On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:20AM +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 05/16/2012 12:21 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
/etc/init.d/nginx upgrade
This has disappeared following migration to systemd, so my intention
is to include an nginx-upgrade shell script to replace this
functionality.
My
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:07:40PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Put it this way: in the package review process,
*must* the name conflict be cause for rejection?
A direct file conflict would definitely be a blocker (
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts )
The case where one command
From: Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 9:01:00 PM
Subject: Re: procps-ng is a mistake (was: Re: Summary/Minutes from today's
FESCo Meeting (2012-05-14))
On 15.5.2012 14:03, Jaromir Capik wrote:
There is. We had to change the
On 05/15/2012 08:23 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/739016 - erlang-poolboy - A hunky Erlang
worker pool factory
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/821771 - erlang-edown - EDoc extension
for generating Github-flavored Markdown
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/821802 -
Compose started at Wed May 16 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires
Please join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this
important meeting, wherein we shall determine the shipment readiness of
F17 Final.
Thursday, May 17, 2012 @ 17:00 UTC (13:00 EDT/10:00 PDT)
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine if
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 04:51 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
Cosimo, can you please also make sure that the Close button gets
keyboard focus automatically after I click on Try Fedora?
I now fixed this here [1], but it will need to be applied to the copy
of
that code that lives in anaconda
I noticed this article:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTEwMTk
Has this been discussed on fedora?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
commit 42be503513c981a7d3ccab24f9397adb28ffe18c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 16 15:21:20 2012 +0200
Import
macros.perl-srpm | 17 +
perl-srpm-macros.spec | 26 ++
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
commit 29746726796f7669fd75921d3b1d475983ae787a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 16 15:21:31 2012 +0200
Remove stray requires: %{name}-setup
perl-srpm-macros.spec |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-srpm-macros.spec
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this article:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTEwMTk
Has this been discussed on fedora?
Not that I've seen. Also, the article is either incomplete or
incorrect, as full x32 support for glibc
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:18:32AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
I noticed this article:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTEwMTk
Has this been discussed on fedora?
x32 is mostly beneficial in that it reduces pointer size and so memory
consumption, with the side benefit that
GlusterFS-3.3.0, which is to GA soon, has had (another) license change.
Much of it now under a dual license: GPLv2 or LGPLv3+, with a small
number of pieces still remain under GPLv3+.
What is the correct way to represent this in the spec file?
--
Kaleb
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
GlusterFS-3.3.0, which is to GA soon, has had (another) license change. Much
of it now under a dual license: GPLv2 or LGPLv3+, with a small number of
pieces still remain under GPLv3+.
IMO:
License: GPLv3+ and
On 05/16/2012 03:48 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
On 05/09/2012 09:34 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 04:51 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
Cosimo, can you please also make sure that the Close button gets
keyboard focus automatically after I click on Try Fedora?
I now fixed this here [1],
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE:
928482218e29aa4c27f281db9bdc1ac4 POE-1.354.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b6581e8e5a42cc0f06f3cc70315a45276707c2af
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 16 16:11:25 2012 +0200
1.354 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-POE.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
An update for a format string vulnerability was released this morning:
http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/pipermail/otr-announce/2012-May/26.html
Packages have been build:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-otr-3.2.1-1.fc17
On Wed, 16.05.12 14:31, Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:18:32AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
I noticed this article:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTEwMTk
Has this been discussed on fedora?
x32 is mostly beneficial in that
So it's actually RC1 in the Wiki and the download. And it looks like none of
the Lives were built.
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:28:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Mhmm, so I was under the impression that x32 was mostly about increasing
the scalability of virtualized systems. i.e. run a higher number of
x32 containers/VM on an x86_64 host. Most server software that is run in
mjg59 wrote:
[...] If you have any applications that need to be 64-bit (ie,
anything that is going to need more than 4GB of address space, which
is very different from needing more than 4GB of RAM) then you need
to have two copies of your libraries and suddenly your memory
benefits have
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/368
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/368/0001-Ticket-368-Make-the-cleanAllRUV-task-one-step.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Wed, 16.05.12 15:30, Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) wrote:
Heya,
(added hpa to CC, who appears to be behind x32 upstream)
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:28:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Mhmm, so I was under the impression that x32 was mostly about increasing
the scalability
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:28:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Mhmm, so I was under the impression that x32 was mostly about increasing
the scalability of virtualized systems. i.e. run a higher number of
x32 containers/VM on an x86_64 host. Most server software that is run in
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5163 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com wrote:
Please test and give karma so this security release won't get stuck for
too long.
To add Karma, after testing log into that page and add a comment
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
And, for various programs you usually don't need 64-bit address space,
but in the case where you have say bigger input you are simply out of luck
if you are limited to 32-bit address space. Say with compilers/linkers,
you
Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 05/14/2012 10:11 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I'm pretty sure that naming conflicts in /usr/bin have happened before
in Fedora, I'm not sure how they were resolved.
Even in a relatively minimal system, I see many programs installed
in both /sbin and
Jaromir Capik (jca...@redhat.com) said:
You're partially right.
If we talk about the Fedora's package name, then it could remain untouched.
But since the new upstream name had to be changed and I wanted others to know
they're installing the -ng version, I changed the name to procps-ng.
Gregory Maxwell (gmaxw...@gmail.com) said:
It's for this reason (and the multilib memory bloat) that I was really
disappointed to see x32 created.
32bit of an addressable space is a real limitation on modern machines—
and completely reasonable software which is linear in input size is
Hi,
A new yum and urlgrabber packages have just hit Rawhide. These releases
include some new features, including parallel downloading of packages and
metadata, and a new mirror selection code. As we plan to include these
features in RHEL7, I welcome any feedback or bug reports!
On Tue, 15 May 2012 23:30:27 +0300
Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il wrote:
...snip...
* A .spec file with the extra %vcs_prep and Vcs-URL can create SRPM
directly from the vcs-repo. This SRPM can be uploaded to our
build system and be used for building *without* any interaction
with
Both packages are compatible with older versions.
Can we use them in Fedora 17 too ?
2012/5/16 Zdenek Pavlas zpav...@redhat.com
Hi,
A new yum and urlgrabber packages have just hit Rawhide. These releases
include some new features, including parallel downloading of packages and
metadata,
On 16/05/12 17:07, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
- new mirror selection algorithm
This should be more accurate than measuring latencies in
fastestmirror plugin, but slow mirrors now have to be tried from time to time,
and the statistics need some time to build up.
So disable fastestmirror plugin
Neal Becker wrote:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTEwMTk
Has this been discussed on fedora?
Yes:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-January/148092.html
The answer was no.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 16 May 2012 00:19, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/16/2012 12:21 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
/etc/init.d/nginx upgrade
This has disappeared following migration to systemd, so my intention
is to include an nginx-upgrade shell script to replace this
functionality.
My
On 16 May 2012 08:16, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:20AM +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 05/16/2012 12:21 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
/etc/init.d/nginx upgrade
This has disappeared following migration to systemd, so my intention
is to include an
You're partially right.
If we talk about the Fedora's package name, then it could remain
untouched.
But since the new upstream name had to be changed and I wanted
others to know
they're installing the -ng version, I changed the name to
procps-ng.
Moreover, I initially wanted to
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 17:04 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 05/16/2012 03:48 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
On 05/09/2012 09:34 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 04:51 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
Cosimo, can you please also make sure that the Close button gets
keyboard focus
Compose started at Wed May 16 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:10:08PM +0100, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
On 16 May 2012 08:16, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:20AM +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 05/16/2012 12:21 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
/etc/init.d/nginx upgrade
This has disappeared
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:30 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:28:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Mhmm, so I was under the impression that x32 was mostly about increasing
the scalability of virtualized systems. i.e. run a higher number of
x32 containers/VM on
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:30 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:28:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Mhmm, so I was under the impression that x32 was mostly about increasing
the scalability
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 21:37 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:30 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:28:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Mhmm, so I was under the impression
2012/5/16 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this article:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTEwMTk
Has this been discussed on fedora?
Not that I've seen. Also, the article is either incomplete
drago01 drag...@gmail.com writes:
[...] Can x32 run i686 software (multilib) ? Because not being
able to run existing software might be a reason for many to want
such a host.
x32 is not a different cpu architecture. It's a software ABI to run
on x86-64, especially suited for smaller-memory
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/5/16 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this article:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTEwMTk
Has this been discussed
On 16 May 2012 20:09, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:10:08PM +0100, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
On 16 May 2012 08:16, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
Also, implementing socket-activation in nginx would make it upgradable
without losing any connections.
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-05-16/fedora-meeting-1.2012-05-16-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
Matthew Garrett wrote:
[...]
So, overall, x32 is only really beneficial for embedded platforms rather
than general purpose ones. As Josh says, if there's sufficient interest
then it could potentially be implemented as a separate architecture and
spend some time in secondary, but I don't know
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
So that make me wonder if we really need to built the whole collection
as x32 ? Or if we only wants a selection of components to be optimized
by x32. For example does it matter to move the whole Xorg server
infrastructure as x32 or is it possible to leave it as x86_64 ?
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:28:29AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
[...]
So, overall, x32 is only really beneficial for embedded platforms rather
than general purpose ones. As Josh says, if there's sufficient interest
then it could potentially be implemented as a
Hi,
Forwarding to devel list for more feedback on this.
Regards,
Parag.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:31 AM
Subject: should we install google croscore font as a default in fedora 18?
To: Fedora fonts
perl-SQL-Translator has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SQL-Translator-0.11011-1.fc18.noarch requires
perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::Port)
perl-SQL-Translator-0.11011-1.fc18.noarch requires
perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::Node)
perl-Net-OpenSSH has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-2.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
On i386:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-2.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
Please resolve
56 matches
Mail list logo
