send it over HTTPS. I am okay with the encryption for the transport, but why use HTTP (S). Why not just connect to a SMSC that speak the protocol natively? There is also the issue

Re: UCP 50

2004-01-14 Thread Arne K. Haaje
onsdag 14. januar 2004, 22:02, skrev Stipe Tolj: Arne K. Haaje wrote: Yes, I know - but that is what they are using.. To send an SMS you craft a packet then send it over HTTPS. I am okay with the encryption for the transport, but why use HTTP (S). Why not just connect to a SMSC that

Re: UCP 50

2004-01-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Paul Keogh wrote: which means you have to pass the UCP string via HTTP GET/POST over HTTPS to them? ... what kind of perversion is this?! I guess they use HTTPS for getting the security purpose done?! Seems they never heard of stunnel (for SSL-enabling TCP server-client