Upstream of python-icalendar changed to Plone foundation and they
relicensed the project from mostly LGPLv2 to BSD.
Original license:
# test.py is GPLv2
# parser is GPL
# doctest.py is Public Domain
# rest is LGPLv2
License:LGPLv2 and GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and Public Domain
Package has been cl
Hello:
A part of my GSoC project - On-Demand Fedora Build Service[1] involves
downloading packages via Koji. The build client can run simulatenously
on multiple nodes (separate machines). Is it OK to use the same
fedora.cert on all these? Or, is there any restrictions to
simultaenously using the s
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 19:04 +1000, Amit Saha wrote:
> Hello:
>
> A part of my GSoC project - On-Demand Fedora Build Service[1] involves
> downloading packages via Koji. The build client can run simulatenously
> on multiple nodes (separate machines). Is it OK to use the same
> fedora.cert on all th
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 21:32 +0800, P J P wrote:
> I'm facing a weird printing problem with cups-1.5.2 on F16. I can
> print a document from the browser; But when i try to print a PDF
> document, it prompts me for the cups server password. I've tried with
> epdfviewer and Adobe Reader both halt at t
Help !
Forwarded Message
me: I see, that we got this active=no (or =FALSE) problem with other cases
me: like my remote server, where I need to work with vnc .
Kevin: VNC has always been considered a remote session and thus not eligible
for
Kevin: active session ACLs. See e.g
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> that would not allow custom kernel and such. Don't support the locked
> down platform; the answer to "Fedora on ARM" is "don't buy a Win8 ARM
> system and expect to run Fedora".
One should be very, very careful with sentences like this one.
On 06/08/2012 08:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>
>> that would not allow custom kernel and such. Don't support the locked
>> down platform; the answer to "Fedora on ARM" is "don't buy a Win8 ARM
>> system and expect to run Fedora".
> One should b
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 08:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>>
>>> that would not allow custom kernel and such. Don't support the locked
>>> down platform; the answer to "Fedora on ARM" is "don't buy a Win
on our RHEL6 servers I'm still using nss_ldap for the hosts database:
we have a private network and I don't want to copy portions of
/etc/hosts around to our servers and putting them into DNS isn't really
an option for us. I couldn't find an easy way to look up the data in
ldap for that data
commit f8ba93f533c4680a2d80e7c9048a3cd23d68bf43
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jun 8 15:07:00 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Test-UseAllModules.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-UseAllModules.spec b/perl-Test-UseAllModules.spec
commit 7b8b00e04dc62cbe967a405b337d6fc44b22a140
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jun 8 15:07:09 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Convert-Bencode.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Convert-Bencode.spec b/perl-Convert-Bencode.spec
index 6b
On 06/08/2012 09:00 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 06/08/2012 08:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>>>
that would not allow custom kernel and such. Don't support the locked
down platform; the
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 09:00 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>> On 06/08/2012 08:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> that would not allow custom kernel a
commit 70e07ef58d2477dfcb878053e33be28ffd5514cd
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jun 8 15:22:08 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-Prototyped.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-Prototyped.spec b/perl-Class-Prototyped.spec
index
On 06/08/2012 09:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 06/08/2012 09:00 AM, drago01 wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 06/08/2012 08:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wr
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPIx-Regexp:
de7334a0c2f121812e59e5ccddea96ec PPIx-Regexp-0.028.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
commit a190fb8ddf2e01ed6e04c5aa495a70ec802e36ad
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jun 8 15:28:43 2012 +0200
0.028 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec | 15 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Once upon a time, Gerry Reno said:
> And I expect this idea of preventing other OS's from being installed on Win8
> ARM hardware will not fly in the EU. It's
> anti-competitive.
You mean they don't have iPads and Android tablets in the EU?
--
Chris Adams
Systems and Network Administrator - Hi
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 09:06 -0400, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> on our RHEL6 servers I'm still using nss_ldap for the hosts database:
> we have a private network and I don't want to copy portions of
> /etc/hosts around to our servers and putting them into DNS isn't really
> an option for us. I could
commit c83ae39618bea099a9d31ddb98cfc4f0a12b0888
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jun 8 16:16:54 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Text-Glob.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Text-Glob.spec b/perl-Text-Glob.spec
index e7d59f3..d50c613 100
commit 0ece950ffbc5e759298bfd30824720963723087b
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jun 8 16:17:06 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-NOCpulse-Utils.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-NOCpulse-Utils.spec b/perl-NOCpulse-Utils.spec
index 0a6a1
On 06/08/2012 10:11 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Gerry Reno said:
>> And I expect this idea of preventing other OS's from being installed on Win8
>> ARM hardware will not fly in the EU. It's
>> anti-competitive.
> You mean they don't have iPads and Android tablets in the EU?
They
commit 51b5a920c4c3bc4c848817d07466fd4003dbf326
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jun 8 16:35:37 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec b/perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec
index
commit b08fe70b17d346dec3fd69456ba6ac8a4089108e
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jun 8 16:38:37 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
pcsc-perl.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/pcsc-perl.spec b/pcsc-perl.spec
index f7ee483..83fc87d 100644
--- a/pcsc-
commit 6832ed75f51695e0695bc445c2cabb77fd84e520
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jun 8 16:39:41 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Guard.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Guard.spec b/perl-Guard.spec
index 7434904..ddd4ed9 100644
--- a/pe
commit 79b5adecf6ac8d166ed218e5d7bbf157c1caabd8
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jun 8 16:40:19 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-YAML-Parser-Syck.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-YAML-Parser-Syck.spec b/perl-YAML-Parser-Syck.spec
index
I'll investigate it when we get to another system change but since its
working on the current servers I'm not touching it :)
By the time we do an OS refresh I'll probably try moving to IPA
Brian
On 06/08/2012 10:14 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 09:06 -0400, Brian Wheeler
Roland McGrath orphaned the 'lcov' package in all Fedora & EPEL branches.
Since I use lcov for libvirt testing & have done some patches/bugfixes
to it in the past, I have claimed ownership in Fedora branches. I'm not
doing anything with EPEL branches though, so if anyone cares about lcov
in EPEL5/E
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 15:16 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Jackson said:
> > If there are ARM machines where UEFI and Secure Boot are available,
> > we're going to have tools to do your own trust database management
> > anyway, so why would supporting them be any different from
On 06/08/2012 04:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 15:16 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Adam Jackson said:
>>> If there are ARM machines where UEFI and Secure Boot are available,
>>> we're going to have tools to do your own trust database management
>>> anyway, so
Outage: Host reboots - 2012-06-13 23:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2012-06-13 23:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date -d '2012-06-13 23:00 UTC'
Reason for
On Jun 8, 2012, at 6:47 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
> And I expect this idea of preventing other OS's from being installed on Win8
> ARM hardware will not fly in the EU. It's
> anti-competitive.
There's no such prevention. It's just that by voluntary agreement some ARM
hardware is being manufactu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:04:29 +1000
Amit Saha escribió:
> Hello:
>
> A part of my GSoC project - On-Demand Fedora Build Service[1] involves
> downloading packages via Koji. The build client can run simulatenously
> on multiple nodes (separate machines)
On Jun 8, 2012, at 8:33 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 10:11 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>>
>>> You mean they don't have iPads and Android tablets in the EU?
>
> They do. And there are certainly anti-competitive claims that can be made
> related to certain ARM platforms.
I don't think ant
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:23:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I'm going to try to get OCaml 4.00.0 beta 2 into Rawhide today.
>
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2012-06/msg00030.html
> http://caml.inria.fr/pub/distrib/ocaml-4.00/
>
> It's supposed to be compatible. I will
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 16:29 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 04:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > And? I wasn't speaking to "we should sign our arm images with
> > Microsoft's key", I was speaking to "we should support Secure Boot on
> > arm". If someone wants to build an arm machine with
On 06/08/2012 11:55 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2012, at 6:47 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> And I expect this idea of preventing other OS's from being installed on Win8
>> ARM hardware will not fly in the EU. It's
>> anti-competitive.
> There's no such prevention. It's just that by voluntary a
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 14:07 +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> > that would not allow custom kernel and such. Don't support the locked
> > down platform; the answer to "Fedora on ARM" is "don't buy a Win8 ARM
> > system and expect to run Fedora".
On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 14:07 +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>>
>>> that would not allow custom kernel and such. Don't support the locked
>>> down platform; the answer to "Fedora on ARM" is "don't bu
On 06/08/2012 05:42 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 16:29 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 06/08/2012 04:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> And? I wasn't speaking to "we should sign our arm images with
>>> Microsoft's key", I was speaking to "we should support Secure Boot on
>>> arm".
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 01:07:20PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > there's been precious little indication.
>
> There is a tidal wave of these PC ARM devices coming:
>
> http://www.itworld.com/hardware/240039/qualcomm-targets-pcs-takes-aim-intels-ultr
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 13:07 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 14:07 +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> >>
> >>> that would not allow custom kernel and such. Don't support the locke
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:52:30 +0100
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Help !
> Forwarded Message
>
> me: I see, that we got this active=no (or =FALSE) problem with other
> cases me: like my remote server, where I need to work with vnc .
>
> Kevin: VNC has always been considered a remote
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 18:14 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 05:42 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > And - though it pains me that this next thought might actually be
> > unpopular, though closer investigation might reveal that I'm giving the
> > feature too much credit, and without considering
On 21 May 2012, at 07:07, Gregory Hosler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am setting up a Koji server, and following the instructions given on the
> Fedora Koji wiki
>
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/ServerHowTo
>
> Part way down, there are d
On 06/08/2012 10:06 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:23:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm going to try to get OCaml 4.00.0 beta 2 into Rawhide today.
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2012-06/msg00030.html
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/distrib/ocaml-4.00/
I
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:25:51PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 10:06 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:23:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>
> >>I'm going to try to get OCaml 4.00.0 beta 2 into Rawhide today.
> >>
> >>https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/
On 06/08/2012 12:31 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:25:51PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 06/08/2012 10:06 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:23:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm going to try to get OCaml 4.00.0 beta 2 into Rawhide tod
On 06/08/2012 12:25 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 06/08/2012 10:06 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:23:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm going to try to get OCaml 4.00.0 beta 2 into Rawhide today.
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2012-06/msg00030.html
On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
> No. It's entirely anti-competitive:
> http://www.softwarefreedom.org/blog/2012/jan/12/microsoft-confirms-UEFI-fears-locks-down-ARM/
>
>
> http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/
You're confusing restriction of user choice
On Sex, 2012-06-08 at 11:34 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:52:30 +0100
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > Help !
> > Forwarded Message
> >
> > me: I see, that we got this active=no (or =FALSE) problem with other
> > cases me: like my remote server, where I need t
Greetings, patient friends:
The elections for the Fedora Board, Fedora Engineering Steering
Committee (FESCo), and Fedora Ambassadors Steering Committee (FAmSCo)
have concluded, and the results are shown below.
Apparently, we like to keep things interesting around here; the
improbable situation o
I used to get stuck on this one and end up going to "system settings" and
"brightness". This is the first I have heard of the Fn combination;
thanks
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Corey Richardson wrote:
> > How are you trying to modify the brightness?
>
> Holding down
On 06/08/2012 12:42 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I tried building without gnome-panel-devel and got:
Cross referencing...
Warning: Class or class type OgtkSourceView2Props.source_view_props not found
Ok
ocamlc.opt -I +ocamldoc -pp "camlp4o -I /usr/lib64/ocaml/camlp4/Camlp4Parsers
pa_macro.cmo -D
On Friday, 8 בJune 2012 20:07:20 Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > That is only assuming that Windows on ARM is successful, of which so far
> > there's been precious little indication.
>
> There is a tidal wave of these PC ARM devices coming:
>
> http://www.it
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:42:43PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Cross referencing...
> Warning: Class or class type OgtkSourceView2Props.source_view_props not found
> Ok
> ocamlc.opt -I +ocamldoc -pp "camlp4o -I
> /usr/lib64/ocaml/camlp4/Camlp4Parsers pa_macro.cmo -D OCAML_308" -c
> gtkdoc.ml
>
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Friday, 8 בJune 2012 20:07:20 Gerry Reno wrote:
> > On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > That is only assuming that Windows on ARM is successful, of which so
> far
> > > there's been precious little indication.
> >
> > There i
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 14:07 +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>>>
that would not allow custom kernel and such. Don't support the locked
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Richard Vickery
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Oron Peled wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, 8 בJune 2012 20:07:20 Gerry Reno wrote:
>> > On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > > That is only assuming that Windows on ARM is successful, of which so
>> >
On Saturday, 9 בJune 2012 00:47:30 Richard Vickery wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Oron Peled wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 8 בJune 2012 20:07:20 Gerry Reno wrote:
> > > On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > That is only assuming that Windows on ARM is successful, of which so
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> El Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:04:29 +1000
> Amit Saha escribió:
>> Hello:
>>
>> A part of my GSoC project - On-Demand Fedora Build Service[1] involves
>> downloading packages via Koji. The build cl
On 01/06/12 02:22, Peter Jones wrote:
>
> Next year if we don't implement some form of Secure Boot support, the
> majority
> of Fedora users will not be able to install Fedora on new machines.
Is that actually true though?
If Fedora does not implement some form of Secure Boot support, 100% of
Fe
62 matches
Mail list logo
