The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:16:29PM -0700, Ed Marshall wrote:
> Is it API-compatible?
Not exactly
https://github.com/kennethreitz/requests/blob/master/HISTORY.rst#230-2014-05-16
pgpwJFv1un9XY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
Is it API-compatible?
--
Ed Marshall
http://esm.logic.net/
On Oct 23, 2014 1:13 PM, "Ralph Bean" wrote:
> There have been some people asking if we can update python-requests
> in f20 from 1.2.3 to 2.3.0.
>
> I'll create an update for it in a few days unless there are any
> objections.
>
> --
>
There have been some people asking if we can update python-requests
in f20 from 1.2.3 to 2.3.0.
I'll create an update for it in a few days unless there are any
objections.
pgpTysJSbVd8l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 21 Beta release
as we did not have release candidate (RC) available in time. However we
will try one day slip.
The next Go/No-Go meeting is on Friday, Oct 24, the same time at
#fedora-meeting-2 channel.
Any help with release validation once
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22.10.2014 13:43, Honza Horak wrote:
> Fedora lacks integration testing (unit testing done during build
> is not enough). Taskotron will be able to fill some gaps in the
> future, so maintainers will be able to set-up various tasks after
> their c
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 20.10.14 15:08, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:56:19PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> > But again, I am not sure I understand what is going on here. Is
>> > systemd now optio
Hi folks,
Cacti is a PHP monitoring program that has been showing its age for a while now.
There are numerous CVEs relating to XSS and SQL injection that
upstream has patched in SVN but are not available in any tagged
release, and this has been the case for several months.
More recently, another
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-10-23 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-10-23 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-10-23 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-10-23 1
Hi all,
could someone from the Rel-Eng team please unblock the tilda package? I
already opened a ticket with the request and I am not sure how long I'll
have to wait until it gets unblocked. [1]
-johannes
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6018
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
So jogl is FTBFS in f21/22. From my repoqueries, nothing needs it, and if
anyone's using it they should move to jogl2 anyway. If no one steps up to
assist (my Java-fu is weak), I'll retire it next week.
Thanks!
-me
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
---
Compose started at Thu Oct 23 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Agda]
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so
ghc-Ag
Compose started at Thu Oct 23 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli
Am 23.10.2014 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 23 October 2014 09:56, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
The upgrade can last one hour (more or less).
An hour?! Most of my offline updates take a few tens of seconds with
F21. Is this
Am 23.10.2014 um 12:43 schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 23 October 2014 09:56, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
The upgrade can last one hour (more or less).
An hour?! Most of my offline updates take a few tens of seconds with
F21. Is this on fairly up-to-date SSD hardware? Are any specific
packages taking l
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 23 October 2014 09:56, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > The upgrade can last one hour (more or less).
>
> An hour?! Most of my offline updates take a few tens of seconds with
> F21. Is this on fairly up-to-date SSD hardware? Are any sp
On 23 October 2014 09:56, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> The upgrade can last one hour (more or less).
An hour?! Most of my offline updates take a few tens of seconds with
F21. Is this on fairly up-to-date SSD hardware? Are any specific
packages taking longer than the others?
Richard
--
devel mailing
On 10/22/2014 09:07 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
the important point in that case is not reboot after upgrading Firefox
but*before* upgrading Firefox, which means that at the time of the
upgrade no Firefox will be running and potentially crashing because one
of the 100s of DSOs it loads on-demand ha
On 10/22/2014 09:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 12:48 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
The icecat spec file needs something like this:
%global __provides_exclude_from ^%{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}
I tried that yesterday in a scratch-build. It didn't work. I've been too
swamp
20 matches
Mail list logo
