EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

2014-10-04 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 895 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 227 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0590/oath-toolkit-2.0.2-4.el6 114

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

2014-10-04 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 895 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 350 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 114

EPEL Fedora 7 updates-testing report

2014-10-04 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2657/python-oauth2-1.5.211-7.el7 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2748/nodejs-0.10.32-1.el7,v8-3.14.5.10-14.el7 9

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-10-04 Thread drago01
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 06:18:11PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: I agree with Rahul that standard is not a great name for the nonstandard, non-productized upgrade, though. Generic is more descriptive anyway. But

F-21 Branched report: 20141004 changes

2014-10-04 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Oct 4 07:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires

Review Swap : dnfdaemon - Dbus daemon for dnf package actions

2014-10-04 Thread Tim Lauridsen
If someone would review this one and let me know what to review Review Request: dnfdaemon - Dbus daemon for dnf package actions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149390 Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rawhide report: 20141004 changes

2014-10-04 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Oct 4 05:15:08 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [Agda] ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-10-04 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 10/03/2014 07:37 PM, Ray Strode wrote: Hi, I agree with Rahul that standard is not a great name for the nonstandard, non-productized upgrade, though. Generic is more descriptive anyway. I'm not sure it's worth repainting the bikeshed at this point, but during the alluded-to discussion a few

dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
I am sorry I did not fully follow the discussions earlier. I only recall it was supposed to exist some compatibility layer at some point. But I keep all the time needing to $ sudo rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db* because I forget and use yum instead of dnf in rawhide. I am not really needing

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 Thread Reindl Harald
I am sorry I did not fully follow the discussions earlier. I only recall it was supposed to exist some compatibility layer at some point. But I keep all the time needing to $ sudo rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db* there is no need to do so because I forget and use yum instead of dnf in rawhide.

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-10-04 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 19:37 -0400, Ray Strode wrote: I'm not sure it's worth repainting the bikeshed at this point, but during the alluded-to discussion a few alternative names came up that would have been better than fedora-release-standard: 1) fedora-release-nonstandard That this was the

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2014-10-04 11:08 GMT-03:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: First think of me of as just an slightly above average user :) I am sorry I did not fully follow the discussions earlier. I only recall it was supposed to exist some compatibility layer at some point. But I keep all the

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 04.10.2014 um 16:49 2014-10-04 11:08 GMT-03:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: First think of me of as just an slightly above average user :) I am sorry I did not fully follow the discussions earlier. I only recall it was supposed to exist some compatibility layer at some point.

Re: Dash as default shell

2014-10-04 Thread Florian Weimer
On 10/04/2014 01:05 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Nico Kadel-Garci wrote: And it's going to break backports to EPEL for RHEL 5 or RHEL 6, or CentOS or Scientific Linux, pretty seriously Please explain how. Systems which haven't undergone UsrMove don't

Re: Dash as default shell

2014-10-04 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Dne 4.10.2014 v 18:00 Florian Weimer napsal(a): On 10/04/2014 01:05 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Nico Kadel-Garci wrote: And it's going to break backports to EPEL for RHEL 5 or RHEL 6, or CentOS or Scientific Linux, pretty seriously Please explain how.

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-10-04 Thread Jaroslav Nahorny
Reindl Harald writes: Am 03.10.2014 um 23:57 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: generic is technical speak or for normal people outside IT at best has a negative context to generica and spam I never heared about „generica” and seing the

Re: Dash as default shell

2014-10-04 Thread Florian Weimer
On 10/04/2014 06:03 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: We still have universal: #/usr/bin/env bash Sadly, some systems have /bin/env, but not /usr/bin/env. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Dash as default shell

2014-10-04 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 04.10.2014 um 18:08 schrieb Florian Weimer: On 10/04/2014 06:03 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: We still have universal: #/usr/bin/env bash Sadly, some systems have /bin/env, but not /usr/bin/env on the Fedoras side a non-brainer just use /bin/env since after UsrMove both works

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-10-04 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 04.10.2014 um 18:08 schrieb Jaroslav Nahorny: Am 03.10.2014 um 23:57 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: generic is technical speak or for normal people outside IT at best has a negative context to generica and spam I never heared about

Re: Dash as default shell

2014-10-04 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Dne 4.10.2014 v 18:08 Florian Weimer napsal(a): On 10/04/2014 06:03 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: We still have universal: #/usr/bin/env bash Sadly, some systems have /bin/env, but not /usr/bin/env. Sadly it's fault of that distro - Fedora is not here to fix other distro mistakes... 'env'

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 11:02:23AM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: I only recall it was supposed to exist some compatibility layer at some point. But I keep all the time needing to $ sudo rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db* because I forget and use yum instead of dnf in rawhide. I'm

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-10-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 11:56:41AM +0200, drago01 wrote: I agree with Rahul that standard is not a great name for the nonstandard, non-productized upgrade, though. Generic is more descriptive anyway. But vanilla is the most delicious. But has no meaning that context for pretty much all

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-10-04 Thread Mike Pinkerton
On 3 Oct 2014, at 19:37, Ray Strode wrote: I'm not sure it's worth repainting the bikeshed at this point, but during the alluded-to discussion a few alternative names came up that would have been better than fedora-release-standard: 1) fedora-release-nonstandard 2) fedora-release-custom 3)

fedora-review: 'Illegal return' warnings

2014-10-04 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. These warnings appear during a package review; apparently, fedora-review command completes all its tasks. WARNING: Illegal return from /usr/share/fedora-review/scripts/generic-excludearch.sh, code 82, output: stdout:None

Re: fedora-review: 'Illegal return' warnings

2014-10-04 Thread Alec Leamas
On 2014-10-04 20:12, Antonio Trande wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. These warnings appear during a package review; apparently, fedora-review command completes all its tasks. WARNING: Illegal return from /usr/share/fedora-review/scripts/generic-excludearch.sh, code

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2014-10-04 13:32 GMT-03:00 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org: On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 11:02:23AM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: I only recall it was supposed to exist some compatibility layer at some point. But I keep all the time needing to $ sudo rm -f

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade I did not remove plain yum so far on purpose, because I was expecting it to be automatically replaced, or kept working, but only now I sent a note about the problems I noticed :) Would you filing a bug report against yum

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2014-10-04 18:23 GMT-03:00 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com: Hi On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade I did not remove plain yum so far on purpose, because I was expecting it to be automatically replaced, or kept working, but only now I sent a note about the

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 Thread Reindl Harald
I checked that I was talking from experience as 1 or more weeks ago. For a single package install indeed, dnf and yum are now working. I figured I have a lot of duplicates left from some earlier update, for example: $ rpm -q xz-libs xz-libs-5.1.2-13alpha.fc22.x86_64

Review needed for new StarCluster version

2014-10-04 Thread Orion Poplawski
I need python-sphinxcontrib-issuetracker to update to the latest version of StarCluster. Any help appreciated: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089416 I could probably review something in return as well :) -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222

Re: btrfs as default filesystem for F22?

2014-10-04 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
I'm happy with ext4. Just out of curiosity, though, how is XFS working out on RHEL 7? On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Ian Kent ra...@themaw.net wrote: On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 13:18 +0200, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: El 2014-10-03 11:38, Steven Whitehouse escribió: Hi, I should also add (just

Broken dependencies: perl-Qt

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2) perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.18()(64bit) On i386: perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)

[Bug 1141390] Review Request: perl-DBIx-RunSQL - Run SQL commands from a file

2014-10-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141390 --- Comment #2 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com --- I skipped Pod::Readme and Pod::Markdown dependencies intentionally because they didn't affect the build or core functionality, - and the first was missing in epel7 [1], the second was

Broken dependencies: perl-Catalyst-Devel

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-Catalyst-Devel has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-Catalyst-Devel-1.28-1.el6.1.noarch requires perl(File::Copy::Recursive) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On x86_64: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-4.el6.x86_64 requires libsal_textenc.so.3()(64bit) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Authen-Simple

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On x86_64: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-4.el6.x86_64 requires libsal_textenc.so.3()(64bit) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Catalyst-Devel

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-Catalyst-Devel has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-Catalyst-Devel-1.28-1.el6.1.noarch requires perl(File::Copy::Recursive) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-XML-Xerces

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-XML-Xerces has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.el5.ppc requires libxerces-c.so.27 On x86_64: perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.el5.x86_64 requires libxerces-c.so.27()(64bit) On i386: perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.el5.i386 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Getopt-GUI-Long

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-Getopt-GUI-Long has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2) On x86_64: perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2) On i386: perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2)

Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora

Broken dependencies: perl-QWizard

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-QWizard has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-QWizard-3.15-8.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2) On x86_64: perl-QWizard-3.15-8.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2) On i386: perl-QWizard-3.15-8.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2) Please resolve this as soon as

Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora

Broken dependencies: perl-QWizard

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-QWizard has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-QWizard-3.15-8.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2) On x86_64: perl-QWizard-3.15-8.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2) On i386: perl-QWizard-3.15-8.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2) On ppc:

Broken dependencies: perl-Getopt-GUI-Long

2014-10-04 Thread buildsys
perl-Getopt-GUI-Long has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2) On x86_64: perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2) On i386: perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2)

[Bug 1141390] Review Request: perl-DBIx-RunSQL - Run SQL commands from a file

2014-10-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141390 --- Comment #3 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org --- Those modules are required in Makefile.PL, so BuildRequires should be put in place for them. Having Pod::Readme available allows the regeneration of the README file, which fixes the