- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/24/2013 02:45 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
* ticket #1182 F21/F22 System Wide Change: Python 3 as the
Default Implementation -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default
(nirik, 18:10:29) *
On Mon, 21 Oct, 2013 at 02:12:04 GMT, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Upstream's CMakeLists.txt does this:
FIND_PACKAGE(Subversion)
IF(Subversion_FOUND)
Subversion_WC_INFO(${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR} GUAYADEQUE)
MESSAGE(Current revision is ${GUAYADEQUE_WC_REVISION})
that you can do successfully complete a graphical DVD default package
install with 512MB of RAM, or a text network default package install. I
believe a text install may even work in 384MB, though I don't absolutely
remember, and you may have to pass the parameter that disable's
anaconda's RAM
On 2013-10-25 01:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 11:51 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 10/12/2013 09:55 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:50:45PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
cx18-firmware -- Firmware for Conexant cx23418-based video capture
devices
libcrystalhd --
On 25.10.2013 03:00, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
Le 25/10/2013 01:53, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:35 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Needing a calendar server for the company, I've ended up packaging the
groupware server SOGo [1], which is a neat MS Exchange alternative.
SRPM
My comments (a github like platform for comment could be really useful)
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47568/0002-Ticket-47568-Renam
e-DSAdmin-class.patch
line: comment
lib389/__init__.py:1: the module is lib389, not dirsrv
lib389/brooker.py:795: python variable naming
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
The koji builders are usually faster than your system anyway
Maybe, if building only a specific arch (e.g. koji build
--arch-override=x86_64). The arm builders tend to be quite slow in the
first place, and I don't think
Hello All!
I 'm trying to write a polkit rule which allows every member of a
particular group (ejabberd) to run a specific script
(/sbin/ejabberdctl or /usr/sbin/ejabberdctl). Other users should
not be even able to run it. This sounds simple, so I quickly wrote
this:
On 10/15/2013 09:13 PM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
On 10/14/2013 10:08 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there a write-up somewhere documenting what strategies are
implemented by bcache to keep the SSD and the hard disk contents in
sync even in the event of a sudden power loss?
This is good place to
On 10/25/2013 11:38 AM, Roberto Polli wrote:
On Friday 25 October 2013 11:18:53 thierry bordaz wrote:
lib389/brooker.py:795: python variable naming convention: I would get
stick
with the _ instead of camelCase and change whenever possible.
If you prefer to use '_' also for local variable, I
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:28:53AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
plplot has an OCaml interface, but I see:
plplot-ocaml.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dllplplot_stubs.so ['/usr/lib64/ocaml',
'/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.9.9/fedora/src']
W dniu 22.10.2013 17:26, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
Also, automake-based projects receive the versions bundled with
automake, when running automake rsp. autoreconf.
*IF* they run autoreconf. I am working on getting software built for
AArch64 for over a year now. Main issue is all those projects
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 19:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
It is up to each WG to determine their product requirements. That
includes which architectures and target users they are trying to
produce a product for.
We've
It is some time ago it was fighting with polkit, but as far is I remember
you have to
make a .policy file to get pkexec to work right
Like this one I use in yumex.
https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/master/misc/dk.yumex.backend.policy.in
It should be installed in /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/
On 10/25/2013 12:07 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 22.10.2013 17:26, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
Also, automake-based projects receive the versions bundled with
automake, when running automake rsp. autoreconf.
*IF* they run autoreconf. I am working on getting software built for
AArch64 for
2013/10/25 tim.laurid...@gmail.com tim.laurid...@gmail.com:
It is some time ago it was fighting with polkit, but as far is I remember
you have to
make a .policy file to get pkexec to work right
Like this one I use in yumex.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tl;dr The Server Working Group has been formed and will be meeting on
Wednesday. See the == Logistical Information == section below for details.
== General Announcement ==
As most of you are aware, the Fedora Project is embarking upon a new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/24/2013 08:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 08:55 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
Back in May, the systemd package was changed to enable journal
persistancy by default, by creating /var/log/journal.
Compose started at Fri Oct 25 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
On 25 October 2013 11:22, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All!
I 'm trying to write a polkit rule which allows every member of a
particular group (ejabberd) to run a specific script
(/sbin/ejabberdctl or /usr/sbin/ejabberdctl). Other users should
not be even able to run it.
Yes, I think so
The policy is to config pkexec to run something as root
The rule is to make the group get permission without having to enter a
root/admin password
Tim
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/10/25 tim.laurid...@gmail.com
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 04:41:09PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
One other detail: the intel driver currently has both UMS support for
the i810 chipset, and KMS support for everything newer. To be
consistent with the above changes I'll be dropping the i810 support,
which will then fall back
commit 5e20537859185e91df105615066366f610656aaf
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 25 15:15:58 2013 +0200
1.96 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Archive-Tar.spec | 10 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5
Hello,
I would like to use a recent version of Netdisco on CentOS 5 but I see
that EPEL still has:
netdisco-1.1-1.el5.noarch.rpm
which is quite old.
In the past I had upgraded from Netdisco 1.0 to 1.1 using the above
package, but I had serious problems with it (I would conclude that the
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:23:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The intended usage of test list has always been a problem. Once in a
while, somebody points that out, but there's nobody (no leadership) to
work on a change actively. Is
On 10/25/2013 03:19 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Hello,
I would like to use a recent version of Netdisco on CentOS 5 but I see
that EPEL still has:
netdisco-1.1-1.el5.noarch.rpm
which is quite old.
In the past I had upgraded from Netdisco 1.0 to 1.1 using the above
package, but I
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 07:40:59AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:34:23AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I have a package review (BZ#1022584:Review Request: qpid-qmf - The QPID
Management Framework). I pulled the subpackages from qpid-cpp relating
to
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The people who've pointed out the confusion about which list to choose
when haven't drunk away their memory and could join here, but that will be
fruitless if an instance such as FESCo decides otherwise.
So, here's what I'd like
I also have plenty of packages:
Re-review request of mlmmj: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
herbstluftwm - A manual tiling window manager:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001407
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c189a753f8924b43f912fcde2525c768e4164e96
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Oct 25 16:01:59 2013 +0100
Update to 1.669004
- New upstream release 1.669004
- Tweaked widow handling to avoid a nasty edge case
- Specify all dependencies
- Replace
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:58:02PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
I also have plenty of packages:
Re-review request of mlmmj: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
Nabbed! :)
--
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/
What do you care what people
I'd like to introduce to you Environment and Stack group. From our first
round of emails it looks like we will work on interpreted languages,
databases, software collections... We'd like to setup good environment
for developers and admins and give other groups good environment for
their work.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:17:14 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I would think that if we are in a situation where people who do development
don't subscribe to the devel list because of 'energy' reasons
(disillusionment, feelings of either a) pointlessness b) fait-accompli,
etc.), then just moving
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-Diff-HTML-0.07-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
cc10542... Update to 0.07
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-Diff-HTML-0.07-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
cc10542... Update to 0.07
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 10/25/2013 04:12 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 07:40:59AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:34:23AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I have a package review (BZ#1022584:Review Request: qpid-qmf - The QPID
Management Framework). I pulled
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 11:24 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
The koji builders are usually faster than your system anyway
Maybe, if building only a specific arch (e.g. koji build
--arch-override=x86_64). The arm
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 16:02 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The split and intended usage has been questioned by several community
members for many years, even already when the lists where still on Red
Hat's servers.
Locating such comments with a search engine isn't easy.
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The people who've pointed out the confusion about which list to choose
when haven't drunk away their memory and could join here, but that will be
fruitless if an
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
551
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
65
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
26
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
551
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
65
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
41
Broken upgrade path report for tags f20-updates-testing - f21:
PackageKit:
f20-updates-testing f21 (PackageKit-0.8.12-1.fc20
PackageKit-0.8.11-3.fc21)
ReviewBoard:
f20-updates-testing f21 (ReviewBoard-1.7.16-2.fc20
ReviewBoard-1.7.16-1.fc21)
aisleriot:
f20-updates-testing f21
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:40:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Ever since I've joined,
which is ohgod nearly five years ago now, the split has seemed
reasonably clear and non-controversial, and I really can't recall anyone
being particularly confused about it, so perhaps this is a problem which
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 21:43 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:40:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Ever since I've joined,
which is ohgod nearly five years ago now, the split has seemed
reasonably clear and non-controversial, and I really can't recall anyone
being
On 10/25/2013 01:36 PM, Jan Rusnacko wrote:
Hello Roberto and Thierry,
as I promised, I am sending you a proof-of-concept code that demonstrates, how
we can mock DS in unit tests for library function (see attachment). You can run
tests just by executing py.test in tests directory.
Only 3 files
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:54:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm sure the docs team talks about stuff in Rawhide occasionally too;
Unlike devel, the docs list is related to Documentation only, isn't it?
Could you imagine turning devel into a less general list?
Is devel the catch-all for anything
I sent a message about this yesterday to the Cloud SIG mailing list, but
neglected to send to the wider community. Also, I just listed people without
introductions, and although I think all of these names should be familiar to
many of us, that seems like a nice thing. So:
I'm pleased to annouce
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Work in Fedora 21 Timeframe
* Proposal owners:
** Discussing changes in Python packaging guidelines with Fedora community and
FPC
** Helping upstreams with porting to Python 3
Note, there's an upstream
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 23:08 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:54:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm sure the docs team talks about stuff in Rawhide occasionally too;
Unlike devel, the docs list is related to Documentation only, isn't it?
Could you imagine turning
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:41:12AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
mailman topics/keywords features to sort into meaningful sub-categories. I
understand that hyperkitty will make this nice and easy, but it's also not
really very hard just as email. Note that you can subscribe to just certain
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 17:41 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
I'd love to hear better suggestions the main problem seems to be it's
so busy no one goes there anymore.
There is a rather obvious gaping logical flaw in that one ;)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw |
On Oct 25, 2013 3:09 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:54:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm sure the docs team talks about stuff in Rawhide occasionally too;
Unlike devel, the docs list is related to Documentation only, isn't it?
Could you imagine
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:41:12AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
mailman topics/keywords features to sort into meaningful sub-categories. I
understand that hyperkitty will make this nice and easy, but it's also
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:02:44 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:54:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm sure the docs team talks about stuff in Rawhide occasionally too;
Unlike devel, the docs list is related to Documentation only, isn't it?
Could you imagine turning
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 02:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Adam says that devel is relevant to *developers* (or rather, packagers).
Yet there is the packaging list, too. Quote from Oct 16th:
I don't know whether this belongs to the packaging or devel list,
Now to me, THAT seems like a
On 10/25/2013 04:48 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The people who've pointed out the confusion about which list to choose
when haven't drunk away their memory and could join here, but that will be
fruitless if an instance such as
On 10/26/2013 02:14 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 02:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Adam says that devel is relevant to *developers* (or rather, packagers).
Yet there is the packaging list, too. Quote from Oct 16th:
I don't know whether this belongs to the packaging or
On 10/25/2013 11:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 17:41 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
I'd love to hear better suggestions the main problem seems to be it's
so busy no one goes there anymore.
There is a rather obvious gaping logical flaw in that one ;)
Not quite.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023397
Bug ID: 1023397
Summary: perl-Archive-Tar-1.96 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Archive-Tar
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023400
Bug ID: 1023400
Summary: perl-lib-abs-0.93 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-lib-abs
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021855
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On i386:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Archive-Tar:
e480708fa215fb3778523d73682c4af8 Archive-Tar-1.96.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023397
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-Autoformat:
7a7881ca625fa71e551c1f43910f2865 Text-Autoformat-1.669004.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
c189a75... Update to 1.669004 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-Autoformat-1.669004-1.fc21' was created pointing
to:
c189a75... Update to 1.669004
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-Autoformat-1.669004-1.fc20' was created pointing
to:
c189a75... Update to 1.669004
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-Diff-HTML:
bea80ec02d4f6d7e8eb8cfbcb35f3b2c Text-Diff-HTML-0.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit cc10542785f4f0271d832c08e683c98bd4d46a5f
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Oct 25 17:13:46 2013 +0100
Update to 0.07
- New upstream release 0.07
- Moved to http://github.com/theory/text-diff-html/
- Switched to a static README.md, rather than a
Summary of changes:
cc10542... Update to 0.07 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
f20-updates-testing f21 (perl-XML-TreeBuilder-4.2-0.fc20
perl-XML-TreeBuilder-4.0-11.fc20)
Please fix the(se) issue(s) as soon as possible.
---
This report generated by Fedora Release Engineering, using
On Friday 25 October 2013 11:18:53 thierry bordaz wrote:
lib389/brooker.py:795: python variable naming convention: I would get
stick
with the _ instead of camelCase and change whenever possible.
If you prefer to use '_' also for local variable, I am fine.
Using camel just for classes is
Performance numbers look good with this patch (no significant impact).
Resending this out for review...
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47368
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47368/0001-Ticket-47368-IPA-server-dirsrv-RUV-entry-data-exclud.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
Hello Roberto and Thierry,
as I promised, I am sending you a proof-of-concept code that demonstrates, how
we can mock DS in unit tests for library function (see attachment). You can run
tests just by executing py.test in tests directory.
Only 3 files are of interest here:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47555/0001-Ticket-47555-db2bak.pl-issue-when-specifying-non-def.patch
Bug description: db2bak.pl takes an option -a backupdir, which is
supposed to be generated by the server and used as a backup directory.
But since the created directory
82 matches
Mail list logo
