The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2573/pdns-recursor-3.6.1-1.el7
5
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2657/python-oauth2-1.5.211-7.el7
0
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:09:05 -0600
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
This has always been a funny one, and I've brought it up in the past,
in the x86_64 repo:
package: grib_api-devel-1.12.3-1.el6.i686 from epelx
unresolved deps:
gcc-gfortran(x86-32)
Apparently there is
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
886
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
340
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
105
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
886
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
218
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0590/oath-toolkit-2.0.2-4.el6
105
On 09/23/2014 05:08 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
On 09/23/2014 10:49 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
For log4j12, I don't see any problem. Can you provide more details?
A bug was fixed in log4j12 that moved the jar from _jnidir to _javadir,
thus breaking the symlinks in packages built before the
Hi Felix,
xorg-x11-drv-sis seems to have disappeared. Did that happen on purpose? It
still exists as a selelection in Bugzilla. Xorg is looking for sis module but
cannot find it. Gfxchip here is Z7/Z9 (XG20 core). Is it now supposed to be
using some other (not installed) driver? Before
Compose started at Wed Sep 24 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[askbot]
askbot-0.7.48-13.fc21.noarch requires
On 23/09/14 14:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Django 1.4 and 1.5 have been retired from the Fedora collection in
Fedora 21 in favor of the two supported branches, 1.6 and 1.7.
Thank you Stephen,
I'm guilty to have missed to send this heads-up mail.
On 09/23/2014 07:34 AM, Fedora Branched
Broken deps for i386
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[askbot]
I wanted to get some input before initiating the retirement process.
PVM upstream seems to be dead, version 3.4.6 was release in 2009.
Also, the entire build is pretty much non-compliant to the packaging
guidelines. The entire source is copied to the buildroot and compiled in
place.
Does anyone
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:12:14AM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
[cduce]
cduce-0.5.5-9.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) =
0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90
[ocaml-bisect]
ocaml-bisect-1.3-3.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) =
0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90
Hello,
the “-p /sbin/ldconfig” syntax triggers a special behavior in RPM if the
scriptlet is otherwise empty . In your case, the “%post libs” scriptlet also
actually, surprising as it may seem, includes the following lines:
On 09/24/2014 07:42 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
the “-p /sbin/ldconfig” syntax triggers a special behavior in RPM /if
the scriptlet is otherwise empty/. In your case, the “%post libs”
scriptlet also actually, surprising as it may seem, includes the
following lines:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
Several suggestions have been made that warrant discussion:
* Upgrades from Fedora 20 remain non-productized. They
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
Several suggestions have been made that warrant discussion:
* Upgrades from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/2014 12:22 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message - There has been some discussion in
various forums lately about how we will handle fedup upgrades from
Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
Several suggestions have been made
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:16:06PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I think either the first option (easy) or the last option (requiring
fedup changes) will be preferable. In the selectable case, I think
that fedup should operate as a non-productized upgrade unless
otherwise specified at the
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 21:35 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote on 2014-09-23 12:45 (GMT-0400):
That's the fbdev X driver, pointed at either vesafb or uvesafb kernel
driver. Which I suppose will get you a high-res console, but isn't
especially great for mode selection in X. (The
Am 24.09.2014 um 18:16 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
Several suggestions have been made that warrant discussion:
* Upgrades from Fedora 20 remain
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting
Wednesday (today!) at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-09-24 17:00 UTC'
We only have
Am 24.09.2014 um 18:22 schrieb Jaroslav Reznik:
Maybe we can go with first option and say, upgrades to products are not
supported, please reinstall. It's new beginning and say non-productized
update support will be gone in F22 timeframe and only productized updates
will be allowed
don't do
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/2014 12:22 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message - There has been some discussion in
various forums lately about how we will handle fedup upgrades from
Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
Hi
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Ah, you're right. On the other hand I think all spins are somehow
desktop related (at least now), so moving spins to use workstation
as the base is probably desirable
No. It is not. Workstation is GNOME based. Most spins are for
- Original Message -
Hi
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Ah, you're right. On the other hand I think all spins are somehow
desktop related (at least now), so moving spins to use workstation
as the base is probably desirable
No. It is not. Workstation
On 09/24/2014 06:16 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
Several suggestions have been made that warrant discussion:
On 09/24/2014 11:28 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
Fourth option might be to make all installations that have gnome-shell
installed become Workstation, and leave others non-productized.
This is hardly a guarantee. I have several servers that get a default Fedora
install and I don't bother removing X
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:39:35 +0200
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de wrote:
On 23/09/14 14:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Django 1.4 and 1.5 have been retired from the Fedora collection in
Fedora 21 in favor of the two supported branches, 1.6 and 1.7.
Thank you Stephen,
I'm
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-09-24)
===
Meeting started by mattdm at 17:00:50 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-09-24/fesco.2014-09-24-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:29:11 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 24.09.2014 um 18:16 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to
Summary of changes:
8201039... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
a2f2ffe... Update to 1.10 (*)
ba7ae7c... Update to 1.11 (*)
dcf7207... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
fa5e58c... Perl 5.20 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages (*)
19c5e98... Update to 1.12 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another
Am 24.09.2014 um 19:12 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
I have updated a few machines by running yum --releasever=21 install
fedora-release then yum distro-sync and not had any issues. As I
understand this thread it is soley about what to do in the case of
using fedup only. in which case we need to
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-09-25 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-09-25 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-09-25 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-09-25
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
On 24 September 2014 10:16, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
Several suggestions have been made
On 09/23/2014 02:37 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 22/09/14 17:18, Haïkel wrote:
Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from pre-determined
airports at the *targeted* period.
If I trust informations from the proposals, SLC would be too expensive
to cover travel expenses for EMEA folks.
Hi,
I noticed that mulitple packages own /etc/bash_completion.d/ even though
it is nowadays part of the filesystem package. From what I read from the
Guidelines, it is not clear to me whether it is prohibited or not.
Should it be fixed? Here is a current list for Fedora 19:
repoquery
Hi, folks!
I'm currently like two months behind on devel@ - apologies if I've
missed anything relevant.
A discussion in #anaconda this morning made it clear that folks have
trouble following our full release cycle, and particularly the various
kinds of 'freeze' that exist.
So, there is a page
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:41:17 -0700
Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
...snip...
AFAICS, the Branch freeze kicks in at the point we enable Bodhi on
the Branched tree, which is usually a couple of weeks after forking
it from Rawhide. For instance, on the F21 schedule -
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:36:15 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that mulitple packages own /etc/bash_completion.d/ even though
it is nowadays part of the filesystem package. From what I read from the
Guidelines, it is not clear to me whether it is prohibited or not.
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 14:46 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:41:17 -0700
Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
...snip...
AFAICS, the Branch freeze kicks in at the point we enable Bodhi on
the Branched tree, which is usually a couple of weeks after forking
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:27:04 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:16:06PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I think either the first option (easy) or the last option (requiring
fedup changes) will be preferable. In the selectable case, I think
that
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:02:41 -0700
Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 14:46 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:41:17 -0700
Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
...snip...
AFAICS, the Branch freeze kicks in at the
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:14:40 -0400
Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:27:04 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:16:06PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I think either the first option (easy) or the last option
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Hi, folks!
I'm currently like two months behind on devel@ - apologies if I've
missed anything relevant.
A discussion in #anaconda this morning made it clear that folks have
trouble following our full
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:22:29 -0400
Christopher ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org wrote:
That page only describes policy, it doesn't really connect policy to
actions one could take, or offer any explanation about what is
actually frozen, and is very confusing. What can a package owner do
in git? What
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 17:22 -0400, Christopher wrote:
That page only describes policy, it doesn't really connect policy to
actions one could take, or offer any explanation about what is actually
frozen, and is very confusing. What can a package owner do in git? What
shouldn't they do? What
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:09:51 +0530, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
On 09/24/2014 07:42 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
the “-p /sbin/ldconfig” syntax triggers a special behavior in RPM /if
the scriptlet is otherwise empty/. In your case, the “%post libs”
scriptlet also actually, surprising
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145923
Bug ID: 1145923
Summary: perl-File-chdir-0.1009 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-File-chdir
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145924
Bug ID: 1145924
Summary: perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.050 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTTP-Tiny
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Parse-PMFile:
9cd66b6bed2c54c695102de4f8aec191 Parse-PMFile-0.26.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4712c9e8dace03908f956d488c0b4a288beefbef
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Sep 24 09:35:33 2014 +0200
Initial import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Parse-PMFile.spec | 61
sources|1 +
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145008
Bug 1145008 depends on bug 1145685, which changed state.
Bug 1145685 Summary: Review Request: perl-Parse-PMFile - Parses .pm file as
PAUSE does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145685
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145924
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-cpanminus:
097fb13a60e770f2ef4313c37e93000c App-cpanminus-1.7011.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8f64689c57782207f7db339c21ffb22eb7db58b8
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Sep 24 10:34:56 2014 +0200
1.7011 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-App-cpanminus.spec |7 ++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145008
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTTP-Tiny:
6a7181c88e666f1bfae9329f24606748 HTTP-Tiny-0.050.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 55827717f386dcbb149406985337f172b389bc2d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Sep 24 11:54:13 2014 +0200
0.050 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145924
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
user: limb set for stevetraylen acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Net-OpenSSH
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-OpenSSH
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb set for stevetraylen acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Net-OpenSSH
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-OpenSSH
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb set for stevetraylen acl: commit of package: perl-Net-OpenSSH from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-OpenSSH
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb set for stevetraylen acl: approveacls of package: perl-Net-OpenSSH
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-OpenSSH
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb created branch epel7 on package perl-Net-OpenSSH
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-OpenSSH
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-OpenSSH:
07675dcaa62166c362d23b8e9eae44da Net-OpenSSH-0.62.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 431c8030a16c587498e37904988e1cb7ce79c8f1
Author: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Wed Sep 24 10:21:38 2014 +
Upstream to 0.62.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Net-OpenSSH.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
The lightweight tag 'perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.62-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
431c803... Upstream to 0.62.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
431c803... Upstream to 0.62. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.18()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
The lightweight tag 'perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.62-1.el7' was created pointing to:
431c803... Upstream to 0.62.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-File:
e23ca28784d92de06e3052c6f3ff3e06 Test-File-1.41.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
2da98bf... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
1203e32... Update to 1.001006 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@darlow.co.uk
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Simple-1.001006-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
1203e32... Update to 1.001006
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit edc33e83175c9787a409e42d4928d5a3bd4a8e00
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Sep 24 12:31:30 2014 +0100
Update to 1.41
- New upstream release 1.41
- Uncomment accidentally commented symlink_target_is_absolute_ok
- Add mtime test functions (GH#8)
Summary of changes:
c3aec12... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
edc33e8... Update to 1.41 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-File-1.41-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
edc33e8... Update to 1.41
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-File-1.41-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
edc33e8... Update to 1.41
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Version:
0332f619b7c22408b600c2b1c10b5f93 Test-Version-1.003001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
Neil Darlow n...@darlow.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(n...@darlow.co.uk |
|)
commit 822c9f8a8e8856e5e7110297f22fe8be0b51bac5
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Sep 24 15:40:47 2014 +0100
Update to 1.003001
- New upstream release 1.003001
- Skip packages unindexable by pause (GH#4)
- Remove inline and remove _get_version; trying to
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-utf8:
58351d9e168399f6e55fb0982cdbe6a1 Test-utf8-1.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f349f1ffcd8621298b4c79e326784a2365070477
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Sep 24 16:04:55 2014 +0100
Update to 1.01
- New upstream release 1.01
- Fix unnecessary warning caused by using /x (CPAN RT#88189,
Summary of changes:
8b96eaf... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
89cc0f4... Perl 5.20 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages (*)
822c9f8... Update to 1.003001 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Version-1.003001-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
822c9f8... Update to 1.003001
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Version-1.003001-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
822c9f8... Update to 1.003001
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
0dc1858... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
f349f1f... Update to 1.01 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-utf8-1.01-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
f349f1f... Update to 1.01
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-utf8-1.01-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
f349f1f... Update to 1.01
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML:
e67560af33061f7148fec275d2da631c YAML-1.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145503
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129402
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145011
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145012
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
commit 19c5e983215060f0fb8191efb0567b4a91ced579
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Sep 24 16:43:08 2014 +0100
Update to 1.12
- New upstream release 1.12
- Fix parsing of unquoted strings (CPAN RT#97870)
- Classify buildreqs by usage
perl-YAML.spec | 25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145015
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-1.12-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
19c5e98... Update to 1.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-1.12-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
19c5e98... Update to 1.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145509
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-YAML-1.12-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-YAML-1.12-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141587
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
