* Nicolas Chauvet [04/06/2013 22:06] :
perl\* (see pkgdb)
I grabbed the following:
perl-Tk-TableMatrix
perl-Test-Refcount
perl-Socket-GetAddrInfo
perl-Net-CIDR
perl-HTML-FromText
perl-HTTP-Cache-Transparent
perl-Lingua-Preferred
perl-IO-Async
perl-Log-TraceMessages
Emmanuel
--
devel
Dear bodhi/koji specialists,
perhaps, this is a dumb question:
sometimes after having filed a BZ, I get some email like
---
Package x-4.1.0.0-4.beta1.fc19:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository,
*
Compose started at Wed Jun 5 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[ekiga]
ekiga-4.0.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.17()(64bit)
[evas-generic-loaders]
evas-generic-loaders-1.7.6-1.fc20.x86_64 requires
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:58 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
---
Package x-4.1.0.0-4.beta1.fc19:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:19:17 +0200, Martin Milata wrote:
I noticed that the MiniDebugInfo files in Fedora 19
(F18 too) have different ELF program header tables than the
corresponding binaries and separate debuginfo files:
MiniDebugInfo files are symbol files only, they are not intended for
Compose started at Wed Jun 5 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[bochs]
bochs-2.6.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires vgabios
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubygem(rbovirt) =
0:0.0.18
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure. FESCo doesn't care if it's a feature or not.
That's why it's no longer called the Feature process. FESCo is an
engineering committee and has no business determining if something is
a Feature in an upcoming release of
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 06:15:58 -0700,
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure. FESCo doesn't care if it's a feature or not.
That's why it's no longer called the Feature process. FESCo is an
engineering committee and
On 06/05/2013 02:37 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:58 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
---
Package x-4.1.0.0-4.beta1.fc19:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository,
* should be available
I noticed that TeXmacs-1.0.7.18-1.fc18 ships /usr/share/mime/types and
similar files which are usually auto-generated by shared-mime-info. Is
this a bug in TeXmacs?
geda-gschem-1:1.8.1-1.fc18, geda-symbols-1:1.8.1-1.fc18,
qelectrotech-0.30-0.4.svn1844.fc18 ship files in the
On 06/05/2013 05:42 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:19:17 +0200, Martin Milata wrote:
My question is, is the table supposed to
look like this and libunwind needs to be patched, or is it a bug?
Segments are irrelevant for symbols.
There is a problem with objdump and
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 14:42:44 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Debugging purposes use linking view. This is also why /usr/lib/debug/**.debug
files do not have valid program headers and the same applies to MiniDebugInfo.
Thanks for the insight, Jan. I think I know how to fix the problem now.
On 04.06.2013 15:34, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 09:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2013 09:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We all know what devel@ does best, so let's fire up the power of
the bikeshedding machine :)
We
On 06/05/2013 04:41 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
I looked at some file list inconsistencies in a custom tool and
discovered several odd things related to ghost files.
A few packages contain hard-linked files where some of the names have
the ghost flag set, but others haven't. Probably the most
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 16:55 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
On 04.06.2013 15:34, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 09:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2013 09:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We all know what devel@ does best, so
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 15:35 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 06/05/2013 02:37 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Wouldn't this just be:
% sudo yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing --downloadonly
x-4.1.0.0-4.beta1.fc19
- ajax
No, because in the most cases I receive this email, it's
* Adam Jackson [05/06/2013 11:36] :
1) That email shouldn't be sent until the update actually hits testing
There's no specific moment in time at which an update hits testing.
It depends on which mirror you're hitting and how frequently it is updated.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971094
Bug ID: 971094
Summary: Update the systemtap tapset for perl
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl
Severity: low
Priority: unspecified
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971094
--- Comment #1 from William Cohen wco...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 757276
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=757276action=edit
Updated version of perl-example.stp that prints the tapset package argument
--
You are
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
No, FESCo will still do the _engineering_ work of reviewing the proposed
changes, ensuring the impact is known and coordinated, and so on. All of
the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971096
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org,
When adding a new sub-package, what's the convention or rule regarding
the associated -devel?
E.g. for glusterfs, with its associated glusterfs-devel; when adding
glusterfs-api containing a new library, should the .so link and header
be in glusterfs-api-devel, or can they be in the
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:25:27 +0200, John Reiser wrote:
On 06/05/2013 05:42 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Segments are irrelevant for symbols.
There is a problem with objdump and MiniDebugInfo and gdb treating ElfXX_Phdr
records as don't care. The problem is that other parts of the debugging
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 18:48 +0200, Branislav Blaskovic wrote:
Hi,
I was chosen as student for Fedora Gooey Karma project in GSOC (Google
Summer of Code).
My proposal [1] is available on fedoraproject wiki page where you can
find main features of this new tool.
Welcome Branislav!
On 06/05/2013 05:30 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Thanks for noticing and reporting!
Thanks for caring.
I've got another one: In abrt-2.1.4-1.fc17.i686, the ghost files
/var/run/abrt/abrt.socket and /var/run/abrt/abrtd.pid both have inode 0
and link count 2. But they can't be hard-linked
On 05.06.2013 17:38, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 16:55 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
On 04.06.2013 15:34, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 09:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2013 09:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 21:22 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
So the endgame here is that there will be no remote authentication
option in anaconda *nor* in firstboot.
Is it really gone from firstboot?
firstboot does not exist any more. There are two replacements in F19.
'initial-setup' is used
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:52:14PM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
I have a package that builds fine in a fresh rawhide mock chroot and not in
a koji build. Is there any difference between the two?
The other thing they don't tell you ... and it's an endless source of
fun ... is that Koji
On 04.06.2013 17:44, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:26 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
For what it's worth, remote authentication is increasingly important
where I sit, so everything that makes it easier to set up is welcome. As
of now, my cheat sheet for older Fedoras and
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 11:15 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
So does fedup or anything in that chain create connection files? I
would imagine no since no one else is experiencing this issue but wanted
to make sure.
Basically, no: all fedup does is install RPMs¹.
The only fedup-specific
Thanks to those that were able to join for the status meeting today, for those
unable the minutes
are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-06-05/fedora-meeting-1.2013-06-05-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:16 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:36:27 -0400
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, okay, that sounds like two bugs to me:
1) That email shouldn't be sent until the update actually hits testing
It actually has landed on the master
On Qua, 2013-06-05 at 10:58 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
as soon as you are able to.
this is a clear message .
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970869
Bug ID: 970869
Summary: missed Requires perl(CPAN::Perl::Releases)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perlbrew
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970913
Bug ID: 970913
Summary: perl-5.18: UTF-8-downgraded variables are not properly
interpolated in a regular expression
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl
Package perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Ordinate in Fedora 19 is now owned by psabata
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Ordinate
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Ordinate in Fedora devel is now owned by psabata
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Ordinate
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Async-MergePoint:
e9055c122e02fd75c8d604bb1dca49ca Async-MergePoint-0.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit aa4baea0ef7287734285fe6e2d04996110433580
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 5 10:52:25 2013 +0200
0.04 bump
- Spec cleanup
- Correct summary and description spellings
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Async-MergePoint.spec | 43
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-Refcount:
06a77b7d16b6fc504580929b11029fbf Devel-Refcount-0.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit dc0ee2e85aa2456d747d0174533bdcb0164680cd
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Jun 5 18:24:43 2013 +0800
Update to 0.10
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Devel-Refcount.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
commit 86fa08cae33be7249b2ab298015aee1a36abe0b0
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 5 14:26:01 2013 +0200
Spec cleanup and dep list fixes
perl-ExtUtils-CChecker.spec | 27 ---
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve this
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970601
--- Comment #1 from Adam Huffman bl...@verdurin.com ---
Yes, I wasn't sure whether I wanted to take on the burden of perl-bioperl. Let
me take a look and see how much maintenance effort it will take.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
commit 3f1dcdc6dc1640dd462344202aa1eba0e121570e
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 5 15:20:09 2013 +0200
Spec cleanup and fixing the dep list
perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Ordinate.spec | 33 +
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971085
Bug ID: 971085
Summary: perl-Digest-MD5-File installs MD5.pm to wrong path
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl-Digest-MD5-File
Severity: medium
Priority:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971098
Bug ID: 971098
Summary: CVE-2013-2145 perl-Module-Signature: arbitrary code
execution when verifying SIGNATURE [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971098
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com ---
Please use the following update submission link to create the Bodhi
request for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well
as this tracking bug. This will ensure that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971096
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||971098
Depends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971096
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965604
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.8-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965604
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.8-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966926
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962318
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967825
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Module-Pluggable-4.8-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962317
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
This review is related to the merge of the ticket 564 with ticket 47358.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/564
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/564/0002-Ticket-564-Is-ldbm_txn_ruv_modify_context-still-requ.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47350
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47350/0001-Compilation-warnings-ticket-47350.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
See http://jenkins.cloud.fedoraproject.org/job/389-ds-base/25/changes
Changes:
[thierry bordaz] Compilation warnings (ticket 47350)
--
Started by an SCM change
Building remotely on Fedora18 in workspace
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47378/0001-Ticket-47378-fix-recent-compiler-warnings.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47367
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47367/0001-Ticket-47367-phase-1-ldapdelete-returns-non-leaf-ent.patch
Bug description: Replication conflict confuses the numsubordinate
count, which leaves an entry that cannot be deleted even its
64 matches
Mail list logo
