On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 07:58 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
If storage is the problem, cull all
Fedora EOL 3+ year releases\rpms etc.
We already do this - old releases are moved to
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/ , where they're stored
differently and not mirrored. We kinda ought to keep
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:58:22 -0500
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps. I think
they have value to people. I think they fill a niche, however large
or small it might be. I also think they can be done by the people
wishing
On 01/29/2014 05:05 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
Great news, thanks for doing this. Is there any more documentation on
libcomps yet? i.e. is it stable enough to use now?
There is at least: https://github.com/midnightercz/libcomps/wiki
But ask Jindrich.
Ales
--
devel mailing list
Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com writes:
I have just added the metadata creation. Good point, thank you.
Another thing worth mentioning: The release tags of those rpms are
incorrect.
Instead of:
dnf-0.4.12-1.git3584018.fc20
It should be:
dnf-0.4.12-0.1.git3584018.fc20
That way when 0.4.12 is
On 01/30/2014 10:38 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com writes:
I have just added the metadata creation. Good point, thank you.
Another thing worth mentioning: The release tags of those rpms are
incorrect.
Instead of:
dnf-0.4.12-1.git3584018.fc20
It should be:
- Original Message -
From: Kévin Raymond shai...@fedoraproject.org
To: ngosw...@redhat.com
Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, For participants of the Documentation
Project d...@lists.fedoraproject.org, trans
tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org,
If I understand the dep-chain correctly:
libreoffice-writer - libreoffice-core - jre -
java-1.7.0-openjdk-headless - apache-commons-logging - log4j
This means I get an ugly icon called Chainsaw in the GNOME Software
center that when I try to remove also removes all the LibreOffice
packages.
If
The difference here is that the resources for GNOME (or anything else Red Hat
needs for future versions of RHEL) are
provided by Red Hat. So if you want the spins to the logically the same in
terms of resources we should start demanding
that any spin set up needs to provide an annual monetary
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.comwrote:
The difference here is that the resources for GNOME (or anything else Red
Hat needs for future versions of RHEL) are
provided by Red Hat. So if you want the spins to the logically the same in
terms of resources we
- Original Message -
From: piruthiviraj natarajan piruthivi...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:45:51 AM
Subject: Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at
commit c082cb4e807c0de5bc941c1ffaca164b9e284740
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Jan 30 10:51:05 2014 +
Update to 1.19
- New upstream release 1.19
- Set pre-req File::Temp version # to 0 (back from 0.2301)
- Note that the actual requirement is for
- Original Message -
From: Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 12:32:57 PM
Subject: Another questionable dependency chain -- libreoffice-writer installs
log4j-chainsaw
If
On 30 January 2014 11:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
Clarification the actual chain is
java-headless-rhino-jline-jansi-hawtjni-xbean-avalon-framework-log4j
Ahh, thanks for working that one out. Java isn't my area of expertise.
It's time to prune such things out of
- Original Message -
From: Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:28:12 PM
Subject: Re: Another questionable dependency chain -- libreoffice-writer
installs
On Jan 29, 2014 11:24 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 18:17 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
1) Disk space. Disks are not cheap in the world of data-access ready
disks. The 4 TB SATAs sound nice but when you try serving FTP off them
you find that
On Jan 29, 2014 11:13 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 16:33 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
I'd rather not confuse what is made from Fedora bits with what is
based on Fedora bits but includes other bits. The remix branding does
not seem appropriate for
On 30 January 2014 11:29, piruthiviraj natarajan piruthivi...@gmail.com wrote:
...doesn't bode well for the packages that is not of interest to red hat.
I think you're misinterpreting the words of Christian. Red Hat (also
my employer, but speaking for myself here) can't and shouldn't be pay
to
On Jan 30, 2014 3:06 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:58:22 -0500
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps. I think
they have value to people. I think they fill a niche, however large
or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059623
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you're misinterpreting the words of Christian. Red Hat (also
my employer, but speaking for myself here) can't and shouldn't be pay
to fix and QA spins like LXDE or MATE. If keeping a MATE spin makes it
harder
I'm trying to get the bug #695589 from the package amavisd-new fixed.
I got an email from Steven in 2013-11-04 saying he was very busy and
didn't have his FAS login at hand, but I haven't got any news since
that.
The bug dates from 2011-04-12, and several attempts have been made to
contact
My statements was directly targeted at the often repeated attitude on this list
which
seems to be that Red Hat should shut up and pay for whatever the given poster
think should be payed
for without having any expectations or requirements of the Fedora community in
return.
The relationship
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apologies for the slightly alarmist $SUBJECT, but I want to make sure
that this gets read by the appropriate groups.
During today's FESCo meeting, there was the start of a discussion on
how to approve new Products
- Original Message -
From: Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:28:12 PM
Subject: Re: Another questionable dependency chain -- libreoffice-writer
installs
- Original Message -
My statements was directly targeted at the often repeated attitude on this
list which
seems to be that Red Hat should shut up and pay for whatever the given poster
think should be payed
for without having any expectations or requirements of the Fedora community
Dne 30.1.2014 13:08, Christian Schaller napsal(a):
My statements was directly targeted at the often repeated attitude on this list
which
seems to be that Red Hat should shut up and pay for whatever the given poster
think should be payed
for without having any expectations or requirements of
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
And we call these spins now.
, but I do also see that there are legal and
administrative reasons for why that could be a bad idea, but I am sure
that
with
some discussion and investigation there are solutions
On 01/30/2014 12:08 PM, Christian Schaller wrote:
My statements was directly targeted at the often repeated attitude on this list
which
seems to be that Red Hat should shut up and pay for whatever the given poster
think should be payed
for without having any expectations or requirements of
- Original Message -
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
wrote:
And we call these spins now.
, but I do also see that there are legal and
administrative reasons for why that could be a bad idea, but I am sure that
with
some discussion
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Able-Runner:
6e64788c48a462e3a14fc8c239b435d3 Test-Able-Runner-1.002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all,
I don't use zygrib anymore. New owner is welcomed!
--
Pavel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com writes:
- Original Message -
From: Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:28:12 PM
Subject: Re: Another questionable dependency chain
- Original Message -
From: Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:25:10 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins
- Original Message -
On 01/30/2014 12:28 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 30 January 2014 11:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
Clarification the actual chain is
java-headless-rhino-jline-jansi-hawtjni-xbean-avalon-framework-log4j
Ahh, thanks for working that one out. Java isn't my area of
- Original Message -
From: Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins
- Original Message -
My
On 30 January 2014 12:48, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
Some
dependencies may be required only in some contexts, for example only for
testing, or only when using that package to compile other packages.
I think not-installed-by-default subpackages are the solution here.
Richard
I can do better, I can provide you with one of these people to look at.
If you send me your postal address I will send you a mirror :)
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014
On 01/30/2014 12:57 PM, Christian Schaller wrote:
I can do better, I can provide you with one of these people to look at.
If you send me your postal address I will send you a mirror:)
Oh a funny man after this insult put up and point me to those post or
shut up.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:25:10 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins
-
On 01/30/2014 01:56 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 30 January 2014 12:48, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
Some
dependencies may be required only in some contexts, for example only for
testing, or only when using that package to compile other packages.
I think
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 07:08:16AM -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:
The relationship between Red Hat and Fedora is very different from that of
for instance Debian and Ubuntu,
with Red Hat being a lot more directly involved in both contributing to
Fedora and paying for the
general upkeep of
On 01/29/2014 09:32 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:21:22AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I've switched to rawhide yesterday, and discovered that vinagre now
forces rsyslog onto my system. That's not great.
The dependency chain goes something like this:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:15:56 +0100
Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
Personally I always felt that this symbiotic relationship was a big
part of
what made Fedora interesting.
Yes, but please don't paint Red Hat bussiness goals as Fedora
community goals. There is some
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:15:56 +0100
Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
Personally I always felt that this symbiotic relationship was a big
part of
what made Fedora interesting.
Yes, but please don't
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:59:44 +0100
Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, but it's not only about money and a lot of contributors use
their spare time to contribute, so I wouldn't stress this money thing
too much.
I didn't introduce the money angle,
just putting into Common
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:30:36AM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
Thanks Christophe! Can you (or elmarco, or alevy), forward that to qemu-devel?
Done:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-01/msg04164.html
Christophe
pgpxg64rTLNtX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing
On 01/30/2014 02:02 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:59:44 +0100
Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, but it's not only about money and a lot of contributors use
their spare time to contribute, so I wouldn't stress this money thing
too much.
I didn't introduce
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:44:20 +, Pavel Zhukov wrote:
Hi all,
I don't use zygrib anymore. New owner is welcomed!
According to the activity in koji, there has been an active owner for
a longer time already.
Apparently, it's named zyGrib and an example where the mixed case
causes
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:46:37 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:44:20 +, Pavel Zhukov wrote:
Hi all,
I don't use zygrib anymore. New owner is welcomed!
According to the activity in koji, there has been an active owner for
a longer time already.
Oh, I'm
2014-01-30 Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:15:56 +0100
Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
Personally I always felt that this symbiotic relationship was a big
part of
what
The lightweight tag 'perl-Event-1.21-2.el7' was created pointing to:
97369b3... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Christian Schaller píše v Čt 30. 01. 2014 v 05:40 -0500:
The difference here is that the resources for GNOME (or anything else Red Hat
needs for future versions of RHEL) are
provided by Red Hat. So if you want the spins to the logically the same in
terms of resources we should start
The lightweight tag 'perl-Expect-1.21-14.el7' was created pointing to:
1fdc683... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
ad5e605... 0.112 bump (*)
9ddc3a6... 0.113 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:09:11PM +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
2014-01-30 Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:15:56 +0100
Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
Personally I
I disagree about keeping spins around in the long term.
Current spins:
* hinders our communication (each spin is supposed to get proper coverage
from marketing, ambassadors etc.), some users think that actually
installing KDE requires reinstalling from the spin !
* prevents spins with a striving
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:10:39PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Planned Outage: Fedocal outage for update - 2014-01-30 10:30 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2014-01-30 10:30 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hours, possibly less.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Nilamdyuti Goswami ngosw...@redhat.comwrote:
What seems to do the trick is
http://support.transifex.com/customer/portal/articles/1188235-comments-on-source-strings
one can comment a string (to all translators, but in the language he
choose), and event report
The lightweight tag 'perl-Exporter-Declare-0.113-1.el7' was created pointing to:
9ddc3a6... 0.113 bump
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:22:59PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/30/2014 02:02 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:59:44 +0100
Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, but it's not only about money and a lot of contributors use
their spare time to
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
So let's not start by putting too much sacred value on the term
Spin. Rather, let's think about what specific technical and
community-building problems are caused by using Remixes, how to solve
them, and then consider
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/29/2014 03:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Apologies for the slightly alarmist $SUBJECT, but I want to make
sure that this gets read by the appropriate groups.
During today's FESCo meeting, there was the start of a discussion
on how to
Hi
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
That being said, as we go forward as Fedora.NEXT, we start to see more
clearly defined divisions between Products, Spins and Remixes. Since
these discussions needed to happen, we (FESCo) felt it was best to try
to move the
Rahul Sundaram píše v Čt 30. 01. 2014 v 11:06 -0500:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
That being said, as we go forward as Fedora.NEXT, we start to
see more
clearly defined divisions between Products, Spins and Remixes.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
The roles stuff? I have, though I'm not sure if I just failing to get it
or something but I don't see anything there that looks especially useful to
a server administrator.
Other than pulling in a group of packages it's not
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
This doesn't mean I'm against doing Big Exciting New Things in general
or Fedora.next in particular, but I do want to stand up for the value of
just keeping your head down (hah, I know, Adam, practice what you
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:58:51AM -0600, inode0 wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
So let's not start by putting too much sacred value on the term
Spin. Rather, let's think about what specific technical and
community-building problems are
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:35:54 +0100
H. Guémar hgue...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
but they won't get coverage from
marketing and ambassadors
Please don't include me in that,
I will always talk about
Fedora supplied Xfce to all who will listen.
and supply said media to those that ask, if I can.
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 06:42 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
jwb has tried to characterize this as an 'opportunity' for spins,
but I
really don't think that washes. It's much more a case of us dumping
a
whole lot of extra work onto any who wants to maintain a spin:
* Get a domain
* Get a
On 01/30/2014 05:06 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
That being said, as we go forward as Fedora.NEXT, we start to see more
clearly defined divisions between Products, Spins and Remixes. Since
these discussions needed to
The Board was recently notified of a serious violation of our Code of
Conduct made on the development list last week. Physical threats of
violence are an egregious offense and may result in further censure or
disciplinary action. While we look into the matter further, we would
like to remind
On 30/01/14 03:45 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
The 'burden' they create on QA is precisely zero, as we explicitly do
not block releases on spins other than desktop and KDE. I don't believe
releng considers the spins much of a burden, either - it's more just
that they don't like building and
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 06:45 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
QA does no testing of spins at all? If that's the case then I
misunderstood. If QA does test, even if they don't block the release,
it takes time and effort.
No testing of spins is required on the part of QA. People who contribute
to QA
Jiri Eischmann (eischm...@redhat.com) said:
That being said, as we go forward as Fedora.NEXT, we start to
see more
clearly defined divisions between Products, Spins and Remixes.
Since
these discussions needed to happen, we (FESCo) felt it was
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 11:17 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 06:45 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
QA does no testing of spins at all? If that's the case then I
misunderstood. If QA does test, even if they don't block the release,
it takes time and effort.
No testing of
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 14:53 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jiri Eischmann (eischm...@redhat.com) said:
That being said, as we go forward as Fedora.NEXT, we start to
see more
clearly defined divisions between Products, Spins and Remixes.
Since
Am 30.01.2014 15:22, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 01/30/2014 02:02 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:59:44 +0100
Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, but it's not only about money and a lot of contributors use
their spare time to contribute, so I wouldn't
On 30 January 2014 20:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
fact is that Redhat
Pet peeve of mine: Please call Red Hat by it's proper name, or people
will start calling you Reindlharald.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 14:53 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jiri Eischmann (eischm...@redhat.com) said:
That being said, as we go forward as Fedora.NEXT, we start to
see more
clearly
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/30/2014 02:02 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:59:44 +0100
Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, but it's not only about money and a lot of contributors use
their spare time to
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Blame me, I filed the original ticket. My concern was that we're (obviously)
doing work in the Fedora.next space around:
1) the three products (workstation, server, cloud)
2) the base, which lives under them in some
Am 30.01.2014 21:23, schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 30 January 2014 20:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
fact is that Redhat
Pet peeve of mine: Please call Red Hat by it's proper name, or people
will start calling you Reindlharald
besides that you know what i meant with my post
On 01/29/2014 07:10 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 29 January 2014 23:58, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps. I think
they have value to people. I think they fill a niche, however large
or small it might be. I also think they
You may have used this kind
of thing - it tells you 'click this next' and waits until you do.
As you might expect, googling for anything along these lines without
having a very precise set of keywords only returns pages of tutorials.
Any suggestions what to look for or, even better, tools in
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Przemek Klosowski
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
On 01/29/2014 07:10 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 29 January 2014 23:58, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps. I think
they have value to
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine
j.orti.alca...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to get the bug #695589 from the package amavisd-new fixed.
I got an email from Steven in 2013-11-04 saying he was very busy and
didn't have his FAS login at hand, but I haven't got any news since
Le jeudi 30 janvier 2014 à 12:28 -0800, Dan Mashal a écrit :
In fact, why don't we take this to a vote instead of arguing about it
on this list? Why don't make this a Fedora elections issue?
for the same reasons as usual, ie practical ones, like voting mean
deciding who vote, ie, only board,
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 07:47 -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:25:10 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora.NEXT
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:47:04 -0500
Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
On one hand, I am impressed by many spins as an excellent technology
demonstration. On the other hand, what should existing users of a
base Fedora do if they find an useful spin with a superior
2014-01-31 Jon jdisn...@gmail.com:
In your case it's been years now waiting can you wait one more
week to complete step five?
Sure I can.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
w3c-markup-validator has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.noarch requires perl(Net::IP)
w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.noarch requires perl(HTML::Template)
w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.noarch requires
dspam has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
On ppc64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.ppc64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
On x86_64:
dspam-web-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(GD::Graph::lines3d)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059620
Bug ID: 1059620
Summary: perl-App-Nopaste-0.96 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-App-Nopaste
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059621
Bug ID: 1059621
Summary: perl-Archive-Extract-0.72 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Archive-Extract
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059623
Bug ID: 1059623
Summary: perl-autodie-2.23 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-autodie
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059625
Bug ID: 1059625
Summary: perl-Config-IniFiles-2.83 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Config-IniFiles
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059627
Bug ID: 1059627
Summary: perl-Email-Address-1.901 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Address
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059628
Bug ID: 1059628
Summary: perl-Event-RPC-1.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Event-RPC
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059634
Bug ID: 1059634
Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.29 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Locale-Codes
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059636
Bug ID: 1059636
Summary: perl-Math-NumSeq-68 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Math-NumSeq
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
