Le 28/03/2012 20:32, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" a écrit :
> So what we as an project will need to do, is to update our documentation
> and maintainers will have to update default apache configuration to
> reflect the new configuration syntax for the application/package they
> maintain.
Yes
> Admini
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 23:00 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Installation:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
>
> Base:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test
>
> Desktop:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_D
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 07:42:59PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 03/28/2012 07:27 PM, Andy Grover wrote:
> >Wait, I thought there was some kind of "flattened device tree" or
> >something that the ARM folks thought would let them avoid ACPI. Did that
> >not pan out? Maybe MS put the kibosh on i
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Beta Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5141 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing instr
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 07:27:13PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote:
> On 03/28/2012 06:13 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Oh no. Nobody's seriously considering UEFI ARM platforms without ACPI,
> > are they?
>
> Wait, I thought there was some kind of "flattened device tree" or
> something that the ARM fol
On 03/28/2012 07:39 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn :
>> On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>> W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
>>> napisał:
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson :
>>> [..]
> There's nothing stopping you fro
On 03/28/2012 07:27 PM, Andy Grover wrote:
Wait, I thought there was some kind of "flattened device tree" or
something that the ARM folks thought would let them avoid ACPI. Did that
not pan out? Maybe MS put the kibosh on it?
In the long run you're likely to see FDT for mobile devices and UEFI
On 03/28/2012 10:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:06 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> Shotwell 0.10 has a nasty event name corruption bug so I thought I would try
>> to compile 0.12 from source.
>>
>> I installed the dependencies:
>> # yum install vala GConf2-devel libgee-devel
On 03/28/2012 06:13 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 07:23:48PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>
>> In the future, ARM systems will transition increasingly to UEFI. Many
>> ARM server systems will likely eventually boot with ACPI as well. They
>> will smell like low-energy alternati
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:06 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> Shotwell 0.10 has a nasty event name corruption bug so I thought I would try
> to compile 0.12 from source.
>
> I installed the dependencies:
> # yum install vala GConf2-devel libgee-devel libgexiv2-devel glib2-devel
> gstreamer-devel gstrea
On 28 March 2012 19:13, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 07:23:48PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>
>> In the future, ARM systems will transition increasingly to UEFI. Many
>> ARM server systems will likely eventually boot with ACPI as well. They
>> will smell like low-energy alternati
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 07:23:48PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> In the future, ARM systems will transition increasingly to UEFI. Many
> ARM server systems will likely eventually boot with ACPI as well. They
> will smell like low-energy alternatives to PC servers over time, and in
> another decade o
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 20:32 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:58 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> >
> >> No, I have been tried edit update which was deleted to gave way to
> >> update of Orion Poplawski - bodhi said I can
Shotwell 0.10 has a nasty event name corruption bug so I thought I would try to
compile 0.12 from source.
I installed the dependencies:
# yum install vala GConf2-devel libgee-devel libgexiv2-devel glib2-devel
gstreamer-devel gstreamer-plugins-base-devel
gtk3-devel libgudev1-devel libexif-devel l
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 18:28 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> > They
> > will smell like low-energy alternatives to PC servers over time, and in
> > another decade or two something more exciting than UEFI will replace
> > UEFI and folks will mail abou
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:58 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>
>> No, I have been tried edit update which was deleted to gave way to
>> update of Orion Poplawski - bodhi said I can't add it because I have not
>> commit rights to that package. Ple
On Mar 28, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> They
> will smell like low-energy alternatives to PC servers over time, and in
> another decade or two something more exciting than UEFI will replace
> UEFI and folks will mail about how things were better with UEFI!
Well, it's not often I moment
On 03/23/2012 08:18 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> DJ Delorie wrote:
>>> always with the caveat that you can't just use "make -j 288" on them.
>>
>> Why not? Multi-CPU machines is very old technology.
>
> Ask the people who designed those machines.
>
> (My guess: memory and bus bandwidth. There's a l
Adam Williamson wrote:
> I think we'd need to make the second more optional than you suggest,
> though. For instance, when the desktop team pushes a 'GNOME 3.4' update
> with 30 packages in it, they really want that update to be tested as a
> whole - broadly they just want people to install all the
On 03/26/2012 08:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Which leads me to a rant about ARM. G RANT!! I didn't think I'd
> ever love the BIOS, but compared to the alternatives (UEFI and a
> million different ARM bootloaders) it's simple and effective.
There is some truth to that. Nobody is going
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 05:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I think "removing the legacy cruft" just for the goal of removing it is
>> not helpful at all and is actually the main cause of "half baked", "half
>> removed" stuff in Fedora.
>
> Interesting how did you come to that c
On 03/29/2012 04:39 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jared K. Smith wrote:
>> Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply
>> was all about the *tone* of your email. I know that language barrier
>> is part of the problem here, but the tone of your email messages often
>> comes acr
Jared K. Smith wrote:
> Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply
> was all about the *tone* of your email. I know that language barrier
> is part of the problem here, but the tone of your email messages often
> comes across as demanding and condescending.
Harald is sim
On 03/28/2012 10:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> ah - i am not permitted to say my opinion of a very very bad
> idea before i become green light
You are fighting a strawman and being repeatedly obnoxious about it. If
you can't change how you voice your opinions, be silent.
Rahul
--
devel
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I see one "error:" in the log:
>
> In file included from ../MSTypes/MSObjectTypeVector.H:96:0,
> from ../MSTypes/MSTypeVector.H:13,
> from ../MSTypes/MSBoolVector.H:13,
> from MSBoolVector.C:9:
>
I'm planning on moving this to the Wiki (as a draft) at the end of the
week, so if people have any further feedback please let me know.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 22:16 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 28.03.2012 21:09, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> >> sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message
> >
> > Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My r
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I have some issues to build aplus-fsf via mock for the master branch.
>
> Because I don't have any idea to selve the existing issues, I have uploaded
> the build.log, the SPEC file and a patch to
>
> http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/aplus-fsf/
>
> It will be nice,
Am 28.03.2012 21:09, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
>> sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message
>
> Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply
> was all about the *tone* of your email.
there was simply N
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:58 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> No, I have been tried edit update which was deleted to gave way to
> update of Orion Poplawski - bodhi said I can't add it because I have not
> commit rights to that package. Please see before in quote.
Ah :/ so I guess provenpackagers *
On 03/28/2012 01:23 PM, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build a perl package which requires mod_perl in rawhide,
and I'm getting this error in root.log:
...
DEBUG util.py:257: httpd-mmn = 20120211
DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: mod_perl-2.0.5-8.fc18.x86_64 (build)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807613
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Hi,
I'm trying to build a perl package which requires mod_perl in rawhide,
and I'm getting this error in root.log:
...
DEBUG util.py:257: httpd-mmn = 20120211
DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: mod_perl-2.0.5-8.fc18.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: httpd-mm
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message
Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply
was all about the *tone* of your email. I know that language barrier
is part of the problem here, but the tone of you
Am 28.03.2012 18:55, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> On 03/28/2012 09:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> and that is why i wrote the mail to not complain AFTER the fact
>> like systemd last year - i do not really understand your problem
>> with this message of me in the context - really!
>
> You keep r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
I have some issues to build aplus-fsf via mock for the master branch.
Because I don't have any idea to selve the existing issues, I have uploaded
the build.log, the SPEC file and a patch to
http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/aplus-fsf/
It will
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:27:57 -0500
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz
>> wrote:
>> > A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build
>> > anymore because of libcups.so.2().
>> > Here i
On 03/28/2012 12:56 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Joe, I am not sure how this effects SELinux labeling, if it does at all.
Afaikt this does not affect selinux in anyway since these are
configuration syntax changes for the most part.
If we take this example which is common as an default in variou
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:27:57 -0500
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz
> wrote:
> > A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build
> > anymore because of libcups.so.2().
> > Here is part of the root.log.
> >
> > Getting requirements for jboss-
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz wrote:
> A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build anymore
> because of libcups.so.2().
> Here is part of the root.log.
>
> Getting requirements for jboss-web-7.0.13-3.fc18.src
> DEBUG util.py:257: --> jpackage-utils-1.7.5
A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build anymore
because of libcups.so.2().
Here is part of the root.log.
Getting requirements for jboss-web-7.0.13-3.fc18.src
DEBUG util.py:257: --> jpackage-utils-1.7.5-17.fc18.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:257: --> 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807793
Summary: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6
Product: Fedora
28.03.2012 21:31, Adam Williamson написал:
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 09:42 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:
Hi,
2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn :
> On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
>> napisał:
>>> 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson :
>> [..]
There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other
modules that add su
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 09:42 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> > 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
> >> On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> >>> 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote
On 03/28/2012 10:33 AM, Karel Klíč wrote:
Orion Poplawski writes:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add
them. Let me know if there are
On 03/28/2012 10:25 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:17:30 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't
On 03/28/2012 09:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> and that is why i wrote the mail to not complain AFTER the fact
> like systemd last year - i do not really understand your problem
> with this message of me in the context - really!
You keep ranting based on assumptions. Someone has asked a ques
Bug already filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807767
Might not be cups-specific, as the corresponding f17 cups-libs does
provide libcups.so.2.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Orion Poplawski writes:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
>
> There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add
> them. Let me know if there are other builds that need to be added.
Am 28.03.2012 17:58, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> if this ever happens anaconda has to be considered as
>> broken by design
>
> Harald, I've tried to be patient with your recent posts to the devel
> list, but you don't seem to get the message
On 03/28/2012 10:24 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 20:17, Orion Poplawski написал:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add them. L
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:17:30 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> > 28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал:
> >> On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> >>> 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
> On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev w
28.03.2012 20:17, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Popl
On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802986
Bug 802986 depends on bug 803798, which changed state.
Bug 803798 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl - Readline
i
commit bfb1aab35e6370680313b4f50052749b86a5bf3a
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Mar 28 18:05:02 2012 +0200
Import
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint |2 +
perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl.spec | 49 ++
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl:
a77ecf4921cc714820fef898c6cb0eaf Term-ReadLine-Perl-1.0303.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
I want push now builds perl-GD
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> if this ever happens anaconda has to be considered as
> broken by design
Harald, I've tried to be patient with your recent posts to the devel
list, but you don't seem to get the message (or you're actively
choosing to ignore it), so I'm goin
On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17
techne-0.2.1-4.fc
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17
techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17
auto
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17
techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17
autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3
"libmicrohttpd" seems to be broken due gnutls changes and
was not rebuilt for decades as also the autotests are
disabled in the src.rpm
_
* so simply rebuild the F15 version does not fix it
* rebuild the F16 package does not fix it
* update to 0.9.15 doe
Am 28.03.2012 09:25, schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
> Adam Williamson wrote on 27.03.2012 20:14:
>> [...]
>> It's worth bearing in mind there's a giant anaconda UI rewrite still
>> pending, which entirely redesigns the storage configuration GUI. One of
>> the other major changes is that it makes all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2012 03:19 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 05:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I think "removing the legacy cruft" just for the goal of removing it is not
>> helpful at all and is actually the main cause of "half baked", "half
On 03/26/2012 05:04 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> Source : yawn-0-0.3.20120227svn561.fc18.src.rpm
YAWN still needs mod_python. WSGI patch is welcome, YAWN is quite small
script. Both maintainers are not skilled Pythonists, especially when it
comes to HTTP services. Any volunteer?
Jan
--
devel mail
Compose started at Wed Mar 28 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807613
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
2012/3/28 Terry Barnaby
> On 03/26/2012 09:20 PM, J. Randall Owens wrote:
> > On 03/26/2012 06:05 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am using the latest F16 kernel: 3.3.0-4.fc16.i686.PAE and am having
> >> problems with a MicroSD card connected to a USB card reader. This has
> >> been
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:00:15PM +0530, Buddhike Kurera wrote:
>> Hello,
>> An idea found on the summer-coding list, please forward if you have
>> any idea, comment.
>
> More ML is better. Take a look at this link for the gory detail
On 03/26/2012 09:20 PM, J. Randall Owens wrote:
> On 03/26/2012 06:05 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using the latest F16 kernel: 3.3.0-4.fc16.i686.PAE and am having
>> problems with a MicroSD card connected to a USB card reader. This has
>> been working fine until recently (at least in
commit 25ec10130c6ef67f3ee27140da371ed2204cd5f2
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Mar 28 09:59:55 2012 +0100
Update to 1.62
- New upstream release 1.62
- Small fix to last version
perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 inse
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
a0faa586626cd67270e9a7e7410175b4 IO-Socket-SSL-1.62.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On 03/27/2012 08:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a different chair each
week, you at least have an SOP for arranging the meetings, so that this
kind of thing is done consistently?
Just in t
- Original Message -
> Hello devel list,
Hi!
> a few months ago I expressed my interest in porting the Ubuntu
> Software Center to Fedora, integrating the AppStream infrastructure
> for application metadata in our repository system.
>
> Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, since have
Adam Williamson wrote on 27.03.2012 20:14:
> [...]
> It's worth bearing in mind there's a giant anaconda UI rewrite still
> pending, which entirely redesigns the storage configuration GUI. One of
> the other major changes is that it makes all installations
> kickstart-driven. The GUI will just prod
77 matches
Mail list logo
