On 15. 8. 2013 at 09:37:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:32:27 +0200
>
> Reindl Harald wrote:
> > what does *not* matter in case of "yum distro-sync" because it does
> > also downgrades and if fedup has a problem with it the people who say
> > yum is not officially supported (while
Hi,
there will be a soname version bump in evolution-data-server update
3.9.90 the next week, namely for libedata-book and libedata-cal
libraries. Affected might be evolution-mapi and evolution-ews, which are
updated together with it anyway. If there will be more, and I have
commit access t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:47:03 +0100
Richard Hughes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to ask for comments on a feature I need for the Fedora
> Application Installer. The current yum backend in PackageKit does
> something like this:
>
> * yum install foo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Jima has not been able to make enough time for Fedora lately and asked
me to orphan and announce the packages he maintains.
alsa-oss
aoetools
banner
bwm-ng
clusterssh
conserver
graphviz
libdnet
libstatgrab
miau
ngrep
perl-X11-Protocol
rblchec
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Forgive me if I sound rude and correct me if I'm wrong, but arent the
> free versions of Flash pretty useless as well?
We're talking about SWF compilers here, not players. There are free
compiler tools that work just fine for certain applicati
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Underlying dep of libgnomeprint22/libgnomeprintui22, which is used by a few
> end-user things (gpp, conglomerate, gnome-genius), but nothing I need for
> now, so giving up ownership.
Isn't it just time we killed the old gnome printing infr
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:46:36 -0700
> Yes they are. Flash is slowly dying though, only to be replaced by DRM
> in html5. Out of the frying pan...
>
> Ananda
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedorap
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:46:36 -0700
Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:38 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Orion Poplawski
> > wrote:
> >> Thanks. Turns out ckeditor also had a raw .fla file. I don't
> >> know if any package would have a .fla with
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:38 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Thanks. Turns out ckeditor also had a raw .fla file. I don't know if any
>> package would have a .fla without a .swf, but it might be worth checking
>> for.
>
> Thanks for poi
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Thanks. Turns out ckeditor also had a raw .fla file. I don't know if any
> package would have a .fla without a .swf, but it might be worth checking
> for.
Thanks for pointing that out!
.fla files are source files, so it's not strictly a
On 14.08.2013 14:05, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> On 08/14/2013 11:46 AM, poma wrote:
>> Summ.
>> yum - kernel-PAE-modules-extra - Installing - OK
>> dnf - kernel-PAE-modules-extra - Upgrading - ?
>>
>>
>> poma
>
> Hi,
>
> this looks like a new bug related to Yum's installonly feature which is
> still
On 15/08/13 12:28 PM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
Try:
%doc License?for?Contents License_gpl-2.0.txt Readme.txt
See: http://www.rpm.org/ticket/858
Mattias
Thank you Mattias, your suggestion worked.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=456936
Luya
--
devel mailing list
de
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>>> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
>>> point in time.
>>
>> Reforking? And then wait unt
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
>> point in time.
>
> Reforking? And then wait until the bitrot sets in again? ;-)
>
> Can't you just use gno
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:15:11 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> That sounds like it would be a lot of duplication in mirrormanager
> and other parts of the project. ;)
>
> kevin
Why not do it's on the users PC\Laptop. (As a change\feature?)
/etc/yum.repos.d/updates.repo (ditto testing if enabled)
keep
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47465/0003-Ticket-47465-problem-with-389-adminutil-detection-in.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47465/0001-Ticket-47465-problem-with-389-adminutil-detection-in.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
Per request at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join
I
would like to introduce myself.
Who am I? Brian Schonecker, RHCE and complete novice at building packages?
What will I contribute? I have access to an IBM mainframe s390x and am
ru
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:22:34 -0500
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/14/2013 12:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I guess I'm open to the idea, but I have long wished we could have
> > some way to always keep the previous version of a package for yum
> > downgrades. ;(
> >
> > Keeping all that in
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:12:48 -0400
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 08/15/2013 03:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:36:53 -0400
> > "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >
> >> Interesting since they did not do that when I joined QA what 5 or 6
> >> years ago so again can you re
On 08/15/2013 02:45 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
It's come to my attention that a number of packages contain Flash (.swf) files,
but absolutely none of them have BuildRequires on a free software Flash
toolchain, nor do any of them seem to be shipping the source for these files.
:-(
It has never
It's come to my attention that a number of packages contain Flash (.swf) files,
but absolutely none of them have BuildRequires on a free software Flash
toolchain, nor do any of them seem to be shipping the source for these files.
:-(
It has never been permissible to included prebuilt files of this
Am 15.08.2013 22:12, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> On 08/15/2013 03:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:36:53 -0400
>> "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting since they did not do that when I joined QA what 5 or 6
>>> years ago so again can you refer me to that discu
Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) said:
> On 12 August 2013 19:36, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > I could see doing this, but it is a non-trivial change to how the
> > repositories are made, and there aren't really any resources assigned to
> > work on that. I can give some pointers to where and w
On 08/15/2013 03:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:36:53 -0400
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Interesting since they did not do that when I joined QA what 5 or 6
years ago so again can you refer me to that discussion.
It's always been a test case/critera that I remember...
htt
On 15 August 2013 15:48, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Oh, and to clarify - upgrades were supported even before then, but
> required booting Anaconda from new install media. That's been true since
> the Red Hat Linux days, so years before Fedora even existed.
>
>
I believe we are arguing over words wh
Oh, and to clarify - upgrades were supported even before then, but
required booting Anaconda from new install media. That's been true since
the Red Hat Linux days, so years before Fedora even existed.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:36:53 -0400
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Interesting since they did not do that when I joined QA what 5 or 6
> years ago so again can you refer me to that discussion.
It's always been a test case/critera that I remember...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/2
On 08/15/2013 03:16 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
On 08/15/2013 02:26 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 01:02:42PM -0400, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Well whomever choose to decide that we "support" upgrades in the
firs
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:02:37PM -0400, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Our release criteria and everything we defined *after* we found out
> that we suddenly supported upgrades is solid which is not what I was
> saying or referring to.
We've always supported upgrades. Before fedup, preupgrade
On 08/15/2013 03:16 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
On 08/15/2013 02:26 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 01:02:42PM -0400, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Well whomever choose to decide that we "support" upgrades in the
firs
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 22:41:37 -0700
>> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>
>>> Additional agenda item:
>>>
>>> Mattdm, sgallagh, and I were talking about the general fesco sentiment
>>> towards mat
tor 2013-08-15 klockan 11:57 -0700 skrev Luya Tshimbalanga:
> Hello,
> I wonder why the build failed[1] despite assigning a quotation on a doc
> file listed on:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gimp-paint-studio.git/tree/gimp-paint-studio.spec?h=el6
>
> Is there a way to fix that?
>
> Ref
>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> On 08/15/2013 02:26 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 01:02:42PM -0400, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>
>>> Well whomever choose to decide that we "support" upgrades in the
>>> first place bypassed the QA co
On 08/15/2013 02:26 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 01:02:42PM -0400, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Well whomever choose to decide that we "support" upgrades in the
first place bypassed the QA community entirely in making that
decision as well as to which tool is "preferred"
Hello,
I wonder why the build failed[1] despite assigning a quotation on a doc
file listed on:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gimp-paint-studio.git/tree/gimp-paint-studio.spec?h=el6
Is there a way to fix that?
Ref
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=456904
Luya
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 01:02:42PM -0400, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Well whomever choose to decide that we "support" upgrades in the
> first place bypassed the QA community entirely in making that
> decision as well as to which tool is "preferred","supported" or
> "recommended".
If QA is t
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
> point in time.
Reforking? And then wait until the bitrot sets in again? ;-)
Can't you just use gnome-bluetooth proper and resurrect the panel icon
stuff like Kale
Le mercredi 14 août 2013 à 11:26 -0600, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> I guess I'm open to the idea, but I have long wished we could have some
> way to always keep the previous version of a package for yum
> downgrades. ;(
>
> Keeping all that in metadata would bloat it a lot.
I think Debian does that
Underlying dep of libgnomeprint22/libgnomeprintui22, which is used by a few
end-user things (gpp, conglomerate, gnome-genius), but nothing I need for
now, so giving up ownership.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
On 8/13/13 8:58 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> # Make the image to be sparse
> $ cp --sparse=always Fedora-x86_64-19-20130627-sda.raw
> Fedora-x86_64-19-20130627-sda.raw.sparse
>
> # Generate the bmap file
> $ bmaptool create Fedora-x86_64-19-20130627-sda.raw.sparse -o
> Fedora-x86_64-19-20130627
On 08/15/2013 09:40 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
I feel that people mostly say "fedora is for testing". It is somewhat
supported by responses to upgrade problems to a new version which
invariable are along the lines of "we don't support that upgrade
path/method".
Well whomever choose to decide that
On 08/15/2013 10:26 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 08/15/2013 10:16 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I agree our updates should be supported option ;-) They are usually
working very well.
We really should try to stop using the word "supported" since it
misleading for everybody.
"Best eff
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/42/#review67
---
the sync crashed for me when I tried to run it, will put the tb
On 08/15/2013 10:16 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I agree our updates should be supported option ;-) They are usually
working very well.
We really should try to stop using the word "supported" since it
misleading for everybody.
"Best effort" is what accurately describes what the community
Am 15.08.2013 18:19, schrieb Kaleb KEITHLEY:
> On 08/15/2013 11:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 15.08.2013 15:40, schrieb Paul Wouters:
>> We can't tell people to re-install from scratch every 6 months.
>> What we need is an "apt-get dist-upgrade" equivalent.
>
> *we have*
>>
Am 15.08.2013 18:02, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
> On 08/15/2013 05:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 15.08.2013 17:17, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
>>> On 08/15/2013 04:36 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 15.08.2013 15:40, schrieb Paul Wouters:
>>
On 08/15/2013 11:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.08.2013 17:17, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 08/15/2013 04:36 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.08.2013 15:40, schrieb Paul Wouters:
We can't tell people to re-install from scratch every 6 months.
What we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/44/#review66
---
Does this work with ilgiz's update_sync code? Is anything other
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:59:30 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 08/15/2013 05:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
> > It gathers up the packages you will need to do the upgrade,
>
> ... and stores them in /var/cache/yum/...
>
> If you don't have a sufficiently large /var/cache, such a download
On 08/15/2013 05:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.08.2013 17:17, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 08/15/2013 04:36 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.08.2013 15:40, schrieb Paul Wouters:
We can't tell people to re-install from scratch every 6 months.
What we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/45/#review65
---
The problem here is how to deploy this in production - there is
On 08/15/2013 05:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:32:27 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
what does *not* matter in case of "yum distro-sync" because it does
also downgrades and if fedup has a problem with it the people who say
yum is not officially supported (while no support in any
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:32:27 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> what does *not* matter in case of "yum distro-sync" because it does
> also downgrades and if fedup has a problem with it the people who say
> yum is not officially supported (while no support in any case exists)
> should ask theirself who
Am 15.08.2013 15:40, schrieb Paul Wouters:
> We can't tell people to re-install from scratch every 6 months.
> What we need is an "apt-get dist-upgrade" equivalent.
*we have*
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum
i currently count 450 dist-upgrade this way and the oldest
se
Am 15.08.2013 17:17, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
> On 08/15/2013 04:36 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> Am 15.08.2013 15:40, schrieb Paul Wouters:
We can't tell people to re-install from scratch every 6 months.
What we need is an "apt-get dist-upgr
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> The requirements from the gramps webpage is a little hard to follow since
> it has information from both 3.X and 4.X but I'm trying to work through it,
> however, looking at the BR in the spec, it seems like there are more than
> typically r
The requirements from the gramps webpage is a little hard to follow since
it has information from both 3.X and 4.X but I'm trying to work through it,
however, looking at the BR in the spec, it seems like there are more than
typically required for a pure python project... I'll look through the setup
On 08/15/2013 04:32 PM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Thu Aug 15 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[FlightGear]
[fgrun]
Fallout of the OpenSceneGraph upgrade.
Now fixed in rawhide.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
On 08/15/2013 04:36 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.08.2013 15:40, schrieb Paul Wouters:
We can't tell people to re-install from scratch every 6 months.
What we need is an "apt-get dist-upgrade" equivalent.
*we have*
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgr
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gp
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> >
>> > Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gps-map Python
>> bindings
>> > were built, I would be happy to test g
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> >
>> > Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gps-map Python
>> bindings
>> > were built, I would be happy to
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >
> > Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gps-map Python bindings
> > were built, I would be happy to test gramps with them and switch if they
> > work.
>
> It's my underst
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure gramps will, as it was a request from that community
>>
>>> that propmpted me to update osm-gps-map in rawhide.
>>
>>
>
>
>> Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if th
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
> Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gps-map Python bindings
> were built, I would be happy to test gramps with them and switch if they
> work.
It's my understanding that with gobject introspection that Python
bindings don't need
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> I'm pretty sure gramps will, as it was a request from that community
>
>> that propmpted me to update osm-gps-map in rawhide.
>
>
> Speaking as the new gramps maintainer, if the osm-gps-map Python bindings
>> were built, I would be happy to t
Hi
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Paul Wouters
> I'll try it for f18->f19, and if this got fixed that is a big step
> towards running fedora longterm across releases.
>
Fedup is not the same thing as preupgrade and it appears you are
complaining about issues in preupgrade and haven't tried f
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> >
> > Checking my F18 system only two packages require python-osmgpsmap...
> >
> > # repoquery --whatrequires python-osmgpsmap
> > gramps-0:3.4.2-1.fc18.noarch
> > kismon-0:0.6-4.fc18
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> >
> > Checking my F18 system only two packages require python-osmgpsmap...
> >
> > # repoquery --whatrequires python-osmgpsmap
> > gramps-0:3.4.2-1.fc18.noarch
> > kismon-0:0.6-4.fc18
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Checking my F18 system only two packages require python-osmgpsmap...
>
> # repoquery --whatrequires python-osmgpsmap
> gramps-0:3.4.2-1.fc18.noarch
> kismon-0:0.6-4.fc18.noarch
>
> I wonder if the current/latest version of gramps and kismon
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.08.2013 15:40, schrieb Paul Wouters:
We can't tell people to re-install from scratch every 6 months.
What we need is an "apt-get dist-upgrade" equivalent.
*we have*
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum
i currently count 450
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:40:01AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> >I want increased participation in the creation of Fedora, which is a
> >product with a defined set of software shipped as default. I'm also
> >happy with people working to make it pract
On 13. 8. 2013 at 11:04:52, Chris Murphy wrote:
> What's the interval of repomd changes, daily? What approximate percentage of
> the entire repomd changes between day 1 and day 7? If the delta is
> comparatively small to full metadata files, what about implementing a daily
> repomd_delta sorta like
On 08/15/2013 03:40 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote:
I want increased participation in the creation of Fedora, which is a
product with a defined set of software shipped as default. I'm also
happy with people working to make it practical to use Fedora as the
ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2013 09:40 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> I want increased participation in the creation of Fedora, which
>> is a product with a defined set of software shipped as default.
>> I'm also happy with pe
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 09:40 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> We can't tell people to re-install from scratch every 6 months. What
> we need is an "apt-get dist-upgrade" equivalent.
+1
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote:
I want increased participation in the creation of Fedora, which is a
product with a defined set of software shipped as default. I'm also
happy with people working to make it practical to use Fedora as the
basis for derived products (such as the spins a
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> Sorry, just seeing this discussion now. What happened was that the
> newest version of osm-gps-map added gobject introspection, so Python
> bindings can be automatically generated. The older python-osmgpsmap
> bindings I believe are deprec
Hi all,
FESCo accepted BlueZ 5 for F20 at yesterday's meeting and I've gone
ahead and imported it in Rawhide.
Small status report where we currently stand:
bluez- updated to 5.8
gnome-bluetooth - updated to 3.9.3 that has BlueZ 5 support
gnome-user-share - won't get ported in time
Helllo Reindl, Rex,
thanks for your comments: I'll wait for new mariadb package
Best,
Mario
On 14 August 2013 17:04, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > Mario Ceresa wrote:
> >
> >> Dear all, while trying to rebuild InsightToolkit in rawhide I get the
> >> following error (
> >> http:
80 matches
Mail list logo
