Seems generally reasonable to me.
Is there a definition somewhere of what constitutes a critical path
update?
Eric
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I was trying to find out why is coin3d version 3.1.3 (latest stable
version) and its python binding (pivy) not in fedora. All I managed to
get was a bugzilla thread
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multipleid=458975
which was talking about getting coin3d version 3 for Fedora.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:01:04PM -0700, Eric Smith wrote:
Seems generally reasonable to me.
Is there a definition somewhere of what constitutes a critical path
update?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_path_packages#Where_can_I_find_the_critical_path.3F
--
Tomasz Torcz
On 09/22/2010 08:32 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to find out why is coin3d version 3.1.3 (latest stable
version) and its python binding (pivy) not in fedora. All I managed to
get was a bugzilla thread
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multipleid=458975
which was
On 22 September 2010 13:29, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 09/22/2010 08:32 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to find out why is coin3d version 3.1.3 (latest stable
version) and its python binding (pivy) not in fedora. All I managed to
get was a bugzilla thread
On 09/22/2010 10:38 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote:
On 22 September 2010 13:29, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 09/22/2010 08:32 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to find out why is coin3d version 3.1.3 (latest stable
version) and its python binding (pivy) not in fedora. All I
On 22 September 2010 14:24, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 09/22/2010 10:38 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote:
On 22 September 2010 13:29, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 09/22/2010 08:32 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to find out why is coin3d version 3.1.3
On 09/22/2010 11:06 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote:
On 22 September 2010 14:24, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 09/22/2010 10:38 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote:
On 22 September 2010 13:29, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.dewrote:
On 09/22/2010 08:32 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote:
Hi,
I was
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
As the concept of using third party repositories (both as packagers and as
users) grows, this interdependence will grow.
Ok, so
2010/9/22 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
Maybe we should turn this around and ask why more people don't
use Rawhide.
Maybe because when I installed rawhide I lost my desktop icons? :)
IMHO rawhide isn't the right answer for most users who wants just one new app.
Rich.
Regards,
Michal
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 15:47 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates policy
draft page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft
How can
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This is reasonably easy to fix: we should do some testing and withhold
packages from Rawhide if they don't pass some basic sanity checks
(eg. does it boot, can an X server be started).
That's basically the proven testers process,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
As the concept of using third party repositories (both
Hi,
I know I can do the likes of
export CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -blah and it will pass whatever CFLAGS is plus
the argument -blah to the compiler.
How do I do this with LDFLAGS. I'm trying to pass --build-id using
export LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS --build-id
It's about the only way I can get mono to build
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:06 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi
Compose started at Wed Sep 22 08:15:25 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
On 09/22/2010 02:08 PM, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I know I can do the likes of
export CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -blah and it will pass whatever CFLAGS is plus
the argument -blah to the compiler.
How do I do this with LDFLAGS.
Depends on a build-system's internals.
I'm trying to pass --build-id
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
[snip]
Exactly - That's why I am wondering if the page you cite above is an
outdated place holder or if this page current and brand new.
It looks like the project updated its version number to 4.0.0a last year:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 08:20 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
That's why I propose an easy way to install additional repos. I can't
see a non tech savvy user installing the chromium browser on fedora,
to be brutally honest. It's annoying having to hold their hand and
walk them through it. I don't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-09-22 09:06:14 EDT ---
perl(File::HomeDir) = 0.91 is needed (upgrade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636514
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/22/2010 05:06 AM, drago01 wrote:
Well use rawhide for anything else than testing and/or developing
the new release just do not fly.
Some of the reasons I can think of:
1) To high rate of changes / breakage
Not much one can do on this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/22/2010 04:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This is reasonably easy to fix: we should do some testing and withhold
packages from Rawhide if they don't pass some basic sanity checks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: JSON-XS-2.3 bump
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636518
Summary: JSON-XS-2.3 bump
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636518
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-09-22 09:18:58 EDT ---
perl(JSON::XS) = 2.29 is needed (upgrade requested
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:07:24PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This is reasonably easy to fix: we should do some testing and withhold
packages from Rawhide if they don't pass some basic sanity checks
(eg. does it boot, can an
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:06:12PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi
I should add that whether this testing happens in Koji or in AutoQA
isn't material. AutoQA is probably better. *Provided* that if the
basic sanity tests fail they must prevent the packages from going into
the Rawhide compose.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 12:48 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 15:47 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates policy
draft page:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream:
9a893347401af6e1c40b22c72d92b383 Wx-Perl-ProcessStream-0.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d88ff6c709b6cfa9304002f8f9ca061da3d05381
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Sep 22 15:34:10 2010 +0200
- update, works with Wx 0.97
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream.spec |9 ++---
sources |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636518
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636471
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I should add that whether this testing happens in Koji or in AutoQA
isn't material. AutoQA is probably better. *Provided* that if the
basic sanity tests fail they must prevent the packages from going into
the
something like sidux, but fedora based im thinking
stable f14 with the goodies stable vision blocks because people want
stale software, and i'd rather not use rawhide or opensuse
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/22/2010 08:08 AM, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I know I can do the likes of
export CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -blah and it will pass whatever CFLAGS is plus
the argument -blah to the compiler.
How do I do this with LDFLAGS. I'm trying to pass
Meeting minutes from our second meeting. I reordered our wiki a bit to
accomodate future meeting minutes and agendas (thanks to KDE SIG for
template :-) )
I would like to know how many people wanted to attend but couldn't
because of time. There are about 2x as many people written on our SIG
page
On Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 8:06:12 AM, drag01 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:01 +0200,
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
- Avoid changing the user experence if at all possible. - this is too
strong condition. In some cases fixing a bug might inevitable change the
user experience and in some cases for example the user experience might
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-09-22 10:08:46 EDT ---
perl(threads::shared) = 1.33 is needed (upgrade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
This example is IMO wrong:
- WebKit requires an update to solve a security problem. This requires
updating Midori to a version with some minor menu layout changes. This
would be a judgement call based on how intrusive the
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 15:18 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
4) To much of manual fixing required
5) To many broken deps, which might prevent applying updates and security
fixes
6) Some others that I can't think of right now might be a consequence
of the above or something else
I think
On Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 6:19:28 PM, Jesse wrote:
On 09/22/2010 04:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This is reasonably easy to fix: we should do some testing and withhold
packages from Rawhide if they don't pass some basic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-09-22 10:16:46 EDT ---
Created attachment 448944
--
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:24:38 +0100,
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I use Rawhide on my laptop and one of my servers, so I'll tell you the
answer to this: because critical components such as the kernel are
often broken. IME this is because there is no testing of these
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 09/22/2010 08:08 AM, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
I know I can do the likes of
export CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -blah and it will pass whatever CFLAGS is plus
the argument -blah to the compiler.
How do I do this with LDFLAGS. I'm trying to pass --build-id using
export
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 14:06:12 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of the reasons I can think of:
2) No signed packages
There is a plan to deal with that, but I am not sure what its current
status is.
5) To many broken deps, which might prevent applying updates and security
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:59:51 -0400,
Al Dunsmuir al.dunsm...@sympatico.ca wrote:
If a second rawhide-specific staging repository (equivalent to
updates-testing, so call it rawhide-testing) was added with some
autoqa automation to prevent gratuitous problems (such as
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:34:34 +0100,
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
No, I think you are wrong.
First of all, I can see no benefit in pushing a package that cannot do
its basic function to Rawhide. Even in Rawhide, no one wants a kernel
that doesn't boot, even if in some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/22/2010 04:14 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 6:19:28 PM, Jesse wrote:
On 09/22/2010 04:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This is reasonably easy to fix: we
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 16:09 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
This example is IMO wrong:
- WebKit requires an update to solve a security problem. This requires
updating Midori to a version with some minor menu layout changes.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPIx-Regexp:
2c315aa4603e511cc9f4f69a535bb02f PPIx-Regexp-0.011.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 429bb74e17b0e3b7a2e25331ae43097727dbc1b7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Sep 22 17:01:26 2010 +0200
0.011 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec | 14 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636514
--- Comment #1 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-09-22
10:57:28 EDT ---
Petr, I'd be happy to let you co-maintain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/22/2010 04:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
That would likely be an improvement, but have you thought through the
interaction issues? Builds are rarely standalone, so we need to figure
out which builds go with which other builds so they can be
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200,
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
I say that the example of Webkit should be removed because if it is not
possible to backport the security patch and due to the version update
Midori has to be updated to a new version regardless of the changes of
user
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:05:30 +0200,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what
we have now.
The other case to consider is two updates in rawhide-pending that each
are OK with rawhide, but which together have dependency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/22/2010 05:07 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:05:30 +0200,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what
we have now.
The other case to consider is
Jesse Keating wrote:
It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what
we have now.
I'm still not going to use rawhide. There would have to be a kernel
without debugging before I would even think of using it for my home or
work systems. I have a need for speed. :P
--
Compose started at Wed Sep 22 13:15:39 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636514
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634899
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what
we have now.
I'm still not going to use rawhide. There would have to be a kernel
without debugging before I would even think of using
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200,
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
I say that the example of Webkit should be removed because if it is not
possible to backport the security patch and due to the version update
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:04 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200,
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
I say that the example of Webkit should be removed because if it is not
possible to backport the security patch and due to the version update
Midori has
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:27:43 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200,
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
I say that the example of Webkit should be removed because if it is
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:51:01 +0200,
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
Of course, the issue might be very minor, but in that case it is not a
judgement call based on how intrusive thec changes are but judgement
call on whether the pros and cons of doing the update are significantly
in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635235
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:22:45PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what
we have now.
I'm still not going to use rawhide. There would have
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:27:43 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200,
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:22:45PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBD-CSV:
50918cc0ed58dd38df462398a16adc36 DBD-CSV-0.31.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8cd85a626a4a8f8b8d9c48d2d0ed9b587ee30029
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Sep 22 19:12:09 2010 +0200
0.31 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-DBD-CSV.spec | 24 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 18:58:25 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
In case of a security issue a random note somewhere don't do that is
not acceptable ... that's all I am saying here.
You are leaving users at risk by assuming that they will read that
notice (note: most wont).
I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635235
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-STD:
fc84fda3b80eef3708d8a51dfcb9a5ba STD-32116.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:25:25PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700
Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com wrote:
A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I
added a patch to resolve it and submitted an update. After seven
days with no
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:14:47 +0100
Alex Hudson fed...@alexhudson.com wrote:
Hey Kevin,
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 15:47 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
How can we clarify the language or the layout of the page to be more
clear? Are there places that it could be more like the existing
package
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:12:54 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 18:58:25 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
In case of a security issue a random note somewhere don't do that
is not acceptable ... that's all I am saying here.
You are leaving users
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:06:42 -0400
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
You've obviously spent a lot of time thinking about the exceptions. I
think that is good. I would, however, suggest you also include
examples of changes/updates that are not applicable for a stable
release.
Good idea.
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:09:32 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:47:04 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates
policy draft page:
Do you want feedback on the mailing
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:37:44 -0400
Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
For (unreleased) F14, I think that the arugment that future work on
the package is better off starting with something that works than to
start off with something that's broken by new gcc, boost, etc is very
valid.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:32PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, for example, we have these use cases for Fedora which involves
information working on the desktop, so the guiding principles for the
stable release ought to be about those users being generally happy and
having a desktop that
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:38 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
So, that would be, BAD:
- Changing User interface (moving menu items or buttons around)
- Changing names of commands for command line.
- Changing behavior of command line options (ie, --foo does something
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:55 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:09:32 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:47:04 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
I'd like to ask for feedback and helping
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:12:54 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 18:58:25 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
In case of a security issue a random note somewhere don't do that
is
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:42:14 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:38 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
So, that would be, BAD:
- Changing User interface (moving menu items or buttons around)
- Changing names of commands for command line.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:45:55 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:55 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:09:32 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:47:04 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:05:23 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
ok. I Changed 'Beta' mentions in the Pre Beta section to Alpha or Beta
releases. Does that work?
That looks fine now. Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 12:35 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Alex Hudson fed...@alexhudson.com wrote:
I think there's one thing missing: some discussion about the guiding
principles about where these rules came from.
Well, there is the Boards vision that this came out of:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:56:07 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Might be true but a random notice on some website / mailinglist /
$whatever is NOT a fix. period.
If one decided to use a notification to mitigate a security issue, one would
put the notice where the affected people
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:01:49 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Right. Also, added to that is: Are the bug fixes worth shipping to
millions of people? ie, do they fix bugs that Fedora users would/have
encountered.
That's another gray area without much guidance currently. I
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:57:49 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 08:20 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
That's why I propose an easy way to install additional repos. I can't
see a non tech savvy user installing the chromium browser on fedora, to
be brutally honest. It's annoying
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:33:47 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:59:51 -0400,
Al Dunsmuir al.dunsm...@sympatico.ca wrote:
If a second rawhide-specific staging repository (equivalent to
updates-testing, so call it rawhide-testing) was added with some
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:00:25 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:22:45PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
I guess I spend too much money on CPUs. Or don't work 'em hard enough.
:P
I've not noticed it
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
One could always use a stable kernel in conjunction with Rawhide.
Speaking of debugging info, are they still turned on for branched
releases like F-14?
Yes. Not until the Final RC builds is debugging switched off. (IIRC)
Rawhide kernels or using a stable kernel
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
