- "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" wrote:
> [mnowak] khmeros-fonts: khmeros-fonts-common-5.0-7.fc12.noarch
newman devel $ rpmquery -lv khmeros-fonts-common
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Jul 26 2009
/usr/share/fonts/khmeros
False positive.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fe
It looks like man is being replaced by man-db in F14 (though the last I checked
the package hadn't been dropped yet, just obsoleted).
However comps still lists man in the base group. Should this be changed to
man-db?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:31:01 +0530
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'd like to confirm if I can approve recoll[1] which uses some build
> deps that it ships in the tar itself. Namely, "unac" and "binc imap".
>
>
> > > 1. I see a unac directory with a "stripped down version of unac".
> > > You nee
On 07/11/2010 06:47 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> The signal-to-noise ratio in Bugzilla has definitely dropped since
> ABRT is introduced.
>
I see more activity but I am not sure it is more noise. There has been
some abrt bugs that caused debuginfo to be not generated and send
properly a
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> The signal-to-noise ratio in Bugzilla has definitely dropped since
> ABRT is introduced. Newer versions do require some text to be inserted
> before it will submit the bug report, but perhaps it has to be
> modified further to requir
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 22:15 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 11.07.2010, 10:16 -0400 schrieb Matt McCutchen:
> >
> > Most of these practical hassles would be eliminated by proper
> > integration between the downstream and upstream bug trackers to allow
> > bugs to be forwarded in o
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 01:29:39PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 11.07.2010, 06:13 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> > Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > > If you're suggesting that an upstream bug report is information needed
> > > to understand a Fedora bug, that's absurd. It's a step tak
Am Sonntag, den 11.07.2010, 10:16 -0400 schrieb Matt McCutchen:
>
> Most of these practical hassles would be eliminated by proper
> integration between the downstream and upstream bug trackers to allow
> bugs to be forwarded in one step and upstream to request additional info
> directly from the re
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Mathieu Bridon
wrote:
> On 07/11/2010 03:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>> The signal-to-noise ratio in Bugzilla has definitely dropped since
>> ABRT is introduced. Newer versions do require some text to be inserted
>> before it will submit the bug report, bu
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 7:06 AM, drago01 wrote:
>>> - Helper routines used by yum to extract dependencies
>>>
>>> - X-Windows server and libraries used for 2D and 3D display such as
>>> opengl, compiz, etc.
>> and ghostscript, poppler, ...
>> Everyone will easily suggest Firefox and OpenOffice.
2010/7/11 drago01 :
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>> 2010/7/10 drago01 :
>>> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Roberto Ragusa
>>> wrote:
Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> I would suggest doing PGO for the following:
>
> - Compression-type utilities (gz, zip,
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> 2010/7/10 drago01 :
>> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Roberto Ragusa
>> wrote:
>>> Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>>>
I would suggest doing PGO for the following:
- Compression-type utilities (gz, zip, unzip, 7zip, etc),
2010/7/10 drago01 :
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Roberto Ragusa
> wrote:
>> Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>>
>>> I would suggest doing PGO for the following:
>>>
>>> - Compression-type utilities (gz, zip, unzip, 7zip, etc),
>>> especially those libraries used by RPM to generate/process delta
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 15:52 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 09.07.2010 23:27, Andreas Tunek pisze:
> > I get Empathy crashes all the time, duplicates of
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531464, but this bug is in
> > WONTFIX status. Anyone know why?
> Actually according to my
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 13:29 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> The difference between the bug reporter and the package maintainer is:
> * The maintainer already knows the upstream bugtracker, the user
> not necessarily. [...]
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 06:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Up
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 06:13 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > If you're suggesting that an upstream bug report is information needed
> > to understand a Fedora bug, that's absurd. It's a step taken to resolve
> > the bug. Would you mark a bug INSUFFICIENT_DATA because the rep
W dniu 09.07.2010 23:27, Andreas Tunek pisze:
> I get Empathy crashes all the time, duplicates of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531464, but this bug is in
> WONTFIX status. Anyone know why?
Actually according to my abrt this did not occur for more than a month
(F-13 kept up-to-date
2010/7/11 Rudolf Kastl :
> 2010/7/11 Kevin Kofler :
>> Matt McCutchen wrote:
>>> If you're suggesting that an upstream bug report is information needed
>>> to understand a Fedora bug, that's absurd. It's a step taken to resolve
>>> the bug. Would you mark a bug INSUFFICIENT_DATA because the repor
2010/7/11 Kevin Kofler :
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
>> If you're suggesting that an upstream bug report is information needed
>> to understand a Fedora bug, that's absurd. It's a step taken to resolve
>> the bug. Would you mark a bug INSUFFICIENT_DATA because the reporter
>> didn't provide a patch?
On 07/11/2010 03:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> The signal-to-noise ratio in Bugzilla has definitely dropped since
> ABRT is introduced. Newer versions do require some text to be inserted
> before it will submit the bug report, but perhaps it has to be
> modified further to require a minimu
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:02:30 +0100, Camilo wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > Upstream wants to talk to somebody who's actually experiencing the problem,
>> > not to a forwarding monkey.
>
> It depends o
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 11/07/10 05:13, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Providing a patch is actually hard. Reporting a bug in the upstream bug
>> tracker is just a matter of filling out the form, if the reporter refuses to
>> do that, it's only pure laziness.
>>
>>
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Tom Atkinson wrote:
> I would like to take over nodm, sponsor needed.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612671
>
I've taken up the request -- coordinating with Tom now on which
package he's going to pre-review under supervision to get his
sponsorship.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
>> 2010/7/10 pbrobin...@gmail.com :
>>> Yes, but most of the Netbook side of things are from Moblin. Also if
>>> you look at a lot of the clutter/mx and other stuff they now do make
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/7/10 pbrobin...@gmail.com :
>> Yes, but most of the Netbook side of things are from Moblin. Also if
>> you look at a lot of the clutter/mx and other stuff they now do make
>> tarballs and in some cases only in the last weeks. Don't rule it ou
From denemo-0.8.18 upstream has changed license to GPLV3+.
Regards,
Roy Rankin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am Sonntag, den 11.07.2010, 06:13 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > If you're suggesting that an upstream bug report is information needed
> > to understand a Fedora bug, that's absurd. It's a step taken to resolve
> > the bug. Would you mark a bug INSUFFICIENT_DATA because
Am Sonntag, den 11.07.2010, 06:14 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > I don't know if Fedora has an official stance documented somewhere, but
> > I personally would support Eric's viewpoint. A Fedora maintainer should
> > be responsible for all the bugs in the package, even if
Alex Lancaster wrote:
>> "NB" == Neal Becker writes:
>
> NB> dblatex is up for grabs. -- devel mailing list
>
> I'll take dblatex. Doesn't seem to be orphaned in pkgdb yet, though.
>
> Alex
Done. Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:02:30 +0100, Camilo wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Upstream wants to talk to somebody who's actually experiencing the problem,
> > not to a forwarding monkey.
It depends on the project. Some projects do not want to receive reports
about pr
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Upstream wants to talk to somebody who's actually experiencing the problem,
> not to a forwarding monkey.
Really? I would have thought upstream would be grateful for any
reports, preferring that to silence. If the actual user is reporting,
go
31 matches
Mail list logo
