On 09/07/2010 07:32 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 18:20 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>
>> ??? This was done 100% Fedora-side (not that I mind if it were adopted
>> by other distros)
>
> Ok, lets go with another example of integration then: file-roller can
> use PackageKit to
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 17:41 -0700, J. Randall Owens wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 05:33 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> >Problem with yum - I cannot seem to find the equivalent of the --test
> > rpm option ?
Well you can do:
yum blah --setopt=tsflags=test
...which is exactly --test, including running
Dear package maintainers
This is kind reminder.
It was software translation deadline on 2010-09-07, and many languages
translation have been updated or completed 100%. Please make sure latest
translation are picked up for rebuilding packages. It is expected to
rebuild all translated packages be
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:06:57PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:56:23AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > I just hit this on an f13 box.
> >
> > Transaction Check Error:
> > package libgcc-4.4.4-11.fc12.x86_64 (which is newer than
> > libgcc-4.4.4-10.fc13.i686) is a
On 09/07/2010 05:33 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 12:52 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
>
>>>
>> Gene,
>>
>> There is in now nss-3.12.7-4.fc13 in bodhi.
>> Regarding
>>
>> error: Failed dependencies:
>> pkgconfig(nss) is needed by (installed)
>> evolution-data-server-devel-2.30.3-1.fc
On 09/07/2010 05:33 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 12:52 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
>
>> Gene,
>>
>> There is in now nss-3.12.7-4.fc13 in bodhi.
>> Regarding
>>
>> error: Failed dependencies:
>> pkgconfig(nss) is needed by (installed)
>> evolution-data-server-devel-2.30.3-1.fc13.x8
On 09/07/2010 12:52 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
>>
> Gene,
>
> There is in now nss-3.12.7-4.fc13 in bodhi.
> Regarding
>
> error: Failed dependencies:
> pkgconfig(nss) is needed by (installed)
> evolution-data-server-devel-2.30.3-1.fc13.x86_64
>
> You could try a 'sudo yum update --verbo
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 19:24:58 -0400,
Neal Becker wrote:
> I need to make a minor edit to one of the sources of a package. I want the
> sources on my machine in a state so that emacs will recognize the files are
> under git control and act accordingly, so I can do my edits and use emacs
>
Hi All,
How do the bodhi 7 days timeframes for updates work? My understanding
is that an update is required to be in updates for 7 days. I have an
update that according to bodhi was submitted as an update on the 29th
Aug at 18:13. It was pushed to updates-testing at 19:42 the following
day (Aug 30
I need to make a minor edit to one of the sources of a package. I want the
sources on my machine in a state so that emacs will recognize the files are
under git control and act accordingly, so I can do my edits and use emacs
vc-mode stuff to commit, diff, etc. I tried using fedpkg clone + fedp
Quote from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria:
All other updates must either:
· reach the criteria laid out in the previous section OR
· reach the positive Bodhi karma threshold specified by the updates
submitter OR
· spend some minimum amount of time in
In addition, to next Tuesday (2010-09-14) being the Feature Complete
deadline for Fedora 14, it is also the Beta Change Deadline.
"At the change deadline, pushes to the branched development repository
are suspended until the release candidate is accepted."
More about what this means is here:
ht
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:51:30PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> How does that manage to build in Koji, which doesn't exactly have bigger
> systems, just more of them.
Koji doesn't use tmpfs for the buildroots, nor does it time out builds
after 6 hours like I do...
--
Matt Domsch
Technology Stra
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:02:05PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 09/06/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> > paraview-3.8.0-4.fc14 (build/make) orion,pertusus
>>
>> Sorry [Errno 28] No space left on device
>>
>> Looks like a check for th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/7/10 2:41 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 03:34 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:02:05PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
paraview-3.8.0-4.fc14 (build/make) orion,pert
On 09/07/2010 03:34 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:02:05PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 09/06/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
>>> paraview-3.8.0-4.fc14 (build/make) orion,pertusus
>>
>> Sorry [Errno 28] No space left on device
>>
>> Looks like a check for that is in or
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:02:05PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 09/06/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > paraview-3.8.0-4.fc14 (build/make) orion,pertusus
>
> Sorry [Errno 28] No space left on device
>
> Looks like a check for that is in order.
Holy cow. So, 8GB RAM, 16GB swap, over 4
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-09-07)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 19:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-07/fesco.2010-09-07-19.30.log.html
..
Meeting summary
---
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 02:40:37AM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Matt Domsch wrote, at 09/07/2010 11:24 AM +9:00:
> > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> > using rawhide from 2010-09-01
> >
> > Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two
> > additional time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631068
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631078
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630539
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630539
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On 7 September 2010 17:32, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> And BTW a request at the time was to extend it with font previews to get
>> a "font store" (because for fonts, gfx preview is really relevant and
>> not eye candy) and it never happened :(
>
> If you send a patch it might !
A patch would be lov
On 7 September 2010 17:20, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> ??? This was done 100% Fedora-side (not that I mind if it were adopted
> by other distros)
Incorrect. It was done on the Fedora transifex instance, but I know
from fact that a few of the translators are from other distros, who
have no interest i
Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Would you clarify if this build results are for rawhide (i.e. F-15)
> tree or for F-14 tree?
It looks like F-14 to me.
Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
Matt Domsch wrote:
> rombobeorn: PragmARC,mine_detector
Those fail because of this GCC bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613407
I have a workaround in updates-testing, but the actual bug looks like it will
last long.
Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 16:57 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> I was participating in the Systemd Fedora Test Day and installed the
> latest Fedora 14 build. I found a few problems (I will file bugs) but
> before I file a bug about NetworkManager, can someone please tell me how
> I'm supposed to configur
Folks,
I was participating in the Systemd Fedora Test Day and installed the
latest Fedora 14 build. I found a few problems (I will file bugs) but
before I file a bug about NetworkManager, can someone please tell me how
I'm supposed to configure it during install such that the interface will
come u
Toshio Kuratomi writes:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:56:23AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>> Could the buildsystem be changed to prevent newer NVRs from being
>> built if an older one exists in a newer buildroot ? Should it ? Is
>> there a valid reason for ever allowing this to happen?
> The buildsys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630714
--- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth 2010-09-07 16:03:16 EDT ---
Clearly my perl-fu is not as strong as yours ;-)
--
Configure bug
On 09/06/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for i386
> using rawhide from 2010-09-01
>
> Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two
> additional times. Those listed below have failed at least three
> attempts to build.
>
> Sorry I
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:56:23AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> I just hit this on an f13 box.
>
> Transaction Check Error:
> package libgcc-4.4.4-11.fc12.x86_64 (which is newer than
> libgcc-4.4.4-10.fc13.i686) is already installed
>
>
> Could the buildsystem be changed to prevent newer NVRs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630714
Ville Skyttä changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
seth vidal fedoraproject.org> writes:
> http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/CompareProviders
>
> that's how it does it.
Thanks. I didn't understand all of that, but since it only describes the current
algorithm in detail, and the instructions refer to all versions of Fedora back
to F10, and I still don
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-GD-2.44-4.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631391
Summary: FTBFS perl-GD-2.44-4.fc14
Product: Fedora
Version: 1
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 18:24 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> When installing packages with yum, if there is more than one enabled
> repository
> that can be used to resolve a dependency, how does yum choose which one to
> use?
>
> I ask because I modified the instructions for installing the 32-bit
When installing packages with yum, if there is more than one enabled repository
that can be used to resolve a dependency, how does yum choose which one to use?
I ask because I modified the instructions for installing the 32-bit wrapped
Flash plugin in 64-bit Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
I believe this has it as well.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/NewPackageProcess
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello all,
I have recently discovered I am still owner of pam_smb :-) and I think
I would like to retire this package entirely, for I find it useless and
even dangerous.
If someone is interested in picking up maintainership because they need
it I am also willing to just orphan it.
Any takers ? I
Matt Domsch wrote, at 09/07/2010 11:24 AM +9:00:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2010-09-01
>
> Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two
> additional times. Those listed below have failed at least three
> attempts to build.
>
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-DBD-Multi-0.14-6.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631224
Summary: FTBFS perl-DBD-Multi-0.14-6.fc14
Product: Fedora
From viewpoint of the package freemarker-2.3.13-8.fc14 the issue is in
the package javamail-1.4.3-2.fc13.src.rpm:
"...
Internal error in the plugin manager executing goal
'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.7:javadoc':
Unable to load the mojo
'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javado
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Log-Log4perl-1.24-3.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631192
Summary: FTBFS perl-Log-Log4perl-1.24-3.fc14
Product: Fedora
On 09/06/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2010-09-01
>
> Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two
> additional times. Those listed below have failed at least three
> attempts to build.
>
> Sorry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Perl-Critic-1.105-4.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631166
Summary: FTBFS perl-Perl-Critic-1.105-4.fc14
Product: Fedora
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:23:47PM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > This is goes along with the only definition of application that I am
> > aware of. Postifx is a system service.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_software
>
> Application software, also known as an application, is c
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> probably on 2010-09-09 the Bugzilla URL to create new Fedora Review
> Requests will change to remove one more relict of the former Fedora Core
> / Extras split. The new URL will be:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS ocaml-deriving-0.1.1a-10.fc13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631141
Summary: FTBFS ocaml-deriving-0.1.1a-10.fc13
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-RRD-Simple-1.44-7.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631131
Summary: FTBFS perl-RRD-Simple-1.44-7.fc14
Product: Fedora
Hi,
probably on 2010-09-09 the Bugzilla URL to create new Fedora Review
Requests will change to remove one more relict of the former Fedora Core
/ Extras split. The new URL will be:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=fedora-review
Please remember to update your bookm
On 09/06/2010 10:39 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 09/06/2010 01:14 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 09/06/2010 05:22 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
There is a build in koji for 3.12.7 for f13 (and f14):
http://koji
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-4.fc13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631112
Summary: FTBFS ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-4.fc13
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS ocaml-cil-1.3.7-6.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631074
Summary: FTBFS ocaml-cil-1.3.7-6.fc14
Product: Fedora
Vers
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 18:20 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 09:51 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
>
> > It gets us translations that we would not otherwise have, and it gets us
> > integration in the rest of the desktop, like automatic font or codec
> > installation.
Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 18:20 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 09:51 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
>
> > It gets us translations that we would not otherwise have, and it gets us
> > integration in the rest of the desktop, like automatic font or codec
> > inst
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 11:48 -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:39 AM, James Antill wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 15:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> >> On 7 September 2010 15:23, James Antill wrote:
> >> > Are you having any discussions about applications like postfix
Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 09:51 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> It gets us translations that we would not otherwise have, and it gets us
> integration in the rest of the desktop, like automatic font or codec
> installation.
??? This was done 100% Fedora-side (not that I mind if it were ado
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Test-Email-0.04-5.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631042
Summary: FTBFS perl-Test-Email-0.04-5.fc14
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS pcsc-perl-1.4.8-3.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631032
Summary: FTBFS pcsc-perl-1.4.8-3.fc14
Product: Fedora
Vers
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 16:54 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 7 September 2010 16:39, James Antill wrote:
> > However this is very much the same problem as a user trying to find
> > "sql server" and getting results like "voms-mysql-plugin" etc. If you
> > intentionally ignore this problem, it jus
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:56:23AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> I just hit this on an f13 box.
>
> Transaction Check Error:
> package libgcc-4.4.4-11.fc12.x86_64 (which is newer than
> libgcc-4.4.4-10.fc13.i686) is already installed
>
>
> Could the buildsystem be changed to prevent newer NVRs
I just hit this on an f13 box.
Transaction Check Error:
package libgcc-4.4.4-11.fc12.x86_64 (which is newer than
libgcc-4.4.4-10.fc13.i686) is already installed
Could the buildsystem be changed to prevent newer NVRs from being built if an
older
one exists in a newer buildroot ? Should it ?
On 7 September 2010 16:39, James Antill wrote:
> However this is very much the same problem as a user trying to find
> "sql server" and getting results like "voms-mysql-plugin" etc. If you
> intentionally ignore this problem, it just means even more work in the
> long term as we have to change th
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:39 AM, James Antill wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 15:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> On 7 September 2010 15:23, James Antill wrote:
>> > Are you having any discussions about applications like postfix, or is
>> > version 2 going to be just GUI stuff?
>>
>> Postfix is
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 15:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 7 September 2010 15:23, James Antill wrote:
> > Are you having any discussions about applications like postfix, or is
> > version 2 going to be just GUI stuff?
>
> Postfix is not an application. Applications have translated desktop
>
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
On Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 10:42:54 AM, Richard wrote:
> On 7 September 2010 15:23, James Antill wrote:
> This isn't repodata, it's a separate data package. You /could/ push
> the icons.tar.gz and desktop sqlite database as repodata, although
> it's not going to change for the duration of eac
Compose started at Tue Sep 7 13:15:51 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630802
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-09-07 11:00:10
EDT ---
Why did you reset this BZ's priority?
This bug
a) breaks build
On 7 September 2010 15:23, James Antill wrote:
> Are you having any discussions about applications like postfix, or is
> version 2 going to be just GUI stuff?
Postfix is not an application. Applications have translated desktop
files and icons.
> I assume you have a plan for making this repodat
Hello Feature People,
According to our schedule, seven days from today is Feature Complete for
Fedora 14.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/14/Schedule
On September 14, 2010, all features must be 100% complete (not including
bug fixes). Features that are not 100% complete will be sent t
bluefish's license has changed to GPLv3+ from 2.0.2-rc1, which will be
landing in Rawhide soon.
Paul.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 14:17 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 7 September 2010 14:11, seth vidal wrote:
> > okay - I'll bite - why do we want to make it less distro-specific?
>
> For the same reason as pirut and pup were replaced. Fedora is *not* a
> big enough ecosystem to drive fully localized
On 09/07/2010 04:51 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 09:39 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>>
>> So all the time you spent writing a compat layer of code for OTHER
>> distros gets fedora what?
>
> It gets us translations that we would not otherwise have, and it gets us
> integration in t
Start End Name
Mon 06-Sep Fri 10-Sep Daily Review & Notification of Open Beta Blocker
Bugs
Tue 07-Sep Tue 07-Sep Software: Start Rebuild all translated packages
Tue 07-Sep Tue 14-Sep Software: Rebuild all translated packages
Thu 09-Sep Thu 09-Sep Create Beta Test Compose (TC)
Hi,
>> Well, until now: mock-scm fetches spec and other files from SCM and
>> source packages either from SCM or a local directory, then it constructs
>> the source RPM on the fly and feeds it to Mock and finally collects the
>> results. So nothing extraordinary but might come in handy for those w
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:01:40AM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote:
> Certainly we would welcome more detail. You should feel free to provide
> it on the wiki.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Boot
*nod*
> I'm less sure about moving it. Since there were no other significant
> changes
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 09:39 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 14:17 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 7 September 2010 14:11, seth vidal wrote:
> > > okay - I'll bite - why do we want to make it less distro-specific?
> >
> > For the same reason as pirut and pup were replaced. Fed
On 7 September 2010 14:39, seth vidal wrote:
> Except we don't seem to do that. Over half of all commits to PK are from
> you. The next closest committer has 6% of commits. If I exclude the
> backends and translations then PK is written almost exclusively by you.
I'm not sure I get your logic. Lo
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 14:17 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 7 September 2010 14:11, seth vidal wrote:
> > okay - I'll bite - why do we want to make it less distro-specific?
>
> For the same reason as pirut and pup were replaced. Fedora is *not* a
> big enough ecosystem to drive fully localized
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 09:01 -0400, Christopher Antila wrote:
> Hi John:
>
> I made changes to (i.e. "finally completed") the KDE portion of the
> wiki's "Desktop" beat a few days ago, and they are not in the draft. I
> will add these to the git version today/tonight. If there's anything
> that I
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 09:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 09:11 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 17:27 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > On 09/07/2010 05:16 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > > Linux has traditionally shown the user packages to update and ins
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 09:11 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 17:27 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 09/07/2010 05:16 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > Linux has traditionally shown the user packages to update and install,
> > > which is great for administrators, but sucks hard for
On 7 September 2010 14:11, seth vidal wrote:
> okay - I'll bite - why do we want to make it less distro-specific?
For the same reason as pirut and pup were replaced. Fedora is *not* a
big enough ecosystem to drive fully localized and feature rich user
experiences. Working with other distros mean
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 17:27 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 05:16 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Linux has traditionally shown the user packages to update and install,
> > which is great for administrators, but sucks hard for end users. How
> > many times have you been prompted with an
2010/9/7 Miloslav Trmač :
> Um, do I understand this correctly that e.g. a kernel update usually
> won't get installed because it belongs in "system infrastructure" and
> few packages depend on "kernel"?
By default, all updates will be selected, even those in the system
infrastructure group.
Rich
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 00:14 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:45:53AM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote:
> > A number of beats were blank, and some of them probably should be, but I
> > left them in the document for now as a reminder in case you are aware of
> > something that
2010/9/7 Miloslav Trmač :
> Richard Hughes píše v Út 07. 09. 2010 v 12:46 +0100:
>> The updater will be an improved version of the old package updater,
>> and anything that's not an application (e.g. PackageKit-libs-devel)
>> will be under a group (not shown in the screenshot) called "System
>> inf
Richard Hughes píše v Út 07. 09. 2010 v 12:46 +0100:
> The updater will be an improved version of the old package updater,
> and anything that's not an application (e.g. PackageKit-libs-devel)
> will be under a group (not shown in the screenshot) called "System
> infrastructure". If you update an
On 7 September 2010 12:57, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Thoughts on making the software center less distro specific? Couldn't
> the UI be grafted on top of the PK api?
app-install is completely distro-neutral. GNOME PackageKit and
KPackageKit get the same kind of data from app-install for each
distro
Hi,
i tested today why stfl FTBFS. I found out that it doesn't installs a
file into /usr/lib.. but lib/..
That happens just for the ruby part of stfl, the perl parts getting
installed into /usr/lib.. just fine.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2450778&name=build.log
I checked (t
On 09/07/2010 05:16 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Linux has traditionally shown the user packages to update and install,
> which is great for administrators, but sucks hard for end users. How
> many times have you been prompted with an update list that asks you to
> decide whether to update somethin
Compose started at Tue Sep 7 08:15:37 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
RackTables-0.18.4-1.fc15.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
claws-mail-plugins-g
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555448
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Linux has traditionally shown the user packages to update and install,
which is great for administrators, but sucks hard for end users. How
many times have you been prompted with an update list that asks you to
decide whether to update something you have no idea about[1]?
Mo illustrated[2] a few d
Bojan Smojver rexursive.com> writes:
> PS. I'm not a package maintainer, so I cannot actually do that.
I meant to say I'm not _the_ package maintainer, so I cannot change this
package.
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
Attention all Proven Testers (and all testers, too!) Please note this
addition to the proven tester procedure:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Proven_tester&diff=195994&oldid=193694
basically, an update not fixing a bug it claims to fix is not a cause
for negative karma unless it's th
Parag N(पराग़ gmail.com> writes:
> I just saw this new build is installing .a and .la files. If .a files
> are needed then -static subpackage should be created and .la files
> must not be packaged.
I'm guessing you are referring to the libka-plugin-dummy stuff. I would venture
a guess that these
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:29 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>> Could someone with enough karma rebuild krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13
>> (this is in relation to bug #597669). The 0.15 is leaking memory like
>> there is no tomorrow and I'm not
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
