Le dimanche 28 novembre 2010 à 12:15 +0200, Panu Matilainen a écrit :
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
> >
> > 1. This change:
> > | Packages with no files can now omit the %files section
I've just pushed biosdevname-0.3.1 into rawhide. This is not yet
installed by default as part of @base, nor is it used by anaconda, but
those changes will come over the next few days.
biosdevname, on at least Dell 10G and newer, and HP 6G and newer
servers, provides "better" BIOS-suggested names
> The only remaining pending rebuilds I am aware
> of now are xmobar and hedgewars (which Bruno is working on).
Ok, I missed one more: ghc-feldspar-language,
which like xmobar also seems to need a little work for ghc7.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
- "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> Agreed. I really don't see a reason to break so many packages, even
> if it is 'only Rawhide'. Was there a reason all these rebuilds could not
> be completed in the tag?
Well mostly me being a slacker (I only rebuilt 50+ packages)
and hoping to engage some of the
- "John Reiser" wrote:
> How can this testing take place when a very long list of dependencies
> has not yet appeared in rawhide?
Well I meant after the rebuilds were completed, but
the majority of the packages had already been rebuilt
at the time of writing. Which one was interrupting
you t
Toshio Kuratomi gmail.com> writes:
> I don't believe so. I think we'd need to 1) rebuild all packages using the
> new compression 2) Teach the deltaiso stuff that generating an F15 iso needs
> to use the new version of the xz/delta*.
2) is easy enough. To get F14 to use the new compression unco
- "Bruno Wolff III" wrote:
> I need ghc-hslogger rebuilt in order to rebuild hedgewars.
It is in dist-f15-build now, so you can go ahead.
Thanks, Jens
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 11/28/2010 03:13 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> The option to check is controlled by an environment variable
> MEMCPY_CHECK_ which influences choices made by __init_cpu_features
> and the STT_GNU_IFUNC mechanism for choosing alternate implementations
> at runtime.
If you're going to control it via an
This patch (with .rpms for x86_64 and i686) enables glibc optionally
to detect, diagnose, and work around overlap in memcpy/mempcpy:
http://bitwagon.com/glibc-memlap/glibc-memlap.html
The option to check is controlled by an environment variable
MEMCPY_CHECK_ which influences choices made by __i
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:25:49AM +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi gmail.com> writes:
>
> > This could require different naames for the library too which will get a bit
> > harder than just the binary name.
>
> Sorry for the late reply. I just noticed the presence in Rawhide of th
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:15:52 +0200 (EET)
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
> >
> > 1. This change:
> > | Packages with no files can now omit the %files section and
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 04:17 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>
>> The new dependency generator is where I suspect some regressions might
>> be lurking - try building packages (for example ones that you maintain),
>> check that all the expected automatic dependencies
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 10:24 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> On 11/27/2010 12:04 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > I have just moved ghc-7.0.1 and a large set
> > of Haskell ghc package rebuilds into dist-f15
> > (from dist-f15-ghc).
>
> > Rebuilds still pending include xmobar, hlint,
> > and various librar
On 11/27/2010 12:04 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
> I have just moved ghc-7.0.1 and a large set
> of Haskell ghc package rebuilds into dist-f15
> (from dist-f15-ghc).
> Rebuilds still pending include xmobar, hlint,
> and various libraries (currently with one or less dependents).
> Testing and feedback
hi,
Upstream(Glenn Randers-Pehrson) says in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644#c10 :
"Upstream has declared end-of-life for libpng10 and does
not plan any more updates, even for security, as announced back in
February. If that is a hardship, you can complain to png-mng-implememe
On 11/28/2010 04:17 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> The new dependency generator is where I suspect some regressions might
> be lurking - try building packages (for example ones that you maintain),
> check that all the expected automatic dependencies are there and that
> it doesn't fall over in othe
Am Sonntag, den 28.11.2010, 18:27 +0530 schrieb
lakshminaras2...@gmail.com:
> I would like to take up gnome-guitar package.
> The last update happened in October 2009. According to the wiki, it
> would be necessary to submit the package for re-review. Please
> confirm whether my understanding is c
I would like to take up gnome-guitar package.
The last update happened in October 2009. According to the wiki, it would be
necessary to submit the package for re-review. Please confirm whether my
understanding is correct.
Thanks
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:26 PM, François Cami wrote:
> On Sat,
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 13:38:36 +0100,
Till Maas wrote:
>
> I wrote to give +1 after using it and your original problem was, that
> you did not notice when something works. So if you updated firefox
> yesterday and used it to browse the world wide web without problems and
> run fedora-easy-kar
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 05:36:58AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 18:15:29 +0100,
> Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > You can very easy report that you have installed some update, used it
> > and it did not break. This is afaik enough to justify +1 karma.
>
> I thought you need
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 18:15:29 +0100,
Till Maas wrote:
>
> You can very easy report that you have installed some update, used it
> and it did not break. This is afaik enough to justify +1 karma.
I thought you needed to do a bit more than just install a package to
give a +1. But hopefully thi
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 11/26/2010 04:50 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
>> and Fedora compatible SRPM(s) can be found at
>> http://laiskiainen.org/rpm/srpms/
>
> I am using this now on my Fedora 14 box and I h
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
>
> 1. This change:
> | Packages with no files can now omit the %files section and still have
> | packages generated.
> is going to make it a PITA to conditionaliz
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:52:13 -0500 (EST)
Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> >> Is that needed if the package init script deals with this already?
> >> (eg xl2tpd will create /var/run/xl2tpd if it does not exist)
> >
> > If the initscript already does it then that
Toshio Kuratomi gmail.com> writes:
> This could require different naames for the library too which will get a bit
> harder than just the binary name.
Sorry for the late reply. I just noticed the presence in Rawhide of the
xz-compat-libs package which provides the old compression with liblzma.so.
25 matches
Mail list logo
