Re: Get rid of file requires outside of the primary paths

2010-08-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:29:35PM -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:43 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:02:13AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > I am a libguestfs user and I'm complaining. It means I have to schlep > > > down a bunch of extra info

Re: Javascript JIT in web browsers

2010-08-18 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:31 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > Shipping a Firefox with no ability to use Javascript would be more or > > less equal to not shipping it, frankly. No-one would use the thing. > > What I suggest is just to use the same old JavaScript interpreter w

Re: [HEADS-UP] python-numarray will be retired for devel/f14 in 3 days

2010-08-18 Thread Chen Lei
2010/8/19 Chen Lei : > numarray is being phased out and replaced by numpy for 4 years, two > packages will be affected after retiring python-numarray in fedora, > however both of them can also work file with numpy. > > repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires python-numarray > python-numarray-0:1.5.2-10.

[HEADS-UP] python-numarray will be retired for devel/f14 in 3 days

2010-08-18 Thread Chen Lei
numarray is being phased out and replaced by numpy for 4 years, two packages will be affected after retiring python-numarray in fedora, however both of them can also work file with numpy. repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires python-numarray python-numarray-0:1.5.2-10.fc14.x86_64 HippoDraw-devel-0:1.

Re: Get rid of file requires outside of the primary paths

2010-08-18 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:43 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:02:13AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > I am a libguestfs user and I'm complaining. It means I have to schlep > > down a bunch of extra info on every update of libguestfs and that sucks > > on my bandwidth. > >

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen patches merged to upstream Linux 2.6.36, plans for 2.6.37?

2010-08-18 Thread Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) of Singapore
Dear Pasi, Xen developers, and Han Weidong of Intel Corporation, I have made a video demonstrating Intel IGD (primary VGA adapter) VGA passthrough to Windows XP Home Edition HVM domU virtual machine with Xen 4.0.1-rc6-pre and Jeremy Fitzhardinge's pv-ops dom0 kernel 2.6.32.19 on 18 August 2010

Re: RCS keywords rewritten in dist-git conversion?

2010-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/18/10 1:31 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:43:57 -0700 > Jesse Keating wrote: >> On 8/5/10 8:02 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >>> On 02/08/10 20:53, Jesse Keating wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

Fedora 14 Alpha Declared GOLD

2010-08-18 Thread John Poelstra
At the Go/No-Go meeting a few minutes ago the Fedora 14 Alpha release was declared GOLD. Thank you to everyone who contributed to making it happen! All the details of the meeting can be found here: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-08-19/fedora-meeting.2010-08-19-00

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 18.08.10 19:35, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:00:16PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:53:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > > > > It tells me to see the logs for details, but there's not a > single message

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:00:16PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:53:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > > It tells me to see the logs for details, but there's not a single > message > > > > > from systemd in the logs. > > > > > > > > There shou

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 18.08.10 19:00, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Hmm, could be. Note that we log to kmsg as long as syslog isn't up, so > > nothing should get lost -- as long as you manage to get a shell somehow. > > > > BTW, as a side note: a simply fix to bypass the problem with a missing >

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:53:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > It tells me to see the logs for details, but there's not a single > > message > > > > from systemd in the logs. > > > > > > There should be an explanation in dmesg, that it cannot find > > default.target. >

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 18.08.10 18:45, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32:01AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 18.08.10 18:15, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > > # systemctl enable ge...@.service prefdm.service getty.target > rc-local.serv

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32:01AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 18.08.10 18:15, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > # systemctl enable ge...@.service prefdm.service getty.target > > rc-local.service remote-fs.target > > > > > > And that should make things work

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 18.08.10 18:15, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > # systemctl enable ge...@.service prefdm.service getty.target > rc-local.service remote-fs.target > > > > And that should make things work again. > > even after doing this, I still haven't managed to get a single box runnin

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:10:11AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya, > > just a little heads up for when you upgrade a rawhide system that is a > few weeks old to current rawhide: since we changed the way how some of > the default symlinks of systemd are created you will end up with an

Re: Get rid of file requires outside of the primary paths

2010-08-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:43:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trie This one too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radix_tree Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. C

Re: Get rid of file requires outside of the primary paths

2010-08-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:02:13AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > I am a libguestfs user and I'm complaining. It means I have to schlep > down a bunch of extra info on every update of libguestfs and that sucks > on my bandwidth. This is basically a hard problem to solve. We rely on copying files dire

Re: Creating private branches under fedpkg/git

2010-08-18 Thread M A Young
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: > However, since git allows you to create local branches at will without > any restrictions, one has to ask if it is still necessary to have a > remote branch for your work. I did end up creating a branch in the Fedora system because it was the only way

Re: RCS keywords rewritten in dist-git conversion?

2010-08-18 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
Paul Howarth wrote: > No changes: the heads of the f12, f13, f14 and master branches all > point to the "dist-git conversion" commit. In case it matters, these branches point to two completely separate commits; f12 has an entirely different history from f13, f14, and master as far as git is conc

Re: Upcoming Fedora 14 Tasks

2010-08-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:43 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 08/18/2010 10:06 AM, John Poelstra wrote: > > Orion Poplawski said the following on 08/16/2010 08:39 PM Pacific Time: > >> Perhaps it makes sense to be posting F-15 tasks as well? > >> > > > > What would the Fedora 15 tasks be besides,

Re: RCS keywords rewritten in dist-git conversion?

2010-08-18 Thread Paul Howarth
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:43:57 -0700 Jesse Keating wrote: > On 8/5/10 8:02 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > > On 02/08/10 20:53, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> On 08/02/2010 11:55 AM, Adam Goode wrote: > >>> Didn't want this to get lost, thanks for fi

Re: New bodhi release in production

2010-08-18 Thread Kevin Kofler
Thomas Janssen wrote: > Another BTW, if you think you have to write "something", a simple > 'thank you for stepping up' would have been enough. Well, yes, thank you for stepping up, your help is very much appreciated! I didn't mean to offend you! (And thanks to Rex Dieter as well, by the way.)

Re: New bodhi release in production

2010-08-18 Thread Thomas Janssen
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Thomas Janssen wrote: >> I'm part of the KDE SIG. I will apply today for proventester to become >> the KDE proventester. > > Actually, Rex Dieter already started the application process, so you'll > probably become "a" KDE proventester, not "t

Re: New bodhi release in production

2010-08-18 Thread Kevin Kofler
Thomas Janssen wrote: > I'm part of the KDE SIG. I will apply today for proventester to become > the KDE proventester. Actually, Rex Dieter already started the application process, so you'll probably become "a" KDE proventester, not "the" KDE proventester. ;-) But the more proventesters we have,

Re: New bodhi release in production

2010-08-18 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > To me, that reads more like a problem with the update submission system > than anything. I'd like to see far fewer restrictions on it (just like > I'd like for koji), so you could edit the existing update to add your > packages. This same issue exists even without feedback

Re: Release bumps scripts caution

2010-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/18/10 12:24 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:04:33 -0700, Jesse wrote: > >> The bump script lives in releng git repo (git.fedorahosted.org/releng if >> anybody wants to hack on it. > > Sure about that? All I could find there

Re: Release bumps scripts caution

2010-08-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:04:33 -0700, Jesse wrote: > The bump script lives in releng git repo (git.fedorahosted.org/releng if > anybody wants to hack on it. Sure about that? All I could find there was a reference to rpmdev-bumpspec (part of "rpmdevtools" package nowadays). The older script's home i

Re: Release bumps scripts caution

2010-08-18 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:04:33 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > This likely happened because the original release string was non-conformant. I missed that. After that happened it looks like the release string did get changed to be conformant. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: Release bumps scripts caution

2010-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/18/10 11:49 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Release bump scripts bumping release version numbers for prereleases should > be handled more carefully or they can cause update problems later on. > For example xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.13.1-0.20100705git37b3480

Re: fedpkg local redefines %fedora macro

2010-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/9/10 6:54 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > Hello, > > while working on `nas' package I found `fedpkg local' redefines > `fedora' macro to value `1'. Dist-cvs `make local' does not do that. > Original source for %fedora is /etc/rpm/macros.dist. See the str

Release bumps scripts caution

2010-08-18 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Release bump scripts bumping release version numbers for prereleases should be handled more carefully or they can cause update problems later on. For example xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.13.1-0.20100705git37b348059.fc14 got bumped to xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.13.1-1.20100705git37b348059.fc14 and then later xorg-x11

Re: RCS keywords rewritten in dist-git conversion?

2010-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/5/10 8:02 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 02/08/10 20:53, Jesse Keating wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 08/02/2010 11:55 AM, Adam Goode wrote: >>> Didn't want this to get lost, thanks for fixing this on IRC, but I

Re: Creating private branches under fedpkg/git

2010-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/4/10 3:01 PM, M A Young wrote: > What is the policy on creating private branches under fedpkg/git? Can it > be done by anyone with acl commit or do you need special permissions? > > My interest is that I had a private branch of the kernel packag

Re: F14 Question: AVerMedia AVerTV Volar Black HD/-A850 availability

2010-08-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 05:40 -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > So I copied dvb-usb-af9015.fw from some UBUNTU installation to > > /lib/firmware, and I could watch digital TV with kaffeine. > > > > So my question: would it be possible to support that stick in >= F15 > > versions? > > AFAIK this fi

Re: Upcoming Fedora 14 Tasks

2010-08-18 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 08/18/2010 10:06 AM, John Poelstra wrote: > Orion Poplawski said the following on 08/16/2010 08:39 PM Pacific Time: >> Perhaps it makes sense to be posting F-15 tasks as well? >> > > What would the Fedora 15 tasks be besides, "Do awesome stuff in the > 'rawhide' branch?" :-) That might be it -

Re: Upcoming Fedora 14 Tasks

2010-08-18 Thread John Poelstra
Orion Poplawski said the following on 08/16/2010 08:39 PM Pacific Time: > Perhaps it makes sense to be posting F-15 tasks as well? > What would the Fedora 15 tasks be besides, "Do awesome stuff in the 'rawhide' branch?" :-) I can certainly draft a Fedora 15 version of the schedule if people are

Re: Upcoming Fedora 14 Tasks

2010-08-18 Thread Orion Poplawski
Perhaps it makes sense to be posting F-15 tasks as well? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.c

[389-devel] Please Review: (620927) Allow multiple membership attributes for one memberof attribute in memberof plugin

2010-08-18 Thread Nathan Kinder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620927 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=439237&action=edit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=439237&action=diff -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev

F-14 Branched report: 20100818 changes

2010-08-18 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Wed Aug 18 13:15:15 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0 CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-0

Re: Get rid of file requires outside of the primary paths

2010-08-18 Thread seth vidal
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:10:29PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote: > > Fedora Engineering Services > > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Engineering_Services) received > > request to get rid of file requires outside of the primary paths > >

Re: Get rid of file requires outside of the primary paths

2010-08-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:10:29PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote: > Fedora Engineering Services > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Engineering_Services) received > request to get rid of file requires outside of the primary paths > (https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/ticket/31). > >

rawhide report: 20100818 changes

2010-08-18 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Wed Aug 18 08:15:08 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

Re: Too late to merge unix2dos/dos2unix?

2010-08-18 Thread drago01
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Tim Waugh wrote: > The unix2dos and dos2unix packages have merged upstream and I've been > sent a spec file that upgrades dos2unix to the new upstream version.  It > correctly obsoletes the unix2dos package. > > Is it too late in the Fedora 14 cycle to bring this

Too late to merge unix2dos/dos2unix?

2010-08-18 Thread Tim Waugh
The unix2dos and dos2unix packages have merged upstream and I've been sent a spec file that upgrades dos2unix to the new upstream version. It correctly obsoletes the unix2dos package. Is it too late in the Fedora 14 cycle to bring this package in (and retire unix2dos)? Tim. */ signature.asc D

Re: F14 Question: AVerMedia AVerTV Volar Black HD/-A850 availability

2010-08-18 Thread Joachim Backes
On 08/18/2010 11:40 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: So I copied dvb-usb-af9015.fw from some UBUNTU installation to /lib/firmware, and I could watch digital TV with kaffeine. So my question: would it be possible to support that stick in>= F15 versions? AFAIK this firmware seems not to be free. M

Re: F14 Question: AVerMedia AVerTV Volar Black HD/-A850 availability

2010-08-18 Thread Jaroslav Skarvada
> So I copied dvb-usb-af9015.fw from some UBUNTU installation to > /lib/firmware, and I could watch digital TV with kaffeine. > > So my question: would it be possible to support that stick in >= F15 > versions? AFAIK this firmware seems not to be free. > Nice query. I have a AVerTV Hybrid Volar H

Re: F14 Question: AVerMedia AVerTV Volar Black HD/-A850 availability

2010-08-18 Thread Thomas Janssen
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi, > > I have the impression that the  DVBT-USB stick mentioned in the subject line > is not supported by F14. After plugging in, I got an error msg: missing > firmware file in /lib/firmware: > > ===

F14 Question: AVerMedia AVerTV Volar Black HD/-A850 availability

2010-08-18 Thread Joachim Backes
Hi, I have the impression that the DVBT-USB stick mentioned in the subject line is not supported by F14. After plugging in, I got an error msg: missing firmware file in /lib/firmware: == Aug 17 16:13:56 localhost kernel: dvb

Re: Checkout entire release with git

2010-08-18 Thread Andreas Schwab
David Woodhouse writes: > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:22 +0200, Till Maas wrote: >> This is how I did it for CVS, I did not yet implement this for git: >> http://blogs.23.nu/till/2008/12/ssh-via-cvs-with-automatic-control-socket-support/ > > https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1330 has a mu