Hallo,
for Fedora 17 we had a feature to make btrfs to the
standard filesystem of Fedora. This feature was defered
because the fsck utitlities for btrfs was not available
on the stable state for Fedora 17.
So, I would like to ask, if there any plans to make this to
a feautre for F-19. I think it
On 01/16/2013 08:36 AM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
= Followups =
#topic #986 F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking
-https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking
.fesco 986
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/986
The feature was renamed, so it will be resent to devel list again with
The Pillow feature should not be in the list, it was already approved by
FESCO last time.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.comwrote:
On 01/16/2013 08:36 AM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
= Followups =
#topic #986 F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking
On 01/16/2013 10:07 AM, Henrique Junior wrote:
Other distros are discussing about the future of MySQL and the
implementation of MariaDB as default. What is Fedora position about
this matter?
Got any links to those other distributions discussions
JBG
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:07:30AM -0200, Henrique Junior wrote:
Other distros are discussing about the future of MySQL and the
implementation of MariaDB as default. What is Fedora position about this
matter?
There have been a few threads about this.
We need facts to get a decision - such a
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Henrique Junior henrique...@gmail.com wrote:
Other distros are discussing about the future of MySQL and the
implementation of MariaDB as default. What is Fedora position about this
matter?
--
Henrique LonelySpooky Junior
http://about.me/henriquejunior
I
Amazing
Can it replace mysql in the future?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/16/2013 10:49 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
The Pillow feature should not be in the list, it was already approved by
FESCO last time.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
mailto:mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/16/2013 08:36 AM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:44:31AM -0200, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
[MariaDB]
I think this is going to happen for F19 or F20
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=15262
Great news - I totally missed this.
This is the package review:
Can someone push this to stable:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-15366/libldm-0.2.3-1.fc18
I don't get any push to stable button when I log in, presumably
something to do with me not having submitted it in the first place. I
asked Matt Booth (the maintainer) but he seems to
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:10:18AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Can someone push this to stable:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-15366/libldm-0.2.3-1.fc18
I don't get any push to stable button when I log in, presumably
something to do with me not having submitted
On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
On 01/15/2013 01:01 PM, Adam Tkac wrote:
Another interesting thread is
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30352453
We are currently discussing drop of the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI feature
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:53:25AM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Hallo,
for Fedora 17 we had a feature to make btrfs to the
standard filesystem of Fedora. This feature was defered
because the fsck utitlities for btrfs was not available
on the stable state for Fedora 17.
So, I would like
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/Enlightenment =
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Dne 10.1.2013 21:28, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink?
What does it get us these days?
Has anything changed about prelink since the last time it was
discussed here?
prelink should not
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/Erlyvideo =
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/Ruby 2.0.0 =
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/JRuby 1.7 =
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:18:19 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely
must be fixed before it can become the default (both affect
virtualization, coincidentally):
It affects also compilation, GDB was rebuilding for 10-15 minutes
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 04:12:29 +0100, xning wrote:
Shall we should modify '-g' to '-g3' to have gcc save the macro
info? So when we install *-debuginfo packages, we can look up a
macro definition, just like we can look up a function definition.
That would be great, I have not found any official
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:02:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 18:05 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
GNOME can apply a keyboard config you set via GNOME Control Center
systemwide, using localectl. I'm not sure KDE, Xfce, LXDE or other
desktops
commit 0494b1c5823db7f9d607eff207e928c464de02f1
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jan 16 14:13:09 2013 +0100
Remove bundled Pod-Parser
perl.spec |9 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index 1ed6a6c..c6f8d4d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue 15 Jan 2013 01:58:45 PM EST, Neal Becker wrote:
Just tried fedup f17-f18. After digging for correct command line, I got it
to
work. BUT,
after reboot it sits at fedora splash screen, which is pulsating. It gives
almost no indication
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the
I love this one, can I do something for this?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
wrote:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features
are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on
devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new
As the Feature was renamed and the content of Feature has been extended
as requested by FESCo, re-announcing it to the community for re-review.
See https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/986
= Features/Fix Network Name Resolution =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FixNetworkNameResolution
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 02:26:00PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 04:12:29 +0100, xning wrote:
Shall we should modify '-g' to '-g3' to have gcc save the macro
info? So when we install *-debuginfo packages, we can look up a
macro definition, just like we can look up a
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/RemovePyXML =
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Jan 16th)
in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
Current items on the agenda:
1) Current
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:49:18 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 11:38:46PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
is to invoke it via systemd-inhibit --what=handle-lid-switch.
# systemd-inhibit --what=handle-lid-switch
Missing command line to execute.
..
On 01/11/2013 07:04 PM, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Broken upgrade path report for tags f18 - f18-updates - f19:
crobinso:
qemu:
f18-updates f19 (2:qemu-1.2.2-1.fc18 2:qemu-1.2.0-25.fc19)
Was working out some regressions with qemu 1.3, fixed now:
Henrique Junior henrique...@gmail.com writes:
Other distros are discussing about the future of MySQL and the
implementation of MariaDB as default. What is Fedora position about this
matter?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ReplaceMySQLwithMariaDB
We could use help with testing.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
On 01/15/2013 01:01 PM, Adam Tkac wrote:
Another interesting thread is
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30352453
We are currently discussing drop of the
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:57:02 +0100
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Of course (BTW the Automake maintainer now confirmed to me privately
that he'd accept such a patch), though it would probably would make
sense to put it in Fedora even before 1.13.2.
I'll try to put together the
Hello xining,
xning xn...@redhat.com a écrit:
Shall we should modify '-g' to '-g3' to have gcc save the macro info?
So when we install *-debuginfo packages, we can look up a macro
definition, just like we can look up a function definition.
For what it's worth, I believe that would be useful,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Jan Kratochvil
jan.kratoch...@redhat.comwrote:
It affects also compilation, GDB was rebuilding for 10-15 minutes instead
of
1 minute. I have provided even a reproducer for 1sec vs. 1min issue.
The Bug just got automatically closed without any human reply as
Hello all,
after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided to drop the
jpeg8 API/ABI feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. The main reason is that
libjpeg upstream didn't present any valid argument for post-jpeg6 changes and
libjpeg-turbo is not going to port all post-jpeg6
On 1/16/13 10:04 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
mailto:jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
It affects also compilation, GDB was rebuilding for 10-15 minutes instead
of
1 minute. I have provided even a
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:14:26 +0100
Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello all,
after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided
to drop the jpeg8 API/ABI feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI.
The main reason is that libjpeg upstream didn't present any valid
argument
- Original Message -
Hello all,
after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided
to drop the
jpeg8 API/ABI feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI.
Ok, I'm going to switch libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI to incomplete category,
thanks.
Jaroslav
The main
reason is that
On 01/16/2013 04:23 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/16/13 10:04 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
mailto:jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
It affects also compilation, GDB was rebuilding for 10-15 minutes instead
of
Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are
required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Also, the scope bits about the issues with codecs are not encouraging. Do we
know that streaming to any of the above targets will work with
patent-unencumbered codecs?
Android should work with WebM as for the others I
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:38:29AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:14:26 +0100
Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello all,
after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided
to drop the jpeg8 API/ABI feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI.
The main
- Original Message -
Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik
jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features
are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on
On 15/01/13 15:43, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
The try: except: is swallowing all errors here. Getting a more verbose
traceback may help diagnose. You can remove the try: except: and dedent the
remaining code one level to get the actual traceback in the build.log.
This is exactly what I did:
#
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Afik Josef just left Red Hat not Fedora...
I haven't seen any recent activity in Fedora from him. Have you?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/16/2013 12:00 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
snip I haven't seen any recent activity in Fedora from him. Have you?
Rahul
Some patches on the btrfs list on Jan 7 and 8, 2013.
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I am testing btrfs on kvm guest, currently i have found:
* Bug 894837 - Transient / Intermittent ENOSPC errors with BTRFS and F18
(btrfs gives no space left on device at full or near full filesystem
and heavy io, for example deleting stuff to reclaim space.)
--
devel mailing list
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/F19Boost153 =
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/BIND 10 =
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Afik Josef just left Red Hat not Fedora...
I haven't seen any recent activity in Fedora from him. Have you?
Did you see consistent activity in
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.dewrote:
Hallo,
for Fedora 17 we had a feature to make btrfs to the
standard filesystem of Fedora. This feature was defered
because the fsck utitlities for btrfs was not available
on the stable state for Fedora 17.
So, I
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:59:08AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
and here is the traceback
raceback (most recent call last):
File /tmp/test.py, line 5, in module
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/pyplot.py, line 26, in
module
Hello All.
2013/1/16 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com:
Also, the scope bits about the issues with codecs are not encouraging. Do we
know that streaming to any of the above targets will work with
patent-unencumbered codecs?
Actually that's not a really big issue. Erlyvide can work as a
- Original Message -
Hello All.
2013/1/16 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com:
Also, the scope bits about the issues with codecs are not
encouraging. Do we
know that streaming to any of the above targets will work with
patent-unencumbered codecs?
Actually that's not a
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/GCC48 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GCC48
A month ago, I switched over the http://bugz.fedoraproject.org alias from the
current pkgdb bugs app[1] to the new packages app[2]. There was a response
from the community that this shouldn't have happened during that phase of the
release cycle and that the new app was broken and too slow[3][4].
Hello All.
2013/1/16 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com:
I'm kind of concerned about this one. The Feature page seems to be more
of an announcement that the application is packaged than anything else.
It was last updated back in August, and it is still at 0%. While we
might debate the usefulness
Hello All
2013/1/16 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
Although I'm going to disable all MP4/AAC-transcoding features and
support for patented streaming protocols, it still will be useful.
Will it be possible to split it out to standalone package distributed
by different means? Same as we
So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely
must be fixed before it can become the default
I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs.
But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the first to admit that I'm
pretty risk averse, especially when it comes to
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Zach Brown z...@zabbo.net wrote:
So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely
must be fixed before it can become the default
I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs.
But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the first
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893464
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Net-STOMP-Client-2.0-1.el5:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository,
* should be available at your
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895876
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-No-Worries-0.8-1.el5:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository,
* should be available at your local
On 01/16/2013 04:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ReplaceMySQLwithMariaDB
We could use help with testing. Personally I'd like to dump mysql in
time for F19, but we need validation that switching to maria doesn't
break anything for anyone.
Good news guys! I'll
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-01-16)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:01:37 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-01-16/fesco.2013-01-16-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is currently
in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test mass rebuild on x86_64
Looking at the schedule Wouldn't it be better to do the mass rebuild in
Rawhide before the branch?
If we're really looking at a
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665901
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:15:25 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is
currently in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test
mass rebuild on x86_64
Looking at the schedule Wouldn't it be better
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757089
Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Jaroslav Reznik schreef op wo 16-01-2013 om 12:35 [-0500]:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:15 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is
currently
in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test mass rebuild on
x86_64
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:15 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is
currently
in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test mass rebuild on
x86_64
Looking at the schedule Wouldn't it be better to do the mass
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739461
Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On 16/01/13 12:27, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Looking at the F17 version of matplotlib, the default afm font is being set
to None there -- so a better fix (but requiring fixing in matplotlib) might
be to patch it like this:
--- /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py
On 16/01/13 16:55, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
I hope other distributions don't use that release.
FWIW i'm afraid i've had to build jpeg8 from source already to get a
certain binary [1] built on
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely
must be fixed before it can become the default
I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs.
But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the first to
2013/1/16 Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com:
On 16/01/13 12:27, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Looking at the F17 version of matplotlib, the default afm font is being set
to None there -- so a better fix (but requiring fixing in matplotlib) might
be to patch it like this:
---
On 01/16/2013 11:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
We need to decide the schedule soon IMHO.
Perhaps the schedule should be decided in part on time to do mass
rebuild after gcc 4.8.0 is released. The ARM team would really like to
see 4.8 in F19 because 4.8 is the first gcc with native Aarch64
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892381
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sys-Syscall-0.25-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:18:37 -0500
Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
I'm waiting until Anaconda settles down before I pursue btrfs in
Fedora again. Things change too much and Btrfs is too reliant on the
anaconda part working properly to even bother trying to push it
through at this
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
Yet, it is source level backward compatible with Ruby 1.9.3, so your software
will continue to work.
The updated Ruby also provides better integration with Fedora, especially
JRuby.
But not only JRuby, it is also one step closer to be prepared
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/BIND
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:52:04AM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 01/16/2013 11:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
We need to decide the schedule soon IMHO.
Perhaps the schedule should be decided in part on time to do mass
rebuild after gcc 4.8.0 is released. The ARM team would really like
to see
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely
must be fixed before it can become the default
I'd agree, though I'd have a
On 01/16/2013 12:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The mass rebuild doesn't have to be with a released compiler (and in fact,
usually has been performed with a prerelease compiler), it is just
important that the release is released with a released compiler.
Even better! Will the 3 failed builds
- Original Message -
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:15:25 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and
is
currently in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test
mass rebuild on x86_64
Looking at
On 01/16/2013 09:21 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I note that the feature page describes this as a parallel installable stack.
Is there a reason to keep both versions around in a way we didn't with
other bind major upgrades?
As far as I understand it, it will take some time until BIND 10 reaches
Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com writes:
read more carefully then: the git repo contains binaries built against
different Ubuntu baseline versions, the older of which have jpeg6 and
the newer jpeg8.
[ shrug... ] So we'd be incompatible with some of them no matter what.
But the bigger point is
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 15:21 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are
required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new
This is a followup to my proposal in
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/175232.html
I want a common output format for static analysis tools so that we can
easily slurp the results from different tools into a database and have a
common system for managing the results
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:38:29PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
Even better! Will the 3 failed builds mentioned at the beginning of
the thread be resolved by the end-of-January estimated ready to go
time? Are there any outstanding bugs in the 4.8-pre compiler that
might have major impact on
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are
required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 21:55 +0100, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are
required
to pass through the community review by
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:59:10PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 21:55 +0100, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:36:10PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely
must be fixed
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:36:10PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
So there
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 13:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:18:37 -0500
Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
I'm waiting until Anaconda settles down before I pursue btrfs in
Fedora again. Things change too much and Btrfs is too reliant on the
anaconda part working
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:46:34 +1030
William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au wrote:
Did the root volume (/) Go into it's own subvolume, or is root just
in /?
If root isn't placed into a subvolume, say /root then mounted
as /dev/sda1 subvolid=255 / lets say, you can't snapshot the root fs,
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
