On 09/13/2014 01:52 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/12/2014 06:25 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
You'll have to download all the source and perform a massive grep.
You have to unpack the sources before the grep, which can be quite a
challenge because SPEC files aren't declarative. The %prep s
the keys are in kernelspace IIRC and thus updated / passed on initrd
/initramfs updates and kernel updates
Corey W Sheldon
Freelance IT Consultant, Multi-Discipline Tutor
310.909.7672
www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 09/13/2014 03:59
On Seg, 2014-09-08 at 02:36 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2014-08-27 at 15:30 +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is new fakesystemd build for F21 which should fix the breakage,
> > sorry.
>
> Hi,
> I think this still breaking rpmfusion builds ,
no longer breaks rpmfusi
On 09/13/2014 03:59 AM, Fred New wrote:
> One step up from this would be something like a kpatch process in rpm
> combined with packaged metadata that replaces in-memory modules so that
> reboots wouldn't be necessary. Yeh, probably impossible.
This has almost certainly already been considered by
> Odd. It seems like it commited to master fine, but for some reason the
> build never happened.
>
> You should be able to just do a 'fedpkg build' in master and things
> should be back on track.
I thought so, and just did that, and it built fine:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?bu
On Sep 7, 2014 11:58 AM, "Simo Sorce" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
> > Controller?
> >
> > I mean is that page current:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4#Cu
On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:51:10 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:44:59 +0200
> Richard Fearn wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got a question about the last mass rebuild:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild
> >
> > For a couple of my packages:
> >
>
On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:44:59 +0200
Richard Fearn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a question about the last mass rebuild:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild
>
> For a couple of my packages:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6133
> http://koj
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:28:15 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
> bodhi -n -r F20 -t enhancement 'see http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net/'
> kdiff3-0.9.98-2.fc20
> Creating a new update for see
> http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net/,kdiff3-0.9.98-2.fc20
> Password for nbecker:
> Creating a new update for see
> ht
On 09/13/2014 03:53 PM, Florian Müllner wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Joachim Backes
> wrote:
>> In gnome-sudoku (gnome-sudoku-3.13.90-3.fc21.x86_64) for F21 I'm missing
>> the feature allowing to print multiple unsolved sudokus.
>
> You should use a user list/forum for these kinds of
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Joachim Backes
wrote:
> In gnome-sudoku (gnome-sudoku-3.13.90-3.fc21.x86_64) for F21 I'm missing
> the feature allowing to print multiple unsolved sudokus.
You should use a user list/forum for these kinds of questions, as it
is not related to developing Fedora in
On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 15:40 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Dear F21 developers,
Hi Joachim,
> In gnome-sudoku (gnome-sudoku-3.13.90-3.fc21.x86_64) for F21 I'm
> missing
> the feature allowing to print multiple unsolved sudokus. This was
> possible in the previous Fedora version(s).
I just checke
Dear F21 developers,
In gnome-sudoku (gnome-sudoku-3.13.90-3.fc21.x86_64) for F21 I'm missing
the feature allowing to print multiple unsolved sudokus. This was
possible in the previous Fedora version(s).
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 21 (Twenty One)
Kernel-3.16.2-301.fc21.x86
skytux is alive in ask and in stackoverflow, at least
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/users/429/skytux/
http://stackoverflow.com/users/1507137/skytux
On Sáb, 2014-09-13 at 05:34 -0400, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I have orphaned skytux'es
On 09/12/2014 06:25 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
You'll have to download all the source and perform a massive grep.
You have to unpack the sources before the grep, which can be quite a
challenge because SPEC files aren't declarative. The %prep stage
sometimes even needs build dependencies
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Richard Fearn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a question about the last mass rebuild:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild
>
> For a couple of my packages:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6133
> http://koji.
Hi,
I've got a question about the last mass rebuild:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild
For a couple of my packages:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6133
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4673
there was a rebuild for b
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce :
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
> Controller?
It is current, and Samba in F20 will never have the AD bit
Compose started at Sat Sep 13 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-
Broken deps for i386
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.i686
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I have orphaned skytux'es packages:
> jwm -- Joe's Window Manager ( master f21 f20 f19 )
jwm taken.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Chris Murphy
wrote:
>
> On Sep 12, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> > The *only* way to do this
> > securely and safely in the system we have now is in a clean pre-boot
> > environment,
>
> Mostly clean post-boot environment, with the system we have no
22 matches
Mail list logo