On 11/10/2012 11:41 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Andre Robatino wrote:
*IMPORTANT*: Both TC8 install DVDs are oversized and will not fit on
single-layer DVDs. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD#Capacity for
DVD size limits.
See what damage "Mini"DebugInfo is doing? Nobody (other than me) cared a
On 11/01/2012 11:08 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> - I built openmpi 1.6.3 in rawhide yesterday. This had an unexpected bump in
> the libmpi_f90.so soname. I know this affects hdf5 and netcdf-fortran, both
> my packages and I'll be rebuilding them later today (hopefully).
On that, I've made a p
I follow the step to retire akonadi-googledata package.
The upstream project is no longer maintain and in kdepim-runtime there is
already a new akonadi resource for google services.
On fedora git web interface I don't see my the last commit with
dead.package file...
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.or
Compose started at Sun Nov 11 09:15:40 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dhcp-forwarder]
dhcp-forwarder-upstart-0.10-1801.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl
[dvipdfm]
dvipdfm-0.13.2d-44.fc18.x86_64 requires libkpathsea.so.4(
Panu Matilainen laiskiainen.org> writes:
> Reverting mini-debuginfo would require a mass-rebuild which is hardly
> going to happen at this point of F18 no matter what you think of the
> feature.
>
> For starters it would help if the DVD didn't contain piles of obsoleted,
> conflicting and in
Compose started at Sun Nov 11 08:15:08 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LabPlot]
LabPlot-1.6.0.2-12.fc18.i686 requires libaudiofile.so.0
LabPlot-1.6.0.2-12.fc18.x86_64 requires libaudiofile.so.0()(64bit)
[autotest-framework
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 06:55:09PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 05:35:16PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I'd strongly recommend oz-install ...
> > https://github.com/clalancette/oz
>
> Okay, so, sell me on this. I know Oz is popular, especially in the OpenStack
>
On 2012-11-11 0:53, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Reverting mini-debuginfo would require a mass-rebuild which is hardly
going to happen at this point of F18 no matter what you think of the
feature.
For starters it would help if the DVD didn't contain piles of
obsoleted, conflicting and in some cases (
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Reverting mini-debuginfo would require a mass-rebuild which is hardly
> going to happen at this point of F18 no matter what you think of the
> feature.
I've seen mass rebuilds rushed through in less time than what we have from
now until the current F18 release target date
Adam Williamson wrote:
> The other classic case is that when a dependency of a package in the
> set of packages to be included in an image is satisfied by more than one
> other package, pungi pulls *all* the satisfying packages into the
> compose, not just one. This seems odd at first glance but no
Am 11.11.2012 18:31, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> Reverting mini-debuginfo would require a mass-rebuild which is hardly
>> going to happen at this point of F18 no matter what you think of the
>> feature.
>
> I really don't understand the cavalier approach to bloat around here
On 11/11/2012 05:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
We need to get the live images back to CD size
Last time I checked the SIG's surrounding each of those spins they
themselves where responsible for their own spins sizes so if they pass
that they might just as well be doing so deliberately to deliver
I visit koji, and can see the build info. How can I delete the build?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:39:15 -0500
Neal Becker wrote:
> I visit koji, and can see the build info. How can I delete the build?
a) Has the build gone out in a rawhide compose? (They happen daily
starting at 08:15utc). If so, instead push a updated/fixed build.
b) If it's not gone out in a rawhi
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:02:27PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> So .. they're different things. I'm still unclear what sort of
> appliances you're trying to build and what for, and that will affect
> what tool you decide to use.
This is the official image produced by Fedora for use in EC2 a
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:46 AM, drago01 wrote:
> We should make fedup obsolete preupgrade. But we should have a gui first .
I had a look at fedup and it seems in a very early stage of
development - so a bit like the Anaconda change (with hindsight) the
new isn't quite ready to take over at th
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:46 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> We should make fedup obsolete preupgrade. But we should have a gui first
>> .
>
> I had a look at fedup and it seems in a very early stage of
> development - so a bit like the Anaconda
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> Reverting mini-debuginfo would require a mass-rebuild which is hardly
>> going to happen at this point of F18 no matter what you think of the
>> feature.
>
> I've seen mass rebuilds rushed through in less time than wh
On 2012-11-11 16:42, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
Reverting mini-debuginfo would require a mass-rebuild which is
hardly
going to happen at this point of F18 no matter what you think of
the
feature.
I've seen mass
On 11/06/2012 06:07 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
And please, please, please could we trim quotes to relevant ones? Thanks!
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
On 11/11/2012 06:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2012-11-11 0:53, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Reverting mini-debuginfo would require a mass-rebuild which is hardly
going to happen at this point of F18 no matter what you think of the
feature.
For starters it would help if the DVD didn't contain pil
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Nov 10, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
Fedora is just one of the downstream users of Anaconda. It is incorrect
to assume that the upstream Anaconda development can be dictated solely
by Fedora, any more than upstre
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
- depends on Python stack
+1, we really need to get Python out of the minimal installation.
The focus should be on replacing the existing Python-based packages in the
minimum set (e.g. yum) by native replacements (e.g. zi
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-11-12
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again tomorrow. Adam won't be around for it because
Monday is a holiday in Canada b
On 2012-11-11 22:02, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Based on a quick grep, it doesn't seem to consider obsoletion at all,
which explains what I see on the DVD and perhaps deserves looking at.
I think the basic idea is that pungi isn't supposed to painfully
re-implement yum. If packages are obsoleted,
On 12. 11. 2012 at 01:28:10, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> - depends on Python stack
> >
> > +1, we really need to get Python out of the minimal installation.
> >
> > The focus should be on replacing the existing Python-based packag
On 11/12/2012 08:56 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2012-11-11 22:02, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Based on a quick grep, it doesn't seem to consider obsoletion at all,
which explains what I see on the DVD and perhaps deserves looking at.
I think the basic idea is that pungi isn't supposed to painful
27 matches
Mail list logo
