The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
545
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
59
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
20
Hi Reartes,
On 10/18/2013 05:57 PM, Reartes Guillermo wrote:
I tested F20 on a physical host with a vertex3 ssd.
But it was not a requested test case, i re-used a md raid0 with a 6gb
partition of the ssd.
The file-system was setup as a storage pool for virt-manager.
I did not experience any
Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news...
The bad news is that we're still some way from a viable Beta RC. We need
work on several blockers, all of which is outlined below. I'll start
with bugs that need work from developers; QA folks, there are tasks for
us listed later on.
Compose started at Sat Oct 19 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
On 10/19/2013 07:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news...
The bad news is that we're still some way from a viable Beta RC. We need
work on several blockers, all of which is outlined below. I'll start
with bugs that need work from developers;
On 10/18/2013 06:54 PM, Elio Maldonado Batiz wrote:
On 10/18/2013 12:55 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Eric H. Christensen
spa...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Information on this fix is in Bugzilla[1].
There are 80 packages affected, would it be possible to give the
Am 18.10.2013 22:58, schrieb Robert Relyea:
On 10/17/2013 06:48 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
rpm uses prelink -y so it already works in most cases and the rare cases can
be fixed in prelink. The problem is its maintainer Jakub has more
significant
work to do nowadays.
I use it as well,
Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news...
can't find any criteria currently that covers application icons (though do
mention it if such a thing exists)...
At issue here are gtk3 applications that use non-standard (e.g. symbolic)
icons look
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
No, the intent was very much to change what the resulting desktop
prioritizes. Quite a few FESCo members would be rather disappointed
if the new Workstation ended up just an unchanged GNOME[1].
[snip]
[1] As opposed to any of 1) non-GNOME, 2) GNOME changed by Fedora, 3)
Hello Paul,
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
this package wishes to take maintainership, please do!
you noticed, that you pushed yet another version of phpMyAdmin with a *.swf
file that is somehow proprietary because
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
and as user i am asking you as phpMyAdmin maintainer why are
you not keep the package up-to-date - they have a mailing list
with release announcements, however i maintain my personal one
It would make more sense to help *solving* the open issues rather
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:04 +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
this package wishes to take maintainership, please do!
I use often and for me is an essential tool, I wish be maintainer of the
Hello Sérgio,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I use often and for me is an essential tool, I wish be maintainer of the
package , I already requested commit permissions in acls , but nothing
happen until now .
can you please provide any patches for review (e.g. via RHBZ) before just
Hello,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
what is needed to be resolved?
my SPEC file is removing all the things i do not need and
not things with bugs to solve - the reason why i build it
myself honestly since years is that the fedora packages
are way too often outdated
if you
Am 19.10.2013 22:27, schrieb Robert Scheck:
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
and as user i am asking you as phpMyAdmin maintainer why are
you not keep the package up-to-date - they have a mailing list
with release announcements, however i maintain my personal one
It would make
Am 19.10.2013 22:04, schrieb Robert Scheck:
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
this package wishes to take maintainership, please do!
you noticed, that you pushed yet another version of phpMyAdmin with a *.swf
file
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:45 +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
Hello Sérgio,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I use often and for me is an essential tool, I wish be maintainer of the
package , I already requested commit permissions in acls , but nothing
happen until now .
can you
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:16 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.10.2013 22:04, schrieb Robert Scheck:
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
this package wishes to take maintainership, please do!
you noticed, that you
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:23 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:45 +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
Hello Sérgio,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I use often and for me is an essential tool, I wish be maintainer of the
package , I already requested commit
Am 19.10.2013 23:26, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:16 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.10.2013 22:04, schrieb Robert Scheck:
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
this package wishes to take
Hello Sérgio,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
you already have a propose to update to 4.0.x in
http://anshprat.fedorapeople.org/rhbz959946/c12/
do not only read https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959946#c12 but
also the other comments below - please.
Greetings,
Robert
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:31:49 -0600
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
If this really is the consensus of the Fedora community, then I would
prefer that the guidelines on the wiki be specifically amended to
require this. IMHO the language in the guidelines is simply too vague
about this
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 09:45 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017435 - Anaconda uses
LVM when Standard Partition is selected in text mode (anaconda) - this
bug has been verified fixed by the update
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Robert Scheck wrote:
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
this package wishes to take maintainership, please do!
you noticed, that you pushed yet another version of phpMyAdmin with a *.swf
file that
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 16:22:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:31:49 -0600 Ken Dreyer wrote:
If this really is the consensus of the Fedora community, then I would
prefer that the guidelines on the wiki be specifically amended to
require this. IMHO the language in the
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 23:49 +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
Hello Sérgio,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
you already have a propose to update to 4.0.x in
http://anshprat.fedorapeople.org/rhbz959946/c12/
do not only read https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959946#c12 but
On 17/10/13 06:45 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
However, activity log shows that you've assigned the ticket to
yourself on 2013-03-14 without being a sponsor. The first submitted
package of a new packager must be reviewed and approved by a sponsor.
Assigning the ticket could result in other
Hi list,
I'm building some packages which depend on the latest version of
pycairo, and an inprogress feature also needs its
rebuild(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005447) as well.
However the version in Fedora hasn't been updated for more than a
year, and also there is a name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017480
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017481
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020802
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On i386:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sub-Exporter:
5332d269a7ba387773fcd140b72a0ed2 Sub-Exporter-0.987.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993353
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
commit 091f476f9a52e3179ccd35ea5b5741a914100fb5
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sat Oct 19 19:33:10 2013 +0100
Update to 0.987
- New upstream release 0.987 (update bugtracker metadata)
- Update patches as needed
...t::More.patch = Sub-Exporter-0.987-tm088.patch |
Summary of changes:
091f476... Update to 0.987 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-0.987-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
091f476... Update to 0.987
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-0.987-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
091f476... Update to 0.987
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-All:
92198fa321810ffca5f9008ac4172d50 IO-All-0.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 502e2f21bf9c45e26ab871284b7ebfa3cdc35a53
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sat Oct 19 20:00:53 2013 +0100
Update to 0.50
- New upstream release 0.50
- Fix various tests on Windows (CPAN RT#89609)
- Fix wrong return precedence (CPAN RT#87200)
- This
Summary of changes:
502e2f2... Update to 0.50 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-All-0.50-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
502e2f2... Update to 0.50
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-All-0.50-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
502e2f2... Update to 0.50
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
commit 14b184bfc16c08bddf05dddfccce0f7f2b54b828
Author: John C. Peterson j...@eskimo.com
Date: Sat Oct 19 12:38:06 2013 -0700
Fixed some minor errors when building for EPEL 6
perl-Class-Accessor-Classy.spec | 16 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
Summary of changes:
14b184b... Fixed some minor errors when building for EPEL 6 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
3039063... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
85d6759... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
14b184b... Fixed some minor errors when building for EPEL 6 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl
Summary of changes:
3039063... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
85d6759... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
14b184b... Fixed some minor errors when building for EPEL 6 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl
Summary of changes:
3039063... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
85d6759... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
14b184b... Fixed some minor errors when building for EPEL 6 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021161
Bug ID: 1021161
Summary: Perl mktime() still not Y2K38 compatible (even it
should be)?
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021161
Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1000912
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
58 matches
Mail list logo
