Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Greg McGary wrote:
Minor conflict: the name of one of id-utils main commands "lid" is also the
same as an existing command, though installed in a d
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 16:42 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2012, 11:57 -0400 schrieb Adam Jackson:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 11:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 13:35 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > > > > The feat
I'm going to manage the GNOME 3.4.2 mega-update again for this
release, as it's much easier to QA in one update than 30. If you're
doing a GNOME 3.4.2 build please add it to the speadsheet
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc
and I'll add it to th
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 13:38 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> I have submitted a bug report[1] related to nouveau driver. The
> installer is unable to detect Nvidia Geforce GTX 460 v2 [2] which is
> different from the original Nvidia Geforce GTX 460, forcing the use of
> vesa driver. As a result
Compose started at Mon May 14 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires rubyg
On 05/14/2012 10:11 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I'm pretty sure that naming conflicts in /usr/bin have happened before
in Fedora, I'm not sure how they were resolved.
Even in a relatively minimal system, I see many programs installed
in both /sbin and /bin, though none seem t
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:48:42AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 05/13/2012 02:02 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>
>
> > From a purely practical perspective, the popularity of OS X as a
> > development platform means that we're likely to see a gradual increase
> > in the amount of code written
Hi,
I was wondering if Packaging Guidelines could be amended so that even when
creating tarball from VCS, using a standalone shell script would be mandatory
(see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
). I believe this could allow easier reviews and package upd
On 05/14/2012 03:02 PM, Tomas Radej wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if Packaging Guidelines could be amended so that even when creating
tarball from VCS, using a standalone shell script would be mandatory (see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control ). I
believe th
Sorry my bad am looking for a review
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 14/05/12 03:35, Adrian Alves wrote:
> > Hello Guys,
> > Am looking for someone to test DrPython,
> ..
> > Regards, Adrian.-
>
> It is pretty unusual, to test a package before it's released. If you're
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
6a9bc800d136af7709b2fb8dd2e4e8a5 IO-Socket-SSL-1.74.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
No old business this week
= New business =
#topi
- Original Message -
> Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2012, 11:57 -0400 schrieb Adam Jackson:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 11:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 13:35 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > > > > The feature page lists some of the back
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-AnyEvent:
f26c1d03d7f5fe7d82e6885e5887bf8f AnyEvent-7.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
- Original Message -
>
> This being said I am +1 for 1 GB, but please note that I only speak
Another thing - we realized that targeting 1 GB is non sense when we
have 700 MB, so we moved to 1.5 GB. There was a little difference and
no way to put everything on it. With 1 GB target and no 7
commit c27a78c70d2fb65fdabe53e67ff5262796e4914d
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon May 14 14:25:59 2012 +0100
Update to 7.01
- New upstream release 7.01:
- Fail with EPROTO in AnyEvent::Handle when TLS is requested but not
available, instead of throwing an exception
Thank you. I'm proud of being part of the Fedora Project community.
I hope I'll do well with your precious help.
Regards,
*Mattia M.*
2012/5/4 Michel Alexandre Salim
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear all,
>
> Please welcome Mattia Meneguzzo (FAS: odysseus) as our newes
Hello,
I would like to know if there are still issues with CDDL packages in Fedora.
It is not my intention to start a flame, I'm simply asking if that's
still the case or if I can fill a Review Request for the infamous
cdrtools in Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507108
http:/
On 05/13/2012 12:00 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
how can someone find out if it is a debug-kernel?
even the satble ones seems to have a ton of debug options enabled
especially "CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y"
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelDebugStrategy to find what
kernel config options to look f
On 05/14/2012 01:40 AM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> I understand that you want to ship isolated images for each of the
> desktops in this combination image, as that is what is tested, etc.
> However, there is gonna be a lot of duplicated bits in those images.
> Can't we use some form of image where
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if there are still issues with CDDL packages in Fedora.
>
> It is not my intention to start a flame, I'm simply asking if that's
> still the case or if I can fill a Review Request for the infamous
> cdrtools i
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:06:19PM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
> I would like to know if there are still issues with CDDL packages in Fedora.
I'm not aware that there ever have been.
> It is not my intention to start a flame, I'm simply asking if that's
> still the case or if I can fill a Review
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:02:23PM +0200, Tomas Radej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if Packaging Guidelines could be amended so that even when
> creating tarball from VCS, using a standalone shell script would be
> mandatory (see
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revisio
On 05/14/2012 10:06 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if there are still issues with CDDL packages in Fedora.
>
> It is not my intention to start a flame, I'm simply asking if that's
> still the case or if I can fill a Review Request for the infamous
> cdrtools in Fedora
I agree with Toshio on this. Depending on how the VCS behaves with
checkout/cloning, it will be difficult to get predictable results in a
usable way through a script. Commenting in the spec file is the best way to
go in my opinion.
On May 14, 2012 9:22 AM, "Toshio Kuratomi" wrote:
> On Mon, May 1
Le 14/05/2012 16:22, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
What do you think?
I personally prefer to have the checkout instructions in comments.
+1
Except for some very complex scripts for which it make sense to have a
shell script.
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
Thanks!
To better understand; in similar cases, how do I know that I can't
link with GPL?
The fact that both "GPLv3 Compat?" and "GPLv2 Compat?" columns have
their value to "NO" in the CDDL or BSD Protection line can be a clear
indication of that?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Lic
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 10:06 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to know if there are still issues with CDDL packages in Fedora.
>>
>> It is not my intention to start a flame, I'm simply asking if that's
>> still the case or if I can
I recently converted mysql-connector-java from arch to noarch (it used
to use GCJ to build, now it doesn't). Martin Cermak pointed out to me
that if you had the debuginfo subpackage installed, and you upgrade,
the old debuginfo will still be there even though it's now irrelevant.
Is this a bug, an
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > On 05/14/2012 10:06 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I would like to know if there are still issues with CDDL packages in
> Fedora.
> >>
> >> It is not my intention to sta
On 05/14/2012 10:32 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> To better understand; in similar cases, how do I know that I can't
> link with GPL?
>
> The fact that both "GPLv3 Compat?" and "GPLv2 Compat?" columns have
> their value to "NO" in the CDDL or BSD Protection line can be a clear
> indicat
On 05/14/2012 10:40 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> Mr Schilling is just a special kind of crazy. He seems to have a rather
> warped view of copyright law. And since when were forks illegal? Do we
> know exactly what parts of cdrtools cause the legal incompatibilities?
If you really want me to
On 05/14/2012 10:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I recently converted mysql-connector-java from arch to noarch (it used
> to use GCJ to build, now it doesn't). Martin Cermak pointed out to me
> that if you had the debuginfo subpackage installed, and you upgrade,
> the old debuginfo will still be there ev
No thanks, no revisiting; searches in google pointing to flame wars
are enough! :D
--Simone
On 14 May 2012 16:42, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 10:40 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>
>> Mr Schilling is just a special kind of crazy. He seems to have a rather
>> warped view of copyright la
Tom Callaway writes:
> On 05/14/2012 10:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I recently converted mysql-connector-java from arch to noarch (it used
>> to use GCJ to build, now it doesn't). Martin Cermak pointed out to me
>> that if you had the debuginfo subpackage installed, and you upgrade,
>> the old debu
TC5 Live Desktop burned to actual media is not EFI bootable on MBP41. The only
option for the media is "Windows". I'm not sure if this regression occurred in
TC4 or TC5.
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 05/14/2012 11:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tom Callaway writes:
>> On 05/14/2012 10:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I recently converted mysql-connector-java from arch to noarch (it used
>>> to use GCJ to build, now it doesn't). Martin Cermak pointed out to me
>>> that if you had the debuginfo subpacka
perl-Net-OpenSSH has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-2.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
On i386:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-2.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
Please resolve th
perl-SQL-Translator has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SQL-Translator-0.11011-1.fc18.noarch requires
perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::Port)
perl-SQL-Translator-0.11011-1.fc18.noarch requires
perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::Node)
perl-SQ
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 12:21 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Apart from the worrying test suite results on secondary archs,
> actually it's the libstdc++ issue that's causing the most headache.
> How much effort does it take to maintain a compatibility version of
> libstdc++? It'd make clang
Compose started at Mon May 14 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
Hi Adam,
TC4 won't install, and because of this, thinking that it was not supposed
to install, I was wondering what one was supposed to do with it. I realise
that my thought-process may have been wrong and it should have been
installable, but I thought I would come from that what happened was that
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> - Original Message -
> >
> > This being said I am +1 for 1 GB, but please note that I only speak
>
> Another thing - we realized that targeting 1 GB is non sense when we
> have 700 MB, so we moved to 1.5 GB. There was a little difference and
>
Some feedback from a succefull installation of F17 TC4 on a Macbook Air 13"
(Model number A1369). Unfortunately the TC5 didn't boot. For TC4 we had to
change label grub option to LIVE in order to boot. Is this a typo?
Anaconda worked just fine and installation was completed succefully. Only
thing
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-05-14)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:13 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-05-14/fesco.2012-05-14-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On 05/12/2012 09:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:00:48AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
>> So the set of people we'd be inconveniencing is exactly the set of
>> people with no bandwidth and the inability to boot from anything larger
>> than a CD.
>
> Not only that - the p
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 13:48 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I'm still a bit baffled that a 3.5 MB increase on a 700MB live image
> is considered a complete showstopper. That's one git package, for example;
> I would hope that creative dependency trimming can find that space.
> (Or reorganization o
One of the packages I'm submitting for Unknown Horizons support
(python-enet or pyenet) has no real version and it's just svn revision
24 (python bindings for ENet);
What would be the best way to express this in the spec file?
ex: Version: 0.0.0+svn24
Or any other? Opinions most welcome.
--
Nel
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Nelson Marques wrote:
> One of the packages I'm submitting for Unknown Horizons support
> (python-enet or pyenet) has no real version and it's just svn revision
> 24 (python bindings for ENet);
> What would be the best way to express this in the spec file?
>
> ex:
Thanks, looks cool to me, I'll use that if there are no objections :)
2012/5/14 Richard Shaw :
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> One of the packages I'm submitting for Unknown Horizons support
>> (python-enet or pyenet) has no real version and it's just svn revision
>> 2
That doesn't seem to contradict me? If we went with this approach then
we'd obviously want to include a CD->USB bootloader, but otherwise it
sounds like there'd be no problem doing a USB install on that hardware.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:00:22PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
> Thanks, looks cool to me, I'll use that if there are no objections :)
>
> 2012/5/14 Richard Shaw :
> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Nelson Marques
> > wrote:
> >> One of the packages I'm submitting for Unknown Horizons support
On Mon, 14.05.12 14:45, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote:
> * #851 F18 Feature: procps-ng (next generation procps tools) -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/procps-ng (sgallagh,
> 18:11:34)
> * AGREED: Feature procps-ng is accepted (9 +1) (sgallagh, 18:14:47)
Ahem. I
> I'm still a bit baffled that a 3.5 MB increase on a 700MB live image
> is considered a complete showstopper. ...
Another place to check is the raw filesystem size before adding payload
and before compressing. The unused space squashes "nicely" because it
was created as zero on purpose, but sti
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
> > * #851 F18 Feature: procps-ng (next generation procps tools) -
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/procps-ng (sgallagh,
> > 18:11:34)
> > * AGREED: Feature procps-ng is accepted (9 +1) (sgallagh, 18:14:47)
>
> Ahem. I think is is
On 2012-05-14 17:22, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I personally prefer to have the checkout instructions in comments.
The big drawback of that is that if they're just in comments, they're
not a prerequisite for creating the shipped tarball, and they will
bitrot sooner or later. Using macros in them i
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 14.05.12 14:45, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> * #851 F18 Feature: procps-ng (next generation procps tools) -
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/procps-ng (sgallagh,
>> 18:11:34)
>> * AGREED:
2012/5/14 Toshio Kuratomi :
> Automating of the package's checksum won't work for many VCS's . git, for
> instance, does not preserve timestamps. So the tarball created from a git
> snapshot will have a different checksum for each checkout.
While files' modification times in a checkout may be di
Other RPM's/spec's are out there for different RPM based distros, of
varying quality, most not quite Fedora compatible,
These are what I've fiddled with/created and am currently using for FC16/x86_64,
http://www.routedlogic.net/files/gns3.spec
http://www.routedlogic.net/files/gns3-0.8.2-1.1.src.r
Unfortunately, your suggestion is no use because the screen will stay
totally black
after initialization of the installer. =(
On Mon 14 May 2012 04:31:49 AM PDT, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
I believe it should be possible to swith to tty2 (with Ctrl+Alt+F2) and
use scp or some other tool to retri
On Mon, 14 May 2012 14:56:00 -0700
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Unfortunately, your suggestion is no use because the screen will stay
> totally black
> after initialization of the installer. =(
If you start the install with sshd as a boot parameter, you'll be
able to ssh in to the installation en
On 15/05/12 07:21, Colin Stubbs wrote:
> These are what I've fiddled with/created and am currently using for
> FC16/x86_64,
...
> http://www.routedlogic.net/files/dynamips.spec
You might want to add the patch for multiple idlepc values. This makes a
big difference in practice.
As far as Fedora'
On Tue, 15 May 2012 08:25:48 +0930
Glen Turner wrote:
> On 15/05/12 07:21, Colin Stubbs wrote:
>
> > These are what I've fiddled with/created and am currently using for
> > FC16/x86_64,
> ...
> > http://www.routedlogic.net/files/dynamips.spec
>
> You might want to add the patch for multiple idl
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 09:07 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> TC5 Live Desktop burned to actual media is not EFI bootable on MBP41.
> The only option for the media is "Windows". I'm not sure if this
> regression occurred in TC4 or TC5.
As noted in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810104 , th
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 09:47 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> TC4 won't install, and because of this, thinking that it was not
> supposed to install, I was wondering what one was supposed to do with
> it. I realise that my thought-process may have been wrong and it
> should have been in
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 11:49 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> On 05/12/2012 09:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:00:48AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >
> >> So the set of people we'd be inconveniencing is exactly the set of
> >> people with no bandwidth and the inability to bo
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 14:50 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 13:48 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > I'm still a bit baffled that a 3.5 MB increase on a 700MB live image
> > is considered a complete showstopper. That's one git package, for example;
> > I would hope that creativ
I added sshd as a boot parameter after highlighting "Install/Upgrade
Fedora" from F17 DVD.
There are still a black screen after initialization. I attempt to get
ssh information using my laptop
and received a denied connection. Did I miss something?
On Mon 14 May 2012 03:33:53 PM PDT, Tim Flink
Thanks Adam,
The *iso may not have burned properly, now that I think of it with the info
you have supplied here. I shall attempt it again within the next 24 hours -
hopefully. I will let you know.
Richard
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 09:47 -070
I filed a bug recently against remmina
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820815) which on second
look would seem to be unrelated to remmina itself, but is rather a more
generic issue affecting Gnome. Essentially, some applications that used
to start their windows with the appropriate siz
On 05/14/2012 10:46 PM, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2012/5/14 Toshio Kuratomi:
Automating of the package's checksum won't work for many VCS's . git, for
instance, does not preserve timestamps. So the tarball created from a git
snapshot will have a different checksum for each checkout.
While files'
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 11:15 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> I filed a bug recently against remmina
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820815) which on second
> look would seem to be unrelated to remmina itself, but is rather a more
> generic issue affecting Gnome. Essentially, some applic
2012-05-11 12:07 keltezéssel, Jim Meyering írta:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
id-utils (1996) seems to predate libuser (2001), so it's
unfortunate that libuser picked the clashing name.
It goes back pretty far. From idutils.texi's history node:
First posted to comp.sources.unix in September 198
73 matches
Mail list logo
