EPEL epel beta report: 20140710 changes

2014-07-10 Thread EPEL Beta Report
Compose started at Thu Jul 10 08:15:03 UTC 2014 New package: CharLS-1.0-5.el7 An optimized implementation of the JPEG-LS standard New package: armadillo-4.320.0-1.el7 Fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS New package: datagrepper-0.4.1-3.el7

Re: EPEL Orphan or retire the TurboGears (v1) stack in 7

2014-07-10 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:39:40AM +, Zhiwei Zhu wrote: Hi Toshio, I have just noticed this message after I failed to install TurboGears (v1) on CentOS 7. We really need the TurboGears (v1) support via epel for el7. Migrating away from TurboGears V1 to V2 or to other framework

Re: EPEL Orphan or retire the TurboGears (v1) stack in 7

2014-07-10 Thread Zhiwei Zhu
Hi Toshio, Thanks. Understand the situation now. Will discuss with my lead about the possibility to maintain the packages by ourselves. BTW, as we don't have experience of maintaining packages on epel, we have no idea how much effort will be required to do that or how difficult it would be.

Re: EPEL Orphan or retire the TurboGears (v1) stack in 7

2014-07-10 Thread Dan Callaghan
Excerpts from Zhiwei Zhu's message of 2014-07-11 09:31:37 +1000: Thanks. Understand the situation now. Will discuss with my lead about the possibility to maintain the packages by ourselves. BTW, as we don't have experience of maintaining packages on epel, we have no idea how much effort

Re: EPEL Orphan or retire the TurboGears (v1) stack in 7

2014-07-10 Thread Zhiwei Zhu
Hi Dan, Thanks for sharing this. It's really a great news for us that you will help to maintain the TG1 stack in EPEL7 and will start the un-retiring process. Hope they will be available again soon. Yes, when talking about real projects, when schedules, requirements, efforts, resources,

(Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

2014-07-10 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey folks! As we just hit a branch point, here's a refresher on what this means for folks who've been running Rawhide. If you want to keep running Rawhide, which will now contain packages tracked for Fedora *22*, you don't need to do anything: just keep updating. From tomorrow onwards, you'll

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, 1:24:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.07.2014 19:18, schrieb Chris Adams: Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said: Please, no! As soon as you use disparate systems in a network environment, having differing versions of UID_MIN (where

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 10.07.2014 09:37, schrieb Al Dunsmuir: On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, 1:24:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.07.2014 19:18, schrieb Chris Adams: Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said: Please, no! As soon as you use disparate systems in a network environment, having

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread William
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 08:17 +0300, Oron Peled wrote: A non-API related question... Generally, I prefer the explicit systemd settings over home directory with magical effects, but I wonder if anyone is aware of existing system users which carry more complex semantics. Perhaps look at the

Re: [Base] The Base Design WG is looking for a new committee member!

2014-07-10 Thread Phil Knirsch
Ups, seems i'm living in the future already. :) Meeting is of course on Friday, not Thursday, so hope to see you there tomorrow! Thanks regards, Phil On 07/09/2014 05:23 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote: That sounds great Michal. If you could join us tomorrow at our meeting at 15:00 UTC on

cross-gcc is updated to gcc-4.9.0 in updates-testing for F19+

2014-07-10 Thread David Howells
So anyone that is using it to build their own packages, if you could check it in the next three weeks. David -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014, at 12:46 AM, William wrote: Under what conditions are these two files created / touched? When systemd-sysusers is run. When I install a package and add a file to this sysuser directory, is only that user added to passwd and shadow? The answer to this is pretty

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED][FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v4

2014-07-10 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:19:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: ddclient seems to have been retired apparently as a part of this process, going by the commit: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ddclient.git/commit/?id=f741436ca38fd6c36ffbfbb26b3131b278657faa but it wasn't listed in this

F-21 Branched report: 20140710 changes

2014-07-10 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Jul 10 07:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [APLpy] APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs [PyKDE] PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) = 0:10.0 [audtty]

Re: fedora-release-$PRODUCT, /etc/issue, /etc/os-release, Per-Product Configs and more!

2014-07-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/09/2014 05:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:42:23PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I do not know which or if any Spins will be providing the specific net install CD you're asking about. This will not be an *official*

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

2014-07-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/10/2014 02:37 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hey folks! As we just hit a branch point, here's a refresher on what this means for folks who've been running Rawhide. If you want to keep running Rawhide, which will now contain packages tracked

Re: pulseaudio-5.0-6.fc20: fine but not on bodhi

2014-07-10 Thread Rex Dieter
Reindl Harald wrote: Am 08.07.2014 21:38, schrieb Rex Dieter: Reindl Harald wrote: until now https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=542357 for whatever reason did it not make to bodhi - it was submitted early today,

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 10.07.14 08:17, Oron Peled (o...@actcom.co.il) wrote: A non-API related question... On Thursday 10 July 2014 01:49:41 Lennart Poettering wrote: Please understand that we are not duplicating adduser here. Already in the name of the tool we wanted to make clear thtat this is

Re: pulseaudio-5.0-6.fc20: fine but not on bodhi

2014-07-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 10.07.2014 14:30, schrieb Rex Dieter: Reindl Harald wrote: Am 08.07.2014 21:38, schrieb Rex Dieter: Reindl Harald wrote: until now https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=542357 for whatever reason did it not make to bodhi - it was submitted early today,

Re: [Base] The Base Design WG is looking for a new committee member!

2014-07-10 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:00:12AM +0200, Phil Knirsch wrote: Ups, seems i'm living in the future already. :) Meeting is of course on Friday, not Thursday, so hope to see you there tomorrow! Sure, will be there. Thanks regards, Phil Michal On 07/09/2014 05:23 PM, Phil Knirsch

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 10.07.14 17:16, William (will...@firstyear.id.au) wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 08:17 +0300, Oron Peled wrote: A non-API related question... Generally, I prefer the explicit systemd settings over home directory with magical effects, but I wonder if anyone is aware of existing

Re: kde-4.13.x update for f20

2014-07-10 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo have 3 repos is to use kde stable ? this will equal to future Fedora 20 , with kde 13 , many years ago I try use kde-redhat and I saw

Re: kde-4.13.x update for f20

2014-07-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 10.07.2014 15:15, schrieb Sérgio Basto: On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo have 3 repos is to use kde stable ? this will equal to future Fedora 20 , with kde 13 ,

Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-07-10 16:00 UTC)

2014-07-10 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:31 PM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2014-07-10 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket.

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 11 July 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

2014-07-10 Thread Phil Knirsch
Agenda: - Introduction of Benedikt Morbach, intern working on buildreq reduction (and potential other stuff if time permits ;)) - Talk with Michal Sekletar as candidate for WG - Vaclav Pavlin presenting minimal Docker image for Fedora (133MB) - Open floor Thanks regards, Phil -- Philipp

Re: kde-4.13.x update for f20

2014-07-10 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Qui, 2014-07-10 at 15:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 10.07.2014 15:15, schrieb Sérgio Basto: On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo have 3 repos is to use kde

Re: fedora-release-$PRODUCT, /etc/issue, /etc/os-release, Per-Product Configs and more!

2014-07-10 Thread Mike Pinkerton
On 10 Jul 2014, at 07:04, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/09/2014 05:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:42:23PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I do not know which or if any Spins will be providing the specific net install CD

Upgrade OpenSceneGraph to 3.2.1

2014-07-10 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Hi, I intend to upgrade OpenSceneGraph to 3.2.1 (Jul 4th) on rawhide. This change will introduce SONAME bumps in OpenSceneGraph-provided libraries and thus is likely to introduce broken package dependencies. I intend to take care about these and to launch rebuilds where necessary. Depending

Re: fedora-release-$PRODUCT, /etc/issue, /etc/os-release, Per-Product Configs and more!

2014-07-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/10/2014 09:53 AM, Mike Pinkerton wrote: On 10 Jul 2014, at 07:04, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/09/2014 05:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:42:23PM -0400, Stephen

Re: F-21 Branched report: 20140710 changes

2014-07-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Are we going to have empty updates and updates-testing repos for branched this time around? This affects the spin-kickstarts package (and possibly the release packages) as normally we want updates enabled, but if there isn't going to be an updates repo for a while, then we'll need to disable

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

2014-07-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:37:39 -0700, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: sudo yum-config-manager --enable fedora and, optionally, enable updates-testing: sudo yum-config-manager --enable updates-testing The updates-testing repo isn't there yet. I am hoping we get empty

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:30:27AM -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: - Original Message - Hi, for Atomic I'd like to investigate the new systemd-sysusers, so I wrote up a Change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SystemdSysusers A move to something more declarative makes sense

Re: fedora-release-$PRODUCT, /etc/issue, /etc/os-release, Per-Product Configs and more!

2014-07-10 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:04:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/server-wg/server-wg.2014-02-25-16.00.html That's why I said the *specific* netinstall he was asking for. The Fedora Server netinstall wouldn't be producing a non-productized result, which

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014, at 05:42 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: Two examples from the top of my head: * Some tftpd implementations use it as the base path (and chroot into it) * Some anonymous ftpd implementation have similar use (chroot into ~ftp) But these aren't really usable without

Comps group for Fedora Audio Spin packages

2014-07-10 Thread Brendan Jones
Hi all, does anyone have any objection to a new comps group containing packages currently present in the Fedora Jam audio spin? We will be discussing names further within the music creation SIG / fedora-music mailing list soon, but Audio Production or Music Creation are two that immediately

Re: Comps group for Fedora Audio Spin packages

2014-07-10 Thread Corey Sheldon
I'd be game Corey W Sheldon Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine 310.909.7672 www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, does anyone have any objection to a new comps group containing packages currently present

Re: fedora-release-$PRODUCT, /etc/issue, /etc/os-release, Per-Product Configs and more!

2014-07-10 Thread Kalev Lember
On 07/10/2014 05:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:04:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/server-wg/server-wg.2014-02-25-16.00.html That's why I said the *specific* netinstall he was asking for. The Fedora Server netinstall wouldn't

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

2014-07-10 Thread poma
On 10.07.2014 13:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote: One thing I discovered last night. There's a bug with the new fedora-release packages and yum/dnf are kind of arbitrarily picking from fedora-release-[standard|cloud|server|workstation] to install if you just update. (This is in large part because

Re: rawhide report: 20140710 changes

2014-07-10 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: sssd-1.12.0-1.fc21 -- * Wed Jul 09 2014 Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com - 1.12.0-1 - New upstream release 1.12.0 - https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Releases/Notes-1.12.0 The previous

Re: F-21 Branched report: 20140710 changes

2014-07-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Another thing that seems odd today is that no rpms in this morning's rawhide repo have fc22 in their names. I would have expected this morning's build to have started enough after branching to pick up at least a few fc22 builds. I'll be more worried if this persists in tomorrow's rawhide, but

Re: F-21 Branched report: 20140710 changes

2014-07-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:18:23 -0500 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: Another thing that seems odd today is that no rpms in this morning's rawhide repo have fc22 in their names. I would have expected this morning's build to have started enough after branching to pick up at least a few

Re: F-21 Branched report: 20140710 changes

2014-07-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:03:05 -0500 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: Are we going to have empty updates and updates-testing repos for branched this time around? This affects the spin-kickstarts package (and possibly the release packages) as normally we want updates enabled, but if there

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

2014-07-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/10/2014 11:45 AM, poma wrote: On 10.07.2014 13:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote: One thing I discovered last night. There's a bug with the new fedora-release packages and yum/dnf are kind of arbitrarily picking from

Re: fedora-release-$PRODUCT, /etc/issue, /etc/os-release, Per-Product Configs and more!

2014-07-10 Thread Michal Schmidt
On 07/10/2014 04:34 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Basically, in order to swap out the productized and non-productized release packages, it's not actually as simple as 'yum swap fedora-release-standard fedora-release-server'. The way the dependency processing works in yum and dnf will generally

Re: F-21 Branched report: 20140710 changes

2014-07-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:25:48 -0600, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: We will get mash fixed today and tomorrow rawhide should return to normal. Thanks for taking care of this and the updates/updates-testing repos. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora-release-$PRODUCT, /etc/issue, /etc/os-release, Per-Product Configs and more!

2014-07-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/10/2014 12:45 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote: On 07/10/2014 04:34 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Basically, in order to swap out the productized and non-productized release packages, it's not actually as simple as 'yum swap fedora-release-standard

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:18 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: We /do/ plan on the syncing anyway, because some admins are still used to vipw their passwd databases and there are legacy scripts around, but still -- could we, when the SSSD interface is available, call out from systemd-sysusers to the

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:44:29PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:18 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: We /do/ plan on the syncing anyway, because some admins are still used to vipw their passwd databases and there are legacy scripts around, but still -- could we, when the SSSD

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 10.07.14 12:44, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:18 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: We /do/ plan on the syncing anyway, because some admins are still used to vipw their passwd databases and there are legacy scripts around, but still -- could we, when the

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

2014-07-10 Thread poma
On 10.07.2014 18:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/10/2014 11:45 AM, poma wrote: On 10.07.2014 13:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote: One thing I discovered last night. There's a bug with the new fedora-release packages and yum/dnf are kind of

empty .bash_history

2014-07-10 Thread Felix Miata
I've a system that's zeroing out .bash_history at every reboot. Is this happening to everyone? Intended? -- The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive. Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED][FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v4

2014-07-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 12:35 +0200, Till Maas wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:19:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: ddclient seems to have been retired apparently as a part of this process, going by the commit:

Rawhide users: ceph packaging issues

2014-07-10 Thread Adam Williamson
I just thought it'd be good to alert Fedora 21 and 22 users to this issue. Some major changes were introduced to the 'ceph' package in the 0.81.0-3 build, and maintained in the 0.81.0-4 build. These builds were done for all current releases, but not submitted as updates to any stable release, so

Re: Rawhide users: ceph packaging issues

2014-07-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 15:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: so, yeah, bit of a mess. You can probably get onto the 0.81.0-5 packages manually with a bit of judicious --nodeps use or 'yum shell' use, but it'd be best if the packages were fixed up, and I figured I'd let folks know about the

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

2014-07-10 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
I'm ready to start my application testing on a Fedora 21 virtual machine. What's the quickest way for me to get one built? Is there a 'net install' ISO file somewhere I can use? On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:38 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: On 10.07.2014 18:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread William
Thank you both for your response. It's appreciated. * Files in systemd's sysusers configuration directory will be used as a data source to create /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow. Also, /etc/group and /etc/gshadow. Under what conditions are these two files created / touched? Three

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread William
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 08:35 -0700, Colin Walters wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014, at 05:42 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: Two examples from the top of my head: * Some tftpd implementations use it as the base path (and chroot into it) * Some anonymous ftpd implementation have similar use

touchpad event data requested - palm detection

2014-07-10 Thread Peter Hutterer
We're currently working on a number of things to improve input devices in libinput - the future input stack for wayland developers. What we need is data to base our assumptions on, so I'm hereby asking the list to provide some. If you don't have a touchpad, please disregard this email. If you're

Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

2014-07-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 09:05:29AM +0930, William wrote: Thank you both for your response. It's appreciated. * Files in systemd's sysusers configuration directory will be used as a data source to create /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow. Also, /etc/group and /etc/gshadow.

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

2014-07-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 16:00 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: I'm ready to start my application testing on a Fedora 21 virtual machine. What's the quickest way for me to get one built? Is there a 'net install' ISO file somewhere I can use?

Re: Rawhide users: ceph packaging issues

2014-07-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 15:36:41 -0700, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 15:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: so, yeah, bit of a mess. You can probably get onto the 0.81.0-5 packages manually with a bit of judicious --nodeps use or 'yum shell' use, but

[Bug 1106210] perl-Switch: FTBFS: Not compatible with Filter-1.50

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210 Marek mojbor...@yahoo.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mojbor...@yahoo.co.uk

[Bug 1118240] New: puic4 is broken: fix provided

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118240 Bug ID: 1118240 Summary: puic4 is broken: fix provided Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: perl-Qt Assignee: iarn...@gmail.com Reporter: olivier.laha...@free.fr

[Bug 1118240] puic4 is broken: fix provided

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118240 --- Comment #1 from Olivier LAHAYE olivier.laha...@free.fr --- Created attachment 917030 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=917030action=edit Fixes partially 'puic4 -x' generated code This patch fixes the header generation and

[Bug 1100158] perl-Server-Starter-0.17 FTBFS sometimes because of races in tests

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100158 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- The t/06-autorestart.t is full of sleeps racing with 4s auto_restart_interval. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[perl-Server-Starter] Fix t/06-autorestart.t race

2014-07-10 Thread Petr Pisar
commit eb4c9e9ca7f3d456982ce5195c5fb4ead9f077c1 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Jul 10 15:45:21 2014 +0200 Fix t/06-autorestart.t race ...-Synchronize-to-PID-in-t-06-autorestart.t.patch | 83 perl-Server-Starter.spec |8

[Bug 1100158] perl-Server-Starter-0.17 FTBFS sometimes because of races in tests

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100158 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1118362] New: perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-9.fc21 FTBFS due signature test failing if there are network difficulties

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118362 Bug ID: 1118362 Summary: perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-9.fc21 FTBFS due signature test failing if there are network difficulties Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component:

[Bug 1118362] perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-9.fc21 FTBFS due signature test failing if there are network difficulties

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118362 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment

[Bug 1118374] New: perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-9.fc21 FTBFS if perl(Perl::Critic::Pulp) is installed

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118374 Bug ID: 1118374 Summary: perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-9.fc21 FTBFS if perl(Perl::Critic::Pulp) is installed Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Assert

[Bug 1118374] perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-9.fc21 FTBFS if perl(Perl::Critic::Pulp) is installed

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118374 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[perl-Test-Assert] Build-conflict with Perl::Critic::Pulp due to release tests

2014-07-10 Thread Petr Pisar
commit c8717a8f62187f826462767553bbe1db5776e070 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Jul 10 16:45:41 2014 +0200 Build-conflict with Perl::Critic::Pulp due to release tests perl-Test-Assert.spec |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-Test-Assert] Bundle upstream signing key

2014-07-10 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 387a17ac8cb52ad42b5d4fda29107fd7f8fa8d35 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Jul 10 16:34:01 2014 +0200 Bundle upstream signing key C0B10A5B.pub | 305 + perl-Test-Assert.spec | 14 ++- 2 files changed, 318

[Bug 1118362] perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-9.fc21 FTBFS due signature test failing if there are network difficulties

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118362 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1118374] perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-9.fc21 FTBFS if perl(Perl::Critic::Pulp) is installed

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118374 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[PkgDB] ktdreyer:perl-Time-Duration-Parse commit set to Approved

2014-07-10 Thread pkgdb
user: ktdreyer set for ktdreyer acl: commit of package: perl-Time-Duration-Parse from: to: Approved on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Time-Duration-Parse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[PkgDB] ktdreyer:perl-Time-Duration-Parse watchbugzilla set to Approved

2014-07-10 Thread pkgdb
user: ktdreyer set for ktdreyer acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Time-Duration-Parse from: to: Approved on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Time-Duration-Parse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[PkgDB] ktdreyer:perl-Time-Duration-Parse approveacls set to Approved

2014-07-10 Thread pkgdb
user: ktdreyer set for ktdreyer acl: approveacls of package: perl-Time-Duration-Parse from: to: Approved on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Time-Duration-Parse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[PkgDB] ktdreyer:perl-Time-Duration-Parse watchcommits set to Approved

2014-07-10 Thread pkgdb
user: ktdreyer set for ktdreyer acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Time-Duration-Parse from: to: Approved on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Time-Duration-Parse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1117988] [RFE] branch perl-Time-Duration-Parse for EPEL 6

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117988 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1037242] perl-Proc-ProcessTable FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037242 --- Comment #2 from Henrique Martins bugzilla-red...@martins.cc --- Can someone make a fc20 version of this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[PkgDB] ktdreyer:perl-Exporter-Lite commit set to Approved

2014-07-10 Thread pkgdb
user: ktdreyer set for ktdreyer acl: commit of package: perl-Exporter-Lite from: to: Approved on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Exporter-Lite -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

[Bug 1117989] [RFE] branch perl-Exporter-Lite for EPEL 7

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117989 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[PkgDB] limb:perl-Time-Duration-Parse watchcommits set to Approved

2014-07-10 Thread pkgdb
user: limb set for ktdreyer acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Time-Duration-Parse from: to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Time-Duration-Parse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[PkgDB] limb:perl-Time-Duration-Parse watchbugzilla set to Approved

2014-07-10 Thread pkgdb
user: limb set for ktdreyer acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Time-Duration-Parse from: to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Time-Duration-Parse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[PkgDB] limb:perl-Time-Duration-Parse approveacls set to Approved

2014-07-10 Thread pkgdb
user: limb set for ktdreyer acl: approveacls of package: perl-Time-Duration-Parse from: to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Time-Duration-Parse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1117988] [RFE] branch perl-Time-Duration-Parse for EPEL 6

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117988 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[PkgDB] limb:perl-Time-Duration-Parse commit set to Approved

2014-07-10 Thread pkgdb
user: limb set for ktdreyer acl: commit of package: perl-Time-Duration-Parse from: to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Time-Duration-Parse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

[Bug 1117988] [RFE] branch perl-Time-Duration-Parse for EPEL 6

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117988 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[PkgDB] limb:perl-Time-Duration-Parse watchbugzilla set to Approved

2014-07-10 Thread pkgdb
user: limb set for perl-sig acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Time-Duration-Parse from: to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Time-Duration-Parse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[PkgDB] limb:perl-Time-Duration-Parse watchcommits set to Approved

2014-07-10 Thread pkgdb
user: limb set for perl-sig acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Time-Duration-Parse from: to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Time-Duration-Parse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[perl-Time-Duration-Parse] Correct %description from cpan2dist

2014-07-10 Thread Ken Dreyer
commit 8a8db3abe02ac1b73be1d3a40a911e3c4dfaf870 Author: Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com Date: Thu Jul 10 14:17:16 2014 -0600 Correct %description from cpan2dist perl-Time-Duration-Parse.spec | 11 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 1117988] [RFE] branch perl-Time-Duration-Parse for EPEL 6

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117988 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Time-Duration-Parse-0.11-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-Duration-Parse-0.11-2.el6 -- You

[perl-Test-Assert] Created tag perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-11.fc22

2014-07-10 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-11.fc22' was created pointing to: 2ca22cc... Tidy the code to pass the Critic test -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1014054] perl-Net-Patricia license tag is broken.

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014054 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1076569] perl-WebService-Linode-0.20 is available

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076569 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-WebService-Linode-0.20

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket 47846 server crashes deleting a replication agreement

2014-07-10 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47846 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47846/0001-Ticket-47846-server-crashes-deleting-a-replication-a.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review ticket 47797: DB deadlock when two threads (on separated backend) try to record changes in retroCL

2014-07-10 Thread thierry bordaz
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47797 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47797/0001-Ticket-47797-DB-deadlock-when-two-threads-on-separat.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47851 - lib389 - Add function to retrieve dirsrvtests data directory

2014-07-10 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47851 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47851/0001-Ticket-47851-Add-function-to-retrieve-dirsrvtests-da.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #47852: Updating winsync one-way sync does not affect the behaviour dynamically

2014-07-10 Thread Noriko Hosoi
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47852 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47852/0001-Ticket-47852-Updating-winsync-one-way-sync-does-not-.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

  1   2   >