Re: Finding all the source packages that include a copy of valgrind.h

2014-09-13 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/13/2014 01:52 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 09/12/2014 06:25 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: You'll have to download all the source and perform a massive grep. You have to unpack the sources before the grep, which can be quite a challenge because SPEC files aren't declarative. The %prep s

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

2014-09-13 Thread Corey Sheldon
the keys are in kernelspace IIRC and thus updated / passed on initrd /initramfs updates and kernel updates Corey W Sheldon Freelance IT Consultant, Multi-Discipline Tutor 310.909.7672 www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 09/13/2014 03:59

Re: fakesystemd package breaking builds

2014-09-13 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Seg, 2014-09-08 at 02:36 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2014-08-27 at 15:30 +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There is new fakesystemd build for F21 which should fix the breakage, > > sorry. > > Hi, > I think this still breaking rpmfusion builds , no longer breaks rpmfusi

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

2014-09-13 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 09/13/2014 03:59 AM, Fred New wrote: > One step up from this would be something like a kpatch process in rpm > combined with packaged metadata that replaces in-memory modules so that > reboots wouldn't be necessary. Yeh, probably impossible. This has almost certainly already been considered by

Re: F21/F22 mass rebuild

2014-09-13 Thread Richard Fearn
> Odd. It seems like it commited to master fine, but for some reason the > build never happened. > > You should be able to just do a 'fedpkg build' in master and things > should be back on track. I thought so, and just did that, and it built fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?bu

Re: Samba as AD DC

2014-09-13 Thread Pete Travis
On Sep 7, 2014 11:58 AM, "Simo Sorce" wrote: > > On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain > > Controller? > > > > I mean is that page current: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4#Cu

Re: F21/F22 mass rebuild

2014-09-13 Thread Dan Horák
On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:51:10 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:44:59 +0200 > Richard Fearn wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've got a question about the last mass rebuild: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild > > > > For a couple of my packages: > > >

Re: F21/F22 mass rebuild

2014-09-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:44:59 +0200 Richard Fearn wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a question about the last mass rebuild: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild > > For a couple of my packages: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6133 > http://koj

Re: bohdi update failed

2014-09-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:28:15 -0400 Neal Becker wrote: > bodhi -n -r F20 -t enhancement 'see http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net/' > kdiff3-0.9.98-2.fc20 > Creating a new update for see > http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net/,kdiff3-0.9.98-2.fc20 > Password for nbecker: > Creating a new update for see > ht

Re: gnome-sudoku in F21

2014-09-13 Thread Joachim Backes
On 09/13/2014 03:53 PM, Florian Müllner wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Joachim Backes > wrote: >> In gnome-sudoku (gnome-sudoku-3.13.90-3.fc21.x86_64) for F21 I'm missing >> the feature allowing to print multiple unsolved sudokus. > > You should use a user list/forum for these kinds of

Re: gnome-sudoku in F21

2014-09-13 Thread Florian Müllner
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: > In gnome-sudoku (gnome-sudoku-3.13.90-3.fc21.x86_64) for F21 I'm missing > the feature allowing to print multiple unsolved sudokus. You should use a user list/forum for these kinds of questions, as it is not related to developing Fedora in

Re: gnome-sudoku in F21

2014-09-13 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 15:40 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Dear F21 developers, Hi Joachim, > In gnome-sudoku (gnome-sudoku-3.13.90-3.fc21.x86_64) for F21 I'm > missing > the feature allowing to print multiple unsolved sudokus. This was > possible in the previous Fedora version(s). I just checke

gnome-sudoku in F21

2014-09-13 Thread Joachim Backes
Dear F21 developers, In gnome-sudoku (gnome-sudoku-3.13.90-3.fc21.x86_64) for F21 I'm missing the feature allowing to print multiple unsolved sudokus. This was possible in the previous Fedora version(s). Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 21 (Twenty One) Kernel-3.16.2-301.fc21.x86

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Germán Racca (skytux)

2014-09-13 Thread Sérgio Basto
skytux is alive in ask and in stackoverflow, at least https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/users/429/skytux/ http://stackoverflow.com/users/1507137/skytux On Sáb, 2014-09-13 at 05:34 -0400, Christopher Meng wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I have orphaned skytux'es

Re: Finding all the source packages that include a copy of valgrind.h

2014-09-13 Thread Florian Weimer
On 09/12/2014 06:25 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: You'll have to download all the source and perform a massive grep. You have to unpack the sources before the grep, which can be quite a challenge because SPEC files aren't declarative. The %prep stage sometimes even needs build dependencies

Re: F21/F22 mass rebuild

2014-09-13 Thread पराग़
Hi, On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Richard Fearn wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a question about the last mass rebuild: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild > > For a couple of my packages: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6133 > http://koji.

F21/F22 mass rebuild

2014-09-13 Thread Richard Fearn
Hi, I've got a question about the last mass rebuild: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild For a couple of my packages: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6133 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4673 there was a rebuild for b

Re: Samba as AD DC

2014-09-13 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014, Simone Caronni wrote: Hello, 2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce : On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain > Controller? It is current, and Samba in F20 will never have the AD bit

F-21 Branched report: 20140913 changes

2014-09-13 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Sep 13 07:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [APLpy] APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs [PyKDE] PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0 [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-

rawhide report: 20140913 changes

2014-09-13 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Broken deps for i386 -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.i686

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Germán Racca (skytux)

2014-09-13 Thread Christopher Meng
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I have orphaned skytux'es packages: > jwm -- Joe's Window Manager ( master f21 f20 f19 ) jwm taken. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

2014-09-13 Thread Fred New
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Sep 12, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > The *only* way to do this > > securely and safely in the system we have now is in a clean pre-boot > > environment, > > Mostly clean post-boot environment, with the system we have no