Once upon a time, Mike Pinkerton said:
> On 3 May 2013, at 15:07, Chris Adams wrote:
> >Once upon a time, Mike Pinkerton said:
> >>Does anaconda check package signatures for the netinstall?
> >
> >I believe so. Checksums are definately checked (RPM won't install a
> >corrupt package).
>
> Are y
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III said:
>> It's not like the people entering the password don't know it is visible.
>
> Actually, yes it is. The vast majority of other software that accepts
> passwords for any reason hides the passwords as th
Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III said:
> It's not like the people entering the password don't know it is visible.
Actually, yes it is. The vast majority of other software that accepts
passwords for any reason hides the passwords as they are typed, so the
general expectation is that passwords a
On 05/03/2013 03:08 PM, Reartes Guillermo wrote:
I think that the previous behaviour was better. (covering the password
with bullets).
At least the phones only show one character at a time, not the whole
password.
GTK shows everything or nothing with visibility being a boolean setting.
GTK
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> This is a perfectly appropriate forum where their authority for
> making this decision is to be discussed before it's revoked if
> necessary.
Hi Pete. Thanks for your very helpful reply. You mentioned something
VERY important, so now I have a
On 5/3/13 11:30 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:24:01PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 5/3/13 10:58 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> No, this isn't the most appropriate mailing list for the discussion -
>>> anaconda-devel-list is a better choice if you want to interact with
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:40 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> I didn't notice this the last time I did an install. But yes, it's a
> *problem* if it does that. I'll upvote or whatever if someone re-opens; I
> do so many installs in coffee shops that I would flat out not use a distro
> that did t
On Sat, 4 May 2013 05:32:18 +0100
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > I strongly disagree. The policy implication of this violation of
> > tradition and expectation goes beyond Anaconda.
>
> If you want to change a decision, it helps if you're discussing it in a
> forum that's read by the people who mad
Hi
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>
> Bugzilla's a dreadful place to have discussions. The lack of threading
> means unpopular decisions tend to just result in large numbers of
> contentless comments which make meaningful discussion impossible - it's
> a nightmare to f
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> If you want to change a decision, it helps if you're discussing it in a
> forum that's read by the people who made that decision.
Anaconda developers don't read the developer list? That's terrible!
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Matthew
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 12:07:30AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > I'm saying that if a bug report has been closed due to the change being
> > a deliberate design decision, reopening the bug isn't going to change
> > the fact that it was a
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 12:11:21AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2013-05-04 04:58 (GMT+0100) Matthew Garrett composed:
>
> >this isn't the most appropriate mailing list for the discussion -
> >anaconda-devel-list is a better choice if you want to interact with the
> >people who actually work on t
On 05/04/2013 12:24 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On the other hand, if it's the right thing to do, then it needs to be
done for GUI password change dialogs and the passwd command should be
updated as well, for consistency, no?
On a related note, Anaconda, GNOME, KDE etc seems to be relying on
dif
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:24:01PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/3/13 10:58 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > No, this isn't the most appropriate mailing list for the discussion -
> > anaconda-devel-list is a better choice if you want to interact with the
> > people who actually work on that cod
On 5/3/13 10:58 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:52:25PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> And if the maintainers feel more than justified in closing it again?
>>> Bugzilla isn't a discussion forum. If disagree with a deli
NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still
oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Test Compose 3 (TC3)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.o
On 2013-05-04 04:58 (GMT+0100) Matthew Garrett composed:
this isn't the most appropriate mailing list for the discussion -
anaconda-devel-list is a better choice if you want to interact with the
people who actually work on that code.
I strongly disagree. The policy implication of this violatio
On Saturday, May 04, 2013 11:28 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 23:26:51 -0400,
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/03/2013 11:22 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
It's not like the people entering the password don't know it is visible.
On the contrary, it is entirely unexpected that
Hi
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> I'm saying that if a bug report has been closed due to the change being
> a deliberate design decision, reopening the bug isn't going to change
> the fact that it was a deliberate design decision.
>
I understand your perspective ju
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Seriously. Learn to trim or I'm never reading email from you again.
Is this better? Quite frankly I could care less whether you read my
email or not.
Dan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:59:11PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > No, this isn't the most appropriate mailing list for the discussion
> > anaconda-devel-list is a better choice if you want to interact with the
> > people who actually work on
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:55:24PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 05/03/2013 11:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> >And if the maintainers feel more than justified in closing it again?
>> Hopefully, they will reconsider their decision befo
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:55:24PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 11:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >And if the maintainers feel more than justified in closing it again?
> Hopefully, they will reconsider their decision before doing that.
> You seem to be claiming that once the mainta
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:52:25PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > And if the maintainers feel more than justified in closing it again?
>> > Bugzilla isn't a discussion forum. If disag
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:52:25PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > And if the maintainers feel more than justified in closing it again?
> > Bugzilla isn't a discussion forum. If disagree with a deliberate policy
> > decision, discuss it on an a
On 05/03/2013 11:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
And if the maintainers feel more than justified in closing it again?
Hopefully, they will reconsider their decision before doing that. You
seem to be claiming that once the maintainer has a bug report as a
deliberate UI change, it should never be r
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:11:56PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 05/03/2013 10:59 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> >Many UI decisions are unprecedented. That doesn't justify
>> >reopening bugs that the maintainer has closed. If you want to
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:11:56PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 10:59 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >Many UI decisions are unprecedented. That doesn't justify
> >reopening bugs that the maintainer has closed. If you want to have
> >a discussion about whether or not this is a reasonab
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> Yet another case of trying to "fix" what isn't broken.
>
> Are any of the several who closed the bug more than 20 years old?
>
> Crazy is the unexpected behavior of echoing back typed password characters.
> Where else, if anywhere, is this happe
On 2013-05-03 14:26 (GMT-0700) Dan Mashal composed:
Chris Murphy wrote:
Dan Mashal wrote:
I believe that this is a major security risk and that this is a new UI
change going forward and this is not a bug.
Do you think this is a good idea?
No. I think it's a bug, and a bug should be f
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:40 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> I didn't notice this the last time I did an install. But yes, it's a
> *problem* if it does that. I'll upvote or whatever if someone re-opens; I do
> so many installs in coffee shops that I would flat out not use a distro that
> did t
On 05/03/2013 11:28 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Are you refering to someone ther than the person who is looking at the
screen while typing in their password? Surely the person doing that
will know it is visible and not enter it while someone is obviously
looking at their screen.
It may not be
I didn't notice this the last time I did an install. But yes, it's a
*problem* if it does that. I'll upvote or whatever if someone re-opens; I
do so many installs in coffee shops that I would flat out not use a distro
that did this!
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fr
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 23:26:51 -0400,
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/03/2013 11:22 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
It's not like the people entering the password don't know it is visible.
On the contrary, it is entirely unexpected that the UI will not hide it.
Are you refering to someone ther
On 05/03/2013 11:22 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
It's not like the people entering the password don't know it is visible.
On the contrary, it is entirely unexpected that the UI will not hide it.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 23:11:56 -0400,
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/03/2013 10:59 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Many UI decisions are unprecedented. That doesn't justify reopening
bugs that the maintainer has closed. If you want to have a
discussion about whether or not this is a reasonable UI
On 05/03/2013 10:59 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Many UI decisions are unprecedented. That doesn't justify reopening
bugs that the maintainer has closed. If you want to have a discussion
about whether or not this is a reasonable UI decision, do so somewhere
other than Bugzilla
This isn't a minor
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:36:51PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 10:31 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >It's unprecedented for maintainers to make UI decisions about the
> >software they develop and maintain?
> Is that a rhetorical question? I was referring to the decision to
> show th
On 05/03/2013 10:31 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
It's unprecedented for maintainers to make UI decisions about the
software they develop and maintain?
Is that a rhetorical question? I was referring to the decision to show
the password in full when the user is typing it.
Rahul
--
devel mailing l
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 07:42:12PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 05:26 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> >And closed as NOTABUG.
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959541
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958608 So I just
> >wanted to email other intelligent people and
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 10:15 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
>
> NM> I don't think selinux will block web server accesses to
> NM> /usr/share/fonts/something, since we deploy webapps in
> NM> /usr/share/something_else, which is pretty much the same namesp
I usually install either from the default desktop Live media or the network
install, depending on what I'm doing. The advantages to the net install are
1. The image fits on damn near anything. I think it's too big for one of
those 220 MB mini-CDs now but a 512 MB USB stick or a regular CD is fine.
On 3 May 2013, at 15:07, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Mike Pinkerton said:
Does anaconda check package signatures for the netinstall?
I believe so. Checksums are definately checked (RPM won't install a
corrupt package).
Are you sure that signatures are checked? If so, why this
Dan Mashal wrote:
> In the latest Fedora 19 Beta TC2 install after I got through the
> initial steps of the install I started to setup my root password.
>
> To my surprise my password was shown in plain text instead of bullets.
>
> I believe that this is a major security risk and that this is a n
On 05/03/2013 05:26 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
And closed as NOTABUG.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959541
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958608 So I just wanted to
email other intelligent people and see if I was crazy or stupid.
I have reopened this. Clearly, this is a
On Friday 03 May 2013 14:26:22 Dan Mashal wrote:
> ...
> And closed as NOTABUG.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959541
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958608
I've read through it and didn't know if I should lough or cry.
Before referring the subject matter: Are secu
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 14:26 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> So I just wanted to email other intelligent people and see if I was
> crazy or stupid.
>
> Dan
I don't ever want my password visible onscreen when I am typing it. I'm
not worried about people staring at my keyboard when I'm typing my
password;
On May 3, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
> So I just wanted to email other intelligent people and see if I was
> crazy or stupid.
Seems specious to me. I haven't seen an implementation like this. It's sorta
like flipping off your parents to their faces, then 2 seconds later covering
yo
On 3 May 2013 15:26, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> >
> > On May 3, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> >>
> >> I believe that this is a major security risk and that this is a new UI
> >> change going forward and this is not a bug.
> >>
> >> Do you
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>>
>> I believe that this is a major security risk and that this is a new UI
>> change going forward and this is not a bug.
>>
>> Do you think this is a good idea?
>
> No. I think it's a bug, and
On May 3, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
> I believe that this is a major security risk and that this is a new UI
> change going forward and this is not a bug.
>
> Do you think this is a good idea?
No. I think it's a bug, and a bug should be filed on it.
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 16:22 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 09:45 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> > Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the
> > netinstall and or ks and desktop users will use live spins?
> >
> > JBG
>
> I don't know if it is still th
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 08:54 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Long-term (if we want to continue handling lots of packages on install
> DVDs), what would be nice would be for anaconda to support multiple DVDs
> for install _and_ allow them to be inserted for repo reading (so you
> could have a "Desktop D
I would like to push updates for m4ri 20130416, m4rie 20130416, and
ntl 6.0.0 to Rawhide. Each of those updates involves an soname bump.
This will require rebuilds of the following packages:
eclib
flint
latte-integrale
linbox
Macaulay2
polybori
sagemath
Singular
I have built all of these in mock
I think that the previous behaviour was better. (covering the password with
bullets).
At least the phones only show one character at a time, not the whole
password.
Cheers.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the latest Fedora 19 Beta TC2 install after I got through
Outage: System reboots - 2013-05-07 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2013-05-07 21:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 3 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2013-05-07 21:00 UTC'
R
Hi,
In the latest Fedora 19 Beta TC2 install after I got through the
initial steps of the install I started to setup my root password.
To my surprise my password was shown in plain text instead of bullets.
I believe that this is a major security risk and that this is a new UI
change going forwar
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 11:59 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Ravindra Kumar (ravindraku...@vmware.com) said:
> >> (Batching a bunch of replies)
> >>
> >> > Install and uninstall looks a bit weird to me; what could be
> >> > done is to make t
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/580
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/580/0001-Ticket-580-Wrong-error-code-return-when-using-EXTERN.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
Le Ven 3 mai 2013 21:06, Alec Leamas a écrit :
> Still hesitating a here: if upstream has decided to support the widest
> possible set of browsers (including IE): should we really just drop the
> formats required by IE? From a user perspective, I don't really follow
> this although I do underst
Once upon a time, Mike Pinkerton said:
> Does anaconda check package signatures for the netinstall?
I believe so. Checksums are definately checked (RPM won't install a
corrupt package).
> Does netinstall even work well?
Certainly. I actually haven't installed Fedora (or RHEL/CentOS) any
other
On 05/03/2013 03:51 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 29 avril 2013 11:22, Alec Leamas a écrit :
The reply makes me feel a little more confused, on a higher level. How
does that reply translate to the packaging of a web application with
some bundled webfonts ? "scratching my head".
That means
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Hm, I've always thought of it differently - if we're trying to provide good
> value in the DVD media as a demonstration of all the things you can do with
> Fedora
It did. Until I couldn't install multiple desktops anymore. (18)
>Isn't the
On 05/03/2013 02:16 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Hm, I've always thought of it differently - if we're trying to provide
good value in the DVD media as a demonstration of all the things you
can do with Fedora, isn't there more value in a development
workstation, or a design suite, or a web applica
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> - Original Message -
> > FWIW I agree with the general trend of discussion so far: let's find
> > things to drop that don't really need to be on the DVD so we can keep
> > MATE and Cinnamon. You can install those from live images or from repos
>
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> > I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later,
>> > so
>> > I'll take one of yours in return. Thanks
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later,
> so
> > I'll take one of yours in return. Thanks!
> >
> > -J
> >
> > --
> > http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.c
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later, so
> I'll take one of yours in return. Thanks!
>
> -J
>
> --
> http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
>
> in your fear,
On 05/03/2013 01:14 PM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
So, in the end, I had to do all the installations with a DVD, then do
updates from our internal Fedora repo.
I've been meaning to file a bug about this, but haven't found the time
yet.
You could try the latest dev release of Fedora 19 and see i
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:45 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> wrote:
> > On 05/03/2013 01:40 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >>
> > Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the
> netinstall
> > and or ks and desktop users will us
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:45 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 01:40 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>
> Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the netinstall
> and or ks and desktop users will use live spins?
>
> JBG
>
I used to use the DVD at one point as a u
On 3 May 2013, at 09:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Why bother with the DVD et all and enter countless debates what
should and should not be on it.
Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the
netinstall and or ks and desktop users will use live spins?
When you do
On 05/03/2013 12:30 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/03/2013 04:22 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 05/03/2013 09:45 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the
netinstall and or ks and desktop users will use live spins?
JBG
I don't know
On 05/03/2013 04:22 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 05/03/2013 09:45 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the
netinstall and or ks and desktop users will use live spins?
JBG
I don't know if it is still the case, but historically you c
I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later, so
I'll take one of yours in return. Thanks!
-J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel
On 05/03/2013 09:45 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the
netinstall and or ks and desktop users will use live spins?
JBG
I don't know if it is still the case, but historically you could NOT
specify a file system different from t
> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
NM> I don't think selinux will block web server accesses to
NM> /usr/share/fonts/something, since we deploy webapps in
NM> /usr/share/something_else, which is pretty much the same namespace.
Well, there are a whole lot of specific fcontext entries for conten
Hi Mrigesh,
I think you've sent the wrong link - this one is the application :)
Thank you,
Sarup Banskota
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Mrigesh Pokhrel wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Mrigesh Pokhrel
> +91 9807585021
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix
--
Thanks and Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
+91 9807585021
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 05/03/2013 02:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 01:59:42PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 05/03/2013 01:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
While you can do all this with the netinstall ISO + a hosted
install tree, this is not as convenient, because hosting or
m
On Fri, 3 May 2013, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Surely if you are mass creating vm's you use ks + cobbler and or
spacewalk to do that instead af ISO file.
Both of those require you to deploy extra infrastructure, which isn't
needed if using the ISO. Different approaches suit different people,
an
Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III said:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:12:09 -0500,
> Chris Adams wrote:
> >At this point, why is there a source RPM ISO? Does anybody actually use
> >it to get source RPMs?
>
> I suspect it is mainly for GPL compliance. It has the packages at the
> same state a
Le Ven 3 mai 2013 16:24, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
>
> NM> I'm not convinced at all this needs changing, since mod_alias
> NM> permits mapping of system paths anywhere you want in your URL space.
>
> But selinux probably doesn't, so the issue is slightl
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:12:09 -0500,
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III said:
I don't think that's the route we want to take. This was a pain to support
in the CD era and it won't be that long before we won't feel limited by
DVD size and produce larger images. (Note the
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 01:59:42PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 01:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >While you can do all this with the netinstall ISO + a hosted
> >install tree, this is not as convenient, because hosting or
> >mirroring a single DVD image is much easier
Am 03.05.2013 15:45, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> Why bother with the DVD et all and enter countless debates what should and
> should not be on it.
>
> Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the
> netinstall and or ks and desktop users will use live spins?
because it
Am 03.05.2013 13:30, schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
> Le Ven 3 mai 2013 01:46, Adam Williamson a écrit :
>
>> I don't really hate the 'let's just install it everywhere and make sure
>> it doesn't run unless it's necessary' approach, but it is kinda lazy
>> engineering, and it *does* waste space on tho
> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
NM> I'm not convinced at all this needs changing, since mod_alias
NM> permits mapping of system paths anywhere you want in your URL space.
But selinux probably doesn't, so the issue is slightly more complicated.
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
Le Ven 3 mai 2013 14:45, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
>> Note that in my case the "fonts" are just just images and icons, which
>> makes the normal font fallback mechanisms useless. They are needed,
>> period.
>
> Well it is not defined in policy.
Actually, the current policy forbids fonts anywhere
Le Mar 23 avril 2013 19:10, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
>> There will probably be more of this, fedora-review is updated with a
>> new test looking for bundled font files.My gut feeling is also that
>> there are some other bundled fonts in existing packages...
There are many packaging font tests
Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III said:
> I don't think that's the route we want to take. This was a pain to support
> in the CD era and it won't be that long before we won't feel limited by
> DVD size and produce larger images. (Note the source rpm image is larger
> than a DVD already.)
At th
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:54:37 -0500,
Chris Adams wrote:
Long-term (if we want to continue handling lots of packages on install
DVDs), what would be nice would be for anaconda to support multiple DVDs
for install _and_ allow them to be inserted for repo reading (so you
could have a "Desktop
Hi,
Oh, I've rectified my mistake. And now my fedora proposal is
available in GSoC student application page of fedora wiki. Here is the link
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_ajaykulkarni
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Tiago Lam wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 08
>
> Please log this in the package review. Let's proceed with the rest of the
> review and look at renaming as a separate issue later.
>
>
>
The current maintainers of community-mysql stated that their preference
was to wait for F20 for community-msql 5.6 a couple of weeks back given
that we are
Le Mar 23 avril 2013 17:55, Alec Leamas a écrit :
> So one question would be what happens in such a definition if none of
> the src: elements are found.
The browser will try to display something with its system fonts. If the
missing fonts used standard encoding, it may even work perfectly.
Anywa
On 05/03/2013 01:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
While you can do all this with the netinstall ISO + a hosted
install tree, this is not as convenient, because hosting or
mirroring a single DVD image is much easier than mirroring
an entire web install tree.
Surely if you are mass creating vm's
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 01:45:51PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 01:40 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >- Original Message -
> >>FWIW I agree with the general trend of discussion so far: let's find
> >>things to drop that don't really need to be on the DVD so we can kee
Once upon a time, Jaroslav Reznik said:
> But I tend to agree with trend - aim on users with DVDs, developers are
> usually able to bring stuff for theirs development needs (and there are
> much more options to select the right set than desktops). So count me
> +1 to remove it.
Development is suc
Le Lun 29 avril 2013 11:22, Alec Leamas a écrit :
> The reply makes me feel a little more confused, on a higher level. How
> does that reply translate to the packaging of a web application with
> some bundled webfonts ? "scratching my head".
That means that you usually do not need a special form
- Original Message -
> On 05/03/2013 01:40 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> FWIW I agree with the general trend of discussion so far: let's find
> >> things to drop that don't really need to be on the DVD so we can keep
> >> MATE and Cinnamon. You can install
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
