Hi,
I have developed a small s390 (System z/mainframe) specific
utility that allows the user to configure the stand-alone or a VM kind
of dump. This is somewhat similar to system-config-kdump, but this is
not a 'kdump' tool. I just wanted to know if I can contribute it as a
patch to the
On 11/03/2012 08:27 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:41:05 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:29:07 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
Hans and I have been having a problem uploading the source for the
new version of
Dne 5.11.2012 10:22, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Where is the community spirit? What went wrong with fedora community? Why on
earth do you people insist on tracking people activity and not try detecting
unmaintained packages?
Detecting unmaintained packages is even easier and has clearer metrics.
Really, why noone wants people that are ready
On 11/06/2012 05:35 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 2012-11-05 12:22, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/05/2012 07:52 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
A crit path update that affects, say, two packages and nothing else,
could be approved by default as well. Many of the crit path
features however
On 6 November 2012 08:07, MANIK BAJPAI manib...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
I have developed a small s390 (System z/mainframe) specific utility
that allows the user to configure the stand-alone or a VM kind of dump.
This is somewhat similar to system-config-kdump, but this is not a
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:53:37 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
That's called CentOS,
Nope ... CentOS/RHEL is a different end of extremes.
7 years+ life-time, no API changes, etc.
What is lacking is a middle ground between Fedora and CentOS.
Something with a life-time of ~2 years, with API
I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely did
not propose anything like noone wants people that are ready to do one
thing in a year.
Vit
Dne 6.11.2012 09:52, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
Where is the community spirit? What went wrong with fedora community? Why on
It's the whole thread that implies that not your mail only.
No one managed to explain why there should be actions against people instead of
packages. I would be really thankful if someone explains how he can getter
better measurement of people activity than of package maintenance problems and
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18 Beta.
Thursday, November 08, 2012 @19:00 UTC (14:00 EST/11:00 PST/20:00 CET)
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
Dne 4.11.2012 10:31, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 11/04/2012 02:32 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
- Autoqa could perhaps help out, but I am not holding my breath. ;)
Yeh, autoqa can't do a whole lot when its builds often intentionally
dependencies break (eg soname bumps). Unless such builds were
I agree. I'd rather give people permission to co-maintain package, then
push them out of community. I'm afraid we can only loose maintainers by
measurements of activity.
Marcela
On 11/06/2012 12:10 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
It's the whole thread that implies that not your mail only.
No
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 22:52 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
all we would gain is a way to distinguish an offical
build vs a scratch build in koji or a build someone did to mimic our
environment.
I think what people mainly want here is a means to protect against
man-in-the-middle attacks between
Is it really that hard for you people to follow our mailing list
guidelines[1]?
JBG
1.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#If_You_Are_Replying_to_a_Message
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compose started at Tue Nov 6 09:15:33 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dhcp-forwarder]
dhcp-forwarder-upstart-0.10-1801.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl
[dnf]
dnf-0.2.14-2.git4831982.fc18.noarch requires python-hawkey =
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the version
history in koji [2] and [3] and if he doesn't care about one package, it
is reasonable to doubt that the other packages will be in better
On 11/06/2012 01:56 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the version
history in koji [2] and [3] and if he doesn't care about one package, it
is reasonable to doubt that
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Dne 6.11.2012 14:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well
On 11/06/2012 02:24 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 6.11.2012 14:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
the script in Johann's ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/967#comment:7 Imho it might be
better to give acl to more people, then
On 11/06/2012 04:32 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
the script in Johann's ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/967#comment:7 Imho
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 16:04:39 +0100,
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
When I do not react upon requests, I usually either missed or forgot
about the request or deliberately do not yet want to approve.
That said, what I feel is missing in Fedora's pkgdb web-forms is an
option to
Hello all,
I'm not a Fedora developer, nor package maintainer. I'm a French Fedora
Ambassador for a long time. (I should say I was cause I don't do to
many things last time, just wake up every 6 months for Fedora releases
and other events).
I'm also a developer but that's not about Fedora.
While
On 11/06/2012 10:34 AM, Matthieu Gautier wrote:
Hello all,
I'm not a Fedora developer, nor package maintainer. I'm a French Fedora
Ambassador for a long time. (I should say I was cause I don't do to
many things last time, just wake up every 6 months for Fedora releases
and other events).
I'm
Hello
2012/11/6 Jason Brooks jbro...@redhat.com:
For those who upgrade each release (or sooner), a 6mo life span for the
latest release wouldn't matter. Those who don't want to upgrade every six
months might well appreciate the two year life span.
They should pay for RHEL.
--
With best
Le 06/11/2012 19:48, Peter Lemenkov a écrit :
Hello All.
2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier mgaut...@fedoraproject.org:
For example, if we start from Fedora20 at beginning of 2014:
- Fedora20(jan 2014) is a stable release. (Fedora18 eol, actual way of
doing)
- Fedora21Preview(jul 2014) is an
On 10/23/2012 04:54 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Lo!
On 23.10.2012 17:23, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:37 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
There is currently no way to undefine a macro at the rpm
2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier mgaut...@fedoraproject.org:
So you not a maintainer but you still suggesting that we, maintainers,
should do 2 times more job by supporting several simultaneous Fedora
versions instead of 3 right now for more than two years. And that's
all just because you think it's
On 11/06/2012 10:55 AM, Matthieu Gautier wrote:
No, I never suggest that. Preview versions have a timelife of 6mo
instead of 12.
Stable version have a lifetime of 24mo (12mo for regular updates)
instead of 12.
The cycle would have to go: stable, preview, preview, stable, and so on
to avoid
Le 06/11/2012 20:05, Peter Lemenkov a écrit :
2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier mgaut...@fedoraproject.org:
So you not a maintainer but you still suggesting that we, maintainers,
should do 2 times more job by supporting several simultaneous Fedora
versions instead of 3 right now for more than two
oddly this looks a lot like the Ubuntu release cycle if you replace stable
with LTS
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Jason Brooks jbro...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/06/2012 10:55 AM, Matthieu Gautier wrote:
No, I never suggest that. Preview versions have a timelife of 6mo
instead of 12.
2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier mgaut...@fedoraproject.org:
Hum.. It should be some misunderstanding somewhere :
Definitely. Please stop talking about things you have no idea about.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/06/2012 02:00 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
Okay, so here are two patches:
fedpkg-1.10-use-nil-to-unset-distunset.patch (this one uses %nil instead
of 0 in my previous fix)
fedpkg-1.10-unset-runtime-disttag.patch (this patch detects the runtime
environment and unsets the version specific
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 22:24 +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier mgaut...@fedoraproject.org:
Hum.. It should be some misunderstanding somewhere :
Definitely. Please stop talking about things you have no idea about.
You can also just show him where he is wrong rather
One have to say the hard truth - only the latest fedora release is supported by
many maintainers because that's what they/we use.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: Matthieu Gautier mgaut...@fedoraproject.org
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent:
On 11/06/2012 07:54 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
One have to say the hard truth - only the latest fedora release is supported by
many maintainers because that's what they/we use.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
Please read and follow the mailinglist guidelines...
JBG
--
devel
Le 06/11/2012 20:19, Mark Bidewell a écrit :
oddly this looks a lot like the Ubuntu release cycle if you replace
stable with LTS
Ubuntu LTS in about 5 years lifetime. Other releases have a lifetime of
18mo.
For now, there is 5 maintained ubuntu versions at the same time (the
older is from 2008)
I have a Wifi card that is supposed to be managed by the network
service. The interface's IP addresses, prefixes, routes and all that get
assigned correctly on boot, but the wireless parameters – mode, ESSID
and channel – do not get assigned. I have to set those manually with the
iwconfig
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 21:47 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
I have a Wifi card that is supposed to be managed by the network
service. The interface's IP addresses, prefixes, routes and all that get
assigned correctly on boot, but the wireless parameters – mode, ESSID
and channel – do not get
Hi,
I'm trying to sort out a pulseaudio issue. It's failing to acknowledge
a request (from Jack) to release a device. I've tried the pulseaudio
list but haven't had any answers. The full thread is here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2012-November/015210.html
This is
Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 21:47 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
I have a Wifi card that is supposed to be managed by the network
service. The interface's IP addresses, prefixes, routes and all that
get assigned correctly on boot, but the wireless parameters – mode,
ESSID and
On 11/06/2012 11:34 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
Jesse, please review and apply these upstream and make a new update.
Fixed comments. Other patch
(fedpkg-1.10-use-nil-to-unset-distunset.patch) is fine as is.
Tweaked and pushed. Building an update now.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a
The nomination period for FAmSCo (Fedora Ambassador Steering Committee),
FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee), and the Fedora Board is
now open, and will close on November 13, 2012, at 23:59:59 UTC.
This election cycle will fill the following seats for a one-year period:
* Fedora
Jesse Keating píše v Út 06. 11. 2012 v 10:48 -0800:
On 11/06/2012 03:35 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And rel-engs actively prohibits staging as much as they can [1], where
it should be encouraged IMO.
Vit
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4580
Additional tags have a
commit a4949f37cacbe54178e8fd58ad30fd919f1f3f5d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 6 09:32:53 2012 +0100
Update to 5.16.2, remove patch for RT#114220
.gitignore |1 +
...5.16.1-PATCH-perl-114220-h-not-equiv-to-h.patch |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872993
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 1.16
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.14
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-XSAccessor/
Please consult the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872993
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865296
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.16.2-234.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.16.2-234.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872992
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI:
92c3d1a5747be1e60618f999a50dad93 CGI.pm-3.61.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3da0ab1994264116344e11c99c9d4c85cd2c7fda
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 6 13:13:57 2012 +0100
3.61 bump (no code changes)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-CGI.spec |9 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 16b7d993a10314f16c0643b47531d08be595fc38
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 6 15:06:35 2012 +0100
Add BR perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker).
Signed-off-by: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
perl-Class-Data-Inheritable.spec |6 +-
1 files
commit 6f8c3a3cd2b1bffe0ad9453c207bc53ca5cb8516
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 6 15:14:54 2012 +0100
Add missing dependencies
perl-Font-TTF.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Font-TTF.spec b/perl-Font-TTF.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MARC-XML:
3b7b3f188c1434394ee6c8b102d01fdb MARC-XML-0.93.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ddfbfcc9da8a6a9f5c45566dbdaf0d6a8ad0db61
Author: Dan Scott d...@coffeecode.net
Date: Tue Nov 6 09:40:28 2012 -0500
Initial import (#829865).
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MARC-XML.spec | 61
sources|1 +
3
Summary of changes:
ddfbfcc... Initial import (#829865). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873715
Bug ID: 873715
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: high
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: lxt...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
commit 7719b7faa40c5b56df27e850997ea4b5eda552e2
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 6 16:15:43 2012 +0100
Modernize the spec a bit and fix the dependencies
perl-GD-Barcode.spec | 26 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
---
diff
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Inspector:
7ab3ca22d3147236dddfb58f2366ad22 Class-Inspector-1.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
7badb20... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
d84d527... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
f8d7e14... Perl 5.16 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages (*)
96c7339... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*)
7badb20... Upstream update. (*)
bd04e91... Merge cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in
commit bd04e9185d7f463ec1adcf3fcab6679b34ac97bf
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Nov 7 07:40:45 2012 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-Class-Inspector.spec |9 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-Inspector.spec
Summary of changes:
d246763... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
28206a9... Upstream update. Spec file modernization. Fix perl_bootstra (*)
78d7dda... Upstream update. Spec file modernization. Fix perl_bootstra (*)
d84d527... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
commit 7267988d38b89ed65c310f2469b9a5685417dfeb
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Nov 7 07:54:36 2012 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-Class-Inspector.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-Inspector.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873715
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Class-Inspector-1.28-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Class-Inspector-1.28-1.fc17
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873715
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Class-Inspector-1.28-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Class-Inspector-1.28-1.fc18
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873715
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Class-Inspector-1.28-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Class-Inspector-1.28-1.fc16
--
You are receiving
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/443
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/443/0001-Trac-Ticket-443-Deleting-attribute-present-in.patch
Bug Description: Even if setting a config parameter to nsslapd-
allowed-to-delete-attrs, the value failed to delete if the type
was on|off or
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18 Beta.
Thursday, November 08, 2012 @19:00 UTC (14:00 EST/11:00 PST/20:00 CET)
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
The nomination period for FAmSCo (Fedora Ambassador Steering Committee),
FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee), and the Fedora Board is
now open, and will close on November 13, 2012, at 23:59:59 UTC.
This election cycle will fill the following seats for a one-year period:
* Fedora
72 matches
Mail list logo
