Hello everyone!
I wonder whether any other application does a similar thing?
/usr/bin/firefox contains this nasty piece:
##
## Use $MOZ_TMPDIR if set. Otherwise use /var/tmp instead of /tmp
## because of 1GB /tmp limit in Fedora 18 and later.
## See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
NOTE: The 64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target (700 MiB) and will
not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng
Michael Scherer wrote:
> Without explaining why a package is suggested or recommended, people
> cannot make informed choice on it.
In all of the examples I mentioned the reason would be pretty obvious
once you know that the recommended package exists. If you're not sure
whether you want a recommen
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 02:20 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > Thinking about it, the terminology adopted by "comps" is clearer
> > and provides a generalization of this -- if someone select something
> > they get:
> > - Mandatory packages (cannot be deselected)
> > - Default p
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 05:23:54PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > > We determined that the added risk here is minimal (if someone has
>> > > come up to your unlocked system, they are most likely capable of
>> > > doing far greater harm).
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 05:23:54PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > We determined that the added risk here is minimal (if someone has
> > > come up to your unlocked system, they are most likely capable of
> > > doing far greater harm).
> > Dude! They could install Emacs!
> Or they could imperson
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 20:13 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 04:24:42PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > We determined that the added risk here is minimal (if someone has
> > come up to your unlocked system, they are most likely capable of
> > doing far greater harm).
>
>
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 04:24:42PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> We determined that the added risk here is minimal (if someone has
> come up to your unlocked system, they are most likely capable of
> doing far greater harm).
Dude! They could install Emacs!
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Clo
>> Having a fake package in DB makes it very static. I think a
>> dynamic (evaluated each time rpm commands are run) implementation
>> will be more useful for the cases like P2V and V2V.
> The problem I see here is that you can boot the same OS on different
> hypervisors or (with P2V) transfer it
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 02:20 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 May 2013 23:33:05 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > TBH I don't think we need Suggests AND Recommends. I can never
> > remember the difference on Debian. Wouldn't most people would be
> > satisfied with a single way to suggest use
On Wednesday 22 May 2013 23:33:05 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> TBH I don't think we need Suggests AND Recommends. I can never
> remember the difference on Debian. Wouldn't most people would be
> satisfied with a single way to suggest useful packages?
Thinking about it, the terminology adopted by
On 23.05.2013 00:55, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'll get more specific then:
python-pyface can use two different graphics backends - either
wxPython or pyQt4. In no way do these two packages provide the same
thing in any meaningful way other than to pyface. So, while one could
go the provides
On 05/22/2013 04:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 23:30 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
different set of dependent packages, leading to some sort of
combinatorial explosion of QA.
Right now we have approximately seven zillion combinatorial explosions
of QA, so one more on
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 23:30 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> different set of dependent packages, leading to some sort of
> combinatorial explosion of QA.
Right now we have approximately seven zillion combinatorial explosions
of QA, so one more on the pile is not going to make much of an
apprec
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:52:22PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Something I'm just now running into - I have a package that can make
> use of one of two different backends, but it definitely needs one of
> them. I don't want to pick which one in the package. Also, it is
> explicitly referencin
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:55:43PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 21:06 +0200, Björn Persson a écrit :
> > Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > what are the changes that you would like to see in the foreseeable
> > > future (say 2-3 years) and why would you like to see them (what wou
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:16:55PM -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
> > libsolv/yast does it ( if I understood correctly ).You can have some
> > virtual provides that exist as fake packages in the db, and then have a
> > package have a requires on it. So it cannot be installed if the hardware
> > is no
> libsolv/yast does it ( if I understood correctly ).You can have some
> virtual provides that exist as fake packages in the db, and then have a
> package have a requires on it. So it cannot be installed if the hardware
> is not here.
Having a fake package in DB makes it very static. I think a
dyn
Reverting changes to files handled by RPM (or installing a single file out
of the package), for instance:
rpm -qp some-rpm.rpm --revert/--extract /etc/some-rpm.conf
/etc/another-file.conf
I know it can be done with rpm2cpio, just a suggestion to implement it
natively and extract the files to their
Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 21:06 +0200, Björn Persson a écrit :
> Jan Zelený wrote:
> > what are the changes that you would like to see in the foreseeable
> > future (say 2-3 years) and why would you like to see them (what would they
> > help you with)?
>
> Dare I say ... (puts on a helmet) ... R
Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 11:17 -0700, Ravindra Kumar a écrit :
> I don't know if this feature already exists, so forgive my
> ignorance if it is already there.
>
> I think having an RPM equivalent of Systemd's
> "ConditionVirtualization" will be very useful
> for controlling packages that are int
Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 22:18 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> (3) RPM's spec file format needs to be redone using a Real Parser. At
> the moment it has all sorts of strange corner cases (for example, how
> to define a macro containing an arch-dependent list?). It'd be a good
> opportunity
On 05/22/2013 07:43 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Dear Fedora community,
several months ago, at the Developer conference in Brno, Software Management
team received a whole bunch of proposals for new functionality in RPM and
related software stack.
We acknowledge the need for some changes in Software Man
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 22:18 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
[...snip various points I agree with...]
> (3) RPM's spec file format needs to be redone using a Real Parser. At
> the moment it has all sorts of strange corner cases (for example, how
> to define a macro containing an arch-dependent l
[This is a copy of an email I sent to an internal Red Hat list last month]
In no particular order:
(1) Yum should not be so slow. In particular "yum install" takes ages
compared to "apt-get install". I don't want to argue about how yum
has to download metadata or whatever, the fact of the matte
Hi
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
>
> We acknowledge the need for some changes in Software Management stack in
> Fedora but we don't want to make changes just by guessing what our
> users want. Therefore I call to you, consumers of our products (dnf, yum
> and
> rpm): what ar
Thanks to those that were able to join for the status meeting today, for those
unable the minutes
are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-05-22/fedora-meeting-1.2013-05-22-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/201
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/22/2013 03:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * #1115 guidance from FESCO on packagekit upstream policykit
> change (nirik, 18:35:22) * LINK:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1115 (nirik, 18:35:22) *
> AGREED: local, active, admin user can upda
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-05-22)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:59:59 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-05-22/fesco.2013-05-22-17.59.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Wed, 22 May 2013 11:58:16 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Either works. The drawback of a side tag is that it's slightly more
> complex to work with. The drawback of a compat library is the lack of
> motivation to complete the migration: there's a danger when you
> introduce a compat library th
Jan Zelený wrote:
> what are the changes that you would like to see in the foreseeable
> future (say 2-3 years) and why would you like to see them (what would they
> help you with)?
Dare I say ... (puts on a helmet) ... Recommends and Suggests?
We really should have a way for Yum and Packagekit
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 20:33 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> > As an user, some way to, but mostly adding some policy, to have multiple
> > sonames of a library installed. Usually only useful to avoid a window of
> > time
> > with broken dependencies, but som
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 11:01 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:
> >> The issue is that once this is in, all the 306 packages above will have
> >> broken dependencies. And it's not just simple rebuilds that are
> >> required; we'd need _ordered_ rebuilds in dependency order: build deps
> >> that require the
On 22.05.2013 03:32, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Also I think realmd has no way to set pure LDAP accounts (RHDS,
> OpenLDAP, ...).
Right, it doesn't yet have that ability. But realmd can gain the ability
to configure other sources than the Active Directory and FreeIPA
providers it currently supports.
Tha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965606
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-No-Worries-1.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-No-Worries-1.0-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965606
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-No-Worries-1.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-No-Worries-1.0-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> As an user, some way to, but mostly adding some policy, to have multiple
> sonames of a library installed. Usually only useful to avoid a window of time
> with broken dependencies, but sometimes useful to have some package
> that only works with an older ve
I don't know if this feature already exists, so forgive my
ignorance if it is already there.
I think having an RPM equivalent of Systemd's
"ConditionVirtualization" will be very useful
for controlling packages that are intended for
virtualized environments. It could gracefully
warn users about uns
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, May 22nd) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) Kernel Status Update
3) Aarch64 Status Upd
Hi,
Please clean up the distaster package verification is.
rpm -Va is so incomplete it spawned rpmlint, package-cleanup and not doubt
others I forget about.
Even for the most basic checks its output is so useless and difficul to
parse we've seen a critical path package like gdm shipped with the
Because of lack of interest in this package and lack of time to maintain
it correctly, I'm searching for a new maintainer.
Else, I plan to orphan:
- mysql-workbench
- mysql-connector-c++
Why ?
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=ON_QA&component
On 05/22/2013 11:16 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
What about speeding up the yum running?
It's a bit slow now.
+1, and what's worse it tends to significantly degrade as it collects
more history in its databases. Most of my systems have multiple repos:
fedora, rpmfusion-{free,nonfree} and their -
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-No-Worries:
608b0fc69817778a46b9424249dcb005 No-Worries-1.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:39:06 +0100,
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Kalev Lember
>> wrote:
>>
>> The way it was done last time on the 1.5 upgrade was to have a
>> compat-libpng package that had the 1.
Performance improvement: improve scaling to 5K+ installed packages.
Since the TeXLive repackaging, my laptop several thousand packages,
about half of which are TeX-related (I like to have a fairly full TeX
install with all the docs). There are two noticable problems: yum slows
down considerably (e
2013/5/22 Jan Zelený :
> Dear Fedora community,
> several months ago, at the Developer conference in Brno, Software Management
> team received a whole bunch of proposals for new functionality in RPM and
> related software stack.
As a packager, some way to transparently handle an upgrade when a
d
> Therefore I call to you, consumers of our products (dnf, yum and
> rpm): what are the changes that you would like to see in the foreseeable
> future (say 2-3 years) and why would you like to see them (what would they
> help you with)?
Feature: facility for atomic upgrade of an entire set of p
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-05-23 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-05-23 09:00 Thu US/Pacific
2013-05-23 12:00 Thu US/Eastern
2013-05-23 16:00 Thu UTC <-
2013-05-23 17:00
What about speeding up the yum running?
It's a bit slow now.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:39:06 +0100,
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
The way it was done last time on the 1.5 upgrade was to have a
compat-libpng package that had the 1.5 release so that nothing broke
while things were rebuilt and then once the
On 05/17/2013 04:46 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 04:37:13PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
I'd like some scriptable way to unpack SRPMs up and including to the
%prep stage. Ideally, the results would end up in a directory I
specify, and intermediate directories which only
This was long overdue, last update was almost a year ago. That said,
the update should be safe: upstream-tracker.org lists only one warning
that is potentially ABI-breaking, which is that the constant "eid_max"
changed value. That constant doesn't appear to be used by any of the
clients. Soname
I'd definitely add a big +1 to "Dependency cleaner"!
Thanks,
Sandro
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Dear Fedora community,
> several months ago, at the Developer conference in Brno, Software
> Management
> team received a whole bunch of proposals for new functionality in R
commit cbdac8b4cc4511250e2be51bcaed44dfd60a1226
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Wed May 22 15:54:39 2013 +0200
Merge cleanup.
perl-Parallel-Prefork.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Parallel-Prefork.spec b/perl-Parallel-Prefork.spec
in
Summary of changes:
130f32a... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
f7b7c41... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*)
d38389c... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass (*)
199c695... Upstream update. (*)
ecbd01b... Merge cleanup. (*)
cbdac8b... Merge clea
On Wed, 22 May 2013 14:29:00 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 22.5.2013 14:20, Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
> > ruby-2.0.0.195-8.fc20
> > -
> > * Fri May 17 2013 Vít Ondruch - 2.0.0.195-8
> > - Update to Ruby 2.0.0-p195 (rhbz#917374).
> > - Fix object taint bypassing in DL
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 08:08 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> I have dreamed for years of buying a laptop that I can actually use outside,
> but I don't want to run Windows on it.
>
> It is a little steep at 700 + 75 for ssd.
Atom N2600 means it's a PowerVR GPU not an Intel GPU, which means the
open
Compose started at Wed May 22 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubyge
Dne 22.5.2013 14:20, Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
ruby-2.0.0.195-8.fc20
-
* Fri May 17 2013 Vít Ondruch - 2.0.0.195-8
- Update to Ruby 2.0.0-p195 (rhbz#917374).
- Fix object taint bypassing in DL and Fiddle (CVE-2013-2065).
- Fix build against OpenSSL with enabled ECC cur
Compose started at Wed May 22 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[airinv]
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.x86
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have dreamed for years of buying a laptop that I can actually use outside,
but I don't want to run Windows on it.
It is a little steep at 700 + 75 for ssd.
http://www.sunbook.us/?gclid=CPe1_ZPWqbcCFQdk7Aod9AMA0g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versio
Dne 21.5.2013 19:57, Till Maas napsal(a):
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:42:10PM +0200, Vitezslav Crhonek wrote:
>
>> - there are symlinks from the old keymap names to the matching entries
>> of the X11 keymaps (pairs taken from 'kbd-model-map' file in localed
>> sources)
>
> The symlinks seem to b
On May 21, 2013 11:50 AM, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 14:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > So I'm writing a blog post on this topic ATM, and that really kinda
> > brought home how messy this design is at present.
>
> So! I've been poking through the logic of this for the
Le Mar 21 mai 2013 16:42, Vitezslav Crhonek a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I have built kbd-1.15.5-6.fc20 recently. It uses converted xkb layouts
> instead of original console keymaps by default.
Wonderful, thanks a lot!
--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
Hi Adam,
Firstboot stays available in RHEL for this reason (legacy plugins). Fedora
modules will probably have to be updated. At least that was the plan. It is
very easy to write a new module with the new API. Ping vpodzime, he has a
development guide.
--
Martin Sivák
msi...@redhat.com
Red Hat
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 14:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So I'm writing a blog post on this topic ATM, and that really kinda
> brought home how messy this design is at present.
One thing that doesn't seem to have been covered in the discussion —
what about third-party firstboot modules?
For an
On 05/22/2013 10:39 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
2013-05-17 12:20, Petr Hracek skrev:
Hi folks,
in order that BZ (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963113)
libpng library was bumped.
[snip]
Please rebuild your packages with new l
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> 2013-05-17 12:20, Petr Hracek skrev:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> in order that BZ (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963113)
>> libpng library was bumped.
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> Please rebuild your packages with new libpng library
>> Here is the
On 05/21/2013 08:48 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
On 21 May 2013 17:43, Florian Weimer mailto:fwei...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 05/21/2013 02:08 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
If there's a way to check if Secure Boot is enabled that would
be great.
Why do you want to do th
Thank you for really deep explanation.
We had discussion how to do that issue
and we will created a side tag for that.
Compatibility package will not be needed and BZ will be closed.
Best regards / S pozdravem
Petr Hracek
On 05/21/2013 03:43 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
2013-05-20 09:03, Petr Hrace
70 matches
Mail list logo
