And I had it showed systemd, dbus-daemon, atd, crond, cupsd, avahi-daemon,
rpcbind, and all sorts of other things having open files in /var/run. Nothing
was using it as a cwd.
So I'm not sure why that would stop it from being renamed.
On 05/13/2013 08:12 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
>
> May
Last week the infrastructure team launched a new version of Fedora
Tagger[1].
It is a webapp that allows users to upvote/downvote tags on packages as
well as rate packages themselves. The data will end up getting pulled into
yum repo metadata by the bodhi masher and into the Fedora Packages[2]
in
Maybe you can try lsof?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
libgnome-keyring is minimal problem (ok - is _not_ problem at all;
although I'm surprised that _console_ git depends on DE-specific
library).
I just recently made use of libgnome-keyring via python-keyring for a
console application I wrote. I thought it was quite handy
I was reading the document:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_from_EOL_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_16_-.3E_Fedora_17
and got to the section:
If you have /var on a separate partition, you will have to manually
convert "/var/run" and "/var/lock" to a symbolic link.
# mv -f /var
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:03:55PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I think the other point here is that at least in theory, we can use
> Formulas as part of a revision to the overall way we build images: you
> could look at a Formula as a recipe for an image, just as we currently
> use kickstarts a
We had a short discussion of this at this morning's meeting but felt a
broader discussion here was warranted.
When preparing the Release Notes, we often ask the developers for wiki
input, and generally come up dry. More recently, we look though the
repos for changes, but the upstream release notes
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 12:54 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 14:26:40 -0400
> john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
>
> > Those are good counter-examples, especially the first. The others
> > though leave me less convinced given what I've been doing here for
> > the last few years which is
On 05/10/2013 04:55 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> You may have noticed me poking random packages, I'm preparing rawhide
> (and only rawhide) for an update to lua 5.2.
>
> Please be patient. :)
tolua++ does not have lua 5.2 support, and porting it is beyond my
skillset (I can do the C++ bits, but the
On Mon, 13 May 2013 14:26:40 -0400
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> Those are good counter-examples, especially the first. The others
> though leave me less convinced given what I've been doing here for
> the last few years which is to take a customized Fedora Live spin
> with stateless Linux featu
On 13/05/13 09:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:56:20 +0200
> Christoph Wickert wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > back in April we discussed the F19 spins and it was widely agreed
> > that http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/19/Spins is the canonical
> > list of approved spins that ne
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: 05/13/2013 13:51
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-spins] Where are the remaining F19 spins?
> Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:24:26 -0400
> john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
>
> > > From: Dennis Gilmore
>
On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:24:26 -0400
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> > From: Dennis Gilmore
> > Perhaps the question we really need to ask is how should we deploy
> > and install Fedora, Which is not something we can change or solve
> > for f19 or probably even f20. An idea that comes to mind is to
> From: Dennis Gilmore
> Perhaps the question we really need to ask is how should we deploy and
> install Fedora, Which is not something we can change or solve for f19
> or probably even f20. An idea that comes to mind is to have package
> selections and post install config tasks ship as kickstar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:56:20 +0200
Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> back in April we discussed the F19 spins and it was widely agreed
> that http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/19/Spins is the canonical
> list of approved spins that need to be
13.05.2013 19:30, Adam Williamson:
The problem is that Fedora is too Gnome distro.
That is a rant, not a description of a problem. The simple fact that the
package "libgnome-keyring" has the word "gnome" in it is not sufficient
to qualify as a problem. As Todd wrote, libgnome-keyring itself has
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 12:23 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> 13.05.2013 02:31, Todd Zullinger:
> > Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> >> 11.05.2013 23:22, Adam Williamson:
> qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring
> >>> ...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are
> >>> pretty modest:
> >> A
Subj.
For packages that requies _any_ icon theme (something like oxygen
provides system-kde-icon-theme).
Prehistory: as we started RazorQt rpms - some people was crying "I have
no any icon in main menu!". So we deside to add _any_ icon theme to
Razor's Requires. And now 10MB razorqt requies 3
> "MS" == Miroslav Suchý writes:
MS> 1) What about those old merge requests?
Don't know; didn't do merge requests. You or anyone else is of course
welcome to look at the list; there's a whole report for them.
MS> 2) Why is not on that list some packages which are still waiting for
MS> revi
On 05/09/2013 01:19 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
I spent a bit of time recently trying to clean up the oldest package
review tickets, making sure links are accessible and the submitted
packages actually build. At this point I think all of the tickets in
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewS
Summary of changes:
7f6364b... update to verison 1.028 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962126
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.028-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.028-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this ma
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
13.05.2013 02:31, Todd Zullinger:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
[...]
As I found in git.spec - git's gnome-keyring suff is optional. Is
it possible to move them into separate package (for gnome users)?
This doesn't sound too unreasonable at first (and wasn't hard to
do; I tested
Bruno, if you take freeimage, I'll help you co-maintaining it
On 13 May 2013 15:41, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:47:32 +0200,
> Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 05/11/2013 11:04 PM, François Cami wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm orphaning some packages:
>>>
>>> c
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:47:32 +0200,
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 05/11/2013 11:04 PM, François Cami wrote:
Hello,
I'm orphaning some packages:
cal3d -- Skeletal based 3-D character animation library
This is needed by sear, which is a WorldForge 3d client, which seems
to be obsoleted b
Compose started at Mon May 13 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) =
On 05/13/2013 02:07 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Todd Zullinger wrote:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
11.05.2013 23:22, Adam Williamson:
qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring
...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are
pretty modest:
As I found in git.spec - git's gnome-keyring suff is opt
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Eugene Pivnev wrote:
>> 11.05.2013 23:22, Adam Williamson:
qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring
>>> ...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are
>>> pretty modest:
>> As I found in git.spec - git's gnome-keyring suff is optional.
>> Is it possible to
On 05/11/2013 10:38 PM, John Reiser wrote:
Some are; libc.so.6 is an important case which demonstrates one use.
Generally, a shared library is just an ET_DYN file, and so can
have a non-zero ElfXX_Ehdr.e_entry. It is up to the author/maintainer
to decide that to do with the facility that ELF pro
Compose started at Mon May 13 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[claws-mail-plugins]
claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.9.0-7.fc20.x86_64 requires
claws-mail(plugin-api)(x86-64) = 0:3.9.0.122
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.1
On 13 May 2013 11:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 01:08 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
>
>> Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, Ada has some nice features. At least there are real arrays, but
>>> they are somewhat cumbersome to work with, compared to Java, Python or,
>>> well, C pointers. The
On 04/18/2013 01:08 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
Florian Weimer wrote:
Yes, Ada has some nice features. At least there are real arrays, but
they are somewhat cumbersome to work with, compared to Java, Python or,
well, C pointers. There are two aspects: preservation of array bounds
in slices (so th
Hi,
On 05/09/2013 10:06 PM, Rave it wrote:
Am Thu, 09 May 2013 21:06:08 +0200
schrieb Hans de Goede :
Hi Wolfgang,
On 05/09/2013 05:10 PM, Rave it wrote:
Hi,
i've have some open reviews which need a reviewer.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924310
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
Hi,
On 05/10/2013 01:37 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
I've made a lot of RPMs but now I can't say when they all can be reviewed.
First of all I think it is great that you are contributing so much packages,
thanks for all your hard work!
As I tried to explain in my original post, the review
Hi,
On 05/11/2013 11:04 PM, François Cami wrote:
Hello,
I'm orphaning some packages:
cal3d -- Skeletal based 3-D character animation library
This is needed by sear, which is a WorldForge 3d client, which seems
to be obsoleted by ember, which is already packaged.
So perhaps we should drop se
13.05.2013 02:31, Todd Zullinger:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
11.05.2013 23:22, Adam Williamson:
qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring
...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are
pretty modest:
As I found in git.spec - git's gnome-keyring suff is optional. Is it
possible to move th
# F19 Beta Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2013-05-13
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) (after QA meeting)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
The fifth blocker review meeting for F19 Beta will follow right after
the QA meeting. We have quite a few proposed blockers to
days. And then we'll move on to the blocker review
meeting that will follow immediately after.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130513
The current proposed agenda is
38 matches
Mail list logo
