Exciting news from the fast-moving world of RH Bugzilla administration:
a mere, fleeting year and a half after I filed the initial request, it
is finally the case that any registered Bugzilla user can now change the
Blocks: (and Depends On:) field of any Fedora bug! Thanks to Matt Tyson
for doing
On 11/26/2012 12:15 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
You're asking for something very open-ended, and which is not even
possible to implement in general -- what if the inspecting operating
system is Linux, and the inspected operating system needs custom Mac OS X
libraries?
Perhaps I am just
Compose started at Wed Nov 28 09:15:37 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dhcp-forwarder]
dhcp-forwarder-upstart-0.10-1801.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl
[fedora-jam-kde-theme]
fedora-jam-kde-theme-1.0.1-1.fc18.noarch
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:43:48PM +0100, Simon Lukasik wrote:
On 11/26/2012 12:15 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
You're asking for something very open-ended, and which is not even
possible to implement in general -- what if the inspecting operating
system is Linux, and the inspected
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT, 19:00 CEST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #966 Fedora 19 Schedule
One more addition:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
= Followups =
#topic #896 Refine Feature process
.fesco 896
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/896
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dne 28.11.2012 14:38, Fedora Branched Report napsal(a):
Compose started at Wed Nov 28 09:15:37 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dhcp-forwarder]
dhcp-forwarder-upstart-0.10-1801.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl
Quoting Ismael Olea (2012-11-27 16:24:26)
We have seen such problems many times in many packages. Usually adding a
dummy method just to satisfy the signature is enough though in this case it
might not be.
I see.
Please report it to svnkit developers too.
Done:
On 11/28/2012 09:17 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 28.11.2012 14:38, Fedora Branched Report napsal(a):
Compose started at Wed Nov 28 09:15:37 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dhcp-forwarder]
Good day all,
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Nov 28th)
in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
Current items on the agenda:
Hi Simon,
On 28.11.2012 14:43, Simon Lukasik wrote:
I can't see how this is related to my latest post. And I can't see what
leads you to think that cross-platform scanning is feasible today
(standard-wise and performance-wise).
Please check this very informative post from Steve (OVAL board
I'm not going to be able to make the meeting.
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Nov
28th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
On 11/27/2012 02:47 PM, Edward Mann wrote:
I would like to be the maintainer for the Enlightenment e17 for Fedora.
I am sending this e-mail to seek guidance and also a sponsor. Getting
e17 on Fedora i will need to build and install the following packages
eina - Core data structure library.
Hello,
this proposal was recently linked in various places, so let's formally
introduce it:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mmaslano/Feature_process
This an incremental change, not a major overhaul designed to solve all problems.
The benefits expected from this proposal:
* Making proposed
It's not clear where this should be discussed? Editing the wiki talk
page? On this list?
Anyway, I'll kick this off by saying:
* Simplifying the process for self-contained features (e.g. individual
package version upgrades)
I don't see why these are features at all. Surely it's better
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 01:45 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Exciting news from the fast-moving world of RH Bugzilla administration:
a mere, fleeting year and a half after I filed the initial request, it
is finally the case that any registered Bugzilla user can now change the
Blocks: (and Depends
Halli,
I'm trying to build the kaya package for the rawnide branch of Fedora.
Unfortunately, I have got the following error messages during the build
process:
make -C compiler
make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/kaya-0.5.2/compiler'
/usr/bin/happy -g -a -c ./Parser.y -iParser.out
On 11/28/2012 06:32 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
[yum-cron]
yum-cron-0.9.2-6.fc19.noarch requires yum-downloadonly
Looks like the yum-cron package was never retired from the distribution.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
--
Orion Poplawski
The Fedora 18 Spherical Cow Beta release is rolling! This release offers a
preview of some of the best free and open source technology currently under
development.
We are delighted to announce the availability of the beta release of Fedora
18. Want to get a taste of the future? Download it
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com said:
* Simplifying the process for self-contained features (e.g. individual
package version upgrades)
I don't see why these are features at all. Surely it's better towards
the end of each release cycle for someone to compare the
I don't see why these are features at all. Surely it's better towards
the end of each release cycle for someone to compare the versions of
packages and add something in the release notes for each major GUI /
programming language / user application that got a big update.
Rich.
I only have
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 15:01:21 -0700,
There are several mechanisms for a developer to get their work into the
release notes. The rel-notes BZ tag was wholly unused during this cycle, to
the best of my knowledge. There were no bugs filed against the
release-notes bugzilla product to request
Hello
I have currently learned that the package rssh has been orphaned and I
will like to keep this package alive.
I will like to non-deprecated the fedora 17 rssh in the fedora packager
database.
I would like to work on the security issues.
thank you
Alex
--
devel mailing list
On , Tom Callaway wrote:
On 11/27/2012 02:47 PM, Edward Mann
wrote:
I would like to be the maintainer for the Enlightenment e17
for Fedora. I am sending this e-mail to seek guidance and also a
sponsor. Getting e17 on Fedora i will need to build and install the
following packages eina -
On 11/28/2012 08:08 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
this proposal was recently linked in various places, so let's formally
introduce it:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mmaslano/Feature_process
This an incremental change, not a major overhaul designed to solve all problems.
The benefits
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:23:09PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
* Simplifying the process for self-contained features (e.g. individual
package version upgrades)
I don't see why these are features at all. Surely it's better towards
the end of each release cycle for someone to compare the
On 28/11/2012 5:27 PM, Alexander Aristotle Davis wrote:
Hello
I have currently learned that the package rssh has been orphaned and I
will like to keep this package alive.
I will like to non-deprecated the fedora 17 rssh in the fedora
packager database.
I would like to work on the security
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
this proposal was recently linked in various places, so let's formally
introduce it:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mmaslano/Feature_process
As discussed earlier, I liked the three-tier approach better, but I'm in
favor of
I would suggest that we create a clear SOP for fall back planning in case
a feature, especially a crit path feature, is not ready for prime time.
Obviously, if a feature is not %100 by feature freeze, then it needs to be
dropped. I would even venture to suggest that we include in the SOP
Hi Alex!
Do you have an srpm we can test with?
Dan
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Alexander Aristotle Davis
aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca wrote:
On 28/11/2012 5:27 PM, Alexander Aristotle Davis wrote:
Hello
I have currently learned that the package rssh has been orphaned and I
will
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 21:45:23 GMT, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Halli,
I'm trying to build the kaya package for the rawnide branch of Fedora.
Unfortunately, I have got the following error messages during the build
process:
make -C compiler
make[1]: Entering directory
You can also try ' repoquery --whatprovides pkgconfig(haskell98-2.0.0.1) '
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 21:45:23 GMT, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Halli,
I'm trying to build the kaya package for the rawnide branch of Fedora.
Actually the baseurl provided in your paste does not work for me.
here is the fixed entry: baseurl=
http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/x86_64/RPMS
2012/11/29 Edward Mann e@edmann.com
**
On , Tom Callaway wrote:
On 11/27/2012 02:47 PM, Edward Mann wrote:
I
Another comment: while you keep that repository up id really welcome if you
could sign the packages in your private repo.
2012/11/29 Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com
Actually the baseurl provided in your paste does not work for me.
here is the fixed entry: baseurl=
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 19:15:29 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote:
You can also try ' repoquery --whatprovides pkgconfig(haskell98-2.0.0.1) '
I don't believe Haskell packages tend to install pkgconfig files (and
haskell98 doesn't provide one). If you know the magic hash of the
package, you can query for
After yum install enlightenment running enlightenment_start makes it crash:
enlightenment_start
E - PID=22138, valgrind=0
/usr/bin/enlightenment: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libedje.so.1:
undefined symbol: EIO_MONITOR_FILE_CREATED
2012/11/29 Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com
Another comment:
the crash happens because of a collision with libeio which is in the fedora
main repository.
2012/11/29 Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com
After yum install enlightenment running enlightenment_start makes it crash:
enlightenment_start
E - PID=22138, valgrind=0
/usr/bin/enlightenment: symbol
Alexander Aristotle Davis wrote:
I would like to be the maintainer for the rssh for Fedora. I am
sending this e-mail to seek guidance and also a sponsor. Getting rssh
on Fedora i will need to fix the security.
Hi Alex!
I think you need a plan for how you will convince potential sponsors
that
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876974
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877015
Bug 877015 depends on bug 876974, which changed state.
Bug 876974 Summary: CVE-2012-5526 perl-CGI: Newline injection due to improper
CRLF escaping in Set-Cookie and P3P headers [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876974
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CGI-3.51-7.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877015
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CGI-3.51-7.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876221
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Wx-0.9914-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876974
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877015
Bug 877015 depends on bug 876974, which changed state.
Bug 876974 Summary: CVE-2012-5526 perl-CGI: Newline injection due to improper
CRLF escaping in Set-Cookie and P3P headers [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876221
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Wx-0.9914-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
commit a8b61f77808a73caeb75df69295dcca285d6c285
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Nov 28 14:10:33 2012 +0100
Add missing buildtime deps
perl-File-Remove.spec | 24
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859872
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
commit 7e17968ce7dac8d5afd8d08160712a0e1012a039
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Nov 28 15:05:33 2012 +0100
BuildRequire Carp and fix the License tag
perl-Font-AFM.spec | 17 +++--
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745537
Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Signature:
c13eabb8c2e6b12fd098710a81185ac6 Module-Signature-0.70.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f0b0d9b8fb445c461192280b2719a70a15bd5ce8
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Nov 28 20:55:39 2012 +
Update to 0.70
- New upstream release 0.70
- Don't check gpg version if gpg does not exist
perl-Module-Signature.spec |6 +-
sources
Summary of changes:
f0b0d9b... Update to 0.70 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Signature-0.70-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
f0b0d9b... Update to 0.70
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Signature-0.70-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
f0b0d9b... Update to 0.70
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878005
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.6-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878005
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877724
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-0.78-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877724
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-0.78-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878005
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.6-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878005
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.6-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878829
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878829
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-prefork-1.04-10.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878005
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.6-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/395
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/395/0001-Ticket-395-RFE-389-ds-shouldn-t-advertise-in-the-roo.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The Fedora 18 Spherical Cow Beta release is rolling! This release offers a
preview of some of the best free and open source technology currently under
development.
We are delighted to announce the availability of the beta release of Fedora
18. Want to get a taste of the future? Download it
66 matches
Mail list logo
